Open main menu

Contents

Category:UnverifiableEdit

Achim (talk) 15:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:ChurchaEdit

Shouldn't Category:Churcha be moved to Category:Chorcha ? Gracias. - Themightyquill (talk) 07:30, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I can not really find even where the name "Chorcha" comes from and because English is used here, I have used the English translation. Maybe a redirect is currently the best way for a reference to "La Chorcha", until I found a good explanation for the name. --Jos1950 (talk) 19:02, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
P.S. Churcha gives the best search results on the Internet. --Jos1950 (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your response. What kind of search are you doing that "Churcha" gives the best result? My Google results are just the opposite:

Also, all but one of the files in the category use "chorcha". - Themightyquill (talk) 19:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

I search with DuckDuckGo and get
with Churcha - La Churcha Samana
with Chorcha - Chorcha.com - Música Electrónica and Oxford dictionaries writes "to have a get-together" which is also applicable.
With Churcha Samana or Chorcha Samana I get on both information on this church.
I do not know what is best, the Spanish name or an English translation. --Jos1950 (talk) 20:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
I found the name Chorcha with an image of "Archivo General de la Nation" (Dominican Republic). There is written "Iglesia (Chorcha) de los Cocoloş the Samana"
Cocoloş Means, a black person that speaks english. So I do think it's an expression in dialect. Originated in the time of the presence of hijackers and large presence of refugees and former slaves by the abolition of slavery. This name I only see in Samana. --Jos1950 (talk) 13:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mapa-Santuario-Mamiferos-Marinos-Banco-de-la-Plata-Navidad-Samana1-300x232.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mapa-Santuario-Mamiferos-Marinos-Banco-de-la-Plata-Navidad-Samana1-300x232.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 01:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion nominationsEdit

Hi, please only use the 'nominate for deletion' link from the left menu to nominate files for deletion. You are creating invalid nominations. Jcb (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I will. --Jos1950 (talk) 00:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Uasd, San Pedro de Marcoris.pngEdit

 
File:Uasd, San Pedro de Marcoris.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tm (talk) 18:58, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Batey esperanza1.pngEdit

 
File:Batey esperanza1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Also affected File:Batey esperanza.png Tm (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Beschermt walvis gebied.pngEdit

 
File:Beschermt walvis gebied.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 18:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Port of Haina, Santo Domingo DR.pngEdit

 
File:Port of Haina, Santo Domingo DR.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 18:35, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Copyright violationsEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | azərbaycanca | বাংলা | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | Simple English | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


 
Hello Jos1950.

You have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

Consider this your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Omdat ik meer van dat soort bestanden op Commons tegen kom was het voor mij een zekerheid dat het toegestaan zou zijn. Reclame, zelfpromotie en bestanden die niet te controleren zijn vormen blijkbaar geen probleem. --Jos1950 (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Of course self promotion and unsourced content is a problem – as are non-free files grabbed from random web sites with completely made up licensing claims. We don't have the resources for systematic full-coverage review of all uploads, so the fact that other stuff exists means nothing. LX (talk, contribs) 08:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Crescent street station (Fulton street)Edit

 
Category:Crescent street station (Fulton street) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DanTD (talk) 00:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Mapa Residencial Naime.JPGEdit

 
File:Mapa Residencial Naime.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tm (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Mapa Residencial Naime.JPGEdit

 
File:Mapa Residencial Naime.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sanandros (talk) 21:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Edward Telleria.jpgEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Bahasa Indonesia | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Português | svenska | 中文 | +/−


Hello! Thank you for uploading File:Edward Telleria.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

I tried that but got an error from OAuth. Therefore, I have downloaded the images and uploaded to Commons with as much data as possible. Also posted a message that I can no longer find. I'm going to explore further. --Jos1950 (talk) 13:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Found the message and could activate the OAuth. Now let's see if it goes well. --Jos1950 (talk) 14:17, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Baseball/BasketballEdit

I'm very sorry, I was confused by es:Gigantes del Cibao, hope it's right now. --Achim (talk) 17:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Ok, stop one moment. I correct it. Are you Dominicano?

Juan Dolio / GuayacanesEdit

Hoi, ik weet niet precies wat je aan het doen bent, maar Juan Dolio en Guayacanes zijn absoluut twee verschillende locaties, beide met een strand en hotels, winkels, restaurants, etc. Jcb (talk) 00:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Volgens de nieuwe lijst van de gov.do is Guayacanes een Municipio, waarin Juan Dolio niet wordt genoemd, maar daarvan wel deel uit maakt (deelgemeente?). Ik zal het nog controleren met andere lijsten (Senso), maar geef me even tijd. Ik probeer nu heel voorzichtig Santo Domingo om te bouwen naar de nieuwe situatie. Elk advies is welkom. --Jos1950 (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Ok. Afgelopen zomer stonden Guayacanes en Juan Dolio nog apart op de borden. Guayacanes was toen een beetje een bouwput, die waren ze grondig aan het opknappen. Betekende wel dat wij de auto op het strand naast onze tafel mochten neerzetten, omdat er tijdelijk geen betere parkeerplek was. Juan Dolio kom ik liever niet, ivm een verhoogd risico op zee-egels, dat heb ik ook zelf een keer aan den lijve ondervonden. Jcb (talk) 06:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Ik weet ook niet goed hoe dat soort locaties het beste kan worden aangegeven. Boca Chica en Juan Dolio waren stranden maar nu complete steden, net zoals Veron, Punta Cana, Bavaro in Altegracia, enz.. Er zit een stuk geschiedenis aan vast dat in de benaming van de locatie moet kunnen worden terug gevonden. Ik heb alle locaties die ik tegen kwam zo veel mogelijk ondergebracht in de regio waar ze bij horen met de provincienamen tussen haken en de Municipios achter een komma, waardoor ze voor mij direct herkenbaar zijn en andere via de Wikipedia kopeling verdere info kunnen vinden. Zoals je zelf al hebt gemerkt is het vreemd als een strand ineens als gemeente wordt aangegeven.
Dit probleem ontstaat ook met de oude en nieuwe situatie van Santo Domingo. Als dit niet goed wordt geregistreerd, kan niemand nog iets vinden. Ook de info op Wikipedia moet blijven aansluiten op de nieuwe situatie en aangepaste Commons indeling.
Misschien is een verwijzingspagina met korte info nu even de beste oplossing voor dit soort locaties en situaties. Als men dan zoekt op de oude situatie krijgt men een overzicht met zoiets als:
  • Museum in Santo Domingo - Distrito Nacional, Ueste, Norte of Este, Boca Chica, enz.
  • Juan Dolio - Recreatie gebied in de gemeente Juan Dolio in (Municipio) Guayacanes.
Dit zal best nog wat werk en discussie geven, want met 31 provincias y 1 Distrito Nacional, Ciudad Colonial, 157 municipios, 232 Distritos Municipales en andere locatie die het aangeven waard zijn, ben je niet 1,2,3 klaar.Wat denk jij hiervan? --Jos1950 (talk) 19:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Ik zou de category-namen zoveel mogelijk kort houden. Er is geen andere Juan Dolio voor zover ik weet, dus de category-naam hoeft niet langer dan dat te zijn. Nadere geografische informatie kun je dan het beste kwijt in de tekst van de category-pagina. Jcb (talk) 23:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Categorie namen zo kort mogelijk, daar streef ik ook naar en dan voor genoemde soort plaatsen zoveel mogelijk de coordinaten met enige info in {en} vermelden. Dat probleem kwam ik ook met Veron-Punta Cana-Bavaro tegen. Maar hoe maak je "Santo Domingo de Guzmán, Dominicaanse Reupliek" korter. "Santo Domingo" kan niet meer, is nu een provincie en drie municipios met die naam. Heb al eens gekeken hoe de internationale afkortingen zijn, maar dat maakt het ook niet duidelijker. We blijven zoeken naar een bijna optimale indeling en vermelding. --Jos1950 (talk) 00:15, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been blockedEdit

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:45, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

العربية | Azərbaycanca | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | jbobau | 한국어 | Kurdî | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I'm not a sock. All IPs in the relevant discussions are mine except 49.213.19.178 and Schaefer-Dumbel.

When I'm blocked, I can draw only with my IP.

I do not have a fixed IP to protect my system. Is that bad? --Jos1950 (talk) 13:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
"
Decline reason: "The purpose of the block is to prevent you from editing. Editing whilst logged out is block evasion (see COM:BP). As someone who has been here over 5 years and has over 17,000 edits, there is no excuse not to know this ("When I'm blocked, I can draw only with my IP"), let alone to engage in it. Эlcobbola talk 15:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 中文(臺灣) | +/−


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I do not understand it. I get a block because another writing something. Even Zhuyifei1999 indicated that the block was questionable and should not block the talk page. The block was not quite right and I could react in the manner indicated. Then I get a block because I ignored the incorrect block. I'm not asking for extenuating circumstances, but rather to go a little like adult volunteers together. --Jos1950 (talk) 17:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "This is not a process in which you repost an unblock template failing to address the issue until you get the answer you want. You were blocked because you were being disruptive; for example:

Hedwig in Washington then warned you about this behaviour and language; you then (apparently) edited with an IP proxy to continue:

  • "Commons loses it's usability for NORMAL PEOPLE if they get back a lot of bullshit when searching for photos." [4]
Hedwig subsequently blocked you, and you continued to edit in that discussion as an IP (block evasion). "I do not understand it" is precisely why your unblock request was declined; COM:BLOCK requires an acknowledgement of the issue (i.e., an understanding) and a credible commitment to discontinue. Not understanding your failure to maintain a collegial atmosphere is problematic on its own (FWIW, Zhuyifei1999 did not indicate "that the block was questionable", he questioned only the talk page block [5]), and you are utterly unrepentant about block evasion and IP socking, which is unacceptable. A passionately held position is not an excuse to disregard community expectations or sanctions. If you continue to post non-responsive unblock requests your ability to edit your talk page may be revoked. Эlcobbola talk 20:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

I have nothing to lose. --Jos1950 (talk) 19:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Gebruik overlegpagina tijdens blockEdit

Beste Jos1950, tijdens een blokkade is het uitsluitend toegestaan je overlegpagina te gebruiken voor overleg rondom je blokkade. Je hebt nu twee keer een deel van de pagina gewist en bent twee keer teruggedraaid. De volgende keer zal je toegang tot deze overlegpagina worden ingetrokken. Jcb (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Bedankt voor de melding. Overleg is echter niet mogelijk omdat ik bij elk overleg een langere blok krijg. Dat werkt alleen maar averechts. Verder heeft het geen zin om te wachten met een blok van ONBEPAALDE TIJD. Bewerken lijkt voor mij onmogelijk geworden, wat heeft een overlegpagina dan nog voor zin. Ik kijk niet meer op Commons, alleen als ik een e-mail krijg weet ik dat er iets is gebeurd. --Jos1950 (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

I got an emailEdit

But found nothing of interest.

Strange that not yet has been determined how long the blockade will last.

See my contributions on Commons and consider whether I was serious and reliable. Then consider whether it may be true that not I started to respond with an IP address. Then consider whether the blockade probably has been overweight. --Jos1950 (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

HmmEdit

Was bezig met een backup en Commons opende. Heb even gespiekt en zag dat alles weer overeal wordt gedumpt, zelfs dit. Maarja, als er geen vertrouwen is houdt alles op. Veel zoekplezier!! --Jos1950 (talk) 22:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Dams_and_Weirs_in_the_Dominican_RepublicEdit

Auntof6 (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:Cordillera_Central_(Dominicaanse_Republiek)Edit

Themightyquill (talk) 19:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Tropical Storm Emily, DR, Aug-2011Edit

B dash (talk) 10:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Escudo UCATEBA.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo UCATEBA.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escudo UCATEBA.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 12:44, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Plaza de la bandera, Sato Domingo, DREdit

Hi, Jos1950, just to inform you there is a typo in the title, should probably be Category:Plaza de la Bandera, Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic). Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 06:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

  • Je hebt gelijk, maar ik ben geblokt omdat men op Commons denkt dat ik een vandaal ben. Ik kan niets meer doen en heb ook geen zin om tegen deze onzinnige blokkade te vechten.

Category:Hurricane Irene, DR, Aug-2011Edit

B dash (talk) 08:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Escudo universidad ASEUMMFU 02.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo universidad ASEUMMFU 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escudo universidad ASEUMMFU 02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Escudo universidad ASEUMMFU 01.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo universidad ASEUMMFU 01.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escudo universidad ASEUMMFU 01.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Escudo del Municipio Mella.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Escudo del Municipio Mella.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Escudo del Municipio Mella.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:41, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Universidad ASEUMMFU 03.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Universidad ASEUMMFU 03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Universidad ASEUMMFU 03.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Trancito de universidad ASEUMMFU.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Trancito de universidad ASEUMMFU.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Trancito de universidad ASEUMMFU.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Jos1950".