Open main menu
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
← Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 →



Delete this redirection, you need no one will look for a picture of that name. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 16:34, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 10:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Navje

Hi, can you please review the closure of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Navje? I have not removed the nomination of both files. Thank you. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry I didn't notice that. Anyway, I have reverted my action on that DR and File:Navje pozimi, Ljubljana.JPG, the file File:Navje-Ljubljana.JPG are kept upon your request.--Morning (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:00, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MillcreekrancH

Please take a look - this topic not fully completed. --Art-top (talk) 04:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 09:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

2 files

Could you review these 2 files for me: File:Holocaust Memorial 18 September 2011.jpg and File:Oyakodon (Chicken And Egg On Rice).jpg. Thanks. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 10:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 12:54, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
  Thank you. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 12:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Just the two of us...

Just checked the deletion log, it's just the two of us for 150 entries back. Keep up the good work! Sven Manguard Wha? 16:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. My pleasure--Morning (talk) 04:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Adminship

Hello, Morning Sunshine. Now that you ask, yes, I would like that very much. --RalgisWM-CR 01:27, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Morning Sunshine. Thank you for your trust by nominating me as administrator. I'm happy to see how many others trust me as well, and I'm glad to understand what I need to become a better editor on Commons. I hope to improve as user and editor so I can be what our community needs, and perhaps be a good administrator if the community wants to. Once again, thank you. --Ralgistalk 18:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Poor action by you


I have reverted an edit by you which was done on several images. You have decided for some files that a "License review [is] unnecessary" which is definately incorrect for this special group of files example. Others will review them. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 07:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know that. In fact, when I was still a reviewer, some reviewers like Leoboudv and Bencmq did the same thing, removing the template. Moreover, the Flickr account which is credited to U.S Government and the EXIF data have shown that they belong to U.S Government. If needed, I think it should be put here as marking them passed as we usually do is not relevant because the license is all right reserved. Regards--Morning (talk) 10:43, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Any image from flickr, panoramio etc. should get a license review. As you may know, flickr licenses can easily get changed or the image can be removed. As such, the initial licensing would be no longer traceable. Which could cause a problem. So, please never remove license-review-tags again - they are extremely useful. --High Contrast (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Image from Flickr misreview by you

Please note that File:Trams_de_Lisbonne_(Portugal).jpg, as reviewed and approved by you, had mismatching Flickr link, Flickr description text, and (after a 2nd upload from the original uploader, apparently prior to your revision) Flickr image. This should never happen. I fixed this one (and will be trying to fix the other two possibly affected images), but there might be more like it. -- Tuválkin 13:34, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

OK, but I fix the link according to the reuploaded version by Wahldresdner (the uploader) as of 20:11, 28 October 2012 before your reverted one, which is located here under cc-by-2.0, so my review is still valid and the situation is the same with 2 others. It may be because that the uploader misupload the image she/he want so please don't revert it again. Thanks--Morning (talk) 13:39, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You said you fixed the link to match the 2nd upload, but you didn’t fix the description not the geolocation. When you review a Flickr image everything must match. Besides, you actually didn’t even did only a link fix, rather you linked to yet a 3rd image, by mistake (never mind that now, it is all fixed).
The orignal uploader uploaded the 2nd image by mistake (not the 1st), as we can infer from the mismatching description and link to the original. I noticed that when I was categorizing this image among Lisbon trams: This image is already in use by wp:de — I’ll have to check with the involved editors there to know if they meant to use this image based on what is/was depicted or on what is/was discribed in the text. This is not good at all.
As I understand it, reviewing a Flickr upload must be more than just check the license — all contents integrated from there to Commons must be checked, both image and text data.
It is both my personal interest and project’s that we don’t have mismatching images and information about them (that includes the link to the source, and the info thereon — description, geolocation, authorship, etc.). To reach that goal I will do the necessary changes to any image in Commons, including reversions of mistakes like this. (All this especially valid cases of images from someone like Alain GAVILLET — who is a trusted source of information about the subject, not just a guy who takes nice shots under a suitable license.)
-- Tuválkin 14:22, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Flickrreview, a special form of License review is to ensure that the COM:EI match and to record this. Of course it is nice if you correct other mistakes as well. -- Rillke(q?) 18:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

deletion of images from david lopez ribes

hello you have deleted all the images I upload from the works of david lopez ribes, I have all the permission, I make myself the photos of his works please help me or give instruction to re-upload¿? the images i thanks --Hippo2012 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, please read and follow the instruction at OTRS carefully. Then post your undeletion request at COM:UNDEL. I or another admin will consider restoring it if the permission is sufficient. Regards--Morning (talk) 05:32, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Help request

Hi, Morning Sunshine. You've helped me in the past so I've come to get your opinion. Nycpraxis (talk · contribs) appears to state here that the file they've uploaded is a photograph taken by someone else. However, their upload contains a self-release rationale. Does this make sense to you or am I missing something important? Thanks for any help you can bring to the matter. Tiderolls 02:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

This image is clearly missing evidence of permission and I have taken it to COM:DR. Thank you for letting me know this. Regards--Morning (talk) 05:35, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


Hello Morning Sunshine, see in the upload of this user, there are some images from copyvio. Related for Miley and Demi and Selena. Kind Regards. --MyCanon (talk) 09:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 11:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for this service. Kind Regards. --MyCanon (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Picture of Red Hat On Head.jpg

Your closure of that discussion was wrong. Commons:Scope says that "the uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page on a Wikimedia Foundation project is allowed". That image was for use on a user's wikipedia user page. Ryan Vesey Review me! 15:19, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

  Restored sincerely sorry for that Morning (talk) 16:13, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
No problem, thanks for restoring it so quickly. Ryan Vesey Review me! 16:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Special Barnstar
Thanks for your hard work! Steinsplitter (talk) 12:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

thanks for your swiftness

you are a sunshine!thank you for having changed that title so quickly , It seemed important to me because that picture was used by the list of historical monuments in France and it was a big mistake.Pimprenel (talk) 17:07, 15 November 2012 (UTC)pimprenel

Thank you very much. I really like my username Morning (talk) 03:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

From АнДрЕй ПаВлОв

Hello, I have a question: why do you specify this photo, as copyright infringement, if a user has already noted this as an appropriate license? АнДрЕй ПаВлОв 20:25, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I deleted your image because it's obvious license laudering which means the free license on Flickr is totally fake, uploader have no rights on it. Regards Morning (talk) 03:22, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
  • I mean that the user is on Wikimedia Commons, has confirmed, that the photos were posted under a free license. АнДрЕй ПаВлОв 11:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
You mean User:FlickreviewR?--Morning (talk) 10:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Rollback and file mover requests

As I explained in my summary at the request page, "I already have file mover and rollback rights at the English Wikipedia", so I already have experience, and therefore I feel I can be granted those rights, without the "80 edits" reasoning. It's up to you though, your the admin, I just though I would let you know. Take care, TBrandley 04:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello TBrandley. I know you are trusted user on but Commons is not The file renaming rules of Commons is a bit different to Wikipedia's. Moreover, you had already been blocked here twice for uploading copyvio so I have a few doubts about giving you those rights. Anyway, please use {{rename}} instead and gain about 1000 edits more and I will reconsider. Regards--Morning (talk) 04:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
OK, thanks. TBrandley 04:46, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

  Hello, Morning Sunshine. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Early closes

I have sent you two e-mails -- is your e-mail address correct? .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:42, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Sincerely sorry, I don't check my email very often so I prefer to be notified. I just want to help with backlog, however, if it does harm to the project, I won't do that again. Thank you for telling me. Best regards--Morning (talk) 08:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Changing names

You are making big mess - after remove images are not visible in articles [1] ! pjahr @ 13:29, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

I think you are mentioning about this image. User:CommonsDelinker should do that or you can do it manually if there is any problem--Morning (talk) 13:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
And the changes are meaningless - what is the sense of change "File:Schlechter.png" to "File:Carl Schlechter (profile).png" ????? And so on, so on... pjahr @ 13:34, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
This is impossible - you are administrator! I just can't believe it... pjahr @ 13:40, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't think it's meaningless. That could make the file name more descriptive with both first name and last name and reduce the confusion with other people with the same last name. Moreover, there are no reason to decline the renaming request according to Commons:File renaming.--Morning (talk) 13:44, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: Autopatrol given

Thanks --Rotpunkt (talk) 11:33, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

From АнДрЕй ПаВлОв

Why are you silent? АнДрЕй ПаВлОв 18:25, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. User:FlickreviewR is just a robot and it can review the license only but unable to check the copyright status of the image --Morning (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Hey, thank you very much for the file rename, as i never thought it would be done in minutes, thank you very much! Earth100 (talk) 12:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

youtube licence

Regarding your edit to File:Pinpoint_Strike_on_Ahmed_Jabari.jpg.png your summary says "Marking as possible copyvio because Standard YouTube License, not suitable for Common" can you expand on that? Because I copy/pasted the description and licence from another image from a youtube that was validated [2], so I am not certain what is the issue, thanks.

Hello. Only videos (or screenshot from it) with "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" from YouTube are allowed on the Coomons. Video with "The Standard YouTube license" is copyrighted by default so they aren't free. Click "show more" on a video to see its license. You may want to read this. Regards--Morning (talk) 05:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)



I noticed you did a lot of renames like this one:

  • 07:05, 26 November 2012 Morning Sunshine (talk | contribs | block) moved page File:Andrea.png to File:Pat Andrea (1995).png (Custom reason: this is not Andrea Corr) (revert)

Where in "File:Andrea.png" did you see the "Corr"? --MGA73 (talk) 11:17, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

I think DragonflySixtyseven gave an example of someone's name which has Andrea in to clarify the file name. I think File:Pat Andrea (1995).png is more descriptive than the old name with just Andrea (and I think there are many people named with it). Is that OK?--Morning (talk) 11:27, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Oh, I see this discussion, I won't do that again. Sorry--Morning (talk) 11:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Okay. Thank you. I was wondering if there was something I was not aware of :-) Cheers! --MGA73 (talk) 08:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Restoring an image

Hello, you recently deleted an image. The license is found in bottom of website's main page [3]. I couldn't participate in the discussion during the time. I'd appreciate if you could restore it after checking. Mohamed CJ (talk) 19:02, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

  Done Thank you for the link--Morning (talk) 11:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for help in renaming yoga related images! OrenBochman (talk) 22:57, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your kindness. Best regards--Morning (talk) 05:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

license review


You made a license review of File:Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Gaza Beach (1).jpg. Have you made an actual second review, or did you trust Matanya? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello. Although the license on Flickr appears to be unfree, the permission is already confirmed by this OTRS ticket and it can only be viewed by OTRS volunteers --Morning (talk) 05:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Has the webmaster of been contacted? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:55, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes, there is an OTRS ticket, but that is not the question. The problem is that many people have the impression that user Matanya has been adding that blanket permission ticket indiscriminately to files whose copyrights were never owned by the flickr account who gave that "permission". And I must say that after an initial skepticism and looking at several of those files, I now tend to agree that the concern of those users seems serious. We wouldn't want to participate to flickrwashing. It appears that you have intervened on the description pages of some of those files and that you have access to OTRS. Hence the question if you actually reviewed the ticket or not and if you can confirm or not that the ticket includes a permission from the actual copyright owners. From your comment above, I'm guessing it means "no". -- Asclepias (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


Hi! I am interesting in reverting and finding vandalism here at Commons, are there any programs or tools that can help the user in question (such as Huggle)? As I currently notice that Huggle doesn't work here. I'd appreciate any help you can offer. Thanks very much, TBrandley 23:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

We do, indeed, not have such nice anti-vandalism-suites that the English Wikipedia has.
Dependent on which kind of vandalism you would like to fight here, you need very different tools.
In the gadgets you'll find RTRC (you need the patroller right to see it), and there is an IRC channel for live watching changes.
For templating users, we have Gadget-UserMessages
If you like to check new files, there are AjaxQuickDelete (and QuickDelete for tagging a file and notifying the uploader), GalleryDetails and VisualFileChange for creating a mass-deletion-request or mass-changing files.
I sometimes patrol some pages, I find in the recent changes, there is/was a Commons:Counter Vandalism Unit and information about patrolling are at Commons:Patrol.
You can request the patroller right at COM:RFR.
Finally, thanks for your interest. Keep in mind that you will be confronted with a lot of different languages and cultures. So please try to be friendly and explanative. You can report serious abuse with evidence to COM:AN/B (often the fastest way to get someone blocked)
-- Rillke(q?) 00:26, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Flickr pics

Hi Morning Sunshine, in the last time several pics like this were uploaded from Flickr. If I've seen that right you reviewed them. Does the review include just formal questions, like 'no copyright notice on Flickr' or does it also include a check if the pic really is free? Best regards --JuergenKlueser (talk) 09:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy

Hi Morning Sunshine. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your trust. However, I'm not very good at FoP so I don't often deal with it except for very obvious case. This is the only thing that I can look at and I sometimes do some Google search if necessary. I think User:Jameslwoodward is the suitable person that you are looking for. Regards--Morning (talk) 05:13, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, I've contacted Jameslwoodward. :) --Raoli ✉ (talk) 17:17, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
...and I've added the whole discussion in the Administrators' noticeboard. Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:58, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Flickr review


When you're reviewing Flickr files, please also educate users about Commons best practices.

Users should be encouraged to upload on Wikimedia Commons the original file version, not a low resolution one.

And honestly, this kind of upload isn't acceptable at all: File:Kóstas Stafylídis.jpg... 178 × 283... --Dereckson (talk) 12:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Wrestling images from Flickr

Hi, Morning Sunshine. I don't think the following images from the "Pro Wrestling Revolution" Flickr account should have passed review, because I don't think the owner of the Flickr account holds the copyright to them:

Four of the five of them bear this copyright notice in the EXIF: "Copyright© 2012 Jeremy Maurer. Any use of this image without the permission of the photographer is in violation of the copyright."

I don't think there's any evidence that the owner of the Flickr account is Jeremy Maurer. In my opinion, everything sourced from this Flickr account should be treated as suspect and deleted in accordance with the precautionary principle. --Rrburke (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Good catch. Sorry for not noticing this. I am fully aware of this and I have worked many similar cases and here is the most recent. I may have been forgot it this time. Anyway, I have nominated 4 images above for deletion. For File:Bestia-666.jpg, I think it's OK here. Again, than you very much. Best regards--Morning (talk) 15:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

youtube licence

Regarding your edit to File:Pinpoint_Strike_on_Ahmed_Jabari.jpg.png your summary says "Marking as possible copyvio because Standard YouTube License, not suitable for Common" can you expand on that? Because I copy/pasted the description and licence from another image from a youtube that was validated [4], so I am not certain what is the issue, thanks.

Hello. Only videos (or screenshot from it) with "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)" from YouTube are allowed on the Coomons. Video with "The Standard YouTube license" is copyrighted by default so they aren't free. Click "show more" on a video to see its license. You may want to read this. Regards--Morning (talk) 05:21, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, now I see what you mean, I'll keep that in mind for youtube related marital.(sorry for taking so long to respond, I don't usually login in here)--Mor2 (talk) 03:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

  Thanks for the filemover rights. That was quick. :) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:43, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
You're welcome. Btw, I have removed your autopatrol as it is included in the image reviewer right so unnecessary--Morning (talk) 05:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Oh okay! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:47, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Albatros C.VII

Sorry, the right filename is File:Albatros C.VII.JPG, not File:Albatros C.. Thanks :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 08:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 08:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Early closes

Again, please wait the full seven days. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

You mean today? I didn't close it as early as the previous days. I also wait for the next 7 hour as you said. INeverCry closed it just 1 hour later than me and sometimes it's only 15-30 mins--Morning (talk) 15:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steampunk Pendant1.jpg. It's a December 4 DR. You closed it at 23:07 on December 10, which is 53 minutes early. As I said before, almost all of the time it's not a big deal, but occasionally it's good to be able to say that the DR was open the full seven days.
I also think it is important for Admins to follow the rules unless there is a really good reason not to -- it sets a good example for others.
Note that I do not interpret the rule as tightly as some might -- some could say that for it to be open a full seven days, it could not be closed until 168 hours after the nom -- in this case, not before 04:51 on December 10. I think it's OK to close it as soon as it's midnight GMT on the sixth day after it was opened. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:25, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Heinkel he 114 san diego air and space museum 4.jpg and further

Hello Morning sunshine, I am a little confused and surprised about your decision to keep these files. Such pics are definitively taken by German photgraphers in the course of WW2. Even if the artist is unknown (which needs to be proven), the copyright has not yet expired. So how can a museum or someone else uploading it on Flickr claim the copyright or tell "unknown copyright"?

Let me assume: I scan a pic from a book, upload it to Flickr and state "No known copyright". Flickr does not have the chance to check this. Some time later I or someone else upload the pci from Flickr to Wikimedia.

I do not understand how Wikimedia on the one side has a strict policy and on the other side accepts such copyright infringements. Of course it may be the case that I missed something or misunderstood the policy. So please could you explain your decision? Thank you, best regards --JuergenKlueser (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I think the Flickr account is very trustworthy which belongs to San Diego Air and Space Museum. Normal Flickr user can't set their image No known copyright license, just authorized account can do this. Unless we can find the real source, they shouldn't be deleted, IMO. Anyway,I'm not very knowledgable of aviation. You can ask for more help from Russavia or post your questions on COM:AN. Regards--Morning (talk) 03:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Morning Sunshine, thank you very much for your answer! I can understand, and will follow your advice. Regards --JuergenKlueser (talk) 09:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi guys, Juergen dropped past my talk page, just wanted to direct your attention to Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mikoyan-Gurevich_Ye-8_(by_San_Diego_A&S_museum).jpg. IMO, all images from the SDASM are suspect in terms of copyright, and they should be deleted under COM:PRP. We might need to blacklist that particular Flickr stream to prevent images being reuploaded. russavia (talk) 09:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Russavia, thank you for your answer and for your link. In particular there is a link to the museums policy [5]. In that there is a statement about "Images with "No Known Copyright Restrictions" in The Commons on Flickr", which says The Air and Space Museum does not warrant that the sharing of these images will not infringe upon the rights of third parties holding rights to these works. It is your responsibility to determine and satisfy copyright and other use restrictions before copying, transmitting, or making other use of protected items. So wikimedia indeed should be extremely careful with these pics. Morning Sunshine, what is your opinion on that now? Best regards --JuergenKlueser (talk) 11:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
I think Russavia has said it all. I think all images from the SDASM should be taken to DRs. Again, thank both of you. Regards --Morning (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Just to be sure: did I make some mistakes uploading the photos? Reading the uploading page, I saw i can add new photos if the SDASM doesn't know the copyright. I don't want to be a problematic user... thank you. --Zerosei (talk) 16:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Zerosei, certainly nobody could blame you for taking a museum's claim at face value! You did the right thing, and in most cases we would not need to be having this discussion. But in this rare case, it seems that this particular museum may be proceeding without a clear understanding of copyright, and so we need to be especially careful with this one museum's Flickr uploads. -Pete F (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Ok, but please, read my comment in the talk page of Russavia. --Zerosei (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

  The Admin's Barnstar
Thanks for your contributions at Wikimedia Commons! TBrandley 03:16, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
My pleasure. thank you very much--Morning (talk) 03:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Did you ping Bryan?

I see that CommonsDelinker has not been active, just wondering whether you pinged Bryan to ask him to restart the bot? I have just pinged him to his email, but just wanting to get an understanding of whether he hasn't been asked, so he hasn't, or whether we have some more significant issue due to Toolserver.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

I have just known about this problem today through Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#CommonsDelinker. Our colleagues have asked him but got no response yet--Morning (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Just to say...

I think there is always a tendency to assume reliable hard working admins will continue to do their work and we forget to say thanks sometimes so "thanks" for all the work :) --Herby talk thyme 08:31, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Right back at you, Herby--Morning (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Men and youths at the riverside (Louvre museum).jpg

Hi. Apparently you ordered the replacement of File:Men river Louvre MAO690.jpg with File:Men and youths at the riverside (Louvre museum).jpg, but the latter redirects to the former for reasons exposed at User talk:Sreejithk2000#File:Men and youths at the riverside (Louvre museum).jpg. Also I don't understand why the global replacement took place three days after all this renaming business. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 23:38, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello I really don't understand about this. I didn't rename the files, Sreejithk2000 did it. I usually use CommonsDelinker to replace the old name as my browser sometimes freezes when I do it manually. I wonder if there is a problem. I don't know much about technical aspects on Commons--Morning (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
That's really weird. Perhaps the bug comes from the huge backlog CommonsDelinker had to purge. Anyway sorry to have bothered you. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick renaming of my file CramerAndStoll-uitlandsche kapellen vol. 4- pl 328.
Kind greetings, and a happy 2013!
Maarten Sepp (talk) 09:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Zh-yue-Steve Jobs.oga

  • OLD FILENAME: Steve Jobs Zh 20120218.ogg
  • NEW FILENAME: Zh-yue-Steve Jobs.oga

the extension filename was changed.--H2NCH2COOH (talk) 05:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Glycine, as a perfectionist, you'll be happy to see that .oga is the specific file extension for Ogg audio files. Our rename scripts automatically detect this while moving files and put them in the right place. Nothing a file mover could do about. If you have another question, don't hesitate to ask me. Cheers -- Rillke(q?) 14:23, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: File tagging File:Nanjing Zhongshan Gate.jpg

OK, I will try to inform the auther to send an OTRS mail to Wikimedia.--Jack No1 (中文/English) (talk) 15:30, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Can you stop canceling moves with the childish action "No valid reason" but they are valid reason?

Can you stop canceling moves with the childish action "No valid reason" but they are valid reason,why you cancelling moves without reason? what you doing to me?!--Mutemaxe III (talk) 08:51, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Monument to Galusha A. Grow Susquehanna County Courthouse Complex Montrose PA Aug 09.jpg

You didn't mark this 3D marker in the US. The sign says 'erected in 1915' it should be OK. I marked some other uploads by this uploader, but I prefer another trusted user or Admin to mark some other images just to be safe. Kind Regards and Happy New Year. Its 10:08 PM December 30 here in Canada. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:07, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

  Done Thank you and Happy New Year 2013, Leoboudv--Morning (talk) 06:09, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank You. May your family have a good 2013. --Leoboudv (talk) 06:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, although Lunar New Year is our main New Year holiday, which occurs in early February this year--Morning (talk) 06:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Blast furnaces Middlesbrough.jpg

Thank you very much for the very fast move of this image. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


Hi MS, I'm reviewing the uploads of a person that uploaded some images with wrong license. I got to File:Braunkopfpapagei.jpg and found that it was taken from flickr and you reviewed. However, the mentioned source does not seem the actual source of our picture. I assume it's a mistake and therefore it has to be deleted. I can do it if I'm right. Best regards --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 17:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

License review requests

Hi Morning Sunshine,
I don't want to sound rude or anything, but can you please not promote users to license reviewers before the requests are there for two days? I noticed that you promoted Hahc21 (talk · contribs) and Steinsplitter (talk · contribs) after 32 and 30 hours, respectively — and the rules clearly say that requests will be open for a minimum of two days. Not that I don't think those users should not be have been promoted, but I guess that we might use some more time in the future. Thanks, odder (talk) 09:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Remaining talk page

You deleted File:Ptashka in Tel-Aviv.jpg but seem to have forgotten about its now orphaned talk page. Cheers Ww2censor (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 13:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Ferdousi Square

Hi dear. plz answer my request. Thanks alot:--MehdiTalk 14:53, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

photos with permission into article

Dear editor morning sunshine why did you delete the photos from Amram Aburbeh article? They are the same as in the original Hebrew wikipedi entry, therefore "twin" version in English should have all the information excatly as the author intended. In addition the author put the photos "permission granted" free to public use , again we should respect the author ideas. Moreover there is "wiki a daniel ventura" that has used the same photos for his articles In conclusion I suggest you reverse your deletion and re-introduce, back into the English article as the photos have been there in the first place. Thank you Carmel Avivi-Green

I deleted those images because of their low resolution without EXIF, which looks like copyvios. Moreover, their sources are not properly indicated. However, if you can contact with the authors of them, please use OTRS (read and follow carefully) to confirm the permission. Regards--Morning (talk) 06:32, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Lakshman Namal Rajapaksa.jpg

Dear Admin (An image uploaded by me from flicker) has been categorized under Flickr images from blacklisted accounts by FlickreviewR bot,I uploaded this to use in ,This is not a flicker wash Photo,I am very sure about that,please consider about this and pass the Photograph under CC BY-SA-2.0,Thank you in advance. MediaJet (talk) 18:16, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I'm not sure about this case so I have taken it to this DR to see the opinion of community--Morning (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Anyway what you have done is great,Thanks MediaJet (talk) 11:23, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Panoramio review

I saw the large backlog too and told Admin Denniss here about it 2 days ago. I have marked maybe 20-30 images in the past 3 days but I work on weekdays and have to sign off now as its almost 11:00 PM here in Canada. Denniss has marked some panoramio images on January 17 (see his edits from 4:34 to 4:41. But perhaps you should contact some other more active Admins and ask them for help to mark the panoramio review category. The backlog is simply too large for a few people to handle. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

  • PS: Most of the pictures are of old 17th, 19th or early 20th century manors, churches, etc. If there is an FOP problem, someone will file a DR against the picture, not against you as most people know we cannot be expected to know the age of a specific church in Latvia. We just verify the license is OK...or not. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Early closes

As I see you have closed a License review again to early. This is obviously against the policy. Though, you have been warned for several times [6] [7] [8] you don't refrain from doing this. Actions against the policy are always bad, regardless how harmless they seem to be. Please stop it. Kind regards, Vogone (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

I am a bit confused about 2 days. Does it means 48 hours or a point of time? Stefan posted his aplication in 18 January and I closed it at the middle of 20 January. Moreover, he has many supports from trusted members of community, which is extremely obvious for license reviewer right. I'm in the different time zone with most of Commons editor so there may be some problems about time. If it requires 48 hours, I won't do that again Morning (talk) 00:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Of course it means 48 hours. It wouldn't make sense if a candidate would start his discussion at 23:59 and it would be closed at 0:00. Then you'd "override" one day of discussion. ;-) As time zone always UTC is relevant on multilngual projects. Thank you for your quick answer. Regards, Vogone (talk) 18:09, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quick note

Heya, I've just seen the DR's you started on some uploads. Instead of taking them to DR, just change the category from Category:Files uploaded by Russavia (cleanup) to Category:Files uploaded by Russavia (delete) and they can be deleted en-masse, instead of going to DR. Cheers, russavia (talk) 00:33, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

I know it. Thank you very much. Cheers--Morning (talk) 00:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Please Delete

Good day to you Admin :)

Below given links to some of portrait photographs uploaded by me,last year,at the time of uploading these photographs,Sri Lanka PD Template was seen like this -> Photographic works or applied art: During the life of the author and 25 years after his death,Later on somebody has updated it to look like this -> Photographic works or applied art: During the life of the author and 70 years after his death,I checked this fact,Its CORRECT,Earlier version is INCORRECT,So now under this Updated Template,below given photographs should not be RETAIN in Commons,So Please delete them.

Thanks MediaJet talk 08:21, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello MediaJet. As some of these image are being used in several wikis, I think it's better to take them to a deletion request. If there are no other problems, they will be deleted after 7 days. Cheers--Morning (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I see that's great,Thanks :) MediaJet talk 05:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Hi, yesterday I uploaded a few images from Hans Braxmeier's pixabay gallery, some of wich you reviewed, like Hat-59647_-_Hans_Braxmeier.jpg. But I added cc-by instead of the proper cc-zero, so I am marking them to review again, sorry for the waste of work. Lobo (howl?) 11:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I should have corrected the license in the first place.   Done anyway--Morning (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Bollywood Hungama image

Hello! You recently reviewed the image File:Kapoor PCA12.jpg. Can you please correct the source link mentioned in the description? The link doesn't take you to this image. I tried looking for the image but didn't find it. I had hence added the Category:Bollywood Hungama images not found to it. It would be great if you could change the source and then remove the category. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry for that. I may hit the wrong button. I have tagged this image as no source as I can't find them on Bollywood Hungama--Morning (talk) 12:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
No problem at all. Have a nice day! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Images Here

Some images in the above category with the 'Índios' title at the bottom have a source. Unfortunately, the uploader linked the flickr source to a flickr set showing all the images rather than a single flickr image. Just to let you know. I will order a few reviews but they are many images here. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:27, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

  Done I have added the real sources for each image and marked them for reviewing again--Morning (talk) 05:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
  •   Comment: Thank you. I actually typed in a 3-5 {{Flickrreview}}s for the uploader's images (not just 1 image) but I also left a message for this person here so hopefully this situation won't happen again. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Same Problem

The images of Fiat cars in this category have a flickr source but the uploader also linked the source to a flickr set. I order 25 {{Flickrreview}}s and they have all passed review. Perhaps you can do the rest for the other images if you wish. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 06:22, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you. I don't know why some people do this sadly. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:34, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


Hi Morning Sunshine; Nonenmac is using the file mover user right in a manner that is not entirely consistent with my reading of COM:RENAME. Since you granted him/her that UR in June, 2012, I wonder if you might wish to review his/her work.[9][10] Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

File:A Coconut tree held in hand.jpg

Hi, The File:A Coconut tree held in hand.jpg was deleted on notability issues. Is there any possibility of getting that image , 'coz I don't have any other copy. --Jayabharat (talk) 04:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

That image was deleted because of it is lout of project scope as a personal image so it can't be restored--Morning (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Can’t upload new version of recently renamed file

Hello Morning Sunshine,

Thank you for renaming File:Turbine.jpg to File:Pratt &​ Whitney Advanced Ducted Propulsor engine test.jpg! I would like to note that I can’t upload new versions of this file now (the text "You cannot overwrite this file." replaces the usual "upload new version" link on the page for me). If this is something you can change, could you please have a look? In any case, thank you for your work. Ariadacapo (talk) 08:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

I really don't know what happened. That image isn't protected at all. I am not very good at technical aspects of Commons. Post your problems to COM:AN or ask some people like Rillke or Rd232, they can surely help you. Good luck. Regards--Morning (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Est-ce que le lien direct fonctionne? -- Rillke(q?) 17:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Oh non, it doesn’t. Upload fails and an angry red message The page title or edit you have tried to create cannot be created or edited by you at this time. It matches an entry on the local or global blacklists, used to prevent vandalism. appears. The same (with identical message) occurs when I try to edit the file’s talk page. Heureusement, les administrateurs sont partout =) Ariadacapo (talk) 18:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
The RegExp shown to you would have been very useful. Well, it should work now. Reason left in the file description. Malheureusement, le temps pour aider est toujours trop court. -- Rillke(q?) 19:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup, Rillke ! (and I will try to report better next time) ♥ administrateurs ♥ Ariadacapo (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Daniel Bryan April 2012.jpg

I added the correct source already. Sorry about that. Starship.paint (talk) 09:59, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

  Done--Morning (talk) 10:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Media deletion

Hi Morning Sunshine, unfortunately the two files that I uploaded seems to be changed since their last version (when I saw and uploaded them). It's my fault that I hadn't added the LicenseReview template after the upload. They had CC license, I hope you trust me, but it's ok to remove them. My question is: what if I added the review template at the time of upload (when they were CC licensed) and you reviewed them as "OK!", but then the author changed the license to this one? Would you act the same as now, asking for deletion? Even if you saw and reviewed the media as correctly licensed? Thanks --Viscontino (talk) 16:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I admit that I reviewed them a bit hastily because I had checked some correctly licensed images uploaded by you before so I marked them without carefully looking at them. But when I looked back, I saw my mistakes and filed DRs. If you could contact with the authors, please tell them to set the free license again. Regards Morning (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
I'll try to contact them, thank you for your understanding. Anyways can you please answer my doubt regarding license changing by the author AFTER the review? What can happen if the author says "Hey you stole my picture, it is not free! (but it was...)"? Will he win the "dispute"? --Viscontino (talk) 17:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Seems hard to contact them. When you have some time can you please answer my question? Thanks --Viscontino (talk) 11:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
I think those images will be deleted for missing permission unless the author has released them under free licenses--Morning (talk) 09:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted even if an admin reviewed them as "OK" before? You just reviewed lot of media that I uploaded from YouTube. What if the user on YouTube decide to change the license to "Youtube standard license"? Will my files be deleted? --Viscontino (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Maybe I need to explain more about this. if the author revokes free license after reviewed, the image is still OK, you can tag {{Flickr-change-of-license}}. However, if that happens before, nobody knows whether the free license had existed or not, so it will be deleted for missing evidence of permission unless you can prove--Morning (talk) 04:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Véhicule Blindé Léger At Bagram Air Base Afghanistan.JPG

Trusted user GrapedApe fooled you into failing this image...but it passed flickr review in 2009 after I carefully checked the image history. I have asked Lymantria to check his activity This is not really acceptable behaviour. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. Regards--Morning (talk) 08:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

My bad

Should I just put a copyvio tag on File:Skagway Centennial Statue 1897 1997 by Chuck Buchanan.jpg as uploader? I didn't realize it was the US Skagway area and not the Canadian one where FOP is allowed. Feel free to just delete it if that is even easier. We could also let it run the DR week and delete then. There should be no policy arguments to keep it as it is a clear FOP violation.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

As FoP cases are involved with the law of a country which can be changed and deleted FoP images can be restored in the future so DRs should be kept as a review for those purposes. So could you please wait for 7 days. If there are no other problems, they should be deleted after then--Morning (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
No problem. I will just let it run its course.--Canoe1967 (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


Hi, Morning Sunshine. What's your opinion on File:Sarin Wanted Poster.jpg, File:Wanted Armenian political fugitives - April 2008.jpg, File:Katsuya Takahashi.jpg, File:Port of Akashi,明石港 明石市岬町 ジュディ・オング ポスター DSCF2049.jpg (de minimis ?), File:Toshikazu Koike.jpg ? Takabeg (talk) 23:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Why don't you file DRs to see what community thinks about them. File:Sarin Wanted Poster.jpg, File:Katsuya Takahashi.jpg, File:Toshikazu_Koike.jpg are rather clear to me. File:Wanted Armenian political fugitives - April 2008.jpg should be deleted as a collection of many pictures whose source and license we don't know. And File:Port of Akashi,明石港 明石市岬町 ジュディ・オング ポスター DSCF2049.jpg, I think it's de minimis--Morning (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Merci. Takabeg (talk) 01:20, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Corrected the image source

200px pass it Perumalism Chat 09:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't think this is the right image. You can see the background behind the actress. It is whitened by the flashlight of camera while the one here is normal--Morning (talk) 10:26, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry My MistakePerumalism Chat 15:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Katadolon® by Danny S. - 001.jpg

Hello. I've seen you renamed as reason # 1 - but is the new name just a sort of uploader request or is it more of advertising / product promotion? Hindustanilanguage (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2013 (UTC).

I'm guessing the uploader wanted to add that ® because Katadolon is a brand name rather than a generic. I don't really see any promotional intent. INeverCry 20:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
I've posted a query on the talk page of Danny S. Let's see waht he's got to say. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC).
Confirmed that's not promotional. Also confirmed that Morning Sunshine is a silent but one of our best performing admins. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:26, 14 February 2013 (UTC).

A barnstar for you!

  The Special Barnstar
I was surprised and happy to see "Arvin High Jack O Schulze Auditorium.jpg" renamed so quickly. Much thanks! Sumanah (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Happy editing--Morning (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Removing a category from a group of files

Hey there. I've noticed you work closely with categories/the Delinker. Do know how I could mass remove this category from all of the files in this category? Many thanks :) Rehman 13:45, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

I work on CommonsDelinker mainly in renaming files used in pages on WMF projects. I am not very familiar with categories. You may post your request on COM:AN or ask some people like Foroa or Rillke. Regards--Morning (talk) 13:50, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Roger. Thanks. Rehman 14:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


Why did you delete File:Nederland wapen.svg and File:Coat of Arms of the Netherlands.svg? Are you aware of the amount of downstream damage you're are causing with these kind of stupid deletions? Multichill (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

At least the first one was created by a formerly very active dutch user, and a reproduction of a coat of arms can't have copyright, as it doesn't match the originality principle. Akoopal (talk) 22:57, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
  Done Thank you for letting me know this--Morning (talk) 14:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Nominated for deletion

Hello Morning Sunshine, Why nominated for deletion of this pictures 1, 2, 3 ? this is the original images. Should not be deleted. Best Regards. MyCanon () 10:26, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello MC. I nominated them for deletion as Commons:Derivative works applies. Take this image for example. The appearance of the film poster, which is copyrighted, is acceptable only when it is not significant in this image. it is called Commons:De minimis. In this case, a large portion of the film poster is shown along with the actor in the image. However, its cropped version are acceptable as the main object is the actor.--Morning (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for this useful information, because if you delete the original images and where to be a source of cropped images. Thanks for everything you've done in the Wikimedia Commons. Kind Regards. MyCanon () 11:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

please stop some tasks commonsdelinker

Please stop some tasks ordered from Commosdelinker. User Fry1989 requested from the edit wars and there is no consensus or justification to carry them out. The issue is complex is the coat of arms of the Spanish autonomous communities and is intended to replace the official versions for personal designs. I left a message on the discussion but I have ignored [11] and has carried out some of the tasks asked [12] The globally change all going to cause a disaster very difficult to repair. regards.--Miguillen (discursión) 12:20, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I think there is something happening here. I didn't do anything on File:Escudo de Cantabria.svg or File:Coat of Arms of Cantabria.svg (you can see the history of both). Maybe the huge backlog of CommonsDelinker has caused this. For technical aspects, you can ask Rillke. Regards--Morning (talk) 04:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
It's about COM:AN/U#Fry1989 I guess. The requests were placed on User:CommonsDelinker/commands/filemovers in an abusive way. -- Rillke(q?) 18:27, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Deletion requests

Hello Morning Sunshine, You have closed the request, but not deleted all immages. See: 1 ;-)--Steinsplitter (talk) 13:39, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

  Done by Denniss--Morning (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


Thanks for the quick renaming of File:United States Special Operations Command Insignia.svg. I appreciate it! Dainomite (talk) 20:06, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Canopic Coffinette (Tutankhamun).jpg

Please consider marking this image if it has not been marked. Thank you and goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

  Done and good afternoon from Vietnam. Best regards--Morning (talk) 09:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the help, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:20, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

File:WWE (Undisputed) Championship (2002-2005).jpg

Hi, you deleted this image per the outcome of a deletion request, the enWP can't afford to lose this image, so I was wondering if we could get a temporary restore to transfer the image over to enWP with a FUR? CRRaysHead90 | We Believe! 14:50, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

  Done. let me know when you have done--Morning (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Ok I got it all, thanks. CRRaysHead90 | We Believe! 17:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


Tank you for your message. But the link I have put for checking (that is to say : ) clearly shows that the photo is published on Flickr under Creative Commons Licence with both pictograms Attribution and Share alike (see what one can read wen clicking on the web link which explains licence beside the photo on Flickr). That's why it's difficult for me to understand the deletion of the file. Kind regards, Agota Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir 09:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Please note that Creative Commons license attribution and/or sharealike without the combination of non-commercial or non-derivation are allowed on Commons. Your image provided in the link above are CC-BY-NC-SA (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike) which isn't compatible with Commons--Morning (talk) 10:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, but what a pity !... Sincerely yours, Agota Oui ? Plaît-il ? / Déversoir 11:00, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Flickr human review

If some images have a flickr source to a photo set, feel free to make a correction and mark it. Good night, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Lovi Poe at the 69th Venice International Film Festival, September 2012.jpg

Can my faulty upload at 3:09 March 4 be deleted from this image file record. Its just embarrasing! I forgot to check the image before I uploaded it from irfanview. I don't know if you can do this as an Admin. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

  Done I'm rather busy now. Sorry for delaying--Morning (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank You. Sorry for that. I fixed most of the images without a correct flickr source today too. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:16, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Renaming BSicons

Hello! About this:

12:46, 21 January 2013 Morning Sunshine (talk | contribs) moved page File:BSicon exKBFa 339999.svg to File:BSicon KBFa 3399FF.svg (File renaming criterion #6

Not cool. For 2 reasons:

  1. "KBFa" was dropped in favor of "KBHFa" a couple years ago — if you are standartizing an icon name, better to do it in full.
  2. This rename was done in January; we’re in March now and the old file’s global usage is still far from empty. If you dont want to toil on manual fix of BSicon use, you should not be doing renamings.

-- Tuválkin 07:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:WWF Championship - Brahma Bull Belt.jpg

Quick question, in related to your closing here, things may work slightly differently than on enWP when it comes consensus making, but last I checked two persons doesn't constitute a consensus, especially one of those persons is the nominator. Essentially what I'm asking is, isn't this grounds for extending the closing date so more people can participate? CRRaysHead90 | We Believe! 02:16, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello. I think this is similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:WWE (Undisputed) Championship (2002-2005).jpg. Things like out of scope content (personal image, advertising...) and copyright violation (including derivative) are quite clear and uncontroversial, so they can be closed after 7 days. Please note that DR is not a vote (although it might be helpful in some complicated cases). See also Commons:Deletion_requests#Overview. Regards--Morning (talk) 03:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Morning Sunshine/Archive 3".