English: Welcome to the Commons, Jopparn!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 20:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:RonnieLeeALF.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 12:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Rights for the photographer, regarding File:Albert_Bierstadt,_Lake_Lucerne,_1858.jpgEdit

Hi Jopparn,

I've changed the license on that page because a mere 'record' photograph of a 2D work of art — plain, full-framed — gets no copyright protection for the photograph. If the original work of art is sufficiently old that its own copyright has expired, the photograph itself will then be free for use on Commons. Therefor I replaced the {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0-migrated}} with {{PD-Art}}. See also Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. --Krinkletalk 22:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Krinkle! On the template it now says "Detta foto är upphovsrättsskyddat i Sverige, om det har inte tagits före 1969." which is translated to "This photo is protected by copyright in Sweden, if it wasn't taken before 1969." However I do release my photo to public domain so that it can be used in Sweden as well. Shouldn't both of the templates be used then? Jopparn (talk) 16:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
That line "Detta foto är upphovs [..]" is only in the Swedisch translation of that Template, it don't see it in the English template. From what I read I understand that the photographer has no rights for re-use, not even if the photographer comes from Sweden. However all photo's after 1969 with PD-art (even made by non-Swedisch photographers) are copyrighted in Sweden, or atleast so it seems. Anyhow, if you put "PD-self" on the image then your image will be public domain in Sweden aswell. I think you are right and it will be a good to PD-self your image too. Thanks, --Krinkletalk 17:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
OK. I changed all of the {{PD-old}} to {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}} in my pictures. Jopparn (talk) 19:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

TackEdit

Tack för [[1]]. Jag vet inte vad som hände vid uppladdningen, men all bildinformation försvann vid uppladdningen. --Ankara (talk) 09:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Childe Hassam, Allies Day, May 1917, 1917.jpgEdit

Twice now you've change the "Other versions" cross-reference to point to the wrong image. Do what you like with the template structures (which I don't know much about and don't care much about), but keep the "Other versions" cross-reference pointing at the right image... AnonMoos (talk) 14:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

No, that is not correct. User:Bukk did it once and I have change it back once, not twice, and that was a mistake which happened when I copied information from my old version of the information...
Instead of just reversing a good intentioned edit it would be good for all of us if you took the time to explained yourself, at least to the user uploading the picture... I have been active on Wikipedia projects for many years now and I do have a bit of skin of my nose, but that kind of stuff together with your not-so-friendly answer when asked about it is more than likely to scare of a new user... Jopparn (talk) 08:21, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Sorry if I misattributed the actions, but I was getting a little impatient by the time the same wrong information was added twice to the page... AnonMoos (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok, no real harm done. I hope that our continued work here together will carry on without any more problems! Cheers, Jopparn (talk) 13:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

  català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Jopparn,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berguddens fyrplats 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, maybe a little under-exposed. --Léna 17:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarsius fuscus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me--Holleday 13:46, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gothenburg Cathedral Organ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good composition. Some noise, but OK.--Jebulon 14:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Townhall of Saint-Gilles roof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good.--Jebulon 14:17, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Crotalus durissus (1) - Nantes.jpgEdit

Dear Jopparn,

thank you for your interest in this picture but it was actually taken in a vivarium (with only 13 snakes), part of the Natural History Museum of Nantes, so I confirm that the snake was alive. The dust you see may come from the shot noise. Thanks again,

Selbymay (talk) 15:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer. It is a very nice picture! Jopparn (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ixelles Ponds.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Ms Moens centre d'accréditation.JPGEdit

 
File:Ms Moens centre d'accréditation.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 19:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Victor Horta Museum.jpgEdit

 
File:Victor Horta Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I have left a comment there. Cheers Jopparn (talk) 10:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Victor Horta Museum window 1.jpgEdit

 
File:Victor Horta Museum window 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 15:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Victor Horta Museum window 2.jpgEdit

 
File:Victor Horta Museum window 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 15:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Ancien Insititut National de Radiodiffusion (I.N.R.) 2011 3.jpgEdit

 
File:Ancien Insititut National de Radiodiffusion (I.N.R.) 2011 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 17:25, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Ancien Insititut National de Radiodiffusion (I.N.R.) 2011 4.jpgEdit

 
File:Ancien Insititut National de Radiodiffusion (I.N.R.) 2011 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Ancien Insititut National de Radiodiffusion (I.N.R.) 2011 5.jpgEdit

 
File:Ancien Insititut National de Radiodiffusion (I.N.R.) 2011 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

M0tty (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagrada Família 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louvren.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)



беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | русский | slovenčina | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | svenska | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Jopparn,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of Versailles roof detail.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Some noise in shadow parts, but main subject ist ok. QI for me --Smial 10:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  Fixed Thank you for pointing that out! I've uploaded a new version with less noice now. I hope that it is better.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vasakyrkan, close-up external art2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:03, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye de La Cambre5.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Florstein 14:25, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triumfbågen, Paris2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye de La Cambre4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
CA, overexposed and perspective distorsion, nice composition --The Photographer 12:33, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
I think, OK. Just the thumbnail apprears too dark. --NorbertNagel 20:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faggens krog 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)



català | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Jopparn,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,

the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art
 
Message delivered by odderBot on 13:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Victor Horta Museum door.jpgEdit

 
File:Victor Horta Museum door.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hektor (talk) 04:20, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

QIEdit

Hej,

Kul att du nominerar bilder! När du nominera andras bilder är det bra om du ger en länk till användaren som tagit bilden; det gör att boten som arkiverar QI-sidan lämnar ett meddelande på fotografens sida (istället för på din användardiskussionen) att bilden blivit utsedd till QI. Vänligen --ArildV (talk) 16:07, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Tack för tipset! Det ska jag så klart göra! Men jag ska alltså inte signera den då med mitt namn? Eller får alla användare som är länkade till i inlägget ett meddelande? Skulle det här vara korrekt (som ett exempel): "File:Miniatyrskulptur_(netsuke).JPG|{{/Nomination|A netsuke at the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities taken by user [[User:Catasa|Catasa]]. --[[User:Jopparn|Jopparn]] 13:44, 24 June 2013 (UTC)|}}"? Vänligen Jopparn (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Hej,
Det går utmärkt att signera samtidigt, i fallet ovan är det bara Catasa som skulle fått meddelandet. Jag vet inte exakt varför, det kan vara så enkelt som att boten väljer den användare som står först (Catasa) men det fungerar.--ArildV (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Closeup on ornament on the Bandstand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Could be geolocalized though. --Coyau 16:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC). Thank you! I have geolocalized the image now. Best, Jopparn 21:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | polski | română | svenska | ไทย | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Jopparn,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

File:Thor statue.JPGEdit

 
File:Thor statue.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 07:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Freyja statue1.JPGEdit

 
File:Freyja statue1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 07:40, 27 November 2013 (UTC)



العربية | català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | magyar | Nederlands | polski | svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Jopparn,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Wiki Loves Monuments är på gång igen!Edit

This is an invitation to participate in the Swedish part of the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. You are getting it since you participated in 2013. The message below is in Swedish, should this be an issue you can get more information in English here or drop a message on my talk page.

Hej Jopparn,
I september genomför vi fototävlingen Wiki Loves Monuments igen.

I år har vi till den svenska deltävlingen lagt till ytterligare en kategori med objekt du kan fotografera, nämligen arbetslivsmuseum. Vi har även passat på att förtydliga instruktionerna för hur man deltar. För mer information se tävlingens hemsida.

Det finns gott om fina priser och tio av bilderna går vidare till den internationella finalen. Så varför inte delta i år igen!

Vänliga hälsningar,
Arrangörerna av Wiki Loves Monuments i Sverige

Message delivered by L PBot (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2014 (UTC).

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos (male).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hare in Solna, Sweden 2014 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good for me. --Hockei 11:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammarby sjöstad 2013 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Öland panorama mot Östersjön 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. QI for me, even when it´s not really sharp. --Hubertl 12:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eketorps borg 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eketorps borg 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Öland panorama mot Östersjön 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support I like it. --Hockei 06:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Kvalitetsbilder från WLMEdit

Lägg gärna till dina kvalitetsbilder från WLM i den här kategorin.--ArildV (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Har lagt till bilderna nu. Jopparn (talk) 20:28, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Snygg bild förresten, bra perspetiv och vackert ljus.--ArildV (talk) 08:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Tack för de vänliga orden Arild! :-) Jopparn (talk) 21:28, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långe Jan 2015 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 18:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långe Jan 2015 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 18:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eketorps borg 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 06:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eketorps borg 36.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 08:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eketorps borg 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 36-pounder long gun from 1659 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmar läns Museum 2015 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Right side leaning in; otherwise ok. --Cccefalon 08:43, 10 September 2015 (UTC). I tried to fix it without losing the edge of the boat. Did it do the trick? Jopparn 16:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
The verticals could be better, but I think, it is acceptable. --Cccefalon 19:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmar läns Museum 2015 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I made some adjustments here as well. Jopparn 19:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Also here, the vertical undistort could be slightly be better. Ok for my support but you might take it as a personal challenge   --Cccefalon 19:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slottskyrkan i Kalmar slott 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Needs perspective correction. --C messier 12:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)  Comment I have tried to fix that issue now. Jopparn 06:35, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  Support OK for me, but it can be done even better. --C messier 20:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016Edit

Hello Jopparn,

In 2014 you participated in the photo contest Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. We organise this photo contest too in 2016.

We also organise 4 photo tours in Ghent, Mechelen, Antwerp and Liège. See: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016

We hope to see your photos of monuments! Romaine 22:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016Edit

Hallo Jopparn,

In 2012 nam je deel aan de fotowedstrijd Wiki Loves Monuments. In België en Luxemburg wordt deze fotowedstrijd ook in 2016 gehouden. Wees welkom!

We organiseren ook vier fototochten in Gent, Mechelen, Antwerpen en Luik. Zie: http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/nl&setlang=nl

We zien graag je foto's van monumenten verschijnen. Romaine 22:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penguins at Boulders Beach 2018 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Penguins at Boulders Beach 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micael Bydén på Stockholm Pride 2018 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 15:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Micael Bydén på Stockholm Pride 2018 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:00, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reiherbrunnen, Baden-Baden 2017 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Touzrimounir 10:42, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!Edit

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019Edit

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8314 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

September är nästan slut: missa inte Wiki Loves Monuments 2019!Edit

Hej,

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare bidragit med bilder till den svenska deltävlingen av Wiki Loves Monuments, och jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också. Kategorierna är som vanligt byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer, och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september. Om du varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

File:The White House, Washington.jpgEdit

 
File:The White House, Washington.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Nu är det dags för Wiki Loves Monuments 2020!Edit

 
Vinnarbilden i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej!

(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet då du tidigare har deltagit i de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Monuments eller Wiki Loves Earth! För någon vecka sedan blev det klart vem som tog hem förstapriset i Wiki Loves Earth 2020 – stort grattis till Brydand100 och hans fotografi av Röttlefallet! Alla vinnare kan du se här – tack alla deltagare för fina bidrag!

Den 1 september inleds 2020 års svenska deltävling av Wiki Loves Monuments, där det skulle vara väldigt roligt om du ville vara med och delta! Målet med Wiki Loves Monuments är att fotografera svenska kulturarvsmonument. De kategorier som ingår är byggnadsminnen, fornminnen, K-märkta fartyg och arbetslivsmuseer – och du är välkommen att bidra med bilder hela september.

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! /Eric Luth (WMSE) (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)