User talk:Mattbuck/Archive12

Archives October 2007 - June 2008 June 2008 - August 2008 August 2008 - December 2008 December 2008 - April 2010 April 2010 - September 2010 September 2010 - May 2011 May 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - March 2012 April 2012 - July 2012 August 2012 - October 2012 November 2012 - January 2013 February 2013 - April 2013 May 2013 - July 2013 August 2013 - October 2013 November 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - February 2014 March 2014 - April 2014 May 2014 - July 2014 August 2014 - September 2014 October 2014 - November 2014 December 2014 - February 2015 March 2014 - September 2015 October 2015 - December 2017 Current

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ebbsfleet International railway station MMB 05 395004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «19 Millennium Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare railway station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 38 444003 158881 377303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 47 Ruislip Lido.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:19, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrews Road railway station MMB 27 66084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:32, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limehouse station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Blue Elf 17:16, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «L5 Henbury Loop Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «52 Feeder Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Bay railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 22:10, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- MJJR 16:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbridge and Burnham railway station MMB 13 150261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- MJJR 16:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 11 172007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 21:56, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 21:42, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawlish railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, good. --Christian Ferrer 19:09, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «15 Millennium Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flax Bourton railway station MMB 46 43XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:04, 03 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey!

Wow! looking at your userpage, you've obviously wasted a lot of time uploading quality images of trains. If you're trying to point out your hobby to everyone, it seems I've arrived to late to save you all that trouble. If I had of gotten here sooner, you could have just added this userbox and gotten on with your life.

Sorry about that. Penyulap ☏ 19:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

oh, I almost forgot to say thanks for helping with the recent Quality image review.

	The Laughing Nutter
	Thank you for lending a hand in the most important task of reviewing arrows on commons. Penyulap ☏ 19:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

If you're just going to be sarcastic, do it elsewhere, I'm not interested in indulging you. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

I've never given an award sarcastically. I know you have a great sense of humour. I'm sorry if I've come across the wrong way. Penyulap ☏ 02:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Well anyway, I still think that the whole thing with the featured arrow candidate was hilarious.. I like light-heartedness. People are too serious about things that don't matter in the grand scheme of things. Penyulap ☏ 10:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:52, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Ruislip station MMB 06 1992-stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB W3 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Q8 Chemistry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 06:04, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 84 37419.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapham Junction railway station MMB 23 458004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrews Road railway station MMB 22 66084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «F6 Docks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «39 Rivers Avon and Trym.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Pic

Hi Mattbuck, the Category:Pic has been contaminated by over 4000 pictures which have nothing to do with it. Is there anything you can do to clean it up? Thanks a lot --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

I'd suggest the category be marked as a metacategory for disambiguation, and Pic (mountain) used instead. Likely those are just annoyance tags mostly. I'll see what I can do later. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:30, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

It's all set, thank you --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB R8 Business School South and Auditorium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB N8 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:56, 10 February 2013

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «G8 Clifton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 58 Norman Rogers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Miss the feet, but ok --Poco a poco 10:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pensford Viaduct MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 20 G-BZVU G-CEKS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:42, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool Street station MMB 03 90005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 16:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «A6 Coalpit Heath Viaduct.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Image use

Hello Matt. I'm interested in using some of your images for some visitor guides. How do you need your work to be attributed? Will a credit suffice? Thanks Howard ps - nice photos.

I'm quite happy for my photos to be used, so long as credit is given. If possible (eg an online source), link back to the flickr page (the appropriate one for each image is linked on the Commons image page), and generally let me know where the photos have been used so I might have a chance of seeing them. -mattbuck (Talk) 15:54, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your response and permission. Unfortunately, source code links to flickr wouldn't be possible as they are printed guides. I can credit you on the contents page with other photographers/tourist boards if agreeable. This may sound obvious, but do I assume your name is Matthew Buck? Please let me know if the above is agreeable. Kind regards Howard

I'd prefer to be credited as "Matt Buck", and that's fine. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

On models...

Hi Mattbuck, since you brought up the OO Scale decision at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fiat 880 DT tractor.jpg I wonder whether you've been following model issues. I've tried to gather thoughts and support for this issue at User:Elcobbola/Models and I'm wondering whether you'd be willing to give me feedback on it. We appear to have differing opinions on the copyrightability of models, so I'd particularly appreciate comments on where you think my position is flawed or incorrect. Эlcobbola _talk 20:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hm, thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 39 444003 158881 377303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «15 Aspire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Deletion request

As you can see, this image File:Ceramica de Pilar Tirados 04 by-dpc.jpg has its OTRS permission, which affect the work photographied, so it is not a copyright violation. Please remove the template, thanks. --DPC (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. --DPC (talk) 18:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Ups!, it wasn't you who removed the template, so back to my first phrase: please note the OTRS permission. --DPC (talk) 18:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorted, please feel free to remove the deletion template in such cases, and strikethrough on the DR page. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:13, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2009 MMB 00 «01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Images from User:Boudoir

Hi!

I received an email from User:Boudoir and replied to the user and to OTRS. --Palnatoke (talk) 05:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

OK, let me know when OTRS want them undeleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:26, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 38 57312.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 62 Ruislip.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok in spite of minor CA --Poco a poco 19:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Danrok 10:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruswarp railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 20:04, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brockenhurst railway station MMB 03 444010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 76 57308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --The Photographer 12:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 73 156414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB X1 East Midlands Conference Centre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

cretins

have made the railway/train issue difficult here and on wp en - I have limited time to pursue at the moment... unfortunately some locations and transport bodies here in Australia have utilised the term 'Train Station', and as a result, there are pockets of resistance... I agree with you, just a problem dealing with templates/categories created in wp en with the wrong terms in the first place... sats (talk) 15:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB R4 Business School North, the Exchange and Djanogly LRC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd get rid of some dark area, but ok --Poco a poco 19:39, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hackney Central railway station MMB 06 313123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:30, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Danrok 13:17, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 16:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 29 Trafalgar Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, imo --Rjcastillo 13:47, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, just wanted to thank you for editing my picture Image:LasLajasBeachPanama.jpg that finally got quality image status :)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 75 158813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok although left side perspective improvable --Poco a poco 23:16, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 31 150101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side could be sharper, but ok --Poco a poco 18:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbury and Islington station MMB 05 378012 378015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromley North railway station MMB 01 465931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but improvable DOF --Poco a poco 19:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not fond of the DOF but ok for me --Poco a poco 19:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi Dear! Thank you so much, for your editing on this photo! @};- Best regards:--Mehdi^Talk 07:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 27 165108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kings Cross railway station MMB 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crazy but ok --Poco a poco 23:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «K8 Henbury Loop Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not a very exciting composition but quality ok --Poco a poco 23:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 17 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 23:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reading railway station MMB 42 165102 165132.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 05 66721 221127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 48 Ruislip Lido.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 20 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not a master work, but don't see a reason why I shouldn't promote it --Poco a poco 20:52, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham Autokarna MMB 20 Buick Riviera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well, the rainbow umbrella is not a great help but the subject looks ok to me --Poco a poco 20:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Khortan

All the photos were mine not stolen from internet as you think! you ve shitted in all my magnificent unic photos stupid! this is me "khortan=previous pournick"

I don't know what you're talking about. Perhaps you could calm down and explain the situation in more detail. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

A stupid math phd! student called "Mattbuck"has deleted all "MY' unic photos!, sorry for his inconvenience! How will he correct his mistake I'm afraid! Such a stupid place is Wiki! A silly one can shit on all of your works! (user:khortan)

Erm, no. As far as I can see, I have never had any interaction with User:Khortan. None of Khortan's images were deleted by me, nor nominated or even looked at by me. They were deleted due to local Armenian copyright laws. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 21 170108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 88 92032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Y9 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 20:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «22 Canons Marsh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fenchurch Street railway station MMB 02 357220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's slightly distorted / tilted. Take a look at the very left pillar. --Tuxyso 18:54, 18 February 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 19:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC) QI now. --Tuxyso 15:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katy Perry gig Nottingham 2011 MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise and sharpness are OK with regard to shooting conditions. I also like this crop with all the lightened smartphones and cameras. Mood is captured well. --Tuxyso 21:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conwy Estuary MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --The Photographer 12:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Ahmose-Meritamun’s inner coffin.jpg

Please can you mark this image? I have waited for almost 10+ hours for the license to be verified. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

• Thank you very much for the assistance. The image must have fallen through the cracks at flickr human review and been missed. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:53, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 10 3717 "City of Truro".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:58, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chepstow MMB 11 Gloucester to Newport Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 16:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «K5 The Galleries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 14:06, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB Z8 Atrium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe with a perspective correction it would be nicer, but ok. --Kadellar 16:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC) I did try a perspective correction, but it forced too harsh a crop. Mattbuck 02:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Fred Kaps.png

Hi,

I noticed the template that you added to File:Fred Kaps.png. The source to the license is in Dutch. (http://www.beeldengeluidwiki.nl/index.php/Afbeeldingen_in_de_Beeld_en_Geluidwiki) This link is also provided at the image's page. It says "Alle afbeeldingen met als bron het archief van Beeld en Geluid, zijn te gebruiken onder Creative Commonslicentie naamsvermelding-gelijkdelen." (All images with have Beeld En Geluid's archive as source can be used under CC-BY-SA.) Two exceptions are given: Screenshots and more recent images commissioned by Beeld En Geluid. The Fred Kaps however falls under CC-BY-SA. Clausule (talk) 21:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok, sorry about that. By the way, when linking to files, add a : after the square brackets and before File - this way it displays it as an inline link, not the actual image. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Oops, sorry, should have known that :-s. Anyway, thanks for your revision! Clausule (talk) 23:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB F7 Wensor Avenue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness isn't terrific, but OK for me -- MJJR 21:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lenton South Junction MMB 05 43048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 14 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but still good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langar Karting & Quad Centre MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington Pier railway station MMB 10 421497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 29 377504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 14:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «L3 Henbury.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Composition / motive is a bit boring that way. Have you tried 1/3 grass and 2/3 sky. Might be more interesting. --Tuxyso 09:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC) I don't think 1/3 would be good, but I have done a crop. Mattbuck 15:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC) OK now. Nonetheless I cannon see a real motive, but you will have known why you photographed it :) --Tuxyso 09:14, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Battersea Park railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice clouds, but the station is too dark. --Kadellar 16:38, 23 February 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 11:21, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Better now. I'd like it even more lightful, but ok. --Kadellar 13:00, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 23 350237 350262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this one. --NorbertNagel 19:42, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapham Junction railway station MMB 19 377212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 42 Bury Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 01 Roald Dahl Plass.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 14:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 21 158852 222020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not fond of the composition but ok for QI --Poco a poco 14:49, 24 February 2013 (UTC) You're not? That's a shame, I thought it was quite interesting, partly because it shows the more local train type (class 158, near) against the intercity type (222, far) that East Midlands Trains has. Mattbuck 11:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minehead railway station MMB 14 4160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «I4 Bristol East Junction 43122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB W2 Millennium Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caledonian Road and Barnsbury railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ackward composition, but ok --Poco a poco 18:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «J1 Bristol to Exeter Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI... but very unspectacular. --Carschten 16:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 02 395006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB 82 Goose Fair.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. --ArildV 21:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Sharpness

Hi Mattbuck, I just started to review some of your QIC nominations, and I hardly dare to go on declining. Each one I’ve looked at tonight is definitely blurred, or rather un-focused. Look at this one: The composition and lighting of the preview made me think "whow", but in 100 percent view, the trees are blurred, so is the brickwork, and the structures of the background building. Nothing in the pic is crisp sharp, and the right half seems to be even worse than the left. Too bad, as the image’s idea is very good. – I’m not going on now in order not to annoy you too much. Maybe your camera needs re-adjustment? --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

If it's no good, please just decline with comments as to why. I know not all my photos are good, and I shall do what I can to remedy the situation. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

As for any images you pick being representative, sorry, but no. The ones you pointed out were taken 3 years apart and with completely different cameras (well, different body, lens, batteries and memory card, but the strap was the same). I've tried to sharpen the image right. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:59, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bedminster railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Andrews Road railway station MMB 10 08XXX 66137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «B7 Clifton Suspension Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:07, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Linking author and account

Hi Mattbuch, it looks like the "problem" is fixed now with [this this edit]. Still I wonder what kind of validity does this edit have. If I find pictures of somebody called John Williams, create an account called JW2013 and affirm in my page that my name is John Williams, then everybody would be happy but I didn't verify the identity. I also wonder if the problem exists only because I put my name in the EXIF data. If that field would be left empty than there would be no issue? Poco a poco (talk) 23:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

I think it's just that people are used to seeing bluelinked author fields. I added my comment by way of explanation as to why it went to discussion. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:38, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Southgate railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 19 221119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 11 Humber Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 22:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment red CA in the left half of the image, otherwise good. --Carschten 16:18, 26 February 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 13:29, 27 February 2013 (UTC)  Support yes --Carschten 16:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

The wp:orange

Hi Dear Mattbuck! plz changing your current attention box after reading wp:orange! using this color with this box is prohibited!--Mehdi^Talk 12:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

First off, this is Commons, not en.wp. Second, as for my similar en.wp banner, the policy says "strongly discourages fake user talk notification banners that mislead readers into thinking they have new messages". My banner does not tell people they have messages, it informs them that I would prefer they use my talk page rather than emailing me. I fail to see the problem. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

thanks for ur descriptions.--Mehdi^Talk 15:20, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby MMB 35 Church of St Mary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 68 43127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Kreuzschnabel 00:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloo station MMB 12 455903 455722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Kreuzschnabel 23:04, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria station MMB 14 456022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Agreeable noise at ISO 800 :-) --Kreuzschnabel 22:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winchcombe railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine pic! --Kreuzschnabel 22:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 34 332003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Comment some pincushion distortion evident in top right corner. Purpy Pupple 01:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Distortion fixed, also played with the colour balance. Mattbuck 11:35, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Good. I’d suggest to crop out the red thing on the lower left, it’s rather distracting. --Kreuzschnabel 22:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC) I did consider that, but it made the crop too tight on the train. Mattbuck 00:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 91 222001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 12:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support OK. --A.Savin 11:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB W8 Melton Hall and Business School North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it is the 4th time I support this view --Poco a poco 23:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patchway railway station MMB 20 43172.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Balloon Fiesta 2009 MMB 31 G-UPOI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 17:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB 56 Ruislip.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

re: File:Gajayana Stadium.jpg

Hi, I was wondering if you could restore File:Gajayana Stadium.jpg that was deleted as part of the mass purge of images by Yodha Oktavian (talk · contribs). Unlike all the other images by the user, it looks like it actually had a compatible Flickr license. --Ytoyoda (talk) 04:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! --Ytoyoda (talk) 13:21, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

No problem. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «L7 Barton Hill Depot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 17:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Westbury railway station MMB 26 43004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 19:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Yes, good quality, but still needs a perspective correction, Poco a poco 19:32, 6 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:07, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Crop is now not optimal (see street lamp) but QI level --Poco a poco 22:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- Arcalino 10:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «K3 The Galleries.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 48 158857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK -- MJJR 21:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 15:11, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weston-super-Mare MMB 54 North Somerset Courthouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 27 321412 350262.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting, barely QI - you could brighten the bottom area (at the driven wheels} --Tuxyso 21:22, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Thatched-roof in the Maldive Islands 01.jpg

Hi Mattbuck- Light sharpening applied. Please let me know if it could use more. Thanks! --Godot13 (talk) 23:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB P6 Accommodation Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lymington MMB 03 Harbour 421497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 12:40, 10 Marh 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edgware Road tube station MMB 04 C-stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Weak support --Kreuzschnabel 22:47, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clifton Campus MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 16:47, 08 March 2013 (UTC)

nudist eva

how did you ran into her pics?

And maybe you have more? pics + information?

regards

verlas

I have no idea what you're talking about. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

e.g.: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eva_2012.jpg

I have no information on her, you can probably find more of her pictures by following the source link back to flickr. I didn't have anything to do with the images, they were uploaded by other people and taken by yet more other people. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeds railway station MMB 28 333015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pickering railway station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, dramatic clouds. --Tuxyso 14:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney MMB 05 Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 29 220018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 11 221131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Bedminster railway station - geograph.org.uk - 2567964.jpg

File:Bedminster railway station - geograph.org.uk - 2567964.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

95.200.144.125 23:19, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit dark but good quality. --Selbymay 13:34, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good composition --Rjcastillo 02:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Twyning MMB 01 River Avon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raskelf MMB 08 East Coast Main Line (West Moor Road).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 45 222005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective (left side) not perfect but acceptable --Poco a poco 12:38, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Myrabella 10:05, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB H8 Business School North.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cool --Poco a poco 20:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackhorse Road station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 45 31601 380007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Indeedous 19:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shirehampton railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB G7 Donation not Discrimination.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA, but ok --Poco a poco 19:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baker Street tube station MMB 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just ok --Poco a poco 22:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 32 144018 142089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light is a bit harsh, but still OK. --Tuxyso 21:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farringdon station MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby railway station MMB 08 156452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:24, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leeds railway station MMB 21 150136 321902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Re:File:Eggplant Flower in Hong Kong.JPG

Are you sure it is over exposed? That's impossible!--Earth100 (talk) 14:35, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

The top petal's edge is clearly #FFFFFF, and the sky should be blue not cyan. I'm also willing to oppose on grounds of JPEG artifacts. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

But the sky is blue!--Earth100 (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

That image is definitely not QI, I'm sorry. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

I believe that i need more than just one user to tell if that's a quality image.--Earth100 (talk) 03:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Then change decline to discuss. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 04 185115 185113.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Whitby railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 14:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tibshelf services MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «10 Atrium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 18:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doncaster railway station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not crisp sharp but nice composition and good lighting IMHO. --Kreuzschnabel 18:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redcar MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 18:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 27 150245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hazy weather + Sharp photo :) QI. --Tuxyso 20:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «H2 Cumberland Basin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paddington station MMB 29 332003 332008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterborough railway station MMB 21 91104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 20:31, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 36 185115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waterloo station MMB 17 159014 455903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB G5 395019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 21:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 15 North Yorkshire Moors Railway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:02, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clevedon MMB 45 Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 47C 158777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:27, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 43 43257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 40 925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 07:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abererch railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 02:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB X9 Portland Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Sjokolade 13:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 35 144013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:12, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 60 222015 222102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 22:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Darlington railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:26, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redcar East railway station MMB 07 142023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Almost a bit artsy - I like it though. Actually very much! --Martin Falbisoner 19:31, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB A4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hackney Central railway station MMB 10 378005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 43 380007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aysgarth Falls MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Promotion with ISO800. Booyah! Mattbuck 02:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thirsk railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting image composition. --NorbertNagel 21:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

re I am a complete and utter idiot. Sorry.

Um, wow, apology accepted.

Just next time, breathe a bit and count to ten or something.

I hope you're doing okay?

And have a great day!

Sincerely, -- Cirt (talk) 15:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 72 222009 158813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 04 375902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raskelf MMB 05 East Coast Main Line (West Moor Road).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! South Ruislip station MMB 01 1992-stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good idea to take this when it was raining, too. --Jastrow 13:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC) It wasn't raining - the watery effect is simply due to looking through curved windows obliquely. Mattbuck 18:52, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-07.jpg

The image, uploaded by Ximeg, has a perfect exposure. Why did you decline it? --Earth100 (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

If there are areas of #FFFFFF which are clearly visible then, by definition, the photo is overexposed. See for instance the bright white bits about halfway down on the left. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Okay, i was just worried a bit...--Earth100 (talk) 13:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Euston station MMB 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 55 43251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «C4 Clifton.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:13, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 31 507017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB M4 Physics.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Healey MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Luke Ford Creative Commons license

Matt,

Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed. Reading the email chain from Luke Ford, the alleged photographer of the photos, Luke's license to Wikimedia is defective. He never agrees to license the photos. The subsequent behavior of additional photos from the alleged copyright holder is also suspect. This is not an issue related to privacy. The defective license issue has not been raised but it does need to be addressed. Photos from this alleged author are all copyright violations.

Then please create a section at COM:VPC to discuss this. But I will not delete an image when the nominating rationale is "I don't like it". -mattbuck (Talk) 22:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 21 390048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pickering railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not enthusiastic about sharpness, but overall acceptable --Poco a poco 19:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redcar MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abererch railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Minor CA. --Iifar 17:22, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 06:27, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Pancras railway station MMB G2 395007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Note added. --Iifar 17:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 06:27, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 25 Fireworks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, from my point of view. --Nino Verde 16:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Redcar East railway station MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I can't see why not. Ok by me. --Jbribeiro1 23:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northallerton railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments many of your photos are very good technically, do not worry if they are not mentioned, it would be interesting to see photos beyond the train station, around the village, nature, etc.. Thanks --The Photographer 12:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC) I know, but right now I'm running a 2:1 ratio of railway photos needing nomination to other photos. Mattbuck 11:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)  Info Ok, no problem --The Photographer 13:58, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 36 156401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:17, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Temple Meads railway station MMB 42 220003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 79 158813 222001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Byland Abbey MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really sharp but OK --JLPC 17:00, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 54 67018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Willesden Junction station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA (overhead wires and suspension frame) --Kreuzschnabel 17:35, 23 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 20:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 33 156408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fellation Tracy and Rick-1.jpg

When you closed the deletion request, did you take into account the fact that the image has been set to private on the couple's Flickr stream? Their comment of "Everything in the public stream is quite tame" implies that only pictures in their public stream are meant for the general public. Therefore, those not in the public stream are not, including the above photo. --Conti|✉ 11:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 56 45596 31601.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 22 170103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lincoln Central railway station MMB 11 Lincoln Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Improvable crop in the bottom but ok --Poco a poco 13:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dawlish railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jervaulx Abbey MMB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 14 North Yorkshire Moors Railway 45407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow! Good quality. --Steinsplitter 16:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «L4 Henbury Loop Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 16:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 54 1744 45596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:10, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «E4 River Trym.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 09:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Open University MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 21:38, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 08 221124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentCA at left windows --Nino Verde 07:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 22:37, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Ok now. Thanks. --Nino Verde 17:27, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Löschung der Bilder zu Niepel-Katzen

Bin absolut nicht mit der schnellen Löschaktion einverstanden. Hatte unter den Löschantrag eine Antwort geschrieben, die unberücksichtigt blieb. So sollte man nicht mit langjährigen Autoren verfahren! Die bilder waren nämlich schon einige jahre hier präsent!! Please answer me and reconstruct this image. --44penguins (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Bitte senden Sie eine Anfrage an COM:UDEL und den Fall für die Restaurierung werden berücksichtigt. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:29, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peterborough railway station MMB 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dramatic atmosphere, DoF could be larger but still OK. --NorbertNagel 19:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 19 323239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hednesford Hills Raceway MMB 06 Pontiac Trans-Am.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountains Abbey MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. It isn't tilt. --Alchemist-hp 07:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 72 156408 153XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Washford railway station MMB 11 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 48 380007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB C0.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 15:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «73 Netham Weir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:26, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liverpool South Parkway railway station MMB 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info Image seems to be tilted counterclockwise a bit.--Earth100 09:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 20:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shepherd's Bush railway station MMB 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 17:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winchcombe railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 02:26, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Toilet (#2)

Hi!

I have just handeled this DR which was started by you. Some of the images have been deleted previously. As such, can you please explain User:Toilet what exactly was wrong with those files, please? Because your English is better than mine, I think you are the better person to do this. Thank you in advance. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 13:08, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your prior participation in a discussion

• Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg

You previously participated in a discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg.

There is another discussion ongoing, again, at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg.

Please if you wish to do so you may voice your opinions and comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sex intercourse.jpg.

Thank you for your time, -- Cirt (talk) 17:26, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:46, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB R3 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 11:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 30 144007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yatton railway station MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northallerton railway station MMB 03 185126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA at the pilar at left part of image. --Nino Verde 13:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC) And everywhere else. Fixed Mattbuck 11:15, 4 April 2013 (UTC) CommentMuch better :) --Nino Verde 16:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Village_pump#Commons:User_pages

Draft is at Commons:User pages, initial discussion at Commons:Village_pump#Commons:User_pages. Any thoughts? Rd232 (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Williton railway station MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:17, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stoke-on-Trent railway station MMB 22 390006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! West Croydon station MMB 10 378136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 26 390026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 09:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks...

... for your very useful work on QIC to review especially those photos which have not yet assesed for a longer time. This are ofter photos with good quality but with motives which do not attract at the first glance (not seldom photos of mine). Keep on reviewing such photos, it is a very important and good work! --Tuxyso (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I do tend to review old ones, just had a week or two off due to being away from my normal PC and monitors I trust. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toddington railway station MMB 04 5619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:22, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualitiy Arcalino 09:31, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2011 MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I love this picture, well done --The Photographer 03:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London MMB C6 South Eastern Main Line 465177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 19:42, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 02 73002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avonmouth railway station MMB 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 08 Greymatter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit soft, but just ok --Poco a poco 18:47, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruswarp MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orpington railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney railway station MMB 05 150227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 08:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 60 156411 153308.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not 100 percent sharp, but OK. --Kreuzschnabel 05:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goathland railway station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice pic but misleading description again IMHO, since it does not show the actual station but two trains, one of which is approaching the station, under a bridge right north of it (AFAIR, I have been there few years ago) --Kreuzschnabel 05:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Description amended. Mattbuck 12:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC) OK now. --Kreuzschnabel 17:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scarborough railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a bit dark imo --Rjcastillo 15:41, 30 March 2013 (UTC) Brightened. Mattbuck 11:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Grondin 15:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Trains of TOC by line

Matt, I notice that all the categories your template has put in Category:Trains in the United Kingdom by operator by line have been sorted with a blank space. This needs changing to the TOC name otherwise we'll have fifty categories one after the other without the A-Z headings.

In other words [[Category:Trains of British Rail by line‎| ]] ought to be [[Category:Trains of British Rail by line‎|British Rail]] Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Fixed - the sortkey was set as {{{2| }}} instead of {{{1}}}. -mattbuck (Talk)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Park station MMB 01 365519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:31, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney Junction railway station MMB 05 73002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB Z0 Pope Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow! Good quality. --Steinsplitter 09:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea Mills railway station MMB 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 09:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 29 43097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --Grondin 17:37, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol Parkway railway station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A little dark for me. --Grondin 15:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Brightened. Mattbuck 20:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --Grondin 15:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 12 153329 47237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 17:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! New Cross railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 17:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sheffield station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:51, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 91 150263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 09:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB 45 Melton Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 09:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 29 144007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lichfield Trent Valley railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but it is slightly tilted, see the fence and the traffic light. --Kadellar 22:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC) I think I probably got the orientation from the signal box in the background, on the basis that buildings are more reliably upright than anything else around. Mattbuck 08:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC) That's true, but someone has to fix the station then. --Kadellar 14:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Grondin 10:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 12 Marlborough Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Harsh shadows. --Iifar 12:52, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 20:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Good for me. --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest Block

Your block of Tony1 followed your highly insulting comment and attack on him on en.wiki. Admin on Commons are expected not to make blocks when they get into a personal dispute with another, especially when they were baiting the other person. I respectfully request that you unblock and recuse yourself from any future blocks that involve people you picked a fight with. Ottava Rima (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heron Quays DLR station MMB 01 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 32 158881 444035 444025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 12:19, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porthmadog WHHR station MMB 02 158822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:47, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 08 390037 390046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments DoF could have been better (only f/5,6) but ok --Poco a poco 11:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:12, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

COM:AN

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Neotarf (talk) 07:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 11 465043 465008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 17:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB K0 Portland Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Moroder 15:36, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB C3 Nottingham Canal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:36, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ngapoi Ngawang Jigme part.jpg

Thank you for renaming Hunu (talk) 16:13, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethnal Green railway station MMB 02 315828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 03 43313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Nino Verde 14:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green Park tube station MMB 01 1996-Stock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- MJJR 21:22, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Highbury and Islington station MMB 19 378146.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portishead MMB 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe useful? --Moroder 09:16, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottinghamshire Pride 2011 MMB 14 Greymatter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «K9 Henbury Loop Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:38, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 40 158954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harringay railway station MMB 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 12:22, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sutton Bank MMB 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB 95 150121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB E3 Coates Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Beach railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:32, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charing Cross station MMB 21 376036 375713 375XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southampton Central railway station MMB 03 220003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 06:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kidderminster railway station MMB 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Noise on the sky, color balance problems --Nino Verde 17:06, 11 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Mattbuck 19:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC) No significant changes in color balance, sky is still noisy (but noise has lower frequency). Also i note two points: CA and dust, which i did not notice previously. --Nino Verde 10:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC) I've fixed the CA and spot (think it was an artifact from the blur applied to the sky). I honestly don't know what you want in terms of colours, I've tried to make it more natural. It wasn't a nice day. Mattbuck 16:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC) I thought again, and ok. May be the color depends from personal preferences. BTW, you could try to check sign or some pieces of trash or buildings parts as a reference gray color (with respect to green foliage reflections) --Nino Verde 05:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC) As mentioned above. QI for me. --Nino Verde 05:03, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Nottingham

Of interest? Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Afraid not. I would go, but I'll be leaving Nottingham and moving to London a few days before. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

QI Comment

Hi Mattbuck- I fixed the image in the April 18, 2013 (last row) section of QI. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 18:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bristol MMB «M2 Severn Beach Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Hill tube station MMB 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition and QI. But I had wait a second until the people passed. --Tuxyso 07:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stratford International station MMB 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 04:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport railway station MMB 18 158956.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 04:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lydney railway station MMB 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 04:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 33 153362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 04:14, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2012 MMB 25 Smudge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Derby railway station MMB 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect but better --Poco a poco 13:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Image deletion

Hi actually I don't need to share it anymore... Some problems happens and I need to remove it.

Once you release something under a free licence, you cannot take it back. What problems? Perhaps if you explained in more detail we might be more sympathetic. -mattbuck (Talk) 01:04, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University Park MMB N9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloucester railway station MMB 45 158955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Combe Circuit MMB C8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Penyulap

Hi. Could you just check that I have summarized the restriction correctly? --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:22, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that's correct. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Additions to Commons:Questionable Flickr images/Users

Please use the automated tool on top of Commons talk:Questionable Flickr images to blacklist Flickr users, this ensures it gets an entry on the blocked user list + blacklists the User-ID for review robots. This also helps to keep both pages synchronized.Thank you. --Denniss (talk) 11:40, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:32, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

No dee to be sorry, you just missed the nice tool (by Rillke I assume) that makes our work a little easier. --Denniss (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardiff Central railway station MMB 30 153362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 12:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 01 A169 Hole of Horcum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 09:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tamworth railway station MMB 53 43321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:57, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taunton railway station MMB 18 221119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now. --Nino Verde 12:12, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jubilee Campus MMB «00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --Christian Ferrer 17:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Image

Sorry, I didn't notice the DR, I thought it was a file erroneusly dodged from the DRs for that uploader. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 22:28, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kentish Town West railway station MMB 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northampton railway station MMB 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay.--Earth100 03:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Severn Tunnel Junction railway station MMB 09 158820.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment a bit noise, CA. imo --Rjcastillo 19:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Fixed Mattbuck 01:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Comment Strong sharpening halos (see bottom edge of the bridge) – I do prefer a bit noise over brute de-noising, losing detail, and subsequent re-sharpening --Kreuzschnabel 08:03, 20 April 2013 (UTC) Dehaloed. Mattbuck 13:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Kreuzschnabel 20:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newport MMB 04 River Usk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wraxall 2010 MMB 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:39, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockport railway station MMB 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham MMB B2 Radford Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:30, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bishops Lydeard railway station MMB 16 4160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! North Yorkshire Moors MMB 04 Fair Head Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Avonmouth railway station MMB 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:20, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grantham railway station MMB 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Railfest 2012 MMB 59 380007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! York railway station MMB 46 185137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northallerton railway station MMB 01 185126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:17, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nottingham railway station MMB 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria station MMB 11 460001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beeston MMB 10 Humber Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 07:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manchester Piccadilly station MMB 23 185135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nailsea and Backwell railway station MMB A7 221XXX.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! King's Cross railway station MMB 15 365517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe too dark but good quality. --Christian Ferrer 04:52, 26 April 2013 (UTC) It was not a bright station at the time. Mattbuck 12:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

QI Comment

Hi Mattbuck, Could you have one more look at the April 13 QI nomination. I tried to sharpen the top of the image, I just don't know if it's enough. Either way, thanks for your comments. --Godot13 (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)