User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jo-Jo Eumerus!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Peloduro_Portada_No.99.png

To answer the questions you asked at the DR, when reopened. The 'work' is PD in Uruguay, it entered the PD 50 years after the author's death (which was in 1965). The 'image itself' is under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license, from Creative Commons Uruguay, who digitized it. The issue is that the work 'itself' is almost certainly the subject of a restored copyright, in the US, under the URAA (the Uruguayan copyright did not expire until the end of last year), which would make the license of the 'image itself' irrelevant, unless the owner of the US copyright (the author's heirs) actually consented to releasing the original work under the CC license... a fact that is not in evidence. Revent (talk) 22:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Better source request for File:View of Trigo Mountains Wilderness, AZ.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:View of Trigo Mountains Wilderness, AZ.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

---

 

Stefan2 (talk) 18:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Jalaldabagh2.jpg

File:Jalaldabagh2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Diannaa (talk) 00:44, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File:NeuroSky Logo.gif

File:NeuroSky Logo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jaleks (talk) 05:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. — regards, Revi 16:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Philadelphia76ers2.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Philadelphia76ers2.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

El Funcionario (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@El Funcionario: Pardon, but "no permission" statements apply when permission is claimed. I am not claiming permission, "PD-US-no notice" is not a permission, simply a statement that a permission is not needed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry but it sounds weird to me that a NBA logo could be under a free license. --El Funcionario (talk) 10:27, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, mostentimes they aren't. But you can't always claim copyright on a logo. Sometimes it's too simple to be copyrightable. In this case, it was published back in times where copyright required a copyright notice and it doesn't have one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Daphne Lantier 19:21, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Jo-Jo Eumerus, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Done and tagged the JS page for deletion, although it seems that the other bots don't like a speedy tagged JS page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/common.js

Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 5 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ISSUE: line 4 character 10: Bad assignment. - Evidence: {{db-u1|1=User request in own user namespace}}
2. ISSUE: line 4 character 11: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: {{db-u1|1=User request in own user namespace}}
3. ISSUE: line 4 character 15: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: {{db-u1|1=User request in own user namespace}}
4. ISSUE: line 4 character 30: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: {{db-u1|1=User request in own user namespace}}
5. ISSUE: line 4 character 35: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: {{db-u1|1=User request in own user namespace}}

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 16:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

Code issues in User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/common.js

Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

1. You edited User:Jo-Jo Eumerus/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 4 column 10: Invalid left-hand side in assignment

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 16:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC).

File:Dnepropetrovskiy rayon herb.png

Why did you rename it? There was no error there.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ahonc: Apparently using "gerb" is an error, going by the Ukrainian Wikipedia at any rate. The toponym was correct, or at very least it was not clear that it is wrong; hence I didn't rename that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:49, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Viiictorrr: ? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

But it was name from Russian. Dnepropetrovkiy is Russian transliteration, and Ukrinian will be Dnipropetrovskyi. Now we have mix from Russian and Ukrainian. COM:FR says about proper nouns, gerb is not proper noun. And COM:FR#Which files should not be renamed? forbids rename between different languages.--Anatoliy (talk) 09:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

I didn't change the name of the place (which is Dnepropetrovskiy both before and after my filemove), just "gerb" to "herb". And going by the Russian Wikipedia "gerb" isn't correct in that language either. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Why not?--Anatoliy (talk) 10:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

According to the resolution of Verkhovna Rada №1377-VIII, it is not Dnipropetrovskyj, it`s now Dniprovskyj. And I think, if that rayon is located in Ukraine, it should be named as in Ukrainian language, not as some minorities may named it for them.--Viiictorrr (talk) 10:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Viiictorrr, no. It is wrong opinion, Commons is multilimgual project, and any language has priority. Author may name files in any language what he want. So if we will have correct name in Swahili, we caannot rename it. It is forbidden by Commons' policies.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ahonc: see my reply below.--Viiictorrr (talk) 10:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Ahonc: ru:Герб and uk:Герб both show "herb" as the transliteration, thus I assumed it was incorrect to say "gerb". @Viiictorrr: I am not certain that that is a good rename reason. Perhaps it should be asked for at its own separate request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

No, transliteration of ru:герб is gerb, and gerb is also alternative transliteration of uk:герб. But it is not proper name.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Gerb means spelling like in Russian, Herb - like in Ukrainian. That`s the difference.

Why not a good reason for renaming? This is a big problem, that names of COA and towns in Ukraine often aren`t called as it is must be on Wiki. By writing Dneprovskiy gerb we declare, that we are still under Russian influence and still just a colony, not independent country.--Viiictorrr (talk) 10:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

It is forbidden because 1) it is not proper name, so not falls ander p.3 of COM:FR, 2) renaming between different language which forbidden by COM:FR.--Anatoliy (talk) 10:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

I've reverted my rename pending a consensus on which name is appropriate - based on this discussion it seems like it may have been an incorrect rename request. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Jo-Jo Eumerus: it is wrong, cause according to the resolution of Verkhovna Rada №1377-VIII, it is not Dnepropetrovskiy, it`s now Dneprovskiy.--Viiictorrr (talk) 10:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Viictorrr: We do not generally prefer one particular language over another. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:17, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

It is not language, Jo-Jo Eumerus. It was renamed recently.--Viiictorrr (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Best way would be to tag the file for another rename. I am wary of this type of rename, myself. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Done.--Viiictorrr (talk) 15:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Distict renamed but CoA stays the CoA of Dnipropetrovsk Raion too, so its name is not wrong. And also there is ambiguity. There are four oyher districts in Ukraine with name Dniprovskyi/Dneprovskiy. Від того, що район перейменували, герб не перестав бути гербом Дніпропетровського району, тому поточна назва не є неправильною. Окрім того, назва району не є унікальною, в Україні є ще 4 райони з такою назвою.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

You are wrong. Look at official site of that rayon, where is written Dniprovskyj (Dneprovskiy). Неправда. Дивіться офіційний сайт, де пише Дніпровський район.--Viiictorrr (talk) 15:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

On the current image there is not inscription with district name.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

That doesn`t change the meaning. Or do you want to see that inscription?--Viiictorrr (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Як не розумієте англійською, поясню українською. Від того, що район став Дніпровським і герб став гербом Дніпровського району, він не перестав бути гербом колишнього Дніпропетровського району, тому назва файлу не є неправильною.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

То ви ніяк не збагнете. Нинішня назва не відповідає поточній назві району, а отже, підлягає перейменуванню відповідно.But whatever--Viiictorrr (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

А хто сказав, що вона має відповідати? Назва має описувати те, що зображено на малюнку. На малюнку зображено герб Дніпропетровського району? Зображено. Значить назва файлу не є неправильною. Отже не треба перейменовувати.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Не перекручуйте. Зображено герб Дніпровського (раніше Дніпропетровського) району. Значить, назва якраз нині є неправильною. Перейменування файлів відбуваються тільки в крайньому випадку, це вам не статті, які можна перейменовувати хоч по 10 разів на добу.--Viiictorrr (talk) 15:57, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Я ж кажу. ВІН НЕ ПЕРЕСТАВ БУТИ ГЕРБОМ ДНІПРОПЕТРОВСЬКОГО РАЙОНУ. Якою вам ще мовою пояснити, щоб ви зрозуміли?--Anatoliy (talk) 16:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Тепер, коли ви відкотили до попередньої версії файлу збагнув, що мали на увазі й загалом, маєте рацію.--Viiictorrr (talk) 16:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Well, correct CoA is with inscription, so I revert to previous version. And this CoA is still CoA of Dnipropetrovsk Raion.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Korea Republic vs Morocco (10155994924908836).png → File:Korea Republic vs Morocco (10155994924908836).jpg

Hello, Please move Korea Republic vs Morocco (10155994924908836).png to Korea Republic vs Morocco (10155994924908836).jpg.

ThanksSoccerfootballwiki (talk) 15:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC

Greetings @Soccerfootballwiki: . That's not a rename, it's a file format change. You need to change it on your computer and reupload it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

File:CD license plate of Norway

The reason I named it as I did is there are 5 such plates in the category. Whenever you see me add the plate number, it's because there are multiples.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Rename request declined File:Baltit Fort, Hunza, GB.jpg

Hi, there are indeed two different forts in Hunza Valley, not far away from each other. The one is Baltit Fort, the other one is Altit Fort. I don't know why those two places have such similar names. The fact leads to confusion from time to time...
Google Maps: From Altit Fort to Baltit Fort
Baltit Fort is in the town of Karimabad, while Altit Fort is in Altit Village, right above the Hunza River.
The File in question definitely shows the Karakoram Highway above the Hunza River with Altit Village and the tower of Altit Fort clearly visible. Compare with this one: File:1100 Years Old Altit Fort from Top.jpg. Best regards--Rupert Pupkin (talk) 09:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Greetings, @Rupert Pupkin: I did notice this when I was evaluating the rename request but the sites marked under this name in WikiMapia didn't look like anything in the photo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis auf Wikimapia, damit hatte ich mich noch gar nicht beschäftigt... Hab einen neuen request gestartet, diesmal mit einem Namen, der sich etwas mehr auf die weiteren Bildinhalte bezieht. Schöne Grüße--Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Moving files

Hi. Please make more research before changing file names. If necessary, ask the uploader if you see they are active. --E4024 (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Commented on File talk:Penne rigate 3878.jpg which I presume is what this request is about. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Meal, sausage Fortepan 52426.jpg

Hi, I don't understand why you did not rename the file. Bihari József actor of Hungary is on the pic. Bihari József színművész, Fortepan 52426.jpg would be a better name. Please rename it. --Regasterios (talk) 13:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, it might be a better name, but so much better as to merit a rename? I am not sure about that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Okay, I'm going to ask somebody else. --Regasterios (talk) 13:58, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Renaming

I had uploaded File:Escudo de Apóstoles (Misiones).svg under that name, because of its accuracy. Municipalidad de Apóstoles (Misiones) refers to an institution, but file is the city's coat of arms. I'm aware it doesn't match other files' names, only this one was not the file to be renamed, but the others.

Mistake may come from files like File:Municipalidad de Apóstoles.jpg which are the coat of arms' use in municipality's official papers, that's why institution's name can be seen under the coat. However, «Municipalidad» is the institution which uses the coat of arms.

How can be settled this issue? --Genericool (talk) 02:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

These "harmonize file names" rename requests are a problem since they usually come with no indication that there is an accepted title pattern. @Regions: asked for the rename so I'll call them here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Good point of view. I agree. Genericool is wrightǃ I´m going to propose "Escudo de (name of each city)"... much... much better. --Regions (talk) 11:28, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Dialect map

Here you ask: harmonize with what?

Harmonize with similar maps in its category, like Dialects-cat-nordoest.png, Dialects-cat-tortosi.png, Dialects-cat-ukr-catalanord.png, Dialects-cat-valdetransitio.png and Dialects-cat-valseptentrion.png.

Sorry for not explaining well the reason in the request. The next time I will do it --Foguera (talk) 18:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Alright. I've restored the request and will make a rename pass now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:11, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi

Hi. There's telegram group for easy contact between filemovers. Please feel free to join us!: --مصعب (talk) 11:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, مصعب, but I am not sure if I want to join a private group like that. One, I am currently already active in some other private groups (not Wikip/media related) and I am not sure how many of them I can handle. Two, I am a little wary of private groups discussing on-wiki matters that don't explicitly revolve about privacy-sensitive issues given the back-room impression they give. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:10, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

thanks. It is not private and all discussions are apparent to new members. We dont discuss any private issues. It is just for highlighting requests that need some language experience to handle. You are more than welcome and it is your decision to join or not because its your time and you have the right to manage it as you want. Regards--مصعب (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

File:梨山腳下的有機稻田 20120814.jpg

Please look at your edits, "梨山腳下的有機稻田" is problematic and misleading. As far as I know from reading the source of the file, it was taken in Hualien. The problem is, 梨山 is located in the mountain area of Taichung, why did Hualien become Taichung?--Kai3952 (talk) 04:13, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Seems like you want to submit another rename request to have the location corrected. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

No! What I want to say is, how do you determine if this file "File:梨山腳下的有機稻田 20120814.jpg" was taken in Hualien or Taichung?--Kai3952 (talk) 09:46, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

I don't. I trust that the person requesting a file rename has. Expecting file renamers to know all these details themselves is unrealistic. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean. You didn't find any problems?--Kai3952 (talk) 10:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

What I am saying is that you can't expect a file renamer to always know what the correct location is. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Contact by tag in the photo by Adrian Gostick

Hello Jo-Jo,

I got a msg. warning that you have tagged the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Adrian_Gostick-in-action.jpg proposing its removal from wikimedia.

I thank you if you can tell me the reasons and justification for this action. I have contacted the office of Mr. Gostick and I have been informed that they have already sent the granting of rights, as suggested in this template.

Thank you very much. Best regard ~Gustavo. // --Gztt (talk)

Greetings, Gztt According to this the permission granted is not sufficient. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Visions of the Universe exhibition opens its doors (9020318929).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Visions of the Universe exhibition opens its doors (9020318929).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Café & Kosmos 18 June 2013 (9022575120).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Café & Kosmos 18 June 2013 (9022575120).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Science in School 27 — Autumn 2013 (10216860124).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Science in School 27 — Autumn 2013 (10216860124).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Poster for the Photo Nightscape Awards (13073718975).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Poster for the Photo Nightscape Awards (13073718975).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Science in School 28 — Spring 2014 (14054712821).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Science in School 28 — Spring 2014 (14054712821).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Science in School 28 — Spring 2014 (14054712821).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:ESO on social media (14714429715).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:ESO on social media (14714429715).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cover of Science in School 29 — Summer 2014 (15035204562).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of Science in School 29 — Summer 2014 (15035204562).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cover of Science in School 29 — Summer 2014 (15035204562).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Cover of Science in School 30 — Autumn 2014 (15359435008).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of Science in School 30 — Autumn 2014 (15359435008).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cover of Science in School 30 — Autumn 2014 (15359435008).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Cover of Science in School 31 — Spring 2015 (16641649988).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cover of Science in School 31 — Spring 2015 (16641649988).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Artist María Ignacia Edwards in her studio (16236326434).jpg

File:Artist María Ignacia Edwards in her studio (16236326434).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:06, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Cover of Science in School 32 — Summer 2015 (19662490271).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cover of Science in School 32 — Summer 2015 (19662490271).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Cover Science in School Issue 33 (20888319563).jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Cover Science in School Issue 33 (20888319563).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:08, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:ALMA Movie poster (8573669971).jpg

File:ALMA Movie poster (8573669971).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Film Poster Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Джерела в Жерела

Подивіться на цю категорію і на заголовки. Жерела — це оригінальна назва серії. --Madvin (talk) 00:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

(З Google Translate) Ах, так це назва твору, а не просто термін? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, "Жерела" is how it was written in the title. After more than 100 years, we write it differently, but I wanted to rename rest of files in the series to match the original title. Some of them are already renamed and have transcripted pages in wikisource.--Madvin (talk) 17:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Ah, OK, that wasn't clear. That means that the rename requests will have to be resubmitted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Here 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 --Madvin (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Shooting a Laser at the Galactic Centre (5158684154).jpg

---

Hello, Jo-Jo Eumerus!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

B dash (talk) 11:00, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Artist’s impression of Mars four billion years ago (16770136981).jpg

File:Artist’s impression of Mars four billion years ago (16770136981).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Abellonlogo.jpg

Yours sincerely, Willy1018(talk) 21:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Was this file meant to be deleted when you closed the discussion or not? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 06:22, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

 Done I handled part 2 and 3 of the deletion request. Sorry, it takes time to check each file individually. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Lunar Eclipse @ ESO (35757802343).jpg

File:Lunar Eclipse @ ESO (35757802343).jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:Lunar Eclipse at ESO 2017.jpg. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

A1Cafel (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Xavier Barcons Appointed as Next ESO Director General (30784108413).jpg

File:Xavier Barcons Appointed as Next ESO Director General (30784108413).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

vip (talk) 00:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Patrolling on Commons

Hi, Would you be interested in helping out with patrolling on Commons? Do let me know. Thank you and warm regards. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 09:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Greetings, Fitindia Unfortunately, due to real world obligations I probably won't have time for additional Commons activity until next summer at least. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Okay sounds good and you probably swamped with admin tasks on EN too. Thank you and warm regards. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 11:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you!

Autocorrect has become my worst enema...a giganteous one. ^Atsme _Talk 📧 10:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Whatopia.png

File:Whatopia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Opirentis (talk) 07:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Whatopia.png

File:Whatopia.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.6.178.36 11:23, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

File:-i---i- (5897608202).jpg

File:-i---i- (5897608202).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

WeHaKa (talk) 14:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

File:The LEGO® VLT model against the real Milky Way (25366824733).jpg

File:The LEGO® VLT model against the real Milky Way (25366824733).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

File:UK event on industry involvement in the E-ELT project (5775740903).jpg

File:UK event on industry involvement in the E-ELT project (5775740903).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Omar Pasha Vrioni II of Berat.jpg

Hi Look. please --Арсенич (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, Арсенич but I already considered that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:32, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Vado Putana (33021024455).jpg

Hi, I have been trying to correct the categories for misidentified/mislabeled images. See File talk:Salar de Arizaro.jpg for the mentioned image. Both photos are taken from a similar location. Jespinos (talk) 13:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Jespinos: Hmm, you think Vado Putana is actually Quebrada Quepiaco? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:52, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

No, they are not the same thing. Vado Putana is strongly linked with Bofedal de Putana, those categories would likely to be merged. Jespinos (talk) 19:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kiev TV Tower 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Political composition of Perth and Kinross Council, August 2020.svg

File:Political composition of Perth and Kinross Council, August 2020.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liam McM (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Boo-Boo Bear.png

To Jo-Jo Eumerus (in regards to File:Boo-Boo Bear.png) Hey, thanks for marking it as a possible copyright violation. I didn't realize that putting an adequate depiction of a character FOR THE SIMPLE SAKE OF VISUALIZATION PURPOSES ONLY could be deemed and misinterpreted as a "copyright violation", provided that the image of Boo-boo was ONLY USED TO DEPICT THE SAME IN ITS WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE! You see, I'm a newbie and I couldn't figure out how to cross-post or in other words - how to feature the original Boo-boo upload from the English Wikipedia to the Bulgarian Wikipedia. ALL I WANTED WAS TO MAKE SURE THE BULGARIAN EQUIVALENT OF THE BOO-BOO BEAR PAGE TO HAVE A SIMPLE DEPICTION OF THE CHARACTER. It was an HONEST MISTAKE. With all that in mind, NOW THAT YOU'VE WENT ABOVE AND BEYOND TO DELETE THE IMAGE, IT WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED IF AT LEAST YOU LINK THE ORIGINAL BOO-BOO IMAGE FROM THE ENGLISH ARTICLE TO THE BULGARIAN TRANSLATION OF THE SAME ARTICLE, SO THAT A PICTURE IS PRESENT IN BOTH VERSIONS. THANKS a Lot! Altidore86 (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

File:22 August 2020 Valle della Breggia 21 55 26 937000.jpeg

File:22 August 2020 Valle della Breggia 21 55 26 937000.jpeg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed. Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Jo-Jo Eumerus.

And also:

• File:22 August 2020 Valle della Breggia 21 55 46 722000.jpeg ( Nominator : Jo-Jo Eumerus )

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:10, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

FOP categorization

Hi, thanks for your work on FOP categorization. However, please include <noinclude></noinclude> within the FOP category so that the daily DR page would not appear on the category.--A1Cafel (talk) 02:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

File:12 August 2016 - Valle di Muggio 19 24 17 299000.jpeg

File:12 August 2016 - Valle di Muggio 19 24 17 299000.jpeg has been marked for speedy deletion. A reason for the tagging has not been detected or none was placed. Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Jo-Jo Eumerus.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 11:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

File:ESO Youtube channel (30196208601).jpg

File:ESO Youtube channel (30196208601).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:33, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

File permission added

Hi, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Help_poster.jpg File permission has been added for this image, please can you rename the file request, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brslxyl (talk • contribs) 18:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:03-tocopilla-calama (El Tatio).jpg

Yours sincerely, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Mapas provinciales nominated for deletion

Hi, Jo-Jo Eumerus. Your nomination of "mapas provinciales" by Risopatrón et al. was accepted. I can't find out if it right or not but you made a not accurate claim. You said that Chilean laws stablishes 70 years. That's true, today. When Risopatrón et al. published their work, the law stablished 5 after author's death. In 1925 a new law stablished 20 years. Then, it was changed to 50 and 70 years. Depending on author's death, this work is PD in Chile too. Regards. Lin linao ¿dime? 18:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Well, this is sort of the problem - we don't know the death dates of the mapmakers and thus can't establish that this is PD. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:55, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I've requested these files' restoration. Both Risopatron and cartographers Ossandón and Boloña were dead before 1936, and so they are in the public domain in Chile since, at least, 1966. --Bedivere (talk) 20:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

File:The first European antenna for ALMA is handed over to the observatory (5664858108).jpg

File:The first European antenna for ALMA is handed over to the observatory (5664858108).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

vip (talk) 13:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Robin Swann in Stormont (cropped).jpg

File:Robin Swann in Stormont (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:100C:A202:13B8:4434:CA33:2967:F694 08:07, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Stijn. Van Cauter

Du hast mehrere Löschanträge auf Dateien gestellt die Stijn Van Cauter hochlud. Ich hatte ihn darum gebeten. Er ist Schöpfer und Rechteinhaber. Kann/Muss er hier noch seine Authentizität Nachweisen? Category:Stijn Van Cauter. Den Kontext findest Du in meinem BNR in der deWP unter Fuck Covid 19 Funeral Doom Run.--Fraoch (talk) 18:07, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Ja, gewöhnlich muss man das nachweisen können. Sagen wir per Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/de Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:32, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Danke, ich habe ihm geschrieben, dass er seine Authentizität nachweisen muss und auf VCR verwiesen.--Fraoch (talk) 08:34, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Via Claudia Augusta.jpg

File:Via Claudia Augusta.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Broken redirect (迷子のリダイレクト)) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : MathXplore.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 09:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Porto Primavera dam and lake, on Paraná River, between MS - SP.jpg

File:Porto Primavera dam and lake, on Paraná River, between MS - SP.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: CSD G7 (Author or uploader request deletion)) Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : RodRabelo7.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Natsuiro Matsuri.png

Hello. I objected to your deletion request for File:Natsuiro Matsuri.png, so please reply--赤座 (talk) 06:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Torres Strait Islanders.svg

Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus. Are you withdrawing your nomination of this file's deletion request? An IP just closed the discussion a few minutes ago stating the nomination was withdrawn, but I've reopened it just confirm whether you actually want the discussion to be closed. If you are, then that's fine. I just wanted to check to be sure. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Greetings. No, I didn't withdraw it and the IP is not mine. They also impersonated User:Alexphangia it seems like. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)