Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Karol Szapsza!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:08, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Contents

Copyright violationsEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | azərbaycanca | বাংলা | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | Simple English | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


 
Hello Karol Szapsza.

You have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

Consider this your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yann (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

File:MakingArticle9007.jpgEdit

Chyba przesadzasz. Osobę bardzo trudno rozpoznać bo ani twarzy, ani otoczenie nieszczególne. Takim szablonem należałoby opatrzyć wszystkie zdjęcia, gdzie widać osobę nie będącą częścią zgromadzenia (czyli np, jeśli robię zdjęcie wsi i ktoś tam tyłem do mnie idzie o kilkadziesiąt metrów też). (w dodatku to autoportret osoby wiedzącej co robi). Ciacho5 (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: Loga SVGEdit

Mam nowszą wersję Inkscape, 0.91, i u mnie również nie widać żadnych napisów na czarnej belce. Może spróbuj zapisać obrazek jako „plain SVG” albo „optimized SVG” i zobacz co się stanie. Jeśli to nie pomoże, to spróbuję coś pokombinować, ale nic nie obiecuję ponieważ nie jestem specjalistą od SVG i Inkscape. jdx talk 18:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Twój KwiatEdit

I have change your Picture but i think, the DOF is with f/2,6 to small for QI, sorry. --Ralf Roleček 23:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! EN57-1448, 855, 1443.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! MAN NL 202 (420) – MKS Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! MAN NM 152 (425) – MKS Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Panorama of Krajno-Zagórze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

EN57-1903.JPGEdit

Nie masz tego zdjęcia w pliku raw? Gdyby go dobrze wywołać fotka spokojnie otrzymałaby QI. Pzdr. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MP 40 machine gun, with folded stock..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panorama of Krajno-Zagórze and the surrounding area..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! School buses of Bałtów Jurassic Park.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Landscape of Skarżysko Książęce, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electric multiple units EN57-19xx series.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bus stock of Zwierzyniec Bałtowski.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ET22-695 + ET22-2040 in Skarżysko-Kamienna.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eiffel Tower miniature in Krajno-Zagórze.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

PerspektywaEdit

Obejrzyj sobie te dwa filmy: [1], [2]. Przyda Ci się to. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eiffel Tower miniature in Sabat Krajno amusement and miniature park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

File:AIDS.DOS.Virus.pngEdit

 
File:AIDS.DOS.Virus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Bosch-Logo.svgEdit

 
File:Bosch-Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Madzia29734 (talk) 11:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


Ad:Quality image candidatesEdit

I do shoot RAW. Previously it was said that my photos were oversharpened, so now probably I exaggerated the other way with sharpening… My question is: is it possible to re-nominate photo after correcting shortcomings indicated at the first nomination? Karol Szapsza (talk) 12:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC) The focus was also not well done and it is impossible to correct this in Lightroom, just make a new photo from this composition. Please don't renominate this photo because I have change my review. I am waiting for you new version and if it is a decline again you might ask for a discussion (yellow colour) and more people will review your photo --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prawy Brzeg Wisły – manewry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stegna Gdańska train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rybina – stacja kolejowa 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rybina train stop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Skarżysko Milica train stop.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz 08:33, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ABC Skarżysko-Kamienna ul. Mikołaja Kopernika.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Karol Szapsza".