Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Marcus Cyron

Say no to Fair Use

Dieser Benutzer verwendet weder Sockenpuppen noch editiert er unter IP-Adresse.

  • Deutsch: Beiträge auf dieser Seite werden durch mich auch hier beantwortet, wenn die Diskussion bei dir begann, soll sie auch dort und nicht hier fortgesetzt werden.
  • English: I’ll answer your queries here. If we started the discussion on your discussion, I answer there.
  • Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to an archive
OTRS Wikimedia.svg This user is a member of the Wikimedia OTRS team. (verify)

TUSC token ea10bfa8c837460b9d03bb73594292e5Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token dc981b9b44185bbbe64865c9ae3660e9Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Eddaido (talk) 08:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for renaming”Kyougoku Takakazu”. Actually, I was particular about this name because it was specified as a historical expert as a regional ruler painter of another person in which this painting is actually present, but it was left wrong.

I did not edit the name myself because I wanted you to know the reason for the change. Xanthippespert (talk) 22:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


FYI, I have been following this collection as a potential mass upload in a month or two, based on my experience with I do not subscribe to the classicists list myself, but was alerted to the discussion. Copyright may be less of an issue, depending on whether we can trust copyright statements on the website to be correct. I'm not analysing this further yet, so let me know if you are taking this forward and I'll focus on other projects.   -- (talk) 11:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Cool! As I thought about that much possible images, I thought even first on you :). I will come to you, when there's a result. Marcus Cyron (talk) 12:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Renaming of File:Google_Chrome.svgEdit

Hi Marcus,

I requested that "File:Google_Chrome.svg" be renamed to "File:Google_Chrome_logo_and_wordmark_(own_work).svg". Thank you for renaming it, however I see that you then renamed the file to "File:Google_Chrome_logo_and_wordmark.svg" with the comment makes no sense - every work is an "own" work - who is "own"? I understand the sentiment, but as I explained in my request, the file in question is not the official logo (it looks different) and the name should make it clear so that people stop using it. Let's come up with a name that makes more sense, such as "user-created", "unofficial", "fan-made", "mockup" (to match File:Google_Chrome_icon_(2011)_mockup.svg).

I propose the following:

  1. Move "File:Google_Chrome_logo_and_wordmark.svg" to "File:Google_Chrome_logo_and_wordmark_(something).svg".
  2. Delete the redirect pages "File:Google_Chrome_logo_and_wordmark_(own_work).svg" and "File:Google_Chrome_logo_and_wordmark.svg" (which will be created when the file is moved). Nothing links to them and they will only cause confusion.
  3. Make "File:Google_Chrome.svg" redirect to File:Google_Chrome_for_Android_Icon_2016.svg like I originally proposed. I can do this myself.

--Hddqsb (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

P.S. I suggested "own work" to match the "Source" parameter, which says "own work" via Template:Own. The documentation says to use it when "you personally created the entire original image by yourself", and I feel that "own work" in the file name conveys the message that a user of Wikimedia Commons created the image. I still think "own work" is the most suitable name, but I respect your status as a trusted member and I am sure you will make a sensible decision. --Hddqsb (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Would it be a better idea to change it from "own work" to your name/nick name? "Own" is really problematic. Marcus Cyron (talk) 00:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
I am not the author, but for what it's worth I think using the author's name is fine. --Hddqsb (talk) 01:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
So we came to an result :). Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Marcus, can you please rename the file like we discussed (and delete the redirect pages I mentioned)? --Hddqsb (talk) 20:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Renamed. But as long the redirects are not needed for other files, I will let them undeleted, because it is possible, that the files were already reused outsite Wikimedia projects. It's better, because of the licenses, to let here if it is possible the correct link. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for renaming. The redirects only existed for 5 days, nothing on Wikimedia links to them and it is extremely unlikely that they are used outside Wikimedia. I see absolutely no licensing issues because the actual file will still exist and no content attribution will be lost if the redirects are removed. They are completely useless and only cause confusion. --Hddqsb (talk) 23:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Marcus Cyron".