Category:Turkish food edit

Done. Now we have to deal with Category:Turkish cuisine, which seems to be redundant. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 13:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

That's true and it's not the only case. There are similar things i.e. Category:Japanese cuisine vs Category:Japanese food and more. I think about it. --Lyzzy 14:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Admins can always use Orgullobot for requests... or you can always ask one of us more active ones to add the request modification... Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 02:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Umgebung Image:Stadtgebiet Meerbusch.png edit

Hallo Lyzzy, hast du die Möglichkeit die Grafik im Rahmen der Lizenz ein wenig anzupassen? Im Artikel Meerbusch werden noch weitere umgebende Städte wie Willich, Duisburg und Kaarst genannt. Das würde gut zum Kontext passen. Gruß --Michael 08:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Gehen würde das natürlich, ob es notwendig ist, ist eine andere Frage. Genannt sind im Moment die wichtigsten Nachbarstädte, die Grenze zu Duisburg (da musste ich erstmal nachfragen, ob sie tatsächlich existiert) ist nur wenige hundert Meter lang. Ich lass es mal sacken. --Lyzzy 18:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Naja, die Frage die sich mir da aufdrängt ist natürlich, wer entscheidet welche Städte wichtig sind und welche nicht. Um Neutralität zu wahren wäre es meiner Meinung nach richtig sie alle zu nennen. Ich unterschlage ja auch keinen Stadtteil im Artikel von Meerbusch, nur weil er subjektiv "nicht wichtig ist". Ich habe gerade auf den offiziellen Seiten der Stadt Duisburg nachgesehen, [[1]] bei Rheinstromkilometer 760 in der Nähe des Krefelder Wendebeckens gibt es — wie du schon richtig sagtest — eine kurze Schnittkante von ca. 710m zu Duisburg. Und Duisburg ist sicherlich nicht unbedeutend. :-) --Michael 16:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Michael, dies ist eine Übersichtskarte, die bewusst sehr schematisch und reduziert ist. Wenn du das in dieser Karte für wichtig hältst, füge es hinzu. Eugen, der die Karte erstellt hat, hat dazu im Moment keine Zeit. --Lyzzy 19:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Okay, ist erledigt. --Michael 21:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Danke MIchael, ich habe deine Version jetzt noch unter dem alten Namen hochgeladen, es ist ja nicht notwendig beide vorzuhalten. --Lyzzy 08:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Danke Lyzzy, ich bin leider aus den Manuals nicht ganz schlau geworden was speziell das Thema Ersetzen von Bildern angeht. Um nichts kaputt zu machen, habe ich es sicherheitshalber unter einem neuen Namen gespeichert. Aber so ist es natürlich besser. --Michael 12:45, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

deprecated function in your monobook.js edit

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Tezuka-osamu-clock-kyoto-stn.jpg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Tezuka-osamu-clock-kyoto-stn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

Teofilo (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please link images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Lyzzy!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Lyzzy oder Alice Wiegand!

mein name ist natalia zimmermann, ich bin studentin der fachhochschule köln, wir machen zurzeit ein projekt das sich mit der problematik zwischen stadt köln und stadt düsseldorf beschäftigt. im rahmen dieser arbeit bin ich für das design verantwortlich, ich habe dein foto gefunden, und wollte dich fragen ob das ok ist, wenn wir das für unser projekt verwenden und im rahmen dieser arbeit im internet veröffentlichen, natürlich nur mit der angabe deines namens! meine email adresse ist: natasha.zimm@web.de ich freue mich auf deine antwort

Urheberrechtsverletzung edit

http://www.duesseldorf-reisefuehrer.de/kunstsammlung_nrw.html bzw. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:K21_Staendehaus.jpg, siehe auch http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Weiternutzung/M%C3%A4ngel#www.heidelberg-reisefuehrer.com --Johannes Götte (talk) 14:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Erteilte Freigabe edit

Hallo Lyzzy, am 3. Juli 2011 habe ich das Bild File:Bescheinigung für Margarete Haeberlin.jpg hochgeladen und im Artikel de:Margarete Rudolphi eingepflegt. Dieses Bild – ein Zeugnis für Margarete Haeberlin von 1894 - ist nun leider am 2. Sept. gelöscht worden, mit der Begründung, eine Genehmigung zur Weiterverwendung sei beim OTRS nicht eingegangen. Vermutlich hat der Bearbeiter die Freigabe übersehen, denn der Rechteinhaber Joachim B. Rudolphi hat die Weiternutzung bereits am 5. Juli erteilt - steht auf dem selben Mailanhang mit der Freigabe für das Gemälde File:Wolfram Rudolphi.jpg. Würdest Du bitte noch einmal auf der Mail von Herrn Rudolphi nachsehen und das Bild „Bescheinigung für Margarete Haeberlin“ ggf. wieder herstellen? Danke, und lieben Gruß --Suse (talk) 12:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Suse, wird geprüft. --Lyzzy (talk) 16:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Ra'ike hat es wieder hergestellt. Vermutlich ist es einfach übersehen worden bei der Abarbeitung. Kannst du dich um die Wiedereingliederung im Artikel kümmern? --Lyzzy (talk) 19:40, 13 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Danke Dir, Lyzzy. Das Zeugnis ist wieder im Artikel. LG --Suse (talk) 07:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Permission to use Kombu.jpg edit

Dear Lyzzy,

I am Joue Huey, I wish to use your photo Kombu.jpg. It will be use in a science textbook where I mentioned kelp contain high level of iodine. Please contact me at jouehuey.yeoh@pearson.com

Thank you.

Joue Huey

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open edit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RaR 2013 Fettes Brot 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 19:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion edit

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RaR 2013 Besucher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RaR 2013 Leslie Clio 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Austrian stamps edit

I left a message for you at: Commons:Deletion requests/File:150years-Austrian-stamps.jpg. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement edit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open! edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

note to self edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement edit

Picture of the Year 2013 Results edit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Lyzzy,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Structured Data on Commons Newsletter, July 19, 2017 edit

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons? edit

The millions of files on Wikimedia Commons are described with a lot of information or (meta)data. With the project Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons, this data is structured more, and is made machine-readable. This will make it easier to view, search (also multilingually), edit, organize and re-use the files on Commons.

In early 2017, the Sloan Foundation funded this project (see documentation). Development takes place in 2017–2020. It involves staff from the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Deutschland (WMDE) and many volunteers. To achieve this, Wikibase support is added to Wikimedia Commons. Wikibase is the technology that is also used for Wikidata.

Recent developments: groundwork edit

  • A new and crucial technical step (federation) now makes it possible to reference data from one Wikibase website in another. Because of this, it will be possible to use Wikidata's items and properties to describe media files on Commons.
  • Another important piece of groundwork is under development: so-called Multi-Content Revisions. This feature allows structured data to be stored alongside wiki text, so that one wiki page can contain several types of content.

Team updates edit

  • Amanda Bittaker was hired as Program Manager for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. Amanda will take care of the overall management of the project.
  • Sandra Fauconnier (known as Spinster in her volunteer capacity) is the new Community Liaison. She will support the collaboration between the communities (Commons, Wikidata, GLAM) and the product development teams at the Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia Deutschland.
  • We have open positions for a UX designer and a Product Manager!

Talking with communities and allies edit

  • Long-term feedback from GLAMs. Besides the Wikimedia community, many external cultural and knowledge institutions (GLAMs - Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) are interested in Structured Data on Commons and are willing to provide feedback on the long-term plans for the project. Alex Stinson, GLAM strategist at the Wikimedia Foundation, is currently in contact with Europeana, DPLA, the Smithsonian and the National Archives of the United States. Alex is also looking for other GLAM institutions who might be able to advise on the long term. If you know of an institution or partner that may be appropriate for consultation, do get in touch with Alex.
  • Jonathan Morgan, design researcher, is starting to work on two projects:

What comes next? edit

  • The Structured Data on Commons team meets in the week after Wikimania to lay the groundwork for the next steps. This includes new backend development and design work, for better and more clear integration of the structured data in pages on Wikimedia Commons.
  • The project's information pages on Wikimedia Commons will receive a long overdue update in the upcoming months. The team will also work on more and better communication channels. Feedback, wishes and tips are welcome at the project's general talk page.

Get involved edit

Many greetings from SandraF (WMF) (talk), Community Liaison for this project! 13:55, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Structured Commons newsletter, October 25, 2017 edit

Welcome to the newsletter for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons! You can update your subscription to the newsletter. Do inform others who you think will want to be involved in the project!

Community updates
Things to do / input and feedback requests
Presentations / Press / Events
 
Audience at Structured Commons design discussion, Wikimania 2017
Team updates
 
The Structured Commons team at Wikimania 2017

Two new people have been hired for the Structured Data on Commons team. We are now complete! :-)

  • Ramsey Isler is the new Product Manager of the Multimedia team.
  • Pamela Drouin was hired as User Interface Designer. She works at the Multimedia team as well, and her work will focus on the Structured Commons project.
Partners and allies
  • We are still welcoming (more) staff from GLAMs (Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) to become part of our long-term focus group (phabricator task T174134). You will be kept in the loop of the project, and receive regular small surveys and requests for feedback. Get in touch with Sandra if you're interested - your input in helping to shape this project is highly valued!
Research

Design research is ongoing.

  • Jonathan Morgan and Niharika Ved have held interviews with various GLAM staff about their batch upload workflows and will finish and report on these in this quarter. (phabricator task T159495)
  • At this moment, there is also an online survey for GLAM staff, Wikimedians in Residence, and GLAM volunteers who upload media collections to Wikimedia Commons. The results will be used to understand how we can improve this experience. (phabricator task T175188)
  • Upcoming: interviews with Wikimedia volunteers who curate media on Commons (including tool developers), talking about activities and workflows. (phabricator task T175185)
Development

In Autumn 2017, the Structured Commons development team works on the following major tasks (see also the quarterly goals for the team):

  • Getting Multi-Content Revisions sufficiently ready, so that the Multimedia and Search Platform teams can start using it to test and prototype things.
  • Determine metrics and metrics baseline for Commons (phabricator task T174519).
  • The multimedia team at WMF is gaining expertise in Wikibase, and unblocking further development for Structured Commons, by completing the MediaInfo extension for Wikibase.
Stay up to date!

Warmly, your community liaison, SandraF (WMF) (talk)

Message sent by MediaWiki message delivery - 14:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Flevoland-1070219.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Flevoland-1070219.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flevoland-1070219.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:06, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Pane Pugliese.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:Pane Pugliese.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pane Pugliese.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Teewurst pic. edit

En Paraguay una empresa de ventas tipo market está usando la foto del teewurst pra promocionar un producto. 181.124.152.102 18:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://www.casarica.com.py/pate-ahumado-willy-teewurst-p11411 181.124.152.102 18:57, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply