Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mhhossein!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Contents

File tagging File:Fatimah Calligraphy.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fatimah Calligraphy.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Stefan4 (talk) 13:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  Hello, Mhhossein. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Vector GhadirEdit

I've uploaded a vectorized version of the Ghadir logo. Hope you like it.

As I've said, I'm new here and you should know it wasn't intentional. The wording is rather confusing : This site requires you to provide copyright information for this work, to make sure everyone can legally reuse it. This file is my own work. This file is not my own work.

Since I made the .svg file, would that be considered my work or yours?

Since I can't delete the file and start over, I'm trying to figure out how to edit the information. GDJ2015 (talk) 03:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

@GDJ2015: Thanks for signing your post. As it is shown here, I am the copy right holder of the logo and have released the work under CC license, i.e., I have premised others to use it or modify it provided that they attribute the work to me and credit me. Even, in the cases the file is modified, as what you did with the logo, the copy right is mine and you have to refer to me. Check how I'll fix the problem and get familiar with it for your further works. Mhhossein (talk) 05:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Voice of AmericaEdit

Hi, Mhhossein. Per User talk:Krassotkin/Archive/2016 Voice of America materials of Voice of America are now allowed into Commons. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

This meant to be mineEdit

Hi Mhhossein,

I trust you're fine. While others may not consider this edit constructive, I want to thank you for helping the new editor. You deserve more than a barnstar. All the best. Wikicology (talk) 13:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikicology: It's a good feeling to see others trust you. Thanks for being patient with my bold edit on your talk page. --Mhhossein talk 16:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Reugny - Mairie.jpgEdit

Hi, This is an abusive DR. This is a 19th century ordinary building, so there is absolutely no reason to create a DR here. It would be much better for you to create DRs only when you know the subject. Here you don't know the French law about architecture, and the history of this building. Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

This is also the case for DRs of old Italian buildings you created. These buildings are 2,000 years old, in case you didn't know. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:39, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Yann: Thanks for the point, however We work based on COM:PRP and the uploader or anyone who wants to keep the file has to show that the subject is in PD by now. Regarding Italian buildings, did you know that per Italy FOP law "photos of any cultural heritage asset are subject to pre-emptive authorisation, a fee and other restriction due to the cultural heritage and landscape law?" --Mhhossein talk 18:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but your understanding of COM:PRP is wrong. It means if there is a doubt, delete, but here there is no doubt whatsoever. AFAIK, we keep Italian pictures if the building is old, regardless of your quote. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Yann: Contrary to you, I'm speaking based on a documented copy right law which raises enough doubt for starting a DR! Apparently you are unaware of it. But I had mentioned it in my nomination, I wonder how you could ignore it! Mhhossein talk 05:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
I am very aware, but, I repeat, your understanding of this is wrong. You need a significant doubt to start a DR. Please correct this, you are just creating useless work for already overbooked admins. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:41, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Yann:Actually, you did ignore it in practice, even if you were aware of it. If you knew it, I mean if you were aware that "photos of any cultural heritage asset [in Italy] are subject to pre-emptive authorisation, a fee and other restriction due to the cultural heritage and landscape law," you would verify that the mentioned law makes enough doubt for raising a DR. Your comments are not fair at all. --Mhhossein talk 13:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Yann:Don't forget that you're a volunteer like dozens of others. So, thanks to your efforts, you are not forced to be one of those "already overbooked admins." --Mhhossein talk 13:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Please see Commons:Non-copyright restrictions where it says "Commons considers non-copyright restrictions to be matters for photographers/uploaders or reusers and are not grounds for deletion of works from Commons". --Sporti (talk) 06:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Sporti: But we're exactly talking about a copyright restriction! --Mhhossein talk 06:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
I'm sure we are not: "Non-copyright restrictions are restrictions on the use of material which are distinct from copyright; such restrictions may apply to works in the public domain (e.g. works no longer subject to copyright) or be additional restrictions on the use of copyrighted works". It is even called cultural heritage and landscape law (not copyright). --Sporti (talk) 07:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
FOP have been used as a ground for DRs on several occasions. --Mhhossein talk 10:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Even your DR about Iranian items is not OK: the DR is fine for the recent building, but not for trains and escalators. So once more, do not create DRs until you get a clear understanding of copyright, which do not have presently. Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

@Yann: Don't make such unfair and non-constructive comments, please. You're speaking as if you'd never made a mistake. However, I assume your good faith. Note that I have made several successful nominations. --Mhhossein talk 13:40, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Attention pleaseEdit

Well, what you just called " useless work for already overbooked admins" now appears to be a legal act the project really needed. I think, you were hasty enough to close those discussions (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rome (14485102670).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rome (14468593049).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arco di Costantino Roma (14660480248).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rome (14824128856).jpg) as 'keep'. I would not bite other users, as you just did. Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 12:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

You can see how this was deleted. --Mhhossein talk 12:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Source?Edit

Yes, it's on a publicly accessible Google Drive shared folder. --Filip (§) 22:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Filip: I could not open the link as I may have gone the wrong way. Could you please provide me with the correct link? --Mhhossein talk 03:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8UTKzll2fWpUGF3dUdqVmJyRms --Filip (§) 06:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello Mhhossein, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Luanda street scene (6178282208).jpgEdit

Hi, Do not revert me. I closed the DR after reading the discussion, and it was open for more than a week. I don't think you should reopen it yourself. I don't mind if someone else think there is a reason to reopen it. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Yann: OK. Just tell me why you think the file should be kept? Btw, I'm well aware of your background. --Mhhossein talk 12:45, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
@Daphne Lantier: As an uninvolved admin, would you mind seeing if Yann's actions was right? I believe that he ignored our ongoing discussion where we were discussing that the Angola's FOP law has a major "if" ignoring which can lead into copyright violation. As you see, no valid answer is given to my concern (also the other user was waiting for an email from Angloa's embassy.) --Mhhossein talk 14:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
I think it would be a better idea to post either at COM:VP/C or COM:UDEL. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
@Daphne Lantier: Thanks for the suggestions. But shouldn't the closing admin be answering about his action? I think his closure was weird and needs to be investigated by other admins. --Mhhossein talk 05:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Well, you can post at COM:AN/U, but that's usually reserved for serious problems. COM:VP/C would probably be the best idea if the file has been kept, and you dispute that result. Daphne Lantier 06:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks again. This user had been previously taken to COM:AN/U for similar reasons. --Mhhossein talk 13:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Noor vs Nasr-1 missileEdit

I saw you declined this file move, but the source page appeared to describe it as a Nasr-1, but now I see the source page identifies both Nasr-1 and Noor missiles. The file mover put a long description in Chinese about how it's obviously not a Noor (translation: "The figure is not Noor missiles, no inlet and other obvious external features, no rocket booster, rocket engine ignition, in line with Nasr-1 missile features"). It is used on the Farsi page about Noor missiles but they copied the entire thing from the English Wikipedia page. I'm happy to move it back if you're sure it's not a Nasr-1. 18:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

ِDear User:Wikimandia, at first I was upset by the revert, then I searched more and now think that the removing was right. Thank you for that. --Mhhossein talk 18:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. I also noticed that the Iranian missiles are copies of the Chinese missiles, so it made sense that this user might have some expertise. Take care! Wikimandia (talk) 19:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

niki KarimiEdit

hello i'm sure that file was my own work. Picture taken in Festival International des Cinémas d'Asie in Vesoul. Please Not to delele thanks Jeffdelonge (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey Jeffdelonge, the file is removed because it was apparently infringing copyright. Older versions were found elsewhere on the net. --Mhhossein talk 12:40, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

PatrollerEdit

Hi, I marked your account as a patroller instead of just autopatrolled. If you're doing license reviews or otherwise looking at an image, you can click "Mark this file version as patrolled" to certify that it seems fine, or you're tagging it appropriately to deal with any problems. Guanaco (talk) 11:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

@Guanaco: Thank you for granting the new right. I'll use it to reduce the backlog. --Mhhossein talk 13:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

ReviewEdit

Hi Mhhossein, I would like to ask you to Review the pictures in this category. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey I've already passed one of them and will review the rest. --Mhhossein talk 19:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
  Done I also changed the licensing terms as I really doubt if those files were in PD-Iran. --Mhhossein talk 20:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Tasnim PhotosEdit

Hi! Please read the {{Tasnim}} description. Do not mark the Tasnim photos without the photographer name and Tasnim watermark as reviewed. (few examples: [1] [2] [3]) -- Meisam (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi Meisam! Thanks for reminding. I was not aware that the authors were not credited and I had to pay attention. However, as I explained here, the photos don't seem to be copyvios, hence I turned the copyvios into DR so that we can discuss them deeper. --Mhhossein talk 05:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I also added my comments. -- Meisam (talk) 11:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Zinedine Zidane by Tasnim 02.jpgEdit

In reviewing this image you forgot to remove the Tasnimnews review needed category at the bottom of the page. I must admit is is easy to forget, so please be careful in future when reviewing Tasnim images. I've removed it for you. Ww2censor (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Ww2censor: Thanks for reminding. I have opened a topic here in this regard. Thank you again for telling me this. Regards. --Mhhossein talk 18:42, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

File:The exploded office.jpgEdit

 
File:The exploded office.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MasoodHA (talk) 15:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Pakpour-2017 Tehran attacks.jpgEdit

 
File:Pakpour-2017 Tehran attacks.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Per the discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license.
Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MasoodHA (talk) 07:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Nakhl Gardani Taft town, Iran.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nakhl Gardani Taft town, Iran.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

MasoodHA (talk) 07:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

عکسهایی در صفحه خلیل نظری که حذف گردیده اند.Edit

سلام و درود دوست گرامی از اینکه فارسی مینویسم عذرخواهی مرا پذیرا باشید زیرا متاسفانه دسترسی به کیبورد انگلیسی ندارم، خواستم بپرسم عکسهایی از مدارک و جوایز و لوح تقدیر هایی را در ویکی انبار آپلود کنم اگر امکانش هست راهنمایی کنید،زیرا قبلا اینکار را کرده ام و دوستان بدلیل کپی رایت حذف کردندولی اگر صاحب اثر خودشان این عکسهارا نشر نداده بودند که الان در فضای مجازی پر نبود پس اجازه نشر را داده اند. همچنین خواستیم که عکسی که شخصا گرفته ایم را بارگزاری کنیم باید چ ویژگی هایی را دارا باشد؟ بازهم قبلا از پاسخگویی سپاسگزارم Sajadbvb (talk) 13:34, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

سلام بر شما، خواهش میکنم. فارسی نوشتن هیچ مشکلی ندارد. این که یک عکس در فضای مجازی پر است، به هیچ وجه مجوز نمیشود شما آن را در اینجا بارگزاری کنید. اگر تصاویر به این دلیل حذف شده است، کاملا صحیح بوده است. برای جلوگیری از حذف، چنانچه به صاحب اثر دسترسی دارید مطالب موجود در این صفحه را مطالعه کنید و براساس آن عمل کنید. اگر عکسی را که شخصا گرفته اید که مشکلی وجود ندارد و میتوانید بارگزاری کنید. --Mhhossein talk 15:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

درود بر شما، منظورمان این است که ما به شخصه عکس از مدارک گرفتیم ولی چون عکس شبیه دیگر مدارک موجود در نت شده قبول نمیکند، مدارک رو نمیشه جور دیگر آپلود کرد؟ Sajadbvb (talk) 17:11, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

@Sajadbvb: سلام و درود، به تفکیک پذیری (رزولوشن) هم اهمیت داده میشود. اگر تصویر شما بالاترین کیفیت موجود را داشته باشد یعنی مربوط به شماست. --Mhhossein talk 17:31, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
@Mhhossein: درود مجدد، الان ما یک عکس با رزولوشن پایین آپلود کردیم ، اگرهمان عکس را با رزولوشن بالا آپلود کنیم اشکال اینکه قبل آپلود شده در ویکی پیش نمیاد؟Sajadbvb (talk) 09:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
@Sajadbvb: همانطور که عرض کردم، اگر تصویر شما دارای بالاترین رزولوشن باشد به طوری که قبلا جای دیگری بارگزاری نشده باشد، این موضوع به میزان زیاد تایید میکند که شما خودتان به تصویر اصلی دسترسی دارید. --Mhhossein talk 16:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Mhhossein: درود فراوان، عکس را خودمان گرفته ایم ولی قبلا با رزولوشن پایین آپلود کردیم حال رزولوشن بالای آنرا میخواهیم آپلود کنیم اشکالی که ندارد؟
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sajadbvb (talk • contribs) 19:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
سلام. رزولوشن طوری باشد که قبلا مشابه آن دیده نشده باشد. --Mhhossein talk 12:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

رفع مشکل حذف تصاویرEdit

سلام بر شما
وقت بخیر
چند تصویر بارگذاری شده که JuTa اقدام به حذف آنها کرده. به این دلیل که قادر به خواندن مجوز نیست (چون وبسایت فارسی است)! دوستان گفتند این مشکل را شما میتوانید حل کنید. برای همین مزاحم شما شدم. آخر این صفحه درموردش بحث شده. متشکرم.

@Sesatamo: سلام وقت شما هم بخیر، در همان صفه بحث خودتان پاسخ خواهم داد. --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mhhossein: تشکر بسیار. اما گویا شما فقط مجوز یکی از تصاویر را تایید کردید. این مشکل برای همه این تصاویر ایجاد شده که همۀ تصاویر هم از یک وب‌گاه و با همان مجوز هستند، و اخطار حذفشان در همان صفحه بحث موجود است. ممنونم--Sesatamo (talk) 12:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

@Sesatamo: این تصاویر را خود سایت ایشان تهیه و منتشر نموده است؟ --Mhhossein talk 13:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
@Mhhossein: بله کاملا.--Sesatamo (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
@Sesatamo: مثلا این منبع رو ببینید. اینها هم مدعی هستند تصاویر مال اونهاست. این را چه میگویید؟ --Mhhossein talk 19:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mhhossein: در مورد این عکس مشکلی نیست. این عکس را به خاطر زاویه و کیفیت مناسب انتخاب کرده بودم. با این حال در این مورد اصراری نیست. میتوان عکس مورد اشاره را حذف کرد و دوتا از تصاویر این دیدار که بدون آرم اختصاصی وب‌گاه رسمی ایشان جای دیگری بازنشر نشده‌اند را جایگزین کرد تا چنین شبهه‌ای هم نباشد: (این عکس و این عکس). سایر عکسهای بارگذاری شده نیز تماما توسط وب‌گاه رسمی ایشان تهیه و منتشر شده‌اند. متشکر از بررسی و عنایت شما--Sesatamo (talk) 22:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

سلام، شما لازم نیست مرا پینگ کنید. خب، شما بفرمایید چطور میشود قبول کرد مثلا این عکس یا عکسهای قدیمی را باز هم همین سایت تهیه کرده باشد؟ --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

سلام. اینطور میشود قبول کرد که «فقط یا اولین‌بار» توسط این وبسایت رسمی منتشر شده‌اند. (البته بعدا به عنوان عکسی از یک منبع معتبر، مورد استفادۀ وبسایتهای خبری نیز قرار گرفته‌اند.) این موضوع مخصوصا در مورد تصاویر به راحتی قابل جستجوست.--Sesatamo (talk) 12:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

@Sesatamo: در مورد تصاویر جدید بهتر است از عکاس بخواهید از طریق OTRS اعلام رضایت کند. در مورد تصاویر قدیمی هم از بقیه کاربران میپرسم. --Mhhossein talk 19:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mhhossein: سلام دوست عزیز. به نظر میرسید تصاویر منتشر شده با مجوز CC BY-SA 3.0 از یک وبسایت رسمی معتبر، مانعی برای بازنشر در ویکی پدیا ندارد. اینطور نیست؟--Sesatamo (talk) 20:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

@Mhhossein: سلام بر شما دوست عزیز. گویا این موضوع به دست فراموشی سپرده شد!؟--Sesatamo (talk) 11:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

@Sesatamo: سلام برخی از تصاویر توسط من و برخی دیگر توسط دیگر کاربران تایید شده اند. --Mhhossein talk 19:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Architecture in IranEdit

Hi, There are still 2 requests pending on COM:UDR for more than a month. Could you have a look please? See also Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Architecture in Iran. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Yann: Sorry for the delay. I already made my comment. I can keep on, if there are more things to say. --Mhhossein talk 19:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your comment. Yes, we need more information about architecture and copyright law in Iran. Jim argues that architects can't do work for hire, while others argue for the opposite. What's your opinion? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Yann: I modified a mistake and made another comment. --Mhhossein talk 13:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Tasnim reviewsEdit

Just a heads up. When you are reviewing Tasnim images that have had the proper substituted template applied {{subst:Tasnim/subst}} it will have included the category Category:Tasnimnews review needed. After you give it a good review you must remember to manually remove the category, otherwise it still sits there for review. I just fixed File:Funeral of Levon Haftvan 02.jpg for you. If you find Tasnim images that have just got a plain {{Tasmin}} template it is best to replace it with the substituting template. If you don't know about this page, Commons:Where is the license on various sites? you may find it useful. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Ww2censor: Thanks so much.--Mhhossein talk 17:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

ReviewingEdit

Hey Mohammad Hossein, can you do reviewing of my uploads replace of Leoboudv according to this discusion.--Rafic.Mufid (talk) 11:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

@Rafic.Mufid: I noticed Leoboudv's pings but also noticed that you were unwilling to have my intervention. That's why I did not respond there. Which files do you mean? --Mhhossein talk 05:49, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Many of the files i upload in these days from Fars source. It's not " intervention", we both are users but you can do review. --Rafic.Mufid (talk) 07:42, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Rafic is talking about you reviewing images in this Category As for me, I have marked enough public execution images and feel unwell. Sorry, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Leoboudv: Hi, Sorry for the delay. I'll see what I can do, though that will be not easy. --Mhhossein talk 17:47, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
  • OK. Its a simple review. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Happy NowruzEdit

  Nowruz
Happy Nowruz Mohammad Hossein! Rafic.Mufid (talk) 08:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
Rafic.Mufid: Thank you very much. --Mhhossein talk 09:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

You've got mailEdit

Hi. You've got mail.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:33, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jeff. See my reply, please. --Mhhossein talk 11:59, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

ReviewEdit

Hi Mhhossein. Would you please Review the images in this category I have uploaded them for a week, but the license review has not been checked yet. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 09:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Mbazri:   Done - Although I don't mind if you ask me for review, note that the files will be reviewed by one our reviewers or admins, soon or late. --Mhhossein talk 11:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Ok, thank you anyway.--Mbazri (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Sockelflak - German AA cannon.jpgEdit

So changing the brightness and contrast of an existing photo is copyright infringement? Brilliant! Snowdawg (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Snowdawg: Oh, thanks for letting me know. I'll withdraw. --Mhhossein talk 18:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Note that I have reverted to the first version as per Commons:Overwriting existing files. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Please undelete Mujahedin photoEdit

Hello - We have taken the photo ourselves. Maybe other blogs have copied that from Wiki commons. Please return to photo to Wiki Commons.https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PersianDutchNetwork#File:Mujahedin_Khalq_Gathering_in_Paris_June_2018.jpg

Thanks --PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
The picture need to be released under a free license by the author and/or copyright holder (who is the author himself at most of the times). Moreover, unfortunately I don't have the right to do the undeletion and the admin won't restore it unless it's proven the work is free. See Commons:Licensing for more details. --Mhhossein talk 15:59, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
We have taken the photo ourselves in Paris. How should we prove that? --PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 22:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, the author needs to release the photo under a license compatible with Commons:Licensing. --Mhhossein talk 04:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Are you the author? --Mhhossein talk 05:06, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, we are the author and we already released the rights. Similar to other photos we have taken and uploaded to Wiki commons. --PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean by "we are the author"? Who took the photo? By the way, I'm seeing enough instructive comments on your talk page on how to prove authorship by OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 05:18, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
I have taken the photo myself. Someone else has copied that from Wiki Commons and because of that you have deleted the photo without consultation! So strange and disappointing.--PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 19:07, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
If it's done by you, then you can prove it via OTRS. I think you're familiar with the process (Revision #210978534). --Mhhossein talk 19:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
No I am not familiar with the process. Please explain. Thanks.--PersianDutchNetwork (talk) 04:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
Please see your talk page once again, you're apparently advised by other editors regarding OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 12:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Maserati Tipo 60Edit

Regarding "Maserati Tipo 61 fr.jpg‎", you denied the renaming request. Could you please offer more details on how maserati.com does not show such error (at least provide a URL or similar reference for readers like me). I have no doubt this is a Tipo 60 (ref. http://www.barchetta.cc/english/all.maserati/Detail/2460.Tipo.60.htm]) ... Ketil3 (talk) 08:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ketil3...Sorry for the decline. But that was because of this url. As you see, there's apparently no significant difference in the two models appearance. Moreover, you can see File:Maserati Tipo 61 Birdcage 2459.gif. Do you still think it's certainly Tipo 60? --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
There is the engine difference, here's another calling it Tipo 60: [4]. But, OK ... just keep the name. It is not so important.Ketil3 (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Dear Ketil3. I'm not insisting on the current name. You can make another rename request, so that other file movers address your request. --Mhhossein talk 15:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Change NameEdit

Hi Mhhossein. I'd like to ask you to change the name of this file to Mohammad Pakpour in 2018 Chabahar suicide bombing. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 18:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Hey Mbazri, can you try {{Rename}} instead? That would be a good practice for you. It's easy, but don't hesitate to ask me for help, if you had issues with using the template. --Mhhossein talk 05:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

  Done. Thank you for your helpful guidance. But tell me please, how will it be changed? Will an administrator do it?--Mbazri (talk) 15:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Yes, admins or file movers will do the rest. --Mhhossein talk 16:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
That's moved by an admin. --Mhhossein talk 12:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Administrator!Edit

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Sicilianu | Slovenčina | Svenska | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


 
An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Mhhossein, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard an it subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons-lr webchat on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

--Krd 13:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Congratulations! 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
@Krd, 4nn1l2: Thanks. --Mhhossein talk 11:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

QueryEdit

Hi, could you clarify for me why the image does not qualify for speedy deletion, as you noted here: [5]? --K.e.coffman (talk) 07:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi K.e.coffman, sure! PD issues are usually better to be discussed by other users given the complexity of the regulations we've got regarding them. I suggest you to explain at the DR why you think the works are not in PD and they will be deleted with 7 days (some times more), if the given rationale applies. --Mhhossein talk 08:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the response. The commons deletion process can be unpredictable; see for example this deletion request from October that is still to be actioned:
Here's a deletion request that I started, also from October:
Do you have insight why these two are still to be closed? --K.e.coffman (talk) 18:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay, yes that can happen sometimes. You can ask for closure at the administrators noticeboard. --Mhhossein talk 03:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

علت حذف عکس شهره قمرEdit

درود. علت حذف فایل شهره قمر چی بود که حذفش کردین؟ Nimaganji62 (talk) 20:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

منبعی که برای تصویر ارایه شده بود استفاده رایگان را مجاز ندانسته بود. --Mhhossein talk 07:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Shroudtwitchcon2018.jpgEdit

This file was uploaded by Nate N8bit Herrara, which is apparently the creative lead of PUBG, as shown in the LinkedIn profile.. Their username corresponds to that user. In addition, I have a reddit exchange where I asked them to upload said photo (the same account also uploaded the initial appearance of the gallery on the web, on Imgur, so I'm sure it is indeed n8bit's reddit account) . How should I continue? Should I upload screenshots of that reddit PM exchange to OTRS, or what? Tutelary (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

I am mistaken. Carry on. Tutelary (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

OTRSEdit

Hi Mhhossein,

An image that you recently deleted has been referenced in an OTRS ticket to allow it to stay. -- 1989 (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm dealing with the ticket. --Mhhossein talk 17:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
  Done --Mhhossein talk 17:02, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Rep. Sharice Davids official photo.jpgEdit

I see you deleted this photo. It appears on https://davids.house.gov/about which has the copyright statement "Except as otherwise noted in this website, all of the content of the website constitutes a work of the Federal government under sections 105 and 403 of title 17 of the U.S. Code." --GRuban (talk) 14:50, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Hey, GRuban. I've restored it for now. Can you provide the link to the source? --Mhhossein talk 18:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
This photo has been on shariceforcongress.com since at least October 5, 2018... a month before she was elected, three months before she sworn-in as a US Representative. This is not a US Government issued photo. Corky 18:25, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the insight. --Mhhossein talk 02:50, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

ImageEdit

Hi Mhhossein, this image escaped my notice (because it's under a new name) - I was wondering if this too could be deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Stan old,
I can't say for definite but I'm 90% convinced that image was uploaded previously here,
Many thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Hey Davey. The file was uploaded just one time and apparently had never been DRed. Do the job and ping me, please. --Mhhossein talk 03:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Will do, Cheers, –Davey2010Talk 22:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Image is now at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Breasts size 85C descr.jpg, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 23:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
I'll do the job if there was no objection after 7 days. --Mhhossein talk 07:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
@Davey2010:   Done. --Mhhossein talk 12:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Pallavi PurohitEdit

Hi, How are you saying that the pictures I have uploaded are copyright violations?! Just because those pictures are existing on the internet before?! They too have been uploaded by me only!

All the pictures I have uploaded have been removed citing copyright violations!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous.celeb (talk • contribs) 19:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Then you need to prove that you're the author/copyright holder. See COM:licensing. --Mhhossein talk 06:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

File that you deleted!Edit

Hello Mhhossein

Can you tell me why you deleted the file I have uploaded? I can prove that photographer who made a photo for this pianist grants the permission this photo to be used freely. What do you want em to provide, where can I send email (what kind), just let me know. Thanks!Asuas (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Hey Asuas, you have not mentioned the file in question and I can't be precise. However, the file were probably deemed as a violation of the copyright. To prove that every thing is OK with the file, please read the blue box here which begins with "This page gives non-lawyers an overview of complicated copyright laws...". --Mhhossein talk 12:10, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, again, this is a file I am talking about. Actually Giorgi Latso has sent usage permission to OTRS yesturday, and he got reply already. We will submit one more email about granting to me the permission from Girogi Latso (he owns the copyright eprmission from Helmut Tremmel, photographer) that I can upload this file on wikimedia commons: File:The latsos1.jpj. Also another file has been deleted and I own the permission for this one: File:Giorgi_Latso_giving_masterclasses_at_Moscow_Conservatory_of_Music.jpg What do you suggest to do, so both can be restored? Thank you! Asuas (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi Asuas. Sorry for the delay. Get sure the author/copyright holder, not the subject being depicted in the photo, send his/her permission letter to OTRS. --Mhhossein talk 03:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Mhhossein. Both are now approved, so it's all ok. I am still awating for one more approval about this this photo I have uploaded yesturday. Actually I need to ask you one question: I made some edits on this photo, so I thought I would resubmit the new one, or can I just reupload it? Thanks again for your help!Asuas (talk) 07:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Every thing is explained here. --Mhhossein talk 08:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

File:9 Dey 88 demonstrations (1).jpgEdit

 
File:9 Dey 88 demonstrations (1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 05:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 1989 (talk) 06:10, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PrugiochaiEdit

Please close. --CptViraj (Talk) 06:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

کارتونEdit

سلام. این اثر آلفردو مارتیرنا هرناندز است. Hanooz 00:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Hanooz: سلام، ممنون که اطلاع دادید. انجام شد. البته خودتان هم میتوانستید اقدام کنید. باز هم تشکر از توجه شما. --Mhhossein talk 05:31, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
ممنون. چون شما بازبینی کرده بودید گفتم اطلاع بدهم. Hanooz 07:24, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

File:CF Baumann - Das Haagthor abgebrochen 1834, Gouache ca1850 Inv.1079 (SW060).jpgEdit

Hello, the file is not visible now.
Also File:CF Baumann - Das Haagthor abgebrochen 1834, Gouache ca1850 Inv.254 (SW232A).jpg
Also File:CF Baumann - Das Ev. Theologische Seminar in Tübingen, Lithographie ca 1840 Inv.9008 (SW220D).jpg
Please corret it! --Mewa767 (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mewa767. I'm opening the files with no difficulties. What do you mean by "visible"? --Mhhossein talk 07:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Today is the first file File:CF Baumann - Das Haagthor abgebrochen 1834, Gouache ca1850 Inv.1079 (SW060).jpg OK but the other two aren't visible. Under the file name is only the message "No file available", --Mewa767 (talk) 10:39, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Then please give me the link of the files you can't open now. Regards. --Mhhossein talk 11:13, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Today are files OK. --Mewa767 (talk) 11:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Mhhossein".