Luc106

Image:106_11.jpg edit

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

Image:Peugeot_104_GL.jpg edit

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

Image:Peugeot-104_ZS.jpg edit

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

Image:Peugeot_106_11.jpg edit

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you.--Orgullomoore

Image Tagging Image:Visa-Grey.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Visa-Grey.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. JeremyA 21:42, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Flickr photos edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! Thanks for your contributions. Please note that just because an image on Flickr is publicly viewable does not mean that the photographer has released it into the public domain. Some of the pictures that you have uploaded (for example this one are clearly marked "All rights reserved", which means that they cannot be uploaded to the wikimedia commons. JeremyA 21:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Answering edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

OK, thank you very much for explaining me these problems. I think you can delete all the pictures you're talking about, because I have already solved the question of these unclear copyrights. (sorry for my english, I'm italian... :) :) :) )... These pictures are not used in my wiki-pages and so they're not used in any other wiki-page I've seen.

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Peugeot-202-Cabriolet.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image talk page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Panther 08:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

OK, thank you for the message. I've simply forgotten to choose the copyright status. You can delete the Image:Peugeot-202-Cabriolet.jpg even now.

I'll re-upload it with the right copyruight status.

Bye and thanks again.

About my last picture without a copyright status... edit

Ok, I've just uploaded the same picture with a slightly different filename and a clear copyright status. The new filename is Image:Peugeot-202-Black-Cabriolet.jpg So you can delete the old file when you want. Bye!!!! :D :D :D

CC license does not mean it's ok on Commons edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hello. You have uploaded some Creative Commons licensed pictures from Flickr and worked on getting the licensing information right here on Commons. Please note that even if a photo is with a CC license, it does not automatically mean that it's free. You should really read the links given to you in the messages above. Specifically, nonderivative and noncommercial licenses are not accepted here. So when you are looking on Flickr for photos to upload here, be sure to tick the "Find content to use commercially" and "Find content to modify, adapt, or build upon" boxes.

To check the license of a picture on Flickr, you can click the "Some rights reserved" and see the license, or hover over it and see it as a tooltip and in the status bar. For example, the picture you say you have fixed in the previous message, Image:Peugeot-202-Black-Cabriolet.jpg, is on Flickr with the "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0" license, which is not ok here. Could you please check the licensing of all pictures you have uploaded from Flickr and mark for deletion the non-free ones? Thanks. I hope this helps. --Para 14:47, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Answer edit

R: Hello. Sorry for my ignorance, I've not yet understood what does an uploaded image need to be accepted, and then some errors can occur. Now, I'll try to repair these images to make them better for Wikipedia Commons (I'm sorry another time for my english: I'm italian)...

Now, take a look to the same image you have talked me about: Image:Peugeot-202-Black-Cabriolet.jpg. I have tried to repair it. What do you think? I have written the author, the day he had uploaded the image and a new link in which is described all the operations that I can do with the image (and all the operations I cannot do)... Is it a right way to have a right image? Let me know.... Bye. :D :D :D

You have documented the licensing well, but unfortunately images with such licensing are not accepted on Commons. If you don't read English well, that's alright, the important texts exist in Italian as well. Commons:Licenze says that "L'uso commerciale dell'opera deve essere permesso" and the licensing of that particular picture says that "Non commerciale. Non puoi usare quest'opera per fini commerciali". These two don't match, and thus the image can't be here on Commons with that licensing. The only thing you can do is write to the author using Flickr mail and ask him if he could change the licensing. This is true for all the images you have uploaded with an NC (non commerciale) or an ND (non opere derivate) license. --Para 18:20, 19 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

R: are you sure? I haven't used the image for commercial purpose. In the third link of the same image (Image:Peugeot-202-Black-Cabriolet.jpg) you can find that I'm free to copy and distribute the image.... please, take a look on the page again...

Yes, unfortunately that is the case. "Tutto il materiale presente su Commons deve essere rilasciato sotto una licenza libera che permetta a chiunque di utilizzarlo per qualunque scopo", including commercial use and derivative works, even if you are not doing anything commercial yourself. This is the main goal of Commons; to have a repository of truly free content. Please read through Commons:Licenze.

The deed of that particular image exists in Italian as well, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.it. Even though you are free to copy and distribute, commercial use is not allowed, so the image is not really free and not ok here. If you want to use the images in some Wikimedia project, you should ask there if they have less strict requirements, and then upload them there. --Para 18:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

R: mmm, I see... I have just read the italian page about licences... so, I could think that all the pictures I have uploaded, are wrong... tomorrow I'll try to replace them.... what a shame... thank for having explained me this rules....bye bye...

Pics removed edit

Ok, I have removed the forbidden pics, that is all the pictures taken by the Flickr site. Where it was possible, I have replaced them with other pictures already existing in the Wikimedia database. The forbidden pics can be deleted now. Bye!

Image Tagging Image:106-954-XN.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:106-954-XN.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 21:02, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:ZX-20-167CV.jpg edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ZX-20-167CV.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 88.134.44.28 16:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

to make things easier edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Luc106, i saw a lot of action made by you. For a mass-upload try http://djini.de/software/commonist/ I use it on my own, its easy! Best regards, -- Stahlkocher 18:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

R: Hallo, what is it useful for? I think I have some problems with the instructions (I'm not english, you know)...

The commonist is a program that makes it easier to upload a lot of files so it might be useful for you. Also, just so you know in the future, at the end of comments on talk pages, we sign our posts with ~~~~ this creates a signature with your name like this one -> Yonatan ^talk 18:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:IMG 0266.JPG edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey! I was wondering if you could choose more descriptive file names as this makes it much easier for people to find and use your photos. Thanks, Yonatan ^talk 18:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

R: ok, that's not a problem... from the next picture I'll update, there will be more descriptive filenames. Bye...

Image:Audibert-lavirotte.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 08:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Fiat 127 Sport edit

Hi luc106, Very nice photo of the Fiat 127 Sport (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Fiat_127-Sport.JPG). I understand it was for sale. Do you have the detail of the Seller? Thanks Ahead, Ofer

Molto Grazie edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Luc106

I think you must be the person who has contributed a whole lot of articles on individual car models from the 1930s / 40s / 50s to Italian wiki. I just want to thank you for all that work. A lot of the older cars on which you write are very little known in the anglophone countries, and I have been translating bits from German, French and Italian wiki to fill some of the gaps. The Italian Beitraege very often have your name on them!

I do not understand too much 'serious' Italian (though I'm fine with ordering a pizza, which is 100% serious when a fellow is hungry), so I've been using computer programs to translate and then using the anglophone outcome only with caution. But generally I know enough about the car to know when the translation program is giving me wrong information (and of course it is, up to a point, possible to corroborate between different language versions).

Again, thank you very much. I am learning a lot from your inputs.

Success

Charles01 16:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Hotchkiss_AM2.jpg edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Image deletion warning

Image:Hotchkiss_AM2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

78.113.118.177 22:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Peugeot Type 172 BC Quadrilette.jpg edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed that you described this vehicle as a Type 172 BC "Quadrilette", which must not be accurate. According to Peugeot, the Quadrilette designated Type 161 and Type 172, and the 172 BC was the first model of the 5CV designation. This either a 5CV (and hence not a Quadrilette) or a Quadrilette (and hence not a Type 172 BC). It looks to me like it's a 5CV based on the image on Peugeot's history website, so you should probably change the designation and remove "Quadrilette" from it. I have been making articles on Wikipedia for many old Peugeots and this will be useful to describe the 5CV article. Chaparral2J 04:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fiat 501 SS edit

Hello I am very interested in the Fiat 501 SS that you have a photo of. Do you have any other photos of this car or could you get some more? I have a 1924 Fiat 501 and I am very interested in researching motor sport versions. Thank you.

File:Clio_S.jpg edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Clio_S.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Peripitus (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Luc, I have seen something interesting on your photo BMW M1 Rear-view.JPG. The model in the background is the M1 Hommage. http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:BMW_M1_Rear-view.JPG&filetimestamp=20080427183026 http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:BMW_M1_Front-view.JPG http://www.autobild.de/mmg/mm_bildergalerie_678400.html Do you have any photos that you could post on Wikipedia? So far there is only one on the english page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M1 http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_M1 Great photos! Keep up the good work. Greetings Spidey (not registered)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Logo-DeTomaso.gif edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Logo-DeTomaso.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Logo-DeTomaso.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rastrojo _(D•ES) 00:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Lancia Type edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Lancia Ardea in (slightly improbably) Essex.jpg

Wen I uploaded this picture I thought it was of a Lancia Ardea. Now I think I may have been wrong. Do you know what it is, please? And thank you.

Saluti Charles01 (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Changes edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rotated, levels adjusted

Hello Luc, I made some edits to one of your pictures. I hope you approve of the improved version - visit the picture page and you can easily compare the two. If you like it I will go ahead and fix a few more of your wonderful old pictures. Cheers, Mr.choppers (talk) 07:30, 15 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fiat 1100/103 Familiare edit

Ciao, sono di Genova anch'io, ho visto la foto della tua Fiat 1100 Familiare. Avrei una curiosità, se non ti crea problemi, vorrei sapere se il primo proprietario, o uno dei primi, non ricordo se l'aveva comprata nuova, di quell'auto si chiamava: Gennari Primo. Ora ti spiego, era mio zio ed aveva una 1100 identica, l'ha venduta, più o meno, negli anni '90/'91 ed ovviamente era di Genova. Appena l'ho vista mi è venuto in mente, poi sapendo che tu in quegli anni abitavi a Genova ed avevi più o meno 19 anni, ho pensato che difficilmente sia una coincidenza, anche perchè di quel modello a Genova negli anni '90 non ce n'erano molte. E' solo una curiosità, mi farebbe piacere sapere che il "gioiello" dello zio è ancora in ottime condizioni. Il mio indirizzo Mail, se vuoi rispondermi, è: info@anellicoibentazioni.it oppure fgane@tin.it GRAZIE Ciao, e già che ci siamo, Buon Natale.

Hm edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

What is this car? Thankful for your help, Mr.choppers (talk) 18:28, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Belated thanks for identifying the lovely Moretti. Ciao, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 18:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Foto auto italiane edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ciao Luc106 ho visto che hai caricato molte foto di auto straniere e nessuna di italiana, la cosa mi stupisce un po' (essendo tu italiano e l'italia patria dell'automobile e le italiane le più belle ed esotiche al mondo) ma se non le hai caricate non è poi affar mio; ti chiedo però per favore se potresti caricare anche le foto di auto italiane che possiedi perché commons ne è scarsamente provvisto (sia recenti che storiche ma soprattutto dagli anni 80 in poi, recenti tanto meglio) ciaoo grazie mille --Pava (talk) 16:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

In pursuit of knowledge edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Do you have a moment, please to look at this and tell me if you can work out what it is? I have been told that it is a Fiat from just before World War I. And thank you for any thoughts you are able to share on this. Saluti. Charles01 (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Daimler edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi Luc106. I write to tell you the car in this picture is a Daimler. When they read it Mr Choppers and Mr Charles01 will laugh. Best wishes, Eddaido (talk) 09:55, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your note. I wrote because the file name and the description say it is a Jaguar and it looks as if you put those descriptions there. Now I have changed its category from Jaguar (you) to Daimler (me). It really should have the file name and description changed, do you mind doing that? Best regards, Eddaido (talk) 11:11, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

???

Abarth question edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Do you know anything about this one? I can't read the sticker well enough, looks like 1000 but the car appears to be an 850? Cheers, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 04:54, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Trabant P50 / UR-50 edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Limousine

Kombi

Hi Luc,
you've created the Category:Prototyp UR-50 for the 1954 Prototypes of the later Trabant P50. Where does you name “UR-50” come from? I only could find this phrase on Commons an the italian Wikipedia. Is it possible, that this was only a misinterpretation of phrases like “Ur-Trabant” or “Ur-P50” – what could be translated as first/original/ancient version (like in german words uralt=very old or Urvater=forefather)?
All museum displays of the prototype I could find, call it simply “P50 prototype”. -- burts ∞ 13:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've read your message. Yes, you're right, it was an error of reading. I've read the code in a wrong way, actually it was "Ur-P50" as you have told me... I'm sorry, it was an error of mine... :( :( :( How can I correct the mistakes? --Luc106 (talk) 20:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

OK. So I will move the files to the new category Category:AWZ P50 prototypes. -- burts ∞ 20:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I saw your category change to Category:Prototyp UR-P50 to late... But I moved all files to Category:AWZ P50 prototypes anyway, as Ur-P50 has no official status, but can just be seen as a nickname. -- burts ∞ 10:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Ford Sierra-RS-Cosworth.JPG edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

the males face is blurred out in the picture but if you look at the hood of the car you can see it clearly — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 136.1.1.164 (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:NSU Prinz-I Technische-Schema.jpg edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:NSU Prinz-I Technische-Schema.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:BMW Wartburg DA3.jpg edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:BMW Wartburg DA3.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

File description edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, great Fotos, but please could you re-upload it with correct descriptions. This Trabant is the 1 Million' Trabant that was built in 1973. - 1964 is wrong. Thanks! --Max schwalbe (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

OK, done!!! Thank you for the correction !!! --Luc106 (talk) 13:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Trabant-601 1973-Heck.jpg edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Trabant-601 1973-Heck.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Trabant-601 1973-Heck.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 08:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Trabant-601 1973.JPG edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Trabant-601 1973.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Trabant-601 1973.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 08:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Audi S2 edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Not sure why you removed this category, but the S2 Avant is most certainly an S2. Best, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 16:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

No probs, take care. Best, mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 14:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:BMW-2002-TI-Garmisch.jpg edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BMW-2002-TI-Garmisch.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Abzeronow (talk) 17:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic