Open main menu
Babel user information
de-N Diese Benutzerin spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.
en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English.
fr-2 Cette utilisatrice dispose de connaissances intermédiaires en français.
ja-4 この利用者は母語話者に近い日本語の知識を有しています。
Users by language

User talk:Kersti Nebelsiek/Archiv

Contents

"Babys in pouches"Edit

Hello, if you are going to create the marsupial pouches categories, please spell it "babies in pouches" instead of "babys". Also, it would help to have parent categories, maybe add them to the anatomy categories. This would help with organization. Thanks for your help. If you don't correct the spelling, I will do it, please don't be offended and don't revert corrections. Have fun, Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

You didn't correct the spelling you changed the category to something completely different, which isn't correct. A whole kangoroo with a baby in the pouch ist not simply a pouch. It schouldn't be directly in the kangoroo pouch category, but it is ok to put the category "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" as a whole in "Category:Marsupial pouches". It's the same principle why you dont put cats with blue eyes directly in the cat eyes category but it is ok to do so via a "cats with blue eyes"-category.
Additionally for "Category:Marsupialia with babies in pouches" an anatomy category is an incorrect parent category, as it is not about anatomy but it is primarily a mother with child category. Kersti (talk) 17:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

AhemEdit

Hello Kersti. Just to let you know about this edit. I’ve fixed the problem. Carry on. Green Giant (talk) 10:29, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Periparus_ater_(illustrations)Edit

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

File:BelgianDraftHorse.jpgEdit

 
File:BelgianDraftHorse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 19:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Estrutura feijao.svg and other SVGsEdit

Hi Kersti,

this is not English!--Geologiya (talk) 15:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Lens (anatomy)Edit

Of course you are right. The problem is that management was not finished yet, and all the images in this category I have moved to a new category (I just created): Category:Human lens. In the same way I had already created Category:Orbit (anatomy) -> Category:Human orbit. Finally I added a new category to Schneckenauge.jpg. Thanks. --Jmarchn (talk) 18:04, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Cardellina canadensisEdit

Hi! I am about to remove your template for VN from the category so it can use wikidata. I am sad about this because the template is really nice. Category:Cardellina canadensis. I guess that is all. (sniffle)--RaboKarbakian (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Sheep_testiclesEdit

E4024 (talk) 11:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Bay foals with their mothersEdit

Hey, I noticed you recently created Category:Bay foals with their mothers. Can you explain why this is a meaningful distinction from any other foals with their mothers, and bay foals in any other context? Cat Bay foals is pretty bloated, but IMO we could split it in some other ways that could be more useful. Such as by stage of coat development (before, during, after first coat shed). And of course at this point we can remove less than decent photos from the category. Glad to see you back btw! --Pitke (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

If you think, that there is a better way of splitting the categories this would be ok for me. On the other hand I think that there are enough bay foals not yet categoriced as bay foals, that alls these distinktions could be made without having categories with less than 20 photos. Kersti (talk) 08:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Get consensusEdit

Sorry, you don’t have consensus to remove images from existing categories. Mark Marathon (talk) 00:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Kersti Nebelsiek,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Histopathology of hemosiderosisEdit

Hello! See how I recategorized this category, creating Category:Hemosiderosis. Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 15:41, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Diseases and disorders of inner earEdit

I don't agree with your change (you has been moved this category to Category:Inner ear), because all its content is referred only to human diseases. Of course exists this diseases in others mammals and vertebrates. When someone uploads a file/s referred to diseases of mammals or other vertebrates then it could be created Category:Human diseases and disorders of inner ear. --Jmarchn (talk) 16:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

 
disorganised hair cells in tailchaser mice - inner ear mutation
 
Scanning electron micrographs demonstrating the different patterns of hair cell production along the length of the cochlea in Jag1-cko embryos in mice

@Jmarchn:

  1. I don't agree that vertigo is a human disease. - it is based on the general functioning of the mammalian inner ear, therefore it should exist in all mammals. Of course it is a subjective symptom and animals can't tell us, that they feel vertigo, therefore it ist difficult to diagnose it in animals.
  2. It is not true that examples of diseases of the inner ear in animals are not yet uploadet. But if you hide the approbiate categories in the human diseases category tree it is a real problem to categorice them properly!
  3. A category named Category:Diseases and disorders of inner ear has simply the wrong name to be a subcategory of Category:Human inner ear
  4. Homozygous merle dogs in some cases are deaf due to problems in the inner ear, same is correct for Dalmatians
  5. en:Congenital sensorineural deafness in cats is a congenital deafness caused by a degeneration of the inner ear.

--Kersti (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I created Category:Diseases and disorders of human inner ear and fill it. --Jmarchn (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Administrator?Edit

Hi Kersti. Are you interested in being a candidate for administrator? If so, I would be happy to nominate you. --99of9 (talk) 10:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

@99of9: After thinking some days about this, I still think, that I would use the administrator right almost exclusively to correct my own faults. If this is reason enough, to make me an administrator, I think it is OK for me, but I don't think that I am much help for the work administrators usually do. Kersti (talk) 11:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for thinking about it. That's probably not a wide enough scope, but if your workflows or interests later change, don't hesitate to let us know. All the best and thanks again for all your work! --99of9 (talk) 12:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Wesp1.jpgEdit

Hi! Are you sure it's dead? I think it's just in defensive position (exposing sting). Salicyna (talk) 18:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

The original description by the photographer says, that it is dead. Kersti (talk) 20:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
OK, you're right :) Salicyna (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Carling King - 03.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Carling King - 03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Carling King - 03.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Castillo blanco (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

ElytraEdit

Hi there; I just happened to notice you've been categorising some images of beetles with "coleoptera elytrae". Elytra is already the plural; the singular for a beetle wing cover is elytrum. You may want to fix those category names. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 01:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Gravures de l'Histoire des oiseauxEdit

Bonjour,

Excusez moi de ne parler ni l'allemand, ni l'anglais. J'ai importé plusieurs gravures du livre "Histoire des oiseaux" par François-Nicolas Martinet (1790-1796) regroupées dans la Category:Histoire des oiseaux par François-Nicolas Martinet. Si vous pouvez, merci de mettre les noms latins de chaque oiseau.

Merci de votre aide. Robert Valette (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)


File tagging File:Berittene Polizei Naadam 2010.JPGEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Berittene Polizei Naadam 2010.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Berittene Polizei Naadam 2010.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Chiyako92 (talk) 18:28, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Western Serengeti 2012 06 03 3722 (7557814100).jpgEdit

Bist du dir sicher mit der Bestimmung? Sieht für mich eher wie ein Reiher aus. Gruß --Veliensis (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Das wird eine dieser großartigen Gelegenheiten gewesen sein, wo ich meinte das eine im Copy-Past-Speicher zu haben aber tatsächlich das andere noch drin war. Du hast völlig recht! Kersti (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!Edit

Dear Kersti Nebelsiek,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Bird egg categoriesEdit

Hi Kersti - when you make these, could you use the sort code "| eggs" (with a space) rather than "|eggs", please. Otherwise they appear as if they are subspecies subcategories, rather than otherwise. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

That is how I normally do it - I must have had my bad day. Sorry. Kersti (talk) 20:06, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Kersti Nebelsiek".