Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Mortier.Daniel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Classement de vos photos edit

Bonsoir,

Vous venez de publier toute une série de photos de bâtiments classés au patrimoine wallon. Mille merci.

Comme vous les avez classé dans la catégorie Cultural heritage monuments in Wallonia qui est prévue pour ne contenir que d'autres catégories, je me permets de mettre vos photos dans des sous-catégories adaptées. Je terminerai ce travail dès que j'aurais le temps.

Bien à vous.

--H2O(talk) 21:02, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Salut Daniel et Jmh2o. Je vois que je ne suis pas le seul sur le coup  . Je vais regarder les côté technique de la chose, comme je t'en ai parlé sur ta PdD en Wiki.fr, sans marcher sur les plates-bandes de Jmh2o. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...)23:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Bonjour,
Déplacer une photo de catégorie ne change rien quant au lien entre Wikipédia et Commons. Ce lien se fait sur le nom.
Bien à toi.
--H2O(talk) 07:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
 
File:Château de Bogolioubovo, reconstitution du buste d'Andreï Bougolioubovski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Catégorisation edit

Salut Daniel.

J'ai renommé presque toutes les catégories que tu avais créées car elles étaient fausses, mal rédigées ou en russe ; sauf une : Category:Церковь Ильи Пророка, 1758 que je ne peux pas faire car je ne sais pas dans quelle ville ça se trouve. Il faudrait que tu sois un peu plus précis dans la légende (description) de tes photos afin de faciliter la maintenance.

J'ai aussi recatégorisé un grand nombre de tes photos... Il va vraiment falloir que je te donne quelques explications supplémentaires à ce sujet.

Pour les prochaines, n'hésites pas à me demander, tu sais que ça ne me dérange pas.

Bonne année :)

Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...)02:57, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merci Llann. Eh bien je découvre enfin tes plus précieuses photos ǃ Quel trésor. Les frontières précises entre Commons et Wikipedia étaient restées dans le brouillard pour moi jusqu'à présent. J'ai bien reçu tes explications et je compte bien les utiliser. Mais au début c'est fastidieux de placer des photos. Wikipedia fait bien d'organiser ces concours qui familiarisent doucement. J'ai un stock de photos en réserve, mais en octobre, au moment où j'étais sur place, nos amis Russes ont également organisé un concours. Si bien que, quand je suis revenu, beaucoup de vides s'étaient remplis. Enfin pour le château de Bogolioubovo, pas trop. C'est une petite ville (un gros bourg disons) à côté de Vladimir où se trouve le château, le couvent de femmes qui l'entoure et... Церковь Ильи Пророка qui signifie "église de l'Intercession-de-la-Vierge-sur-la-Nerl. À un kilomètre à peine du château au milieu d'hectares de prairies inondées au dégel. À plus tard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mortier.Daniel (talk • contribs) 5 janvier 2015 à 09:38‎ (UTC)
Content que mes photos te plaisent  .
Pour les catégories, bien que mon tutoriel soit en français alors que les catégories sont à 95% en anglais, le principe reste le même à partir du moment où tu commence par aller regarder dans la catégorie mère (par exemple, dans la category:Lviv, il y a tout plein de sous-catégories qui te donnent un choix de rangement important).
Lorsque tu verses tes photos, tu n'est pas obligé de les catégoriser au moment du versement, il n'y a pas d'urgence ; il te suffit, dès qu'elles sont versées, d'aller modifier ça photo par photo, en prenant bien ton temps et, surtout, sans créer des catégories fantaisistes (comme "ChurchElisahProphet(Suzdal)2.JPG", par exemple...). Si vraiment tu penses qu'il faut créer un catégorie, ne le fais pas en langue locale ("Свято-Воскресенский женский монастырь Воскресенский собор и Введенская церковь Муром" : pas bon !!!) mais en anglais pour que ce soit accessible à la majorité des gens qui cherchent des photos. Tu vas me dire que je connais le principe, mais, sans connaitre la Russie, j'ai réussi à remettre tes photos dans les bonnes cases et, si tes légendes étaient plus précises (ajouter le nom de la ville dans laquelle se trouve "Façade de l'église.jpg" est d'une grande utilité), j'aurais pu les catégoriser encore mieux, voire créer des sous-catégories si besoin. Comme tu n'as pas encore beaucoup de photos, je te suggère de reprendre ces légendes (descriptions).
Gogol avait traduit "Category:Церковь Ильи Пророка, 1758" mais comme il n'y a pas de ville, je n'ai pas su dans quelle catégorie mettre ces deux photos...
Si besoin, fais comme d'hab', demande-moi  . À bientôt. --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...)18:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Statue au centre de Lviv.JPG edit

 
File:Statue au centre de Lviv.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

INeverCry 03:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Commons has a specific topic edit

Deutsch  català  English  español  sicilianu  українська  日本語  polski  македонски  suomi  Nederlands  français  magyar  עברית  italiano  اردو  português  +/−
Please don't post messages that are not relevant to Wikimedia Commons. The site does not host articles, only media files such as images, video and audio. Neither should the site be used for chatting, promotion, personal webpages or other such things. For more detail, see Commons:Project scope. Thank you.

Motopark (talk) 06:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Toutes mes excuses de vous faire perdre votre temps du fait de mon ignorance. J'avais créé une page pour des photos de l'église "Sint John Crisostom church in Yaroslavl". Un intervenant l'a supprimée en la confondant avec l'église Saint Jean Baptiste à Yaroslavl. Ce sont deux églises différentes et la carte et les coordonées géographiques le prouvent. Mais elles se ressemblent et St Jean Chrysostome n'existait pas encore. Pourquoi : parce que on les confonds. C'est de ma faute du fait de mes erreurs de depart en anglais. Par contre si on la supprime de nouveau je devrai recommencer à créer un site pour St Jean Crisostome. Cordialement Mortier.Daniel (talk) 07:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Saint John Chrysostom Church (Yaroslavl) edit

Hi Daniel, sorry for moving your files to the wrong place. They are now in Category:Saint John Chrysostom Church (Yaroslavl). --Rudolph Buch (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Excuse me for the mistake. It was the first time I created a file on Commons. Thank you very mutch for your help.Mortier.Daniel (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope edit

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Fileː Church of the nativity of the Christ (Yaroslavl), was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Motopark (talk) 08:36, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Zvenigorod icons edit

Bien sûr, avec plaisir. Article russe - ru:Звенигородский чин. Shakko (talk) 10:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 edit

Bonjour Mortier.Daniel,

En 2014, vous avez participé au concours photo Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium & Luxembourg. Nous organisons aussi ce concours de photo en 2016.

Nous organisons aussi 4 balades photo à Gand, Malines, Anvers et Liège. Visite : http://www.wikilovesmonuments.be/w/index.php?title=Photo_tours_September_2016/fr&setlang=fr

Soyez les bienvenus ! Romaine 18:03, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Ceux du Donbass de Prilepine Zakhar.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ceux du Donbass de Prilepine Zakhar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ceux du Donbass de Prilepine Zakhar.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 08:06, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:La Vie des insectes de Viktor Pelevine.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La Vie des insectes de Viktor Pelevine.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:La Vie des insectes de Viktor Pelevine.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mortier.Daniel, the artwork on such book-covers is copyrighted. You cannot scan or reproduce it without the permission of its creator or rightsholder. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ok but I don't know how it is possible to suppress the file.Can you help me. Bests. Mortier.Daniel (talk) 08:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Vassili Pouzanov-Moliov.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vassili Pouzanov-Moliov.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vassili Pouzanov-Moliov.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mortier.Daniel, the photography on the reproduced page may still be in copyright. You need to find out when it was originally created and who is the original photographer. Only then its copyright-status can be evaluate. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


File:Cathédrale de la Résurrection (Brest).JPG edit

 
File:Cathédrale de la Résurrection (Brest).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarash (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Buildings in Plyos.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Buildings in Plyos.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Nadejda Mniova IMG 5427.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nadejda Mniova IMG 5427.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Nadejda Mniova IMG 5429.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nadejda Mniova IMG 5429.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Nadejda Mniova IMG 5428.jpg edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nadejda Mniova IMG 5428.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Hôtel de la Bessière Bar-le-Duc IMG 5508.JPG edit

 
File:Hôtel de la Bessière Bar-le-Duc IMG 5508.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Critique macédonienne de la pensée française , ouvrage des éditions Denoël.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Critique macédonienne de la pensée française , ouvrage des éditions Denoël.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth O (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Intérieur de la chapelle de Penvern à Trébeurden.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:49, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Panneau avec photo et poésies de Chalamov au musée de Vologda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Blacklake (talk) 05:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Le jugement dernier par A. Roublev.JPG edit

 
File:Le jugement dernier par A. Roublev.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Carl Ha (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Юра Рябинкин.jpg edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Юра Рябинкин.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Юра Рябинкин.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 11:37, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Tihiy Don Aksinya Grigory.jpg edit

 
File:Tihiy Don Aksinya Grigory.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.123.231.39 07:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply