Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Martin Urbanec!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Contents

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Martin Urbanec,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:45, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

CategoryEdit

What is this category for.[1]. Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 10:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

This category is supposed to contain images uploaded by Commons Android App between Jul 2016 and Jun 2017. But it is broken, I've made a mistake. Sorry! Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
What exactly is the point of having that category? Is there any discussion about it? grendel|khan 18:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
My work was approved in my bot flag request. In this discussion you can find other information about the aim of the category. It is supposed to be only temporary and relatively small (around 20k of files). Feel free to ask if you need to know more! --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

An English lessonEdit

Re: Commons:Deletion requests/File:2G8A8960.jpg . "Duplicity" means "double dealing, deception, dishonesty" Since I don't think you are accusing anyone of that, I think the word you want is "duplicate". .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Oh, thanks a lot. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Technical Barnstar
Thanks for providing the API "urbanecmbot". :) AyushiNegi (talk) 19:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much! I'm happy that I could be useful. Please ping me if you (or anyone else) need help regarding that API. "Urbanecmbot" is name of my...bot (User:UrbanecmBot)/toolsforge tool used by that bot and by misc scripts like this one. have a nice day, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Mediagrant 2018Edit

Koukám do té kategorie a vidím, tam věci co by tam neměli patřit. Nebo se mílím?--Juandev (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Abych řekl pravdu, nevím už, na základě čí žádosti jsem to dělal. Možná Jakub Holzer (WMCZ)? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Jakub Holzer o tom nic neví, takže na to začínám uplatňova klasický wiki principy dosahování konsenzu, takže ty kategorie, které tam nepatří navrhuji na smazání a revertoval jsem tvoji akci přidání fotek Wikiexpedice Západ, které si přidal do nové kategorie. Mít všechny Wikiexpedice pod Mediagrantem 2018 nedává moc smysl. Byly propláceny a uskutečňovány v oněch letech - co na tom, že některé fotky pochází z roku 2018.--Juandev (talk) 08:44, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Pokud o tom nic neví, tak zapomněl, že to po mě chtěl - našel jsem příslušnej mail. Přeposílám tobě a Kubovi. Žádám, aby nedocházelo k úpravě kategorií před dosažením shody. Díky! Mimochodem, Wikiexpedice pod media acquisition spadá - neexistuje nic přijatelnějšího, pod co by jako akce WMCZ měla spadat (education ani tech to rozhodně není).. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:07, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Aha, teď jsem to pochopil lépe. Já jsem (asi botem) přidal novou MG šablonu ke všem MG fotkám, které byly nahrané v r 2018. Nedává mi moc smysl proplácet něco, co ještě nebylo vytvořeno. Je mi jedno, v kterých kategoriích fotky budou. Jen bych rád, aby se to, jak to má zůstat, ujasnilo mezi tím, kdo nesouhlasý (tebou Juane), tím, kdo to chtěl (Kuba, viz přeposlaný mail) a tím, kdo to udělal (mnou). --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

watermarkEdit

ok, you know better - I just thought as I wrote. I see that you are an admin and you are online; may I ask you for a edit:
There had been a change necessary at {{Created with/sandbox}}; please copy it to {{Created with}}. As soon it is transferred I can continue. -- sarang사랑 11:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I'm not Commons admin, but cs.wikipedia admin. I will be very happy to help you on Czech Wikipedia, but I cannot help you with this kind of request here, sorry. I'm not absolutely sure if it should be deleted, maybe you're right, I just wanted to add additional information from project I'm mainly active on. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Wikiexpedice SlezskoEdit

V kategorii nejsou soubory. Proč nedošlo k vytvoření redirektů z kategorií? Juandev (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Asi proto, že přesun do nového systému kategorií ještě není u konce. Nad přesměrováními uvažujeme, je to myslím vhodné už jen proto, aby se nerozbily staré odkazy :) --Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 21:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Nad přesměrováním nemusíte uvažovat, prostě ho vytvořte, je to normální praxe. Jinak nevím, soubor, který byl přesunut se ani po 10 dnech nezobrazuje v kategorii? To je divné ne. Juandev (talk) 22:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Changes of the category tree in MediagrantEdit

I am really surprised that event there was not a consensus for this change, you have done this change. Now we have two problems:

  1. As you moved files from one category to another one, you forgot to place in all categories the category redirect. So what is happening right now is, that reports of blog posts relating Mediagrant links to empty cats. But there might be more pages from outside which links to empty cats.
  2. Than you replaced multi subject categories by one subject category (e.g. insted of category:Mediagrant 2019:Foto českých obcí you have category:Mediagrant 2019 and category:Foto českých obcí), which makes it impossible to filter them by year, do the evaluations, reports. The problem is we dont have filters on Wikimedia Commons to search using more cuts, thats why multi subject cats are so common.

So at this step, if you are planing to do more, you should stop. The discussion about this proposal havent ended either on Czech Wikipedia.Juandev (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Please don't post the same questions at several places, Juan. These comments were answered elsewhere --Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 07:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
These comments fits in here, because it is a set of changes happening on Wikimedia Commons. So as it is the case of Wikimedia Commons, we discuss it on Wikimedia Commons. Second point is, that it is not just one change, but set of changes performed by Martin Urbanec's bot. And Martin Urbanec's bot discussion page links here, so thats why I open this discussion here.
You should also stop your activity relating this change on WMC as we havent found a consensus for this yet.
Finnally this is the talk page of Martin Urbanec, so let Martin to tell us first. Juandev (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Well, I agree with Vojtěch Dostál and I feel concerns you raised were answered properly. But since you asked for my comment, here you go. I did bot edits on Vojtěch Dostál's direct request and, to some extent, under his supervision. I'll be happy to answer any questions regarding technical parts of the work, but I'm not active in this change more than that. Because of that, I don't think my talk page is a proper place for discussions of that kind, Vojtěch's would fit better (this isn't recommendation to post similar message there).
The discussion ended (nobody commented from that point to the start of the works) on February 04, and the works started on February 15. That's two weeks of additional time for any possible objections. It really isn't possible to wait forever.
As you probably agree, it isn't advisable to stop in the middle. Since majority of things that needs to be done was done already (by number of edits), and since possible revert of those changes would be very time consuming (as was introducting those changes), the only reasonable thing is to continue with the work. Best regards, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:16, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Martin Urbanec".