Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jovianeye!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prairie Shores.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Added location. --Ikar.us 20:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valluvar Kottam.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. However, needs a debate. Rare view. Not to be ignored.--Jebulon 17:12, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
  Comment I have added another image with a different view in March 28 section but I have always felt this one is more encyclopaedic. --Jovianeye 00:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
And for art-oriented reviewers, the other one will be too tightly cropped. Why does it need debate? Nobody opposes. --Ikar.us 01:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC) why "need a debate" ? Because before my support, nobody was interessed by this nice picture. Now, we have a debate.-----Jebulon 10:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 92e544896b2e0eca4741dab70567e6e2

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Valluvar Kottam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valluvar Kottam 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Intrest, good photo, imo QI --Skipper Michael 23:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charminar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agora Sculpture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not great but ok --Simonizer 22:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kathakali.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry of Olivet Baptist Church.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI --Ianare 15:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ripon Building panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ripon Building panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 15:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victory Monument Chicago.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Victory Monument (Chicago).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Commons:Valued image candidates/Wasp & aphid May 2010-1.jpg

Scope was changed from Braconid wasp laying an egg inside an aphid to Oviposition in braconid wasps. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 08:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Просьба

Коллега! Если Вас не затруднит не могли бы Вы перевести в формат SVG эти файлы: File:Znak.jpg, File:Znak1.jpg. Заранее благодарен --Kolchak1923 (talk) 19:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riveted Bell Buoy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI --Ianare 02:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Floods in QI

You might be interested in an ongoing discussion regarding QI floods of late, here. Cheers, ianaré (talk) 19:28, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Jovianeye!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steeple of St James Catholic Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
little CA imo acceptable --Mbdortmund 22:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! General Logan Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok, better. --Cayambe 16:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eagle Harbor Lighthouse Sideview.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Cayambe 08:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Indian Passport.jpg

 
File:Indian Passport.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

I do hope we can save this, but I think it needs to be discussed. Indian copyright law seems to lack the usual exemptions, so we'd need to figure out what to do, and whether the symbol (the only copyrightable part of the image) is old enough to be out of copyright. =/ --Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Capital_with_crowd_and_cameras.jpg Tilt corrected

Yes, there was some tilt in the image. It has been corrected. Thank you.--Amadscientist (talk) 00:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IIT Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}


QIC, Consensual review

Hello. Would you please verifiy the count of votes you made concerning this pic, in the running total of Consensual review. I'm not sure you are right, maybe you counted only the little "green cross symbol", and not all the opinions... Sorry if I'm wrong. Salut ! --Jebulon (talk) 22:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fountain of the Great Lakes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Floodlights.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Cayambe 07:13, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain Of The Great Lakes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metra Locomotive EMD F40PHM-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. The geotag is there, but please also add the name of the locality to the descr. --Cayambe 07:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done --Jovianeye 16:33, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IIT Machinery Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment ccw tilted by 0.128° --Berthold Werner 09:06, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
  Done Tilt fixed. --Jovianeye 13:38, 11 June 2010 (UTC)>
Ah, sorry. It is clockwise tilted. Sorry, my error. --Berthold Werner 17:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Rotated 1st version CCW by 0.13. Hope it is ok now! :-) --Jovianeye 17:35, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
  Support Jepp, it's okay now ;-) --Carschten 19:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metra Locomotives F40PH-2 & MP36PH-3S.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Red light cameras.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi A8 D4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
An ok from an audi driver ;-) --Berthold Werner 19:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hartzell Memorial United Methodist Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
There is a small spot in the sky. (look at annotation) --Berthold Werner 12:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I really dont know what that was, but I have fixed it. --Jovianeye 14:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Ok for me. (Yes, the street lamp is a bit disturbing, but it's there and it's part of this place.) --Berthold Werner 15:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Light Camera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI to me.--Jebulon 23:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IIT Main Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good in my opinion. Perspective is not corrected completely, but I find this better than potential visual side effects from a stronger correction. --Johannes Robalotoff 09:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IIT Armour Laboratory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IIT Machinery Hall 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Still very good, although sky is slightly overexposed in the lower part. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:19, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cryogenic Liquid Nitrogen Tank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Useful. Trace 11:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Puvar 20080220-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puvar 20080220-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Agora_Sculpture.jpg

 
File:Agora_Sculpture.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JeremyA (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N Connector.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support The paper could be "whiter", but otherwise very good. -- H005 17:49, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RF Attenuator 30dB 5W.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
IMHO good now. --Berthold Werner 09:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Global Vipassana Pagoda 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good --George Chernilevsky 16:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! David Sassoon Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Indian Notes 10 100 500.JPG

 
File:Indian Notes 10 100 500.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jappalang (talk) 06:19, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Perspective correction needed. For me the image, to real size, is little clear or perhaps unsharp--Lmbuga 20:07, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  Comment Attention! , the building of the right can disturb--Lmbuga 20:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Perspective has been corrected further. The building on the right is an integral part of this place and IMO is not disturbing! --Jovianeye 03:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  Support Good result now --George Chernilevsky 17:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Ok. But the title of the proposal is "Taj Mahal Palace Hotel" and the building of the right is disturbing (The title is not a place). Thanks, Jovianeye, for the "!"--Lmbuga 00:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taj Mahal Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Perhaps a bit more contrast would be even better --Mbdortmund 18:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Motif on Global Vipassana Pagoda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
interesting --Carschten 17:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gateway Of India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
wow! --Carschten 16:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Global Vipassana Pagoda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me and usefull for all. --Coyau 17:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David Sassoon Library, Mumbai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Images Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--George Chernilevsky talk 12:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main Tower of Municipal Corporation Building, Mumbai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Taxiarchos228 11:51, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset in Angamaly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Qi for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Return to the user page of "Jovianeye/Archive 1".