Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 3d-function-7.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Crocodylus-johnsoni-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amanita-muscaria-side-inversnaid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Plant-texture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Normal-distribution-cumulative-density-function-many.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rectangle-varignon.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 3d-function-2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lda-gauss-1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-exteriour-angle-theorem-1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Equilateral-triangle-tikz.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


Nehmen und Geben

Hallo Martin, QIC ist keine Service-Platform sondern ein Projekt, das vom Mitmachen lebt. Wer regelmässig seine Photos dort bewerten lässt, von dem wird erwartet, dass er sich auch an den Reviews beteiligt. Ich schlage vor, dass Du Dich mit den Bewertungsregeln etwas vertraut machst und Commons:Image_guidelines liest. Du kannst erst mal solche Bilder bewerten, bei denen Du Dir zweifelsfrei sicher bist, ob sie die genannten Kriterien erfüllen oder nicht. Wenn Du Dir unsicher bist, suchst Du Dir ein anderes Bild aus. Als Regel für regulars in QIC gilt, dass für jedes nominierte Bild ein anderes Bild bewertet wird. Vielen Dank für Deine Mithilfe. Gruss aus Köln, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

@Cccefalon: Ok, alles klar. Ich habe damit gezögert, weil ich bei einige Bildern die zurückgewiesen wurden nicht sehe warum. Insbesondere ob ein Bild scharf ist oder nicht kann ich einfach nicht erkennen. Aber ich werde mich mal daran versuchen :-) --MartinThoma (talk) 11:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Prima. Wie gesagt, fang erst mal mit einfachen Bildern an. Es gibt auch einige regulars, wie z.B. Johann Jaritz, Jacek Halicki, Hubertl, Poco a poco, Christian Ferrer und andere, die seit langer Zeit dabei sind und die überwiegend fehlerfreie Bilder abliefern. Da kannst Du Dich am Anfang mal dort orientieren, wenn Du unsicher bist. Eigentlich haben alle, die hier eine Weile dabei sind, dazugelernt und die typischen Fehler gewöhnt man sich schnell ab. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 11:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Dem schließe ich mich an! --Hubertl 12:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Innsbruck-Stiftskeller.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Normal-distribution-cumulative-density-function.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Perceptron-unit.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ECB-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pairing-function.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Feed-forward-perceptron.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Random-image.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CBC-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CBC-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CFB-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Restricted-boltzmann-machine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! CFB-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Extended-euclidean-algorithm-runtime de.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sigmoid-function-2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sigmoid-function.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! ECB-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

You could re-evaluate my photography.

 
Glebionis_coronarium

--Harpagornis (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Harpagornis,
Although I like your photography very much, it has one issue: The tip of one leaf at the top is cut away. According to a much more experienced Commoner (User:Cccefalon) this is a no-go for QI.
I'm sorry. --MartinThoma (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Polygon-is-point-inside.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! OFB-Mode-Decryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! OFB-Mode-Encryption.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parse-tree.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Udp-package-scheme.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-exteriour-angle-theorem-2.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dot-product-5.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Equilateral-triangle-heights.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-heronian.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-labels.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-right-abchpq.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Da hängt noch was von Dir in CR ....

... und zwar hier: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list#File:Isosceles-triangle-more.svg

Vermutlich ist das Deiner Aufmerksamkeit entgangen. Das sollte doch zu verbessern sein. Du kannst es nach einer Ablehnung auch renominieren, falls der Fehler beseitigt wird.

Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cccefalon: Danke, ja, das habe ich übersehen. Ich habe es korrigiert. --MartinThoma (talk) 10:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-stewarts-theorem.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isosceles-triangle-more.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

erledigt. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-perpendicular.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

erledigt. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:40, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-gergonne-point.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

erledigt. --MartinThoma (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. MartinThoma (talk) 05:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hyperbolic-triangle-interior-angles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Equilateral-triangle-circles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-angles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Thales-circle-triangle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Isosceles-triangle-tikz.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-9-point-circle-escribed-circles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-9-point-circle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-9-point-circle-circumscribed-circle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-unit-circle.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Triangle-pappus.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! EmiMa-042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Photo-phylles 2017

Hi,

I just found lots of interesting pictures on your pages.

I suggest you have a look to my website http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A

We would be honoured if you accept to participate! It's completely free.

Best regards Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC) (administrator of the french Wikibooks)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 12:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:069-Barcelona.jpg

 
File:069-Barcelona.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Discasto talk 11:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear MartinThoma,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "MartinThoma/Archive 1".