Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Marrovi

Disambiguation of categoriesEdit

I think about Category:Ex monastery of San Francisco, Pachuca => Category:Ex monastery of San Francisco, Pachuca de Soto, Hidalgo, Mexico move...
We have a rule on Wiki Projects, that we do not add a disambiguation to the names if it is not absolutely necessary. For example: when there is only one Category:Lucrécia on Commons it doesn't need a disambiguation (in brackets or after comma). Only when we have two different Category:Lucrécia, we are adding a disambiguation mark, for example:

  1. Category:Lucrécia (Rio Grande do Norte)
  2. Category:Lucrécia (Rio Grande Central)

The same situation is with the categories you've moved yesterday.

Wieralee (talk) 09:41, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, in Mexico is necessary to make changes, because we have many old tamples with the same name, other user edited a specific point situation as: temple, (town o city), (state), (country). I use this logical order for new categories about Mexican churches. Thank you very much for the rules in other wikiprojects, see you next time.--Marrovi (talk) 16:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 09:14, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Arreglar redireccionesEdit

Hola Marrovi, ¿podrías arreglar por favor las redirecciones que creaste con los siguientes múltiples traslados? Desde el artículo de Wikipedia Palacio Municipal de Puebla, en enlaces externos se enlaza hacia Commons con Category:Palacio Municipal de Puebla, y desde ahí hay una serie enorme de redirecciones producto de traslados que tú hiciste, solo ve entrando a cada una de las páginas a que redirige y te darás cuenta. Cada una de esas redirecciones debe apuntar la categoría final, la definitiva, sin redirecciones intermedias, y también el artículo en Wikipedia. Te dejo hacerlo en Commons antes de hacer yo el cambio en Wikipedia (sé que estás bloqueado allá), haré la edición después para asegurarme de que busques antes por favor arreglar las redirecciones. Saludos. --UAwiki (talk) 18:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

El reclamo no es por la traducción a inglés, sino porque quedó como residuo una serie de redirecciones mal hechas, debes cambiarlas para que terminen apuntando a la categoría final, el nombre que tenga. --UAwiki (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Bueno, ya arreglé tu desastre, visto que no me expliqué bien o no quisiste comprenderme y ha pasado un par de días. Porque una cosa es usar el nombre en inglés de una categoría, y otra es trasladar "Palacio Municipal de Puebla" a "Municipal palace of Puebla", 4 minutos después trasladar a "City hall palace of Puebla City", 1 minuto después a "City Hall Palace of Puebla City", 20 minutos después a "Hall Palace of Puebla City", y 6 horas después a "Municipal Hall of Puebla City". Tantos traslados dejaron una serie de redirecciones, he apuntado todas a la categoría que quedó al final. --UAwiki (talk) 23:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Está bien, no hay problema, saludos y que te vaya bien :) --UAwiki (talk) 17:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chan Chan 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chan Chan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Enseñanza del ladino (1).jpgEdit

 
File:Enseñanza del ladino (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

174.17.228.105 19:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Enseñanza del ladino (2).jpgEdit

 
File:Enseñanza del ladino (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

174.17.228.105 19:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Enseñanza del ladino (3).jpgEdit

 
File:Enseñanza del ladino (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

174.17.228.105 19:44, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tulancingo (80).jpgEdit

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tulancingo (80).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:13, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Re: Mineral del MonteEdit

There is a difference if the Historic centre of Mineral del Monte really exists or is something that the media and the tourist sites say. I couldn't found noting that say that really exist like a law or a decree, that define the poligonal area of the historic center.

I really doubt that there is an actual area designated Historic centre, I mean a protected area. Is maybe somthing that the people say. The only thing that I foun is waht the media and the tourist sites say. Maybe is the center area but is not cataloged Historic centre.

Anther thing is tha now whit these categories like "culture of", one more time is need the diference between city and municipality, becase all of the photos in that new category are from the city, and you are removing photos from the city that belong to the city category, is better to create "culture of the municipality of" and the photos can be in both categories. Or just those categories put them in the city category and if other towns of the municipality, if they had phothos of festivales or cucuisine, put them in the state category.RubeHM (talk) 16:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Paris (91).jpgEdit

 
File:Paris (91).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Poudou99 (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Marrovi".