User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2015/Q3

De-adminship warning edit

This talk page in other languages:

Dear King of Hearts, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 22:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Same chemical structure (JPG or SVG) edit

Dear King of Hearts. JPG structure and SVG structure indicated here represent the same molecule. --Cjp24 (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, but it's a different rotation. As there were no other participants, I want to err on the side of caution as someone might prefer one rotation over another. -- King of 00:35, 19 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Special:AbuseFilter/102 edit

Hi, is the filter still needed? Creating filter for two users is a wasting of abf conditions: If they are editwarring, then they should be blocked. Was this discussed on AN/U? I can't find something in the archive (except socking reports related to Pava). I am inclined to switch the filter off. Regards and Thanks in advice, :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

I've turned it off, not for efficiency (unlike enwiki, I don't think Commons ever hits the condition limit), but because this filter amounted to a de facto topic/interaction ban and any such ban probably would have expired by now. -- King of 03:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Thanks :-). I cleaned up a few filter in the last days and notice this. Thanks again! --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JarektBot (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Return to the user page of "King of Hearts/Archive/2015/Q3".