Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:MKFI

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MKFI!

File:57 45 Bridgeport.JPGEdit

Hi, this looks to me like a standard 6-pounder Hotchkiss gun, not a Nordenfelt. The breech and barrel of the two guns are distinctive. Where did the Nodenfelt info come from ? regards, Rod Rcbutcher (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Most likely my mistake. My source is a book of coastal artillery guns used in Finland by Enqvist, Ove: Itsenäisen Suomen rannikkotykit 1918-1998, Sotamuseo (1999), ISBN 951-25-1033-2, and the information plaque in the Kuivasaari coastal artillery museum. Both sources mention only that "Hotchkiss and Nordenfelt guns or copies of them were manufactured in many countries. Finland had three 57 mm "Bridgeport" guns and two 57 mm "Derby" guns. These guns were converted to fire the same ammunition used in 57 mm Nordenfelt guns." The sources I have do not describe whether the Bridgeport or Derby guns were based on Nordenfelt or Hotchkiss design, and I may have jumped to Nordenfelt conclusion from the ammunition used. MKFI (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
OK, that makes sense. I think there was a gun factory in Bridgeport which had the licence to build Hotchkiss guns. Keep taking the great photos ! regards, Rod Rcbutcher (talk) 01:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:100 56 TK on Kuivasaari island, FinlandEdit

I appreciate your suggestion but I stand by my decision. And let me tell you why: For one if the category refers to this specific 100 56 TK than it can also be linked to the Kuivasaari category, I don't see why this picture should be in the main category of pictures taken on or of Kuivasaari island. Also if someone decides to upload another picture of this specific artillery piece than he/she will only have to worry about this single category. The only reason that I can see for creating a Category:100 56 TK is if there were pictures of other artillery pieces of the same type located at different locations.

Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 18:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

While creating a specific category for the 100 56 TK guns on Kuivasaari island does reduce over-categorization, I am concerned that the subject of 100 56 TK has no base category. Category:100 56 TK on Kuivasaari island, Finland is a somewhat clumsy search term, and for articles in wikis on 100 56 TK it would seem more obvious for the image category to have the same name. MKFI (talk) 19:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
We can always create a general Category:100 56 TK and put the Category:100 56 TK on Kuivasaari island, Finland in it. I think that's a reasonable compromise.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 22:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

NiceEdit

Hi MKFI ! Nice to find some help here. Are you shure about the sorting system ? Best regards from Germany see:



 Wiki-Diskussionseiten Militärgeschichte / Waffen International 
    Discussions:  Military history / Firearms
       Diskussionen:  Militär / Waffen
       Discussions:    Histoire militaire / Armes
       Discussioni:     Guerra / Armi da fuoco
       Dyskusje:        Militaria / Broń
       Обсуждения:   Военная история

Perhaps there is a place for Finland ? --Gruß Tom (talk) 18:05, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

I am not sure about the "by calibre" sub-category sorting system; that is why I have not made changes to other sub categories outside subs in Category:Artillery by calibre 100↔200 mm. Do you have other ideas? I think it would be best to either separate sub "by calibre" categories from weapon categories or make the base calibre x↔y categories contain only sub by calibre categories (ie. metacategory). MKFI (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
OK we developed this system in german cats see [1] as part of systmatics for artillery. Of course there remains the need of a systematic for the different types of weapons. The primary level cat system we uses the technical view. Secondary view are themes as countrys, or areas of interest. In you like to you can have a look to the rules we made in order to have a logical treatment within the hole system see: de: or fi:(googletrans) . The advantage of the system by caliber is that allmost every artillery weapon can be asorted. Even those you never heard before. Because the normal caliber range for artillery is from 20 mm to 300 and above it is good to have this separeted from handguns for this area there are some calibers which can apear on both sides but such is live. see handgun ammo tables: [2] [3] [4]. OK your turn to speak ;-) --Gruß Tom (talk) 19:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
OK, that seems sensible enough system. For the commons by calibre categories what (I think) might cause confusion is that there is the base Category:Artillery by calibre, which only contains "by calibre" categories (currently at least). The sub "Artillery by calibre x↔y mm" categories contain both sub "x mm artillery" categories (which the german wikipedia does not have, though the english wikipedia uses them), weapon categories and files. Should we maintain this current system or should the "Artillery by calibre x↔y mm" categories contain only "x mm artillery" categories?
If we maintain the current system, should the "x mm artillery" categories be separated from the other contents by sorting them so they show in the beginning of the category listing, using some other method, or not separated at all?
Finally there are now both the new "x mm artillery" categories, but also the few older "x inch artillery" categories. Should the "by inch" categories be converted into category redirects? It seems pointless to maintain both, and several countries have converted from standard to metric system but maintained the old measurements (ie. 6 inch gun -> 152 mm gun).MKFI (talk) 20:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
In my (and others) opion a conversion of the inch system should not be done. It is historic, that we have differnt systems with firearms, beginning with stonebullets to "bore x system", "inch", "gauge", "pounder", "millimeter". It is unique to have all them togehter (asorted by our service with millimeters in the background). I'afraid i did not really understand the problem concerning "Category:Artillery by calibre" itself. If i look from the view of Category:Artillery everthing seems to be fine to me. Please explain once more and try easy ;-) (Sorry) --Gruß Tom (talk) 20:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

From your first note "Are you shure about the sorting system", I got the impression that you disapproved when I sorted the Category:120 mm artillery and others with |*120 so that they appear first on the parent category list. Did I misunderstand?

And I see that the Category:Artillery does indeed contain a variety of content. In that case there is no problem with the contents of "Artillery by calibre x↔y mm" categories. I was a bit too eager to over-categorize things. MKFI (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

I was not disapproved - no problem - your idea with the asterix differs a little as i am used to do - but in the end it shows up the same systematic. BTW .. Just while looking around in the "high end" caliber range we both can see that the en:system is weak. above 300 there is only the "305" which makes sense for a subcat. Also good to see the modern and historic calibers in comparasation. I am shure this system has a good chance to be accepted by our users. Please explain once more if any problems a still to be seen. --Gruß Tom (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
P.S. FYI: I left a note on Category talk:Artillery by calibre. Feel free to add something if you like to. Best regards --Gruß Tom (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Just a misunderstanding on my part then. And enwiki system definately does have its disadvantages. In that case I think we can conclude that the current system used in commons is OK and there are no problems. MKFI (talk) 21:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Thx (if you like to go on with "cosorting" your help is welcome) --Gruß Tom (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

once more i've seen you working for hours. It seems to to be ~90% complete. Some "Nut cracking" will remain for time of slow growing. It was a pleasure to meet you. Regards --Gruß Tom (talk) 13:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pori ja Jenny Wihuri.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Request help identifying artillery fuzesEdit

Rod,

I have uploaded some pictures of sectioned artillery fuzes that I took in Finnish artillery museum in Hämeenlinna. Unfortunately the fuzes were not labeled and the museum weekend staff could not help me. I have created the Category:Unidentified fuzes for them. I pestered the museum staff by email later and found that the fuzes are mostly from light caliber (75-105 mm) shells. I got some details of one (File:Artillery fuze Hämeenlinna 13.jpg), but did not press the issue on others. Given the mix-and-match of equipment used by Finnish army these fuzes could be Russian/Soviet, British, French, German, Swedish, Finnish, American, even Austro-Hungarian or Japanese (and that's just presuming they were actually used by Finland and not acquired by the museum later).

You seem to know quite a lot of artillery fuzes based on your edits. If you can find anything of these, it would be most appriciated. MKFI (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, great photos, it's really sad the museum doesn't have info about them... I only know about British WWI stuff - my grandfather was an 18-pounder gunner, my father was on merchant ships in WWII which were armed with old WWI guns, and my research has been geared to that... the only photo I have any idea about is File:Artillery fuze Hämeenlinna 12.jpg - looks like a Krupp design circa. 1905 for a long-range shrapnel or airburst HE shell (3 timer rings, both time and percussion action). Similar to British No. 80 (File:No80FuzeMkVL.jpg), with extra ring, but the threads are bigger (i.e. fewer per inch) than the British fuze. File:Artillery fuze Hämeenlinna 14.jpg. File:Artillery fuze Hämeenlinna 15.jpg and File:Artillery fuze Hämeenlinna 4.jpg look like French mortar bomb fuzes. regards, Rod Rcbutcher (talk) 05:57, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the help. I added Category:Fuzes of Germany or Category:Fuzes of France to files you listed, but left them still in the unidentified category in case someone else has further information of them. MKFI (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File:17 cm Minenwerfer Hämeenlinna 2.JPGEdit

Hello, are you sure this is indeed the later n/A model ? The barrel looks very short, in fact it looks like the a/A model. Regards, Rod Rcbutcher (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The museum information plaque does list it as 4.5 caliber barrel, but does not otherwise specify whether it is a/A or n/a. It is quite possible that the museum information tablet is in error. MKFI (talk) 16:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Great tip!Edit

[5] - news came out like thunder. Now I have the Magic Green Harmless Button - never leave home without it! Great. If only I knew what it's good for ;) Thanks again, NVO (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:Commons:Deletion requests/File:080720teachersinBPMS.jpgEdit

Hi, MKFI. I guess the ip user just simply copy and paste the tag from File:080720teachersinBPMS.jpg. I am not intending to delete those files tagged by the anno-IP since they are not massive group pictures used in one article. : ) -Mys 721tx (talk) 01:36, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Kristina Regina Eteläsatama 1.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

finally used CatscanEdit

works great. Looking for a particular picture of a fluoride, but NOT a structural formuala. And there are like 50 subcats of fluoride. Could scan images very fast after using catscan! thanks.TCO (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Mercedes-Benz Econic airport tanker Malmi 2.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:19, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


File:Mercedes-Benz Econic airport tanker Malmi 1.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sami Kontio Challenge pylon race round 2 D-EZOZ 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sami Kontio Challenge pylon race round 2 OH-SKA 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sami Kontio Challenge pylon race round 3 D-EZOZ 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Bailengzhun from below.jpg.jpgEdit

Can you please make sure that I am correct?Please fill out the correct File Name,File:Bailengzhun from below.jpg.—Yiken (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

    • Thank you.—Yiken (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Louhi ja HalliEdit

Katselin nuo Louhen ja Hallin kuvat läpi ja täydensin tietoja sen verran mitä osasin. Lamorin vehkeitähän nuo enimmäkseen ovat. Tarkempia speksejä löytyy mm. Lamorin uutislehtisestä, joka on osittain copypastettu sanasta sanaan meikäläisen kirjoittamasta Wikipedia-artikkelista. Tupsumato (talk) 19:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Flag of Denmark.svgEdit

Apparently SouthSudan has reverted your revert and the flag is now back to his version with the wrong proportions. Is there any way to convince this user that the flag shouldn't look like that? ElMa-sa (talk) 13:17, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I left a note on User talk:SouthSudan. Another user has already reverted the flag. If this happens again you can revert the image yourself (the "revert" link left of the old file version thumbnail), and ask for help at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. MKFI (talk) 13:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Micro Design ImprovementsEdit

Hey, MKFI :). Just a note that I've replied here; I appreciate MediaWiki.org isn't a place most people use, and so I'm trying out notifying people on their "home" projects when I've left a message there. Let me know if you want me to stop :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

And again :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:45, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

File:IMKL-2103 Forum Marinum 2.JPGEdit

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Kuvat sivuttainEdit

Moi, huomasin että ottamasi pystykuvat (eivät kaikki mutta esim File:Aktia Eteläsatama 2.JPG, File:Aktia Eteläsatama 3.JPG, File:Rautauoma equipment.JPG, File:MiG-21bis (MG-130) Verkkokauppa left wheel 1.JPG jne..) menee sivuttain kun ne avaa isoksi. Tiedostosivulla ja pienoiskuvassa ne ovat kuitenkin oikeinpäin. Oletko muistanut kääntä kuvat oikeinpäin kun olet ladannut ne koneelle? –Makele-90 (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Kuvat on käännetty kamerassa suoraan EXIFissä: "Orientation Rotated 90° CW". Riippuu käytettävästä ohjelmasta osaako se näyttää kuvan oikein. Mediawikin kuvaskaalain osaa nykyään huomioda exif-käännöksen joten aiempaa kuvan "fyysistä" käännöstä ei enää tarvitse tehdä: Commons:Rotation. MKFI (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
En tiennytkään, että 60D:stä löytyy tuollaisia ominaisuuksia :D Mutta näkyykö myös sinulle kuvat sivuttain kun niitä katsoo korkeatarkkuuksisena versiona? Varmaan tohonkin saa jonkun ohjelman kääntämään kuvan oikeinpäin. –Makele-90 (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
Onhan tuo automaattinen exif-kääntö löytynyt pokkareistakin jo ainakin parin vuoden ajan, jos ei ehkä välttämättä oletuksena. Selaimet eivät tosiaan osaa kääntää kuvaa exiffin perusteella vaan näyttävät sen kyljellään, mutta esimerkiksi xnview näyttää kuvat oikein. MKFI (talk) 10:30, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Patsaiden kuvatEdit

Hei MKFI. Olen uusi käyttäjä wikimedia commonsissa ja olet kommentoinut minun ottamia patsaiden tekijänoikeusrajoituksia. Jos huomaat tekijänoikeuslain vastaisia ongelma voit minun puolestani poistaa kuvat. Rakennukset ovat kai vapaita ilman tekijänoikeudesta. --Paasikivi (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Vastasin omalla keskustelusivullasi. MKFI (talk) 09:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Yllätys by Into Saxelin.JPGEdit

  File:Yllätys by Into Saxelin.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A333 (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Karhu Oskar Raja-aho.JPGEdit

  File:Karhu Oskar Raja-aho.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A333 (talk) 12:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A333 (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

VedenkantajaEdit

Hei. Sulla on kaksi hyvää kuvaa Viktor Malmbergin Vedenkantajasta täällä Commonsissa. Wiki loves Public art -projektin yhteydessä tuli ilmi, että ko. patsas on paljastettu 1924 (eli vuoden 1922 jälkeen) ja Malmberg kuoli 1936 (eli myöhemmin kuin 1925), joten patsas oli Suomessa tekijänoikeuden alla vielä 1.1.1996 (ns. URAA-päivänä) joten se vapautuu tekijänoikeuden rajoituksita vasta 95 vuotta julkaisusta eli 1. tammikuuta 2020. Koska kuvat ovat käytössä artikkeleissa, niin voitko mahdollisesti käydä tallentamassa ne Fi-wikiin (ja toinen on sv-wikissä), niin voi pyytää niiden poistoa Commonsista? Mieluummin niin kuin että minä soheltaisin. Yt, -Htm (talk) 23:43, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Tallennettu, fi:Tiedosto:Vedenkantaja by Viktor Malmberg fi-wiki.JPG ja fi:Tiedosto:Vedenkantaja Viktor Malmberg fi-wiki.JPG. Samalle nimelle Commonsin tiedostojen kanssa en pystynyt tallentamaan. Artikkeleissa on yhä Commonsin kuvien viittaukset. MKFI (talk) 11:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Kiva, kiitos. - Vaihdoin artikkeleihin fi-wikin viittaukset. Vaihdoin kuvatiedostoihin myös käyttämäsi pd/oma mallineen tilalle pd/luopunut (sisältö on sama, mutta siinä mallineessa ei kehoteta tallentamaan kuvaa commonsiin, koska se ei URAA:n takia käy). Tiedoston kaksoiskappaleelle täytyy näköjään keksiä oma nimi joka wikiin. -Laitan commons-kuville poistopyynnön. - Mullekin tuli vähän siivousta, olen tallentanut fi-wikiin muutaman URAA-kuvan ja pitää vähän fiksailla niiden mallineita. Tuo URAA-malline oli mulle uusi, mutta aina sitä oppii. -Htm (talk) 16:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Monacon tekijän oikeuslakiEdit

Hei minulla on julkaisemattomia kuvia Monacosta ja enkä löytänyt Monacon tekijänoikeus politiikkaa freedom of panoramasta onko osa Ranskan tekijänoikeuslakia vai onko Monacolla oma. Kiitos --Paasikivi (talk) 12:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Tähän en löytänyt selvää vastausta, mutta ilmeisesti Ranskan laki ei kelpaa: Commons talk:Freedom of panorama/Archive 1#Monaco. Kannattaa vielä kysyä asiasta muilta: Commons:Village pump/Copyright. MKFI (talk) 12:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Anders Donner portrait by Eero Järnefelt.JPGEdit

  File:Anders Donner portrait by Eero Järnefelt.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Tämän voisi varmaan tallentaa fi-wikiin varustettuna URAA- ja PD/luopunut mallineilla? /Transfer to fi-wiki is possible? -Htm (talk) 03:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Tallennettu, fi:Tiedosto:Anders Donner portrait by Eero Järnefelt.JPG. MKFI (talk) 20:11, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
.Hianoa! - Htm (talk) 18:17, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Burger KingEdit

Hei,

Täytyy kysyä sinulta: miten ihmeessä uusin kuvani File:Queue to Burger King in Helsinki, Finland.jpg liittyy Suomen puolustusvoimiin? JIP (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Mannerheimintie sen tekee. OgreBot-ohjelma etsii automaattisesti User:MKFI/Military of Finland galleriasivuille kaikki uudet kuvat jotka Category:Military of Finland luokan alta löytyvät. Tässä tapauksessa näyttäisi siltä että polkuna on ollut Category:Military people of Finland -> Category:Generals of Finland -> Category:Carl Gustaf Emil Mannerheim -> Category:Mannerheimintie -> File:Queue to Burger King in Helsinki, Finland.jpg. MKFI (talk) 19:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sulkavan_kirkon_krusifiksi.JPGEdit

Could you check this? Does not like anything I have seen in Sulkava at all. Thanks. --Periegetes (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC) https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sulkavan_kirkon_krusifiksi.JPG&uselang=fi

It is from Sulkava church, on the right side of the smaller pulpit right of altar. Just barely visible on this picture (partly behind a column). Section moved to the end of the page. MKFI (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Airbrakes and spoilersEdit

Morning MKFI. I've responded to this on my talk page. Cheers,TSRL (talk) 09:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

FYI eli tiedoksiEdit

Onneksi olkoon, kirkkokuvasi on päässyt Hesariin [6]. Keskustelua aiheesta myös Kahvihuoneessa. Regards, -Htm (talk) 15:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Finnish Hurricanes G-CBOE (aircraft)Edit

I understand that this is a repaint. I had tagged it in that category for ease of use in finding it due to the fact that there are only one photo of a genuine Hawker Hurricane is Finnish use. Articseahorse (talk) 12:49, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

OK. MKFI (talk) 14:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Police vans in FinlandEdit

Hello!

Vans are not automobiles (nor trucks), that's why I created the "Vans in Finland": the purpose was to remove the vans from the automobiles... So why did you give this category the Police automobiles in Finland as parent?
Wouldn't it be better then to create a "Police vehicles in Finland", if you thing "Police in Finland" is too unclear? This way, "Police boats in Finland‎" and "Police motorcycles in Finland‎" could be gathered with this category too...
Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 08:58, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

A difference in definition it seems. I considered "automobile" to be a parent concept which includes personal cars, vans, trucks and buses as sub-types. If this is not the case then my edit can be reverted. MKFI (talk) 09:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, as almost all categories using "Automobiles" in their name claim that this category uses the term "automobile", instead of the term "car", I now "hear" automobiles as (personal) cars. That's why I prefer using "vehicles" as parent category. The name "Land vehicle" is also used to limit the scope in another way, but I really think it's a weird name.
I'll create a "Police vehicle in Finland" so things will be more clear (at least I hope so  ).
Regards,
BarnCas (talk) 10:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Astrid Thors.JPGEdit

  File:Astrid Thors.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)


Code issues in User:MKFI/common.jsEdit

Hi MKFI, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:MKFI/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new jshint issues -- the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 7 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
  2. ISSUE: line 10 character 48: ['href'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: var googleImagesUrl = googleImagesBt.attributes["href"].value;
  3. ISSUE: line 12 character 27: ['href'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: googleImagesUrl.attributes["href"].value = googleImagesUrl;

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 11:53, 20 April 2015 (UTC).


Code issues in User:MKFI/common.jsEdit

Hi MKFI, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:MKFI/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue -- the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 11 column 32: Unexpected token ;

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 12:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC).


Code issues in User:MKFI/common.jsEdit

Hi MKFI, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:MKFI/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 2 new jshint issues -- the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 7 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
  2. ISSUE: line 13 character 52: ['href'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: var googleImagesUrl = googleImagesBt.attributes["href"].value;
  3. ISSUE: line 15 character 31: ['href'] is better written in dot notation. - Evidence: googleImagesUrl.attributes["href"].value = googleImagesUrl;

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 13:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC).

ThanksEdit

Thanks for helping me. Ainsleykg (talk) 14:58, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of Finland Air force squadrons without squadron emblem.svgEdit

Greetings! Will you back me up in deletion request? I could really use your help. This file is hanging here just because of one man's stubbornness. But I am sure we have enough expertise to fight this stubbornness. The cause is just. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this one is worth spending too much effort on. At least the file doesn't claim to be an actually used flag. MKFI (talk) 18:37, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately it is. Before I started cleaning up this category, there were all king of rubbish there. Vanadium were eliminated fast, but this one is uploaded be mistake and was used as the "Flag of the Finnish Air Force" some people like to think that the FAF has a branch flag, like the RAF or USAF and they were quick in placing it in their national Wikipedias. But this is deeply misguiding and creates an alternative reality. If the file will remain in Commons someone will return to using it just because "it's looks nice". I want to protect FAF articles from it. Hope you understand. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 18:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Suomen poliisi.svgEdit

The file Suomen poliisi.svg is not an exact duplicate version of the Suomen poliisin miekkatunnus.svg:
the Suomen poliisi.svg has a white colour (with blue contours), but the Suomen poliisin miekkatunnus.svg is transparent.
Infact, perhaps the colour of the Suomen poliisi.svg should be argent (silver), white metal (gray) instead of white, look at the file Supo old badge.svg:  .
--Coat af arms (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

HYLJE (ship)Edit

  • Hi MKFI, can you read these rules for ship names before you are going to revert my edition:

rulesEdit

A. When to create a category for a specific shipIf you know the name of a ship in a photo, you might want to create a category for the ship.

B. How to name the category

1.In general, name the category with the ship's name as painted on the vessel (when the picture was taken). Sample: This photo shows "Isla de Botafoc" in 2008. The category is named "Isla de Botafoc (ship, 1980)". This even if the ship had other names before and afterwards. 2.The general format for category titles is "<name of ship> (ship, <year>)". <year> is the year the ship was completed, see Category:Ships by year built for further information. Samples: "Golden Hind (ship, 1973)" or "Pacific Dawn (ship, 1991)". 3."<name of ship> (ship, <year>)" is a naming convention rather than a disambiguation rule. "(ship, <year>)" is added even if there is no other category named "<name of ship>". The "<name of ship>" may already mean ship. Samples: "Norwood (ship, 1899)" or "Europic Ferry (ship, 1968)" or "Mein Schiff 2 (ship, 1997)" or "The Big Red Boat II (ship, 1966)". 4.Submarines use "<name> (submarine, <year>)" and tugs/towboats use "<name> (tugboat, <year>)". All other types are identified by category:Ships by type. Samples: "Akula (submarine, 1909)" or "Cape Romain (tugboat, 1979)". 5.Fishing ships display their license number. Categories for these have the format "<license number> <name> (ship, <year>)" (see Category:Fishing vessels by license number). Sample: This image shows "N206", the category is named "N206 Castle Bay (ship, 1965)". 6.Prefixes are generally omitted. Samples: "Titanic (ship, 1912)" instead of "RMS Titanic (ship, 1912)". Rather "Ammonia (ship, 1929)" than "DF Ammonia (ship, 1929)" or "SF Ammonia (ship, 1929)" . Exception: If the name as painted on the ship always includes the "prefix", the category name includes it as well. Sample: MS. Volendam (ship, 1990) as the name on the vessel reads "MS. Volendam". 7.If there are several ships with the same name built in the same year, the place where the ship was built/location of the shipyard is added: "<name of ship> (ship, <year>, <place>)". Sample: "Mistral (ship, 1999, Saint-Nazaire)" as there are several Mistral (ship, 1999). In the rare case that there are several ships with the same name built the same year at the same place, the yard number is also added: "<name of ship> (ship, <year>, <place>, <yard number>)". Sample: "Stena Transporter (ship, 1978, Ulsan, 649)" and Stena Transporter (ship, 1978, Ulsan, 651). 8.If you don't know the year the ship was built or can't find it, just use "<name> (ship)". Sample: "Ben Campbell (ship)".

best regards,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:43, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

HyljeEdit

I don't see this data:
IMO number : 8006804
Name of ship : HYLJE (during 1981)
External marking : 799
Call Sign :OIMG
MMSI : 230353000
Gross tonnage : 726
DWT : 984
Type of ship : Pollution Control Vessel
Builder : Laivateollisuus Oy
Year of build : 1981
Flag : Finland  
Port of registry : Upinniemi
Status of ship : In Service/Commission
Registered owner : Finnish Ministry of the Environment
This is not good, I think, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

PjotrMahh1 I was under the impression that naval ships follow the convention of ship name + pennant number: Category:USS Elrod (FFG-55), Category:HMS Broadsword (F88), Category:Pori (83). I should note that if you create a new category to replace an existing one it would be in my opinion better to use category redirects instead of deleting the old one. I have added the missing info, sorry about that. MKFI (talk) 07:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
  • Hei MKFI, sorry I don't see, does Hylje has a naval ensign or flag of Finland? Photo by Aleksi Lindström, he wrote FNS HYLJE. Naval vessel with flag of Finland. Is it correct? Thanks,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 09:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hylje is a Finnish navy ship, yes. MKFI (talk) 20:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ErickSatiEdit

Hey MKFI, wikipedia is telling me that theres a request for deletion on my uploads of Edwards Manufacturing Company's photos. I've submitted the files to Wikimedia commons [Ticket#: 2016063010014361] to try to not get them taken down. Is there something more that needs to be done to allow these pictures to exist on wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErickSati (talk • contribs) 18:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion RequestEdit

Can you please explain to me, in the simplest terms as I'm having trouble finding the answer myself, why you had my film posters deleted from Wikimedia? How do others upload film posters to Wikipedia articles? What did I do wrong and what do I need to do to fix it? I own the rights to the film posters, what copyright am I violating? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLachrymistFilm (talk • contribs) 18:52, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

TheLachrymistFilm, if you have the rights you need to send OTRS ticket so we have an actual confirmation and record of that. Since the posters were not actually created by you personally you need to include the artists in OTRS as well. If the OTRS ticket is accepted the files can be restored.
An easier way might be to upload one posters locally in English Wikipedia under US fair use law. (In Commons fair use is not allowed.) This is how most modern film posters are uploaded, for example Independence Day (1996 film) poster is an English Wikipedia local file (en:File:Independence day movieposter.jpg) and not available in Commons.
Many film posters in Commons are in fact copyright violations which have not yet been caught. We get a lot of film posters / CD covers / concert posters etc. which are copyright violations and legitimate uploads can get caught up as well.
Sorry if this is confusing, but the copyright law (especially all the different variations around the world) is not simplest thing. MKFI (talk) 19:21, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

You deleted file:GPS - APRS - Radio - data - sanomaserveri - Kaavio tnx Matti OH3EGY.pngEdit

Dear Sir,

You have deleted the drawing my friend Matti Pyykkonen kindly made with effort to describe readers emergency comms message handling.

There was nothing wrong with rights to publish it. Why did you delete it? I clearly wrote on it about permission and linked it to his page! Did you ever read it? I have been writing, illustrating and and co-authoring printed media for decades and I am quite familiar with the rules of crediting pics for their copyright owners.

We can not get the pic back after your deletion. Neither me or Matti himself managed to restore it. Hitting help buttons all we get is page after page of incomprehensible computer code! So I kindly ask you to put the pic back, please!

Regards,

- Juha Hartikka

OH7HJ Finland — Preceding unsigned comment added by OH7HJ (talk • contribs) 20:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Vastasin omalla keskustelusivullasi. MKFI (talk) 22:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Belgian Armed Forces picturesEdit

I don't understand why you deleted all those pictures... it was alot of work finding correct pictures and uploading all of them... none of them had watermarks on them.

Instead of deleting everything and telling me "this is your last warning" mind giving me some advice on how I can find pictures free of copyright using google image search? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DomeResident (talk • contribs) 23:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

DomeResident, by default everything is copyrighted. Watermarks are irrelevant. You must find an image with explicit free license claim or have the copyright owner send OTRS permission. Neither of these are easy ways.
Almost everything you can find in the internet is copyrighted and unless you are the copyright owner you can't take a picture from the net and upload it to Commons with a free license. Government works are also usually copyrighted (United States is the big exception).
You can try to find something with Google image search by adding CC-license (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA) to search terms. MKFI (talk) 06:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Ok I will try adding CC-license (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA) to my google image search terms. Is there a possiblity if I send an email to the copyright owner of all the photographs on the website of the Belgian Armed Forces (www.mil.be) that he/she can give me an OTRS permission for ALL the photographs on their website? It would be kind of ridiculous that I would have to get an individual permission email for every single photo that I would like to use on wikipedia... --DomeResident (talk) 08:29, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

DomeResident, yes it is possible to ask for a blanket permission. Whether the copyright owner agrees to grant it is another thing. MKFI (talk) 08:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion request for FoB for B&B.jpgEdit

Hello MKFI I understand you may be keen to ensure material is not used without the consent of the owner and in this case, the schematic of the Battle of the Ford of the Biscuits was used in a blog on the Ancient Clan O'Neill website. However I wrote the blog, I am Dr. James O'Neill fro University College Cork. After posting 'Maguire, MacBaron and Henry Duke's crackers' I decided to update the FoB Wiki site and share by map which I created using Photoshop and 1:10000 scale Northern Ireland OS contours. Since the map is already out in the public domain I have no problem sharing it with the Wiki community. Consequently, I would appreciate it if you would remove your delete request.

regards

Dr. James O'Neill — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galloglass1598 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello,
I have responded on the deletion request page. Please send OTRS permission so we have a record of the license. MKFI (talk) 09:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Monte Carlo vodka deletionEdit

(Comment moved to the end of the page)

Hello, Rainier Enterprises is the owner of Monte Carlo vodka , Certificate of Registration US Copyrights NO. VA 1-901-109 Please explain why you delite our file, Best Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcv369 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. MKFI (talk) 17:48, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Anttikokkomaki.jpgEdit

Kyseisen kuvan käytöstä on sovittu valokuvaajan, Joonas Salo, kanssa. Käyttöoikeudet ovat siis kunnossa. Marttipop (talk) 06:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Vastasin omalla keskustelusivullasi. MKFI (talk) 08:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

The Emperors of Bedlam Book Cover - Deletion RequestEdit

Hello. The copyright and uploaded book cover for The Emperors of Bedlam, published October 1, 2016 is wholly owned by Fugue Publishing (FuguePub is our Wikipedia user account). We are in the process of creating an entry for "The Emperors of Bedlam" book series that will include such book cover. We ask that you please not delete this image.

Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FuguePub (talk • contribs) 22:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

FuguePub, if you own the copyrights for the image please comment in the deletion discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Emperors of Bedlam - Book Cover.jpg. In order to prove that you are authorized to upload this we usually require OTRS permission. MKFI (talk) 07:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletionEdit

Hi I just create two nomination for deletion pages and added them here. But the page looks like something went wrong. Can you fix it please? Thanks. --85.101.109.144 09:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Fixed. The deletion subpages were missing headers. MKFI (talk) 10:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Kuvasi ovat päätyneet kirjaanEdit

Hei, sinua ehkä kiinnostaa tietää, että tänä vuonna julkaistu tietokirja Maailmanympärimatka Helsingissä: suurlähetystöt ja niiden historia (Kustantaja Laaksonen) käyttää kuvituksessaan kolmea sinun ottamaasi valokuvaa (nähdäkseni File:Iraqi embassy in Helsinki 4.JPG, File:Iraqi embassy in Helsinki 1.JPG ja File:Egypt embassy in Helsinki.JPG). Selasin kirjaa tänään Akateemisessa kirjakaupassa ja kiinnitin huomioni muutamaan kuvaan, jotka näyttivät kovin tutuilta. Kuvalähteeksi on ilmoitettu pelkkä Wikimedia Commons. Tekijänoikeusongelmaa siinä ei liene, kun olet ilmoittanut luopuvasi kaikista oikeuksistasi noihin kuviin, mutta ajattelin tämän ehkä kiinnostavan sinua. --Risukarhi (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Kiitos tiedosta. Hiukan olen yllättynyt että Egyptin suurlähetystön kuva on päässyt kirjaan; valokuvana se ei mielestäni ole kovin kummoinen. MKFI (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

File Deletion - The Collaborators.jpg & Bastion Poster Compressed.jpgEdit

Hi MKFI, I wondered if you could tell me why the two uploaded files The Collaborators.jpg & Bastion Poster Compressed.jpg were deleted after I was issued with a concern over copyright, and sent an explanation in response. Thanks in advance. RichardAlbiston89 (talk) 00:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardAlbiston89 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. MKFI (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

ReEdit

Hello MKFI, I create categories that I saw suitable only to what I put into it. Which mean I will create Category:Videos of T-72 tanks when I found some videos of T-72 tanks that quite simple. So if you or anyone see categories should have parent add into it and go for more complex tree, you can do it yourself. Have a nice day, sorry if my english is bad.Tnt1984 (talk) 10:31, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello MKFI, like I said before I create category for videos of only specific that I saw since I don't think that my worry if I don't need them to check further for wasting time if anyone think parent should have they can create them themselves and add into it, in the mean time that you (if you really want them), if I need them I will create them myself like Ak family when I don't really feel like classify what they are using. Cheer man.Tnt1984 (talk) 10:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello MKFI, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

HHubi and his socksEdit

Hi! I thought you might want to know that the abuse filter I created already caught HHubi 6 times and denied him access. His last try was a complaint on the abuse filter talk page, last sentence: Comments = I would like to add the file description in de, en, and ru language as follows. However, access to WC is denied. Vr. --HHubi   I hope that's that.   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:43, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "MKFI".