Open main menu

Archive:

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

  • Please don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~.
  • If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page–my talk page–as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place.
  • If I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.


Please leave a new message.

De-adminship warningEdit

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Kallerna, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

QI Tunisia trainingEdit

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Caption questionEdit

Hello, do you know which breed of dog is shown in this photo that you uploaded? Thanks, --Pine 17:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever, as it is categorized. kallerna 09:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Hippocrates' statue 1.jpgEdit

 
File:Hippocrates' statue 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ah3kal (Talk) 15:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)


File:Hippocrates' statue 2.jpgEdit

 
File:Hippocrates' statue 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ah3kal (Talk) 15:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Copyright and use of imagesEdit

Moro Kallerna,

We would like to use this image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Pursilahdenranta%2C_kerrostalo.jpg in an ecommerce website as part of front page illustrations (we need an image of an apartment building). How would you like to be attributed?

Regards Tero Lahtinen —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.55.109.254 (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kallerna,

I'm contacting you about the use of your images in my website (www.dixon.es).

I've got to admit that the different copyright and licensing agreements under which fotos are made available via Wikicommons seem a bit of a labyrinth to me, hence my contacting you directly.

If you have a look at the website you'll see that I've added a copy of your foto https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11459341 to a slider on the home page.

I'm not a programmer, and fighting with websites is a real trial for me. However, I've got this far, and I'd like to know how you'd like me to proceed with a credit (assuming that you're ok about my using the foto in the first place, of course).

I did initially add a credit to the foto itself, but it looked really poor in the standard slider that I've used, so I removed it and added a "Credits" link on the main menu, with intention of listing all the fotos that I've used along with the corresponding credit and link.

So, before I go ahead, I'd like to have your feedback about the idea, and of course about the use of your foto.

Look forward to hearing from you

--Sattamassagassa (talk) 13:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

No problem, just use the photo the way you want. kallerna 18:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Dubai Marina The Beach.jpgEdit

 
File:Dubai Marina The Beach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saqib (talk) 08:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 09:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

AnikKhan.jpgEdit

Hello,

I am in the process of having the picture in question reviewed as I have obtained permission from the photographer. I went to place the {{OTRS pending}} tag in the talk page and noticed it was gone. Could you undo this by chance?

Study aide (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15thEdit

 
Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

  #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

  Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Niisku.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Niisku.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

AyaanLamar (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Kallerna,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Korpisoturi.jpgEdit

 
File:Korpisoturi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 03:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bolivia 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bolivia 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter Island 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good but could you add a cat about horses (hint: icelandic horses) --Poco a poco 20:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro de Atacama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro de Atacama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 18:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sol de Mañana 2018 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 18:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
  Question - What accounts for the weird purple color in the water? -- Ikan Kekek 17:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
According to enwiki it "is caused by red sediments and pigmentation of some algae". --MB-one 19:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek 09:32, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siilinjärvi Särkijärvi pit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chuquicamata 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 17:48, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kogelbaai from Dappat se gat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Eatcha 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Eatcha 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Eatcha 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Eatcha 05:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shark cage diving Gaansbai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter Island 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality but please add geo coordinates --Podzemnik 21:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulders Beach 2019 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

KuvaEdit

Hei Kallerna! Kuvan käyttöoikeudesta tahtoisin kysyä. Kuva koskee https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikanheitto#/media/File:Tikkataulu.JPG

Saako käyttää jaettavaan materiaaliin? Singe -levyn kansi. Entä saako muokata?

jarkko.honkanen@gmail.com

— Preceding unsigned comment added by PoopiUtti (talk • contribs) 09:47, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatra Rysy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 05:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hevoset kesälaitumella 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen airport from air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec path 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morskie Oko 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikers in Czarny Staw Gąsienicowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 08:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen Morskie Oko 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kościelec view 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kościelec view 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FSCBot (talk) 18:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. The nebula in the distance makes the image more mysterious :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvøroyri from Smyril 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:42, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvøroyri from Smyril 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 08:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support great qulaity.--Chianti 16:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sumba sheeps 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Is this also at FPC? I'd support. --Smial 10:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vágur 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Composition seems a bit vague to me, but quality is OK and the sun spot makes it a good image ;–). --Aristeas 09:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hvannhagi 9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hvannhagi 9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:26, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sumba sheeps 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sumba sheeps 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sumba sheeps 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Kallerna".