Open main menu
English: Welcome to the Commons, Marcok!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Contents

SerlianaEdit

A me paioni archi a tutto sesto a colonne binate... Una serliana è questa Image:Palazzo Te Mantova 2.jpg o questa Image:Diocletians mausoleum-Split.jpg.

Quando metti una serliana accanto all'altra hai una successione di archi a colonne binate, non di serliane :-) Non sono un esperto, ma io per serliana ho sempre sentito intendere un'apertura isolata, non una sequenza. Ovviamente posso sbagliarmi, cmq nel caso di dubbi, su Wikipedia si usa chiedere il parere di terze persone per dirimere la questione. Nessuno di noi è perfetto. Tu prova a chiedere ad altri che si occupano del progetto architettura, e vedi cosa ti dicono loro, e decidi di conseguenza. Se non se ne viene a capo, si può provare a chiedere al bar. Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 02:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Decisione salomonica. Oltre tutto ho visto la galleria con le tue foto: decisamente di qualità molto alta. Complimenti. --User:G.dallorto 20:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

ChiesaEdit

Ok, grazie! ;) --Ginosal (User talk) 21:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiradunoEdit

Non mi ci si vedi proprio per nulla, perché sono mi sono convinto del fatto che il modello Wikipedia ha dei limiti molto più gravi per quanto riguarda la condivisione di testi che per quanto riguarda la condivisione di immagini, quindi lavoro su Commons. Ma l'idea di venire m'interessa, tanto più che l'incontro si svolge comodissimamente nella mia città. Purtroppo però il link che mi indichi è rotto. Ce ne è uno funzionante? Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 01:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Immagini videogiochi cancellatiEdit

Amministratore, perche' cavolo hai cancellato le immagini che avevo uploadato, eh?! Erano completamente free/gratis, scaricabili ed updabili da/su numerosi siti, quindi esigo l'immediato ripristino delle immagini.

User talk:Karl90 14.33, 8/02/2008

Image:VillaTrissinoFromQuatgtroLibri.svgEdit

You are right, I just checked and it is the project of villa Mocenigo. (Two sources - quattri libri itself among them). I don't know where I got the missinformation from any more. The picture should be moved I suppose. Good catch. Thanks. Haros 15:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Michael JacksonEdit

But it was free image on flickr... So why ? Jamcib 20:05, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 4a7b74e0ecbafd56a7f31e941614ca6aEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. CaligariEdit

Category discussion notification Category:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

--84user (talk) 09:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo giardino retro 2009-07-18 f01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo fronte 2009-07-18 f05b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rocca Malatestiana Cesena 2006 pano.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Barbaro Maser viale 2009-07-18.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tempio di Zeus Olimpo apr2005 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Emo Fanzolo loggia 2009-07-18 f02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! San Marino statua della libertà.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Villa PisaniEdit

I almost have an ok picture here: http://picasaweb.google.no/hans.a.rosbach/VillaPisani# Unfortunately I did not take yet another picture to the left. But next time :-) Haros (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Well done. :-) Haros (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Castel del Monte giu06 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Thank you!Edit

Thank you Marcok for promoting my Quality Picture Candidate and especially for your suggestions. Cheers, --Jcart1534 (talk) 03:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello09 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vicenza Basilica Palladiana 14-09-08 f07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Contarini Piazzola by Marcok 2009-08-08 n02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Pojana photo by Marcok 2009-08-08 n09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello07 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Badoer Fratta Polesine facciata by Marcok 2009-08-16 n06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello11 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello08 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Palazzo Te Mantova 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Villa Pisani Bagnolo wiki 2009-08-08 n14 rect.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trulli Alberobello20 apr06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

File:Palladio pducale.JPGEdit

Salve, what kind of source are you missing? The source is Palladio's book, the autor of the foto is me or my camera! Please be so kind and give a more detailed information. Salve, --Warburg (talk) 07:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

SegnalazioneEdit

Ciao, scusami l'OT qui su Commons. Ti volevo solo segnalare questo tipo di modifica fatta a tappeto su tutte le voci "Nati il..." e "Morti il...".--Trixt (talk) 11:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

CategorizationEdit

Re: [1]:

  • What is the point of adding a category that is not in the hierarchy?
  • The English-language plural of "thief" is "thieves".

Jmabel ! talk 00:57, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

The thing is, any text in a description is just as searchable as category text. The whole point of using categories is to hook something into the hierarchy. - Jmabel ! talk 21:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Ma anche no dai, è solo un modellino --Sailko (talk) 18:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

File:WELCOmE.jpgEdit

Ciao, ho messo in cancellazione immediata questa immagine, in quanto evidentemente fair use: è uno screenshot da un videogame e come tale non può essere rilasciato in cc-by se non da chi ne detiene tutti i diritti.--Nanae (talk) 09:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Chapels o Orartories?Edit

Ciao, come credo tu ricordi mi sto divertendo con la fotografia e la categorizzazione di chiese, oratori, chiesette, cappelle, capitelli e via via verso il sempre più piccolo e popolare. Tralasciando gli ultimi mi trovo alle volte perplesso per la differenza che abbiamo in it.wiki tra it:Oratorio (architettura) e it:Cappella, presumo anche per l'"evoluzione" temporale degli edifici religiosi che negli anni hanno visto aggiungere a quelli a semplice pianta una serie nicchie laterali, vedi it:Cappella radiale, che sostanzialmente inglobavano i culti popolari per i vari santi all'interno dell'edificio religioso principale della zona, presumo per richiamare più facilmente i fedeli (se dico delle stupidaggini porta pazienza, correggimi, le mie sono solo deduzione logiche). Ritornando a noi qui in Commons abbiamo due categorie "italiane" IMHO sovrapponibili, la Category:Chapels in Italy e la Category:Oratories in Italy, che credo sia il caso di unificare in qualche modo, mi rimetto quindi alla tua cultura architettonica nel ragionare se una Cappella gentilizia di un palazzo o villa padronale (vedi File:Villa Pisani Montagnana by Marcok 2009-08-08 f03.jpg) sia da considerare o l'una cosa o l'altra o, come io credo, si debbano infilare nella stessa categoria mettendo un disclamer multilingua in testa alla cat per far capire agli utenti di lingua straniera che in Italia la definizione è simile e/o sovrapponibile alle loro "Chapels" create magari con un altro iter religioso. Tra l'altro, come credo tu ben sappia per aver parlato con i responsabili dei Beni culturali delle diocesi, negli annuari diocesani queste sono indicate come oratori, cosa che aumenta la confusione dell'utente non esperto che si approccia al problema. Che ne pensi? Scusa del pippone, se ti va si potrebbe anche ragionarne per altre vie telematiche (un sms e ti chiamo). :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 10:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Wow, altra carne al fuoco ;-) Così ho una cat, Category:Churches in Costa di Rovigo dove si può trovare la qualunque, la chiesa parrocchiale Category:San Giovanni Battista (Costa di Rovigo)‎, la ex chiesa parrocchiale prima della riunificazione, ora considerata oratorio Category:San Rocco (Costa di Rovigo), una cappella gentilizia di un palazzo rurale ora scomparso Category:Oratorio di Ca' Michiel (Costa di Rovigo) (nella cat degli interni si vede l'accesso murato riservato ai proprietari), un classico oratorio/cappella campestre (che nell'Emilia-Romagna settentrionale chiamano chiesolini) Category:Madonna della Salute (Colombano, Costa di Rovigo) e più di un oratorio popolare Category:San Giovanni Decollato, detto San Giovannino (Costa di Rovigo), per non parlare del sacello ai caduti ex oratorio Category:Oratorio Santa Maria Assunta (Costa di Rovigo). Mi sa che ho fatto filotto, manca altro? :-)))))--Threecharlie (talk) 11:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Ancora sull'architettura religiosaEdit

Ti chiedo una nuova cortesia benché presumo non esista una netta differenza tra i termini: resto ancora dubbioso sull'attribuzione di una foto ad un it:Abside, qui Category:Apses, ed un it:Presbiterio, forse perché popolarmente è chiamato abside anche la parte interna della chiesa che occupa il retro dell'altare maggiore, almeno nelle strutture non rotonde. dato che mi trovo in difficoltà potresti per cortesia fornirmi degli esempi eclatanti in modo da non potermi confondere?. Grazie ancora :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 17:44, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Porta pazienza se non è argomento commonaro...Edit

...ma mi riesce più facile arrivare a te da qui. Visti i recenti scambi di idee mi sarebbe molto utile (ma sarebbe utile a tutta ala comunità) una traduzione da qui inserendola come è ovvio come sottopagina di quel wikiprogetto in lingua italiana ma che sarebbe fondamentale linkare anche qui in Commons, inoltre l'immagine della pianta della chiesa divisa per "settori" è intuitiva e non abbisogna di faticose traduzioni e discussioni multilingua. Sai chi se ne potrebbe occupare? Grazie :-)))--Threecharlie (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Marcok,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File tagging File:Pierson's Puppeteer.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pierson's Puppeteer.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AVRS (talk) 14:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiGitaEdit

Ciao Marco, qui trovi alcune foto scattate da me oggi, se utili per il futuro o una breve gallery sulla WikiGita. --Pottercomuneo (talk) 21:17, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Vista panoramicaEdit

Ciao Marco, Grazie per l'informazione; la cosa un po' mi stupisce e un po' mi fa arrabbiare, ma soprattutto mi pone tante domande.

  • Che cosa significa architettura contemporanea? L'età contemporanea - in storia - inizia con la rivoluzione francese ma, al fine di cui parliamo, il periodo è più ristretto? Ad esempio, le immagini del cimitero maggiore, costruito nella prima metà dell'ottocento, possono essere pubblicate? Oppure, per restare alla pagina del borgo Berga, quelle dell'ex Gil o dell'Istituto Fogazzaro, degli anni trenta del novecento?
  • Che cosa si intende per architettura? Soltanto le opere di un certo rilievo come quelle che mi hai citato, oppure anche modeste costruzioni? Qualsiasi costruzione al giorno d'oggi ha un progettista.
  • Parliamo solo di nuove costruzioni o anche di restauri?
  • Non si possono pubblicare soltanto se la costruzione è il contenuto esclusivo o principale dell'immagine, oppure anche quando ne rappresenta soltanto una parte?
  • La cosa vale anche per i monumenti, ad esempio quello di Neri Pozza sul ponte San Paolo e la fontana di piazza delle poste?

A questo punto, che faccio: cancello le immagini? Intanto ti ringrazio e a presto Claudio

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Marcok,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

DeleteEdit

Hello, please delete photo "Fuck You", thank you.---Gaard van der Pol (talk) 22:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Dato che sei del mestiere...Edit

Ciao, mi potresti dare una mano nel capire cosa in lingua inglese è più adatto a definire un porticato, "porches in..." o "arcades in..."? Vedo che (sembra) venga indifferentemente usato uno o l'altro termine ma se anche fossero equivalenti sarebbe, per evitare che "categorizzatori seriali" come me impazziscano, da uniformare le categorie ad un singolo termine, che ne dici? Aspetto news :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 13:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

  • I hope no one minds my weighing in on someone else's talk page, but in English a "porch" and an "arcade" are entirely different. A "porch" is raised above ground level; an "arcade" is at ground level or perhaps one step above. A "porch" is mainly a place for sitting; an "arcade" is mainly a place for walking, and may even extend straight through a building, where as a "porch" is strictly along the edge of the building. - Jmabel ! talk 16:01, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks @Jmabel:, help me for understand, therefore in Category:Porches in Emilia-Romagna the only porch is File:Piazza Santa Fara - Bobbio.JPG?--Threecharlie (talk) 23:04, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I'd say so. I might call even that one an "arcade" (in a different sense of the word than I was thinking of above) because it is composed of a series of arches. But it is the only one I would call a porch. - Jmabel ! talk 00:15, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Ancora sulle vere da pozzoEdit

Ciao, ho visto gli spostamenti e ti ringrazio, però ancora non mi è chiara la sovrapposizione tra Water wells e Well heads, dove alle volte vedo "Water well heads" che forse è una forzatura e non è corretto. Dimmi se il ragionamento fila... in teoria dove c'è una vera da pozzo c'è anche un pozzo, quindi sempre in teoria si dovrebbero creare due categoiria "parallele" dove infilare le immagini, una perché legata all'architettura come elemento architettonico (la vera), l'altra legata all'idrauilica e alla distriubuzione delle acque (potabili o meno) di risorgiva o reflue. In pratica però, e scusa il sofismo derivato dall'attività su altre categorie artiustiche, se una vera da pozzo si trova in un museo è chiaro che non c'è anche il pozzo, inoltre potrebbe resistere la vera in una posizione dove una volta vi era realmente un pozzo ma al momento (dello scatto) era secco o interrato, o contaminato, o comunque che non ha più la medesima funzione... Morale, limitiamo le categorie all'effettivo soggetto dello scatto (la vera) e non a quello che ne è collegato (il pozzo)? Una similitudine mi viene con gli antichi acquedotti romani che, mi risulta, in qualche raro caso ancora vedono scorrere acqua che però dubito sia effettivamente utilizzata a scopi idraulici. Che ne dici? Scusa per la pedanteria :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 07:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Copyright by Wikimedia ItaliaEdit

Hi Marcok! I noticed that you've uploaded a few files tagged with {{Copyright by Wikimedia Italia}}. Specifically:

I'm afraid the wording of this template is not consistent with our licensing policy. Our licensing policy requires all content on Commons to be free. There used to be one single exception from that, which was that non-free content was allowed if the copyright was held by the Wikimedia Foundation. However, that exception has been removed from the policy (after the Wikimedia Foundation finally joined the free content movement), and more importantly: the exception never applied to Wikimedia chapters, which are legally independent of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Could you please review the licensing of these files? Given that the Wikimedia Foundation has released its logos under a free license, is there any content in the files mentioned above which the Wikimedia Italia chapter or any other contributor can claim copyright over and does not wish to release under a free license?

Thanks, LX (talk, contribs) 19:51, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your message, LX. I'll modify I have fixed the tags. --Marcok (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Immagine posterEdit

Ciao Marcok, ho inserito l'immagine del poster sul sito del film a questo indirizzo https://stayhuman.tv/production/?lang=it completa di loghi CC BY-SA 4.0

Ho inviato l'immagine a questo indirizzo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard

L'immagine ora è a questo indirizzo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Restiamo_Umani_-_The_Reading_Movie_-_POSTER.jpg

Ce l'ho fatta oppure c'è ancora qualcosa che non va? Se c'è qualcosa che non va puoi per favore aiutarmi a risolvere questa situazione per me impossibile da risolvere? Grazie --Utente23 (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Fotos of Barletta ColossusEdit

Dear User Marcok,

my name is Stefan E. A. Wagner, I am Archaeologist from Germany. At the moment, I am writing a scientific essay about the Barletta Colossus and I urgently need some pics of this statue.

I would use it for scientific publishing only. NO commercial use. I saw on Wikimedia, that you are a very good and clear fotographer, so I would feel very honored, if you could imagine to give me some pics for publication. Of course I would cite you as the photographer and you also would get a free version of my essay, if it will be published.

Please answer me on the following E-Mail-adress:

drakkenree@googlemail.com

Thanks and best regards,

Stefan E. A. Wagner

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardipithecus (talk • contribs) 13:27, 2 March 2016‎ (UTC)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016Edit

 
Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste


Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parco Querini Vicenza tempietto settembre 2012 by Marcok f02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chiesa Misericordia Vicenza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 en France, Edit

  Votre photo « Chateau de Villandry 3 sept 2016 f11.jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du .  

Cordialement, Lundi Novembre (talk) 12:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Mi fai una cortesia?Edit

Molto tentato nel spostare massivamente il contenuto di Category:Cupolas in Italy in Category:Domes in Italy (anche se in realtà a una prima occhiata sembrerebbero tutte chiese da cui Category:Church domes in Italy), dato che le categorie delle altre cupole per nazioni contengono effettivamente un'altra tipologia di infrastruttura/elemento architettonico posso sfruttare le tue conoscenze per vedere se c'è da salvare qualcosa oppure spostare tutto? Scusa per la rogna, so che ci vuole tempo...--Threecharlie (talk) 11:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

@Threecharlie: In effetti non capisco: la voce en:Cupola sembrerebbe corrispondere a it:Lanterna (architettura) (tanto che la voce è stata proposta per l'unione con en:Roof lantern). Dunque in teoria Category:Cupolas in Italy andrebbe unito non a Category:Domes in Italy ma a Category:Lanterns (architecture), d'altro canto esiste anche Category:Lanterns (architecture).... Non ci capisco più nulla. È meglio allargare la discussione prima di fare unioni, direi... --Marcok (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Ecco come diavolo si chiama in architettura la... lanterna!!! A chi la si potrebbe allargare? Mai vorrei che arrivasse in mano a qualche ignorante, in senso letterale, che senza avere aperto mai un libro di architettura in vita sua sostenga che "ha ragione", comunque sia, assodato che quelle ritratte nelle foto non sono lanterne ma cupole nella loro interezza (sarebbe come categorizzare la foto di un'automobile mettendoci anche (o solo) quella delle ruote) se una volta accennata la discussione poi stagna io provvedo a spostare e pace. Intanto grazie per la consulenza ;-)--Threecharlie (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Mi permetto di pingare anche @DenghiùComm: per conoscenza :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 20:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Avete controllato nella en:WP le voci delle relative parole? --DenghiùComm (talk) 05:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
@DenghiùComm, Threecharlie: C'è questa corrispondenza: voci su en.wiki: en:Cupola e en:Roof lantern (proposte per il merge) - categorie corrispondenti su Commons: Category:Cupolas e Category:Lanterns (architecture) (IMHO da unire) - voce in italiano unica it:Lanterna (architettura). Personalmente aspetterei che vengano unite le 2 voci nella en.wiki, poi si potrebbe fare la stessa cosa con le categorie di Commons. --Marcok (talk) 09:09, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Chissà, forse ne hai idea...Edit

Ciao, dato che è territorio tuo, riusciresti a risalire alla chiesa dove è esposta questa pala, vedi Category:Jacopo Apollonio? Qui dove hanno trovato le immagini, grazie :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 08:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

@Threecharlie: Tutto quello che so è in it:San Nazario (Italia) (non è proprio vicina dato che è in Valsugana). Su Commons c'è solo la Category:San Nazario (comune, Italy). La parrocchia è intitolata ai Santi Nazario e Celso martiri [2] anche la chiesa, provvedo a sistemare le categorie. --Marcok (talk) 09:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Grazie :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 09:22, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Questa invece sì...Edit

Rieccomi, problema simile a quello precedente. OpenStreetMap mi geolocalizza alcune immagini by Panoramio, alcune le ho categorizzzate, altre ancora da categorizzare, come Villa Saraceno detta palazzo delle Trombe a Category:Finale (Agugliaro) quando vedo altri scatti, sempre di Via Finale, geolocalizzati in una struttura vicina che fa riferimento alla pagina it:Villa Saraceno (opera tua del 2008). Puoi dare un'occhiata? Grazie :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 04:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Castello di Chenonceau : nome sbagliatoEdit

Ciao Marcok. Le tue fotografie qui sotto sono quelli del castello di Azay-le-Rideau e non quelli del castello di Chenonceau. Cordiali saluti. LIONEL76 (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)



Français : Bonjour Marcok. Vos photographies ci-dessus sont celles du château d'Azay-le-Rideau et non celles du château de Chenonceau. Cordialement. LIONEL76 (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
English: Good morning Marcok. Your photographs above are those of the castle of Azay-le-Rideau and not those of the castle of Chenonceau. cordially. LIONEL76 (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Non tutti i pavimenti sono floors o no?Edit

Ciao, domanda tecnico-linguistica: questa pavimentazione, forse esterna alla villa in questione, e che ho trovato in più di un'aia deve essere categorizzata solo in Category:Floors in Italy (o in Veneto)?--Threecharlie (talk) 08:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Threecharlie: Credo che floor sia usato soprattutto per i pavimenti interni. In questo caso mi pare che creare la categoria "Brick pavements in Italy" da mettere all'interno di Category:Pavements in Italy potrebbe essere la soluzione migliore. --Marcok (talk) 08:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

VicenzaEdit

Vi ringrazio per le tue correzioni sulle didascalie delle mie immagini di Vicenza. Cercherò di ricordare tutto perché non ho finito. Bravo per il tuo impegno. Sei un wipikedien esemplare. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:32, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Mi dispiace dargli tanto lavoro, l'ortografia è difficile per me qualunque sia la lingua, sono dislessica pesante. Cerco di catturarmi facendo buone fotografie, ma per l'ortografia sono un "terrorista". --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
@Archaeodontosaurus: Nessun problema, WikiCommons è pieno di immagini con titoli sgrammaticati ;) L'importante è il contenuto delle foto. Complimenti per tutte le foto che carichi e per l'ordine meticoloso con cui le inserisci nelle categorie. --Marcok (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

RICHIESTA INFORMAZIONIEdit

CIAO SONO svemma.32 NON HO CAPITO QUALI SONO I CODICI CHE MANCANO E CHI LI DEVE INSERIRE. NON HO CAPITO INOLTRE COSA DEVO FARE PERCHE' LE MIE FOTO PARTECIPINO AL CONCORSO. CIAO ASPETTO UNA TUA RISPOSTA GRAZIE.

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Architetto Sebastiano Locati (1862-1939).jpgEdit

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Architetto Sebastiano Locati (1862-1939).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

@Ronhjones: You tagged many images with a source provided. Most of the images were imported from it.wiki. You also tagged many images of monuments authorised for Wiki Loves Monumnets (where ALL monuments are authorised). But you also tagged as copyviol my own works, and I find it not acceptable for Commons:AGF. Please remove unnecessary tags and be careful. --Marcok (talk) 07:49, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
They were correctly tagged as a derivative works. There is no link to show they are PD, or a death date of the creator, or who the creator is - you cannot claim a 70 years after author dies, unless you show us the author and death date. Italian wiki might allow such omissions, but commons needs to be able to check that the license is valid for both the country of origin and the US. Also I note there are no licenses for the US in the images - that is another reason that could cause deletion. {{PD-100}} does not include licensing for the US. They need to be changed to an appropriate license in COM:TAG. Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:15, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
@Ronhjones: Sorry, but most images you tagged are already with sources, and almost all are so old they are clearly out of copyright. For example File:Antiquitatum_variarum_volumina_XVII_pagina.jpg. Sometimes the sources are in the description field (it happens importing old images). You also tagged many Wiki Loves Monuments images I personally shoot (probably ignoring that ALL WLM-Italy monuments were previosuly authorized, even if there was a clear link to follow!). And so on. This means you apparently didn't spent any time to analyze - or even watch - every single image before tagging them. I'm a long-running Commons user and also an admin in it.wiki, but during the last 15 years till now I newer saw a such behaviour. As a GLAM WiR I imported - or helped importing - thousands images, also using other usernames. When an image can be easily fixed (like most images you previously listed), every Commons user generally helps fixing it. And all images will be fixed... if you leave enough time to Commons users. So I'm very sorry for the lack of collaboration. I think this doesn't create a good environment, expecially for new users. --Marcok (talk) 14:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
There are plenty of files there where you are assuming that the image is past 70 years photographer's death, and you state "unknown". That is obviously very wrong. If it is truly unknown and the country is 70pma, then it has to be pre 1898 and use both {{PD-old-assumed}} + {{PD-1923}}. Just a quick look shows quite a few in the 1900-1920 region - you cannot guarantee they are PD, unless you can show the creator's death. Ronhjones  (Talk) 14:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

File:AlexanderPopovic.jpgEdit

 
File:AlexanderPopovic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments ti aspetta, con centinaia di nuovi comuni fotografabiliEdit

 
Concorso Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2018 (English version)

Gentile Marcok, ti ringraziamo ancora una volta per la tua passata partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM). Il più grande concorso fotografico del mondo si svolge anche questo settembre per documentare e promuovere il patrimonio culturale italiano, con una licenza copyright libera.

Quest'anno è doppiamente facile partecipare: gli oggetti fotografabili coprono quasi 1000 comuni in più, grazie all'adesione di centinaia di nuovi enti fra cui Roma, e alla possibilità di fotografare circa 2000 alberi monumentali. Controlla le liste di monumenti fotografabili! Carica tutte le foto che hai e magari organizza una visita presso i monumenti che ancora non hanno una foto.

Quest'oggi il Parlamento europeo ha respinto la proposta di estendere la libertà di panorama. E allora scattiamo e pubblichiamo tutte le foto che possiamo, almeno per questi monumenti per cui ci è legalmente consentito!

Grazie, Nemo 16:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Marcok".