Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Lieutenant Ramathorn!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:55, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

I apologize for altering your image. I will not change it again. BuickCenturyDriver (talk) 02:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Contents

File:PR R1-2.svgEdit

 
File:PR R1-2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 22:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Puerto-Rico-W14-3.svgEdit

 
File:Puerto-Rico-W14-3.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 22:31, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

RevisionsEdit

Please stop reverting files I have edited without a proper reasoning. The files are accurate. Fry1989 eh? 22:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

If you continue to revert these files without a proper reasoning, I will have no choice but to revert you. Please also reply on your talk page. Fry1989 eh? 22:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

They are not accurate. I am reverting all of your revisions to the highway signs since you seemed not to notice that the original version uses proper MUTCD colors for printing reproduction. See the specs. [1] The colors are identical to the ones in the MUTCD. --Lieutenant Ramathorn (talk) 22:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I have used the official MUTCD specs for the design of these signs where available. Some colours are different from the specs, but most of them do follow the MUTCD, those that do not required consideration for real life. Fry1989 eh? 22:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The specs for all of the signs in the MUTCD are freely available from DOT. In fact you can actually extract the properly colored images out of the MUTCD, which it appears was the case for the majority of the files that you modified away from MUTCD specs. --Lieutenant Ramathorn (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Yes, they ARE freely available, and I have bee uploding and correcting files to meet these specs. If you do not stop reverting I will ask that you be blocked. The yellow that I have used for the warning signs is directly chosen by the MUTCD here where they provide many of the files in Zip. Stop reverting them. Fry1989 eh? 22:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
The MUTCD does not use black borders on it's signs anymore, you are following OLD versions, the current version does not, nore do any of these signs have an external black border in real life. Fry1989 eh? 22:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Stop lying and threatening people. --Lieutenant Ramathorn (talk) 22:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
I'm not lying, look at the link I have provided it proves I'm telling the truth. Download one of their warning signs. It uses the yellow that I am, and it will not include an external black border. Continued revisions will be considered vandalism and I will ask you be blocked, this is your last warning. Fry1989 eh? 23:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Enough threats and lies. The link you provided is not the actual MUTCD. I am using 2009 Edition with Revision Numbers 1 and 2 incorporated, dated May 2012 as a basis. That is the document that should be used as the guide as i"The PDF version of the 2009 MUTCD with Revision Numbers 1 and 2 incorporated, dated May 2012 is the official current edition." If you download a PDF of this document [2] you will see it has the black outlines around the signs. Please do proper research before posting and/or accusing people of things. --Lieutenant Ramathorn (talk) 13:53, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
It IS the MUTCD's website and it is the files they have chosen to provide. I have nothing to gain from lying to you, so piss off if you're gonna keep that attitude I'll tell you right now. All I care about is the signs being accurate, and that's what I'm doing. If you edit war on them, I've made it clear what course of action I will be forced to take. Fry1989 eh? 18:59, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

File:PR R1-2.svgEdit

 
File:PR R1-2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 20:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:NJ-2011.jpgEdit

 
File:NJ-2011.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zginder (talk) 00:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File:2012 Ohio License Plate.jpgEdit

 
File:2012 Ohio License Plate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

If you wish, feel free to re-upload this image on the English Wikipedia under the name File:2010 OH passenger plate.png, but first, please downscale it to a width of 300 pixels or so, to comply with Wikipedia's fair use policy.

 – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 18:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File:1969 Delaware license plate 111111.jpgEdit

 
File:1969 Delaware license plate 111111.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 06:17, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Lieutenant Ramathorn".