Open main menu

You have been blocked for a duration of 6 monthsEdit

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 6 months for the following reason: uncivil behaviour/personal attacks after numerous warnings and blocks, see COM:AN/U.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

Steinsplitter (talk) 13:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Ottimo lavoro Steinsplitter,senza essere avvisato o senza un warning,è normale questo Sergio? e sopratutto gli altri possano definire le mie foto "Cartoon" o insultami,venire a votare solo le mie foto negativamente ed a insultarmi a loro niente. Ok se questo mondo è così ve lo lascio. The Photographer I will be polite when others will be with me. Goodbye. --LivioAndronico (talk) 16:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
And thanks Ikan Kekek really man do this behind without even warning. I already knew you were not a photographer, now this too. Thanks again. --LivioAndronico (talk) 16:43, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Non è vero. Hai ricevuto tanti avvisi nel passato, e sei stato bloccato non solo una volta. Il tuo comportamento non è accettabile. Pertanto ti avviso se sei abusando la tua talk page, possiamo revocare l'l accesso per la stessa. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:48, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Cioè uno riceve un avviso 6 mesi fà o più e questo vale per sempre? Io ripeto è normale questo Sergio? Comunque Steinsplitter non sai parlare senza minacciare o bloccare? Non ti ho mai visto nè sentito se non per questi due motivi, amministratore molto utile direi. Loro mi prendono in giro ed è tutto OK io rispondo esono lo stronzo? hai la coscienza a posto? Va bene, ANCHE IO dunque blocca pure tanto che ci vengo a fare?. Ti ringrazio Sergio per la pazienza e ti auguro anticipatamente un buon Natale ed un felice anno nuovo. Ho 38 anni,faccio l'arbitro e l'imprenditore turistico, mia moglie è incinta del nostro terzo figlio dunque qualcosa farò,grazie ancora.--LivioAndronico (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Colin and Livio, is it too much to ask you both to ignore one another? Clearly you two have relation problems amongst yourselves. Can you both relate one another without using triggering terms? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Blackcat, no we clearly don't just have relation problems among ourselves. I am tired of admins who don't do their job and suggest "interaction ban" whenever there is any hassle between two users. Livio has a problem with everyone who dares oppose his pictures. There are about half a dozen reviewers on Commons who've had issues and most do not review his pictures any more. That's what he wants, blackcat, for nobody to oppose his pictures. You will not find any issues with my reviews of Livio's images, though you won't find many because it is such a painful experience I am reluctant to do so. You will find me opposing others day in day out, without any problem. There are clear examples in the past and current of livio deliberately revenge voting. In addition to the unpleasant tone he takes with reviewers. Please black cat, if you can't be bothered to examine the actual history, just don't bother contributing at all. -- Colin (talk) 18:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
The record amply bears out Colin's remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Colin do you have to lie to live? Where would these dozens be? Pathetic....Ikan Kekek you may be worse off doing these hidden things, but you know it--LivioAndronico (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Livio is not able to talk english and hes using automatic translators. You also might try to understand his difficulties in communicating.Paolobon140 (talk) 20:50, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Paolobon140 you can see on AN/U the various links supplied by Wikicology showing a long-term pattern of insults. I don't think anyone, including Livio, has ever suggested the insults were are result of Google translate failing with some loving banter between good friends. Or that he has ever claimed the reason he got upset and started throwing insults was because he misunderstood what someone wrote. The recent: "with Diliff ... are you in love? You should tell him": I haven't heard that sort of childish comment since school. It has no place here. -- Colin (talk) 08:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Grazie Paolobon140 ma come ti dissi precedentemente qui è un covo di serpi...come si dice a Roma :"Il più pulito c'ha la rogna!"--LivioAndronico (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Paolobon, capisco anche italiano. Suoi parole in italiano non erano meglio che in inglese. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Colin, I understand your point but for example here I retired my positive vote because of a technical observation (light couldn't be such in that period of the year at that time) and Livio accepted my decision without problems. I mean that one can turn a proposal down without using triggering and aggressive metaphors like "you use NR and Clarity like a tart uses foundation and lipstick", especially if one is not ready to receive sarcahasm. If you had said "sorry but in my opinion you used too much noise reduction", and had like me noted that at that time there couldn't be that light through the windows, most probably you wouldn't have got an overreaction. I'm not justifying Livio because overreaction is never justified, so I am not discussing the block, I am just telling that there's no need for triggering the counterpart. I am often addressed with acid sarcahasm but I am one who deals with that and am cynical enough to not care, but not everyone has this high threshold. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 11:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Blackcat that's not a fair quote. The original review said "The stonework has no texture (possibly too much NR) and the carvings have way way too much local contrast ("Clarity" slider to the max)." Which I'm sure you agree is as dispassionate and unlikely to cause any offence as is possible. Yet above you claim "If you had said "sorry but in my opinion you used too much noise reduction"" -- well, I did. And Livio responded with "I don't use NR,thanks". Which we all know is a lie. I've no idea why he lies about his processing, since it is not like we can't tell. As I said before, if you can't be bothered to review the history and report facts accurately, then you aren't helping. I have better things to do than deal with misrepresentations of the truth like above. I sincerely hope the above mistake was an accident rather than deliberate -- Colin (talk) 11:46, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

العربية | Azərbaycanca | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | jbobau | 한국어 | Kurdî | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Livio, this recent block and your past behaviour has been discussed at the Administrator's Noticeboard and there is consensus that your block shall be extended to an indefinite period. You may appeal this block by email but there is little chance that your request will be considered within a period of six months from now. After six months, your talk page access will be restored so you can make a regular request for unblock if you so wish. De728631 (talk) 14:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Translation requested at my talkpage: Livio, questo blocco recente e il tuo comportamento passato é stato discusso nella AN di commons e cé consenso di bloccarti a un periodo indefinito (per sempre). Puoi presentare ricorso contro questo blocco via e-mail, ma ci sono poche possibilità che la tua richiesta venga presa in considerazione entro un periodo di sei mesi. Dopo sei mesi, l'accesso alla pagina di discussione verrà riaperta per effettuare una richiesta di sblocco. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I have now restored your talk page access, so you may use the {{Unblock}} option. De728631 (talk) 20:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New YearEdit


Excuse me if I get them now but soon the Grand Administrator Steinsplitter will block me and then:

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to Spurzem,Llez ,Famberhorst, Petar , Ermell, Jacek,Johann,Diego,Agnes,PumpkinSky, Moroder,XRay,Pudelek, Lmbuga ,Ralf , Laitche, Martin, Uoaei1, Daniel,Berthold, Basotxerri, Christian ,George,Paolobon140 I hope I have not forgotten anyone yeah, I have to admit that I quarrel with a lot of people   --LivioAndronico (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

P.S Diego I'm sorry, but as I think you understand ... I can not make the changes you requested --LivioAndronico (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Nice picture. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. --User:Lmbuga.
  • Nice picture. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. -- PumpkinSky talk 22:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, LivioAndronico, and best wishes to you. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
Have a good Christmas time, Livio! You have to see things from the good side, now you have a lot of time for many other things :) Poco2 22:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Livio! I wish you the very best for the next time, and I hope you will come back afterwards with lots of great pictures --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I wish you you the very best too. Hopefully you'll come back soon. It's time for recreation ... and to take photographs. --XRay talk 05:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you! Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:25, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you, Livio. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. --Laitche (talk) 12:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Merry Christmas for you too. My recommendation is prepare a big package of Featured Pictures images, if you want nominate something, simply, tell me. --The Photographer 15:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Molti saluti, amico! Best wishes! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Meglio presto...che mai. Tanti Auguri e pace!Belle feste!--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
  • @Livioandronico2013: You forgot one! Happy holidays to you and your family my old friend! lNeverCry 23:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Livioandronico2013: Now you have time for setting Krismas tree in Holly Rome. That is double joy ! Mery Krismas to Roma. --Mile (talk) 16:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Model of Paris by Antonio Canova in Ca' Rezzonico (Venice).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veiled Dame by Antonio Corradini.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ceiling of the Room of the giants in Palazzo del Tè, Mantua.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ceiling of the Room of the giants in Palazzo del Tè, Mantua.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.


/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Unblock requestEdit

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "I will not answer any more comments ... promised"
Decline reason: "COM:BLOCK requires an acknowledgement of the issue and a credible promise to discontinue the behaviour that caused the block. These requirements, by the way, are more or less criteria #2 and #3 of the Standard Offer, the premise under which talk page access was restored. This request provides neither (fails both), and is bizarrely meagre and apathetic, especially given the anticipation implied by its appearance a mere 15 minutes after talk page access was restored, after a 6 month wait. The lack of effort does not speak well of sincerity, a measure of credibility. Further, even if the required commitment had been made, there would be ample evidence of a lack of credibility as demonstrated by the diffs below. The obstinateness and utter lack of clue necessary for someone blocked for incivility and personal attacks to make this revert and then less than two weeks later request an unblock is remarkable. If Livioandronico2013 is unprepared to acknowledge that his conduct and hostility are incompatible with a collaborative project, and to act accordingly, he should be prepared to remain blocked. Эlcobbola talk 22:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(Change local status for a global block)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

Ok elcobbola, is possible delete all my pictures? --LivioAndronico (talk) 06:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
No, it is not possible unless they violate policy (e.g., are copyright violations, out of scope, etc.) You have donated them with irrevocable licenses. Эlcobbola talk 20:39, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Livioandronico2013 was blocked for six months by User:Steinsplitter on 27 November 2017. On 10 December 2017 this was extended to indefinite:

"There is consensus that User:Livioandronico2013 be blocked indefinitely for his continuous incivilities and rude responses during disputes while having been blocked numerous times before. The recent six-months block handed out by Steinsplitter will therefore be extended accordingly. As Livio has shown no sign of understanding and did not tone down his rhetorics even after this new block, appeals made by Livioandronico2013 to the indefinite block shall only be considered after a period of six months from today. Livio's talkpage access will then be restored so he can make a regular request for unblock." -- De728631"

While blocked on Commons, Livioandronico2013 wrote an attack on my Wikipedia talk page here on 5th December 2017. When my talk page was archived, I naturally did not retain that attack. Then on 22 May 2018 Livioandronico2013 restored his attack to my talk archive here. I removed it and he restored it again on the 24th May 2018 here. I complained and an admin removed the attack, protected my talk page archive, and Livioandronico2013 was blocked for a week on Wikipedia on 26th May 2018. His response to being blocked, posted 2nd June 2018 is here.

Livio "evaded" his Commons block by attacking me repeatedly on Wikipedia. I have had zero interaction with Livio on Wikipedia, so the attacks there are purely motivated by his issues on Commons. This cross-project harassment occurred only a few weeks ago, and his defiant response to the en:wp blocking admin was only 10 days ago. See no reason at all to unblock. -- Colin (talk) 09:57, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

  Oppose. Diffs shown by Colin make me feel, that Livio is not ready to interact with other users in a civilized way. Promise not to answer comments does not sound good, because often some comments need to be answered, for example somebody can ask questions. I see here no apology. Taivo (talk) 18:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok Taivo, is possible delete all my pictures? --LivioAndronico (talk) 06:45, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
@Taivo: I always found Livioandronico a pleasant colleague and I never had any problems with him. His pictures are very good and it is a great pity that he is excluded from collaborating in the commons. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Lothar but is too late.....--LivioAndronico (talk) 21:32, 30 June 2018 (UTC)


Diego,Yann or blackcat seen is not interested in Taivo and elcobbola, or they do not know .... do you know how I can delete all my images here? Thank you --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

You are blocked, so you cannot delete anything here. Even after unblocking you cannot delete anything here. Only administrators have right to delete. But if you want to delete all your uploads in Commons or only some your uploads, then I oppose. Uploader's request is valid reason only during first week after uploading. If you uploaded self-made photos into Commons, then you published them under non-revocable free license and you cannot demand their deletion. Taivo (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
I understand that Livio is asking us to delete them. Per Taivo, that is not possible, as those are not "your" images anymore but rather belong to everybody when you uploaded them with a free license. The same applies to articles in Wikipedia. None of the described deletion criteria in the corresponding policy would cover this case, sorry. Poco2 20:57, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Poco, I surprised to see you make this mistake. The photos still are owned by Livio. They do not belong to anyone else, certainly not to everyone. This is quite different to Wikipedia, which is a collaborative editing project where every article has multiple editors and thus a multitude of "owners", none of whom have any more rights than any other. The most obvious consequence of this is that, as copyright owner, Livio can additionally licence his work in any way he likes (such as asking for a fee to remove the need for attribution for a given re-user), or even to release them into the Public Domain, whereas the rest of us are bound only to reuse his images under the strict terms of CC BY SA 4.0.
Livio, although the licence is legally irrevocable, Commons is not legally bound to host them forever, and could choose to no longer do so. But it is current and longstanding community policy to reject deletion requests where the author regrets their donation long afterwards. -- Colin (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Anyway Colin you should not "scold" only Diego but also Taivo and Elcobbola said it and before him (I sincerely think like you,but isn't a problem). However, even if too late I have to admit that I could handle myself better here ..... and I sincerely regret it, but that's life. I greet everyone, I apologize if I bothered you and anyway I thank you for your time. You can also close my talk page. Thanks again.--LivioAndronico (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Livio, I'm used to that, yes, it's kind of annoying, specially when people get involved in discussion although they've not been asked to Poco2 09:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
No. Poco said "those are not 'your' images anymore but rather belong to everybody" which is, as Colin noted, entirely wrong. You in fact retain ownership of the intellectual property; you've merely relinquished some (but not all) rights. Taivo and I merely said the licenses under which you released the images are not revocable; unlike Poco's, ours were not comments on ownership. Эlcobbola talk 17:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok all have right...So yes or not elcobbola?--LivioAndronico (talk) 21:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
gracias por la respuesta y tu tiempo Diego --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:01, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Livio, hanno ragione. La richiesta di cancellazione, su foto regolari, non dipende più da chi le ha caricate, e da bloccato non puoi neppure, in caso, fare una richiesta (che comunque verrebbe cassata per i motivi anzi detti). Mi dispiace. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:10, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Grazie Sergio --LivioAndronico (talk) 17:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Picture of the Year/2017/R1/v/Ceiling of the Room of the giants in Palazzo Te, Mantua.jpgEdit

Thanks to:

  1. Michael Barera
  2. Betau
  3. George Chernilevsky
  4. Tim1965
  5. Danyele
  6. Tom Ja
  7. Caligatus
  8. Качуровська
  9. DerBorg
  10. Poco a poco
  11. Draceane
  12. Superbia23
  13. Green Mostaza
  14. Rhododendrites
  15. MrPanyGoff
  16. Toyotsu
  17. Jakubhal
  18. Shizhao
  19. GianluSport
  20. Semmendinger
  21. Gunnar.offel
  22. Nicola Quirico
  23. Parma1983
  24. Kamranazad
  25. Mahdijiba
  26. Alexis900
  27. Wayne2435
  28. Josep Azuara
  29. Piotr Bart
  30. Lydia
  31. Iking5
  32. Shi Annan
  33. Vmavanti
  34. Андрій Гриценко
  36. Cote d'Azur
  37. Talmoryair
  38. Grest7
  39. Netrat
  40. Nenea hartia
  41. Msm020373
  42. Kalapulla123
  43. Applodion
  44. Amqui
  45. Lvova
  46. Naereen
  47. BD2412
  48. Mcoffsky
  49. Issam chalouhi
  50. Jörg Blobelt
  51. Lamblings
  52. TheMatt
  53. FPP
  54. Alekino
  55. Avertje
  56. Abductive
  57. Abujoy
  58. J.-H. Janßen
  59. Epitalon
  60. Wolverène
  61. Tetraktys
  62. Lordgilman
  63. Lo Ximiendo
  64. Beatrice
  65. Pelz
  66. Wendersnaven
  67. Danidamiobi
  68. Brais Oliveira
  69. DePlusJean
  70. Alexmar983
  71. Florencedepau
  72. Azoma
  73. Paris1127
  74. ToBeFree
  75. SCFoxJD
  76. Shahin
  77. Daniel Case
  78. Lilitik22
  79. Saikindi
  80. Sammyday
  81. B20180
  82. Grottem
  83. Pierre André Leclercq
  84. Tidoni
  85. Bennauser
  86. TheJae
  87. Pitke
  88. Geohakkeri
  89. EinDao
  90. Охоник
  91. Deror avi
  92. Grzegorz Browarski
  93. Patriccck
  94. Tom Rheker
  95. Zavodovski
  96. Seraphsephirot
  97. MaiDireChiara
  98. Yodaspirine
  99. Karelj
  100. Anastan
  101. Joanbanjo
  102. Draco9904
  103. Damned
  104. Huydang2910
  105. Tktktk
  106. M.Hidan
  107. AMPERIO
  108. C messier
  109. Zoeperkoe
  110. Fontema
  111. Atsme
  112. Bluemel1
  113. Jærv
  114. Ghilt
  115. Harlock81
  116. Theaitetos
  117. Deltahead
  118. Sacha47
  119. Kess
  120. Samiclaus
  121. Hkandy
  122. Abderitestatos
  123. Andreyiv
  124. Hugo.arg
  125. WikiLuke
  126. Dungodung
  127. BSRF
  128. Urielpunk
  129. VonKellcsiis
  130. Lhimec
  131. LucasBrown
  132. Jarry1250
  133. Domandologo
  134. David1010
  135. Modest Genius
  136. Darwinek
  137. Suisant7
  138. Elmie
  139. Okras
  140. Tharumaxx
  141. Matthewrobertolson
  142. Davidh820
  143. F123
  144. DrPZ
  145. Hiàn
  146. IanThePineapple
  147. Jdx
  148. Tequask
  149. Herzi Pinki
  150. Bspf
  151. Kghbln
  152. Лорд Бъмбъри
  153. MarcelBuehner
  154. Nutcracker100
  155. LeinadCQ
  156. Nina Flor
  157. Σπάρτακος
  158. Frankemann
  159. Flixtey
  160. Phyrexian
  161. Ryan Hodnett
  162. Platonides
  163. Annatsach
  164. Riverhugger
  165. Cybularny

--LivioAndronico (talk) 20:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Picture of the Year/2017/R2/v/Ceiling of the Room of the giants in Palazzo Te, Mantua.jpgEdit

Many thanks to:

  1. Ghilt
  2. DerBorg
  3. Jmh2o
  4. Σπάρτακος
  5. Ra'ike
  6. CMI 2017
  7. Ігор Пєтков
  8. Yurii-mr
  9. Ham II
  10. Hedda Gabler
  11. Ynnda
  12. Palauenc05
  13. Isra2911
  14. Skoczny Kacper
  15. Jolek
  16. Mindspower
  17. Iry-Hor
  18. Pelanch3
  19. Javert2113
  20. Fritzmann2002
  21. Quadrige
  22. Pierre André Leclercq
  23. PaoloFaulkner
  24. VAP+VYK
  25. BreadBuddy
  26. Strandist
  27. Civvì
  28. Accurimbono
  29. G.Tuono
  30. Lungoleno
  31. Narada Lefvf
  32. Hogwarts Portal
  33. Amqui
  34. Peter17
  35. Chiananda
  36. Tom a
  37. Nickin
  38. L'Alsacien
  39. Effems
  40. Tutelary
  41. Suman chowdhury 22
  42. Cincotta1
  43. Tetraktys
  44. Eryn Blaireová
  45. Svawald
  46. Leserättin
  47. Phyrexian
  48. Krwy
  49. Hectorpal
  50. A1AA1A
  51. Vplusa
  52. GiovAngri
  53. Florencedepau
  54. Pandadri
  55. Rhk111
  56. Giakosh
  57. Srm038
  58. Glorious Engine
  59. Santi Cba
  60. Iazyges
  61. Bhagya sri113
  62. DeuxPlusQuatre
  63. Damian Vo
  64. JMilty
  65. Dievo
  66. Tharumaxx
  67. Sannita
  68. Jene Verkentel
  69. S Shamima Nasrin
  70. HybridExplorer
  71. Afernand74
  72. Richard Nevell
  73. Harnut Vlad
  74. Adeninasn
  75. MilanoCollection
  76. ImanFakhri
  77. Aletheia 90
  78. Toni Pecoraro
  79. Godsy
  80. WikiEditCrunch
  81. Антуан
  82. Hrodvarsson
  83. Piecon
  84. Doctorhawkes
  85. Jakochiet
  86. Australiantiger
  87. Илья Яковлев
  88. K-iczn
  89. Wdvorak
  90. Trekkie4christ
  91. Mikceo
  92. Zetazeti
  93. Loneather
  94. C.Colérus
  95. Mudroslov
  96. Spartan - 117
  97. Wolverène
  98. Rostislav2009
  99. Hebius
  100. Minoo
  101. Deshumanizado
  102. LeoC12
  103. Anandcv
  104. Djjennyhillton
  105. Kakolukia
  106. Josepko
  107. Jörg Blobelt
  108. Embu wiki
  109. TradeJackLandSim
  110. Radhadwibedi
  111. Analogue Transmission
  112. Winterrose
  113. RobertLechner
  114. Sgconlaw
  116. Dhanalakshmi .K. T
  117. Aw58
  118. Black Falcon
  119. Dalanuch
  120. Piradaperdida
  121. Documentary1
  122. Giudark
  123. Jeff5102
  124. Amarvudol
  125. Stivmeister
  126. Lang Babylon
  127. Mariusz Swornóg
  128. Purielku
  129. Damned
  130. Giorgos ab1234
  131. Benjamin112
  132. Fernando de Gorocica
  133. MaiDireChiara
  134. Iskander ukr
  135. Michael D. Schmid
  136. Matthewrobertolson
  137. Facquis
  138. MarcelBuehner
  139. VasoniVasoni
  140. Axagore
  141. Señoritaleona
  142. GreatStarMaster
  143. Лорд Бъмбъри
  144. Conteur-momentanement-indisponible
  145. JMes
  146. Laurel Lodged
  147. Seawolf-92
  148. Nicola Quirico

--LivioAndronico (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)


I'm really sorry :( --Σπάρτακος (talk) 17:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination FPEdit


At Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#FYI it has been announced that Livioandronico2013 has been running two sockpuppet accounts, to evade his block and to double-vote on feature picture nominations. Category:Sockpuppets of Livioandronico2013 includes User:Architas and User:Σπάρτακος. The former began more or less when Livioandronico2013's unblock request was denied but the other is much older. I'm posting here so that those who are watchlisting this page, and have been involved with Livioandronico2013 on Commons, are aware of the socking. -- Colin (talk) 18:48, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Colin There are some way (or flag) to let to a user only upload pictures and edit on his pictures pages only? --Photographer 00:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
@The Photographer: This type of restriction will be available with the upcoming partial block feature. However, the more socks, the less likely such a block amendment would be granted. Guanaco (talk) 02:28, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
@The Photographer: given that Livioandronico2013 socked with two accounts throughout his time here, and cheated in over 300 featured picture nominations, I think that permitted to "upload only" would simply result in the creation/use of another sock with which to nominate and vote on their photographs. I don't believe that the Media Wiki projects are simply a "free media repository" or a "free content encyclopaedia" but are also communities. So I don't think we can ignore the person behind the photograph. Livioandronico2013, it turns out, was not only a PITA and a serial revenge voter, but a cheat who mislead this community for years. That's not the sort of person I want in this community, no matter how restricted their account is. -- Colin (talk) 07:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Colin I underestand and respect your point. Also thanks Guanaco --Photographer 23:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Livioandronico2013".