Open main menu

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Susan Anderson, Mount Pisgah Cemetery.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Deleted FilesEdit

hello Mr. Mutter Erde, I am writing to ask you if by chance it could help me supporting some of my requests to restore files concerning a blocked user that has by name Глинистый сланец lately I tried to make some requests on Commons: Undeletion requests, but I can not find much support for the restoration, I noticed that recently you had changed a picture that was part of that 'blocked users, well I tell you that if you go to see the page of commons undeletion, you will notice a long list of files where few files have been restored, be aware that the may of files uploaded by this user are all portraits, photographs, and paintings of the era, the lience of which is only the license of the PD. I would like to submit to you some uploads of this user, so to realize what files they are dealing with since all have been deleted, and that I am trying to ask for the restoration.

currently I on the page of Commons: Undeletion requests I have three requests if they are not supported enough, if you want to make a jump I'll tell you immediately their number and the current title they have, so you will not be wrong to see them:

  • title 1 and list: (1.1 ile:King Victor Emmanuel III and Prince Amhà Selassié.png)
  • title 2 and list: (1.5 PD-100)
  • title 3 and list: (1.17 File:Inaugurazione della XXVI Legislatura.png)

--79.31.200.87 00:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I have seen that User:Yann distincts between a worthy upload and a less worthy uploader as here. So I would ask him to undelete your files (But please: Only files with a good source and a good description). Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 06:21, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

CommonsEdit

hi Mr. mutter I'm writing to ask you if you can convert a wikipedia file, in a file of commons, I'm asking you why I would have some files to convert to commons--Карой Гузман12 (talk) 16:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

I guess you want to transfer some files from English or Russian wikipedia to Commons as here, right? Then I suggest to use this tool: https://tools.wmflabs.org/commonshelper/ Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 08:52, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hatun Sürücü - Landschaftsfriedhof Berlin-Gatow .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Petros Moriates cabinet card.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:05, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


File:George I of Greece by Petros Moriates.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:11, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


File:Lazarettschiff Gera (Batavia, Java, 1901).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:05, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Zur InfoEdit

Ich wollte dich auf de:Wikipedia:Auskunft#Ist das wirklich Lola Montez... hinweisen. Die Frage bezieht sich auf das Bild, das Du hier auf Commons hochgeladen hast: Eliza Rosanna Gilbert known as Lola-Montez - Reutlinger.jpg. Es scheint berechtigte Zweifel daran zu geben, dass es sich bei der darin Dargestellten um Lola Montez handelt. (Ja, ich sehe, dass Du die Namensgebung nur entsprechend der Quelle gemacht hast.) — Speravir – 23:11, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Ja, danke für den Hinweis, da stimmt was nicht. Da Getty das Bild aber als die Lola Montez verkauft https://www.gettyimages.de/license/500637761 (immerhin 565 Euro) besteht Handlungsbedarf.Jemand sollte sich mal mit dem Lebenslauf der Nachahmerin beschäftigen und sie gegebenenfalls in einem eigenen Artikel vorstellen. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC).
Christie's hat übrigens auch schon eine Lola Montez versteigert (links). Offenbar ein Lieblingsmodell des Malers Conrad Kiesel. Mutter Erde (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Stolzer Preis, den Getty Images da für ein gemeinfreies Bild verlangt. Und, stimmt, das Modell auf den 3 Gemälden von Herrn Kiesel sieht auch nicht nach Lola Montez aus. — Speravir – 22:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Hast Du in der Auskunft http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8596913c/f32.item und http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8596913c/f33.item gesehen? Damit kann sie nicht Lola Montez sein und auch nicht von Charles Reutlinger fotografiert worden sein. Ich werde gleich mal diverse Änderungen an „deinem” Upload vornehmen. — Speravir – 23:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Sehr schon aufbereitet und erklärt. Danke. Damit die Namensvetterin aber nicht verschwindet und damit die Geschäfte von Getty et al. befördert, hab ich ihr ein eigenes Bett aufbereitet Category:Lola Montés (actress). Verbesserungen immer willkommen. Grüße Mutter Erde (talk) 08:31, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Habsch bemerkt. Und, genau, ein paar Änderungen habe ich vollzogen. — Speravir – 01:33, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Inge Keller - Dorotheenstädtischer Friedhof - Mutter Erde fec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

A small gift for a great personEdit

  A small gift for a great person
Kleine Geschenke pflegen die Freundschaft und deswegen eins das genau zu Dir passt. Lotje (talk) 05:04, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

<bɾ>

Das ist ein sehr sehr schönes Geschenk. Und so geschmackvoll. Ich bin gerührt. Dankeschön :-) Mutter Erde (talk) 17:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
The pleasure is all mine.   Lotje (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Redundant categoryEdit

Hi:

I had to remove Category:Meteorological institutions from category Meteorologisches Observatorium Lindenberg as it is already in the Category:Deutscher Wetterdienst, a sub-category of the former.

Pierre cb (talk) 04:45, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Ronald Zehrfeld und Rainer Bock in 'Barbara', 2012.jpgEdit

 
File:Ronald Zehrfeld und Rainer Bock in 'Barbara', 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

gettyimages & AlamyEdit

hello Mr. Mutter Erde, I am writing to ask you if you happen to remove the watermarks of gettyimages or alamy ???--Глнстый Карой (talk) 20:29, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I can't remove watermarks from Getty mages. But you can get a smaller version without Getty watermark if you know the title of a Getty image, for example: >Emanuele III with King Gustavo in Stockholm<. Put this phrase into the google mask, take the first getty entry and now you have to be quick. Click on this image in the gallery. Now you have one or two seconds to make a screenshot without watermark. If you are not quick enough, repeat the whole procedure. And don't forget to put your Getty file into the category Category:Media licensed by Getty Images. CAUTION: Most of the Getty Images are still under copyright. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 07:03, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Honor_killingEdit

E4024 (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Charlotte von Wolzogen. Holzstich.jpgEdit

Hi, Mutter Erde, I was wondering if this is Charlotte von Lengefeld?   Lotje (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, there is a lot of confusion about some women named Charlotte in Schiller's life. But it's simple, look at the year 1783 in http://www.friedrich-schiller-archiv.de/biografie-schiller/kurzbiografie-1782-1789/ (with picture of sweet little sixteen Charlotte von Wolzogen) and the year 1788 (with picture of his wife Charlotte von Lengefeld). Regards. Mutter Erde (talk) 07:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC) Another source [1]

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Drafi Deutscher - Mutter Erde fec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Familie Kempner - Parkfriedhof Lichterfelde.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Paul Avril - Les Sonnetts Luxurieux (1892) de Pietro Aretino, 2.jpgEdit

 
File:Paul Avril - Les Sonnetts Luxurieux (1892) de Pietro Aretino, 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Monkey D Louffy (talk) 23:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Spinsters' RockEdit

Hello Mutter Erde, I have a question which I am very sure you will be able to answer: though the name of the dolmen in English is Spinsters' Rock, in German language, the article is about Spinster's Rock. Is that correct? Should the article be renamed as per the English spelling? Thank you for your time.   Lotje (talk) 07:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, I have found a third spelling, without an apostrophe. It is from a British website, see http://www.pastscape.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=445766 . Sorry, but my English is not good enough to judge this case. ː-). I would ask on the talk site of Spinsters' Rock. Good luck Mutter Erde (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank; you Mutter Erde. Lotje (talk) 14:50, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Shivaune_Christina_LingtonEdit

Martintsmith (talk) 20:02, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hans-Michael Rehberg - Friedhof Heerstraße.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Iosif & Nadezhda.jpgEdit

 
File:Iosif & Nadezhda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 12:59, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jörg Mahlstedt, Friedhof Heerstraße - Mutter Erde fec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Berliner FriedhöfeEdit

Danke für's bearbeiten. ich hoffe, du bist nicht zu sehr genervt von teilweise unscharfen fotos. gruß --Z thomas 15:18, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Bittesehr. Was das Hochladen von Schrott-Fotos angehtː Ich würde mich sowas gar nicht trauen. Dann lieber keins (Immerhin handelt es sich oft um sogenannte "Ehrengräber"). Du könntest übrigens die misslungensten Bilder selbst löschen lassen. Ich denke da zum Beispiel an den Alten Friedhof Wannsee, z.B. File:Alter Friedhof Wannsee Erdmann Encke1.jpg, File:Alter Friedhof Wannsee Philipp Franck3.jpg und weitere Scheußlichkeiten. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 05:49, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
heute wieder schöne fotos von dir vom alten jacobi. Hast du bessere als meine heute hochgeladenen von bolte und kiepert?
du magst es nicht glauben, aber ich hab tatsächlich scheußlichkeiten vorab aussortiert. Stell ruhig noch auf das andere foto oben nen LA. Ich kann das irgendwie nicht... Gruß--Z thomas 20:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Ist leider schwieriger als gedacht. Da zum Beispiel der folgende Admin nicht beurteilen kann oder mag, wieviele Blder es von folgenden Gräbern gibt, möchte er auch die Schrottbilder behalten. Da ich aber nicht einsehe meine Lebenszeit damit zu verbringen, die Schrottfotos auch noch zu kategorisieren um etwaige Dubletten (LOL) zu erkennen, müsstest Du selbst die Löschung beantragen (Bild aufmachen, Button unten links ("Löschung vorschlagen") klicken. Gründe: blurry, rubbish, low quality, personal wish of the uploader usw..
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Friedhof heerstraße berlin 2018-05-12 7.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grab friedhof heerstraße 2018-05-15.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grab friedhof heerstraße 2018-05-16.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Friedhof heerstraße berlin 2018-05-12 13.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Grab friedhof heerstraße 2018-05-26.jpg
Viel Glück und Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 11:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
du hast ja recht... vermutlich wird es mit dem uploader-wish einfacher
hast du zufälligerweise ein foto vom grab von de:Johannes Sievers (Kunsthistoriker) er hatte auf dem Friedhof Wannsee I einen Ehrengrab. Ich war im Regen mal da, hab es nicht gefunden bzw bin der meinung, dass die grabstelle beräumt war. gruß --Z thomas 11:26, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Vermutlich hast du recht. Ich habe es vor Jahren auch schon mal gesucht und nicht gefunden. Es ist offenbar neu verkauft worden. Mutter Erde (talk) 11:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
danke für das Foto von Max Gülstorff. ich hab es bisher nicht geschafft und wollte dich tatsächlich heute fragen, ob du es hochladen kannst. das ist ja gedankenübertragung! gruß --Z thomas 09:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Bitteschön. Und Gruß ː-) Mutter Erde (talk) 09:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-M1203-303, Berlin, Trümmerräumen am Reichtag.jpgEdit

Hi Mutter Erde, I was wondering what to do with the spelling mistakes in the different images like this one (file name and text. It would be easy to have them corrected in one go. Let me know your thoughts. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 11:44, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, Bundesarchiv wants to know all about minor and bigger mistakes - here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error_reports So please tell first BA, so that they can change it in their collection. Later you can rename it, I think (but I am not sure ????) Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 12:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Oh gosh, Mutter Erde, then I hope they will not categorize my recent spelling corrections as "mischief"  . Lotje (talk) 12:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Francois Haby - Es ist erreicht-Bartbinde, 1900.pngEdit

Hi Mutter Erde,

als Hinweis: „Es ist erreicht“ war de:Bartwichse für 2 Mark die Flasche (zum Preis siehe Abb.). Die Bartbind wird nur als 'Beifang' beworben. In sofern ist der Informationstext nicht ganz korrekt. Vielleicht magst du das Bild nun auch bei 'Bartwichse' einbinden. Und/oder bei de:François Haby. --Summer ... hier! (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe Dateinamen und Beschreibung entsprechend verändert und in die Category:Hair wax einsortiert. Sollten noch mehr Bilder zum Thema hochgeladen werden, könnte man die (Unter-)Category:Moustache wax gründen. Dankeschön und Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 07:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Ich habe zu Danken . siehe hier (man muss meinen Witz aber nicht mögen - tolerieren reicht). --Summer ... hier! (talk) 14:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Elsa Wagner, Friedhof Dahlem - Mutter Erde fec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:SPIEGEL-Bestseller vom 15. September 2018.JPGEdit

Català | Deutsch | English | فارسی | 日本語 | Русский | Slovenščina | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SPIEGEL-Bestseller vom 15. September 2018.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Exzellenz Karl Helfferich mit seiner Gemahlin Annette, geb. von Siemens.jpgEdit

 
File:Exzellenz Karl Helfferich mit seiner Gemahlin Annette, geb. von Siemens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 10:12, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaryEdit

When editing a page on Commons there is a small field labeled "Edit Summary" or "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the Edit Summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the Edit Summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's name in the Edit Summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. This will help you avoid leaving misleading summaries like you did here.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

OK, thank you Mutter Erde (talk) 14:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wladimir Gaidarow - Alexander Binder - Ross-Verlag.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Wladimir Gaidarow - Alexander Binder - Ross-Verlag.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wladimir Gaidarow - Alexander Binder - Ross-Verlag.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:45, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Siegmund von Suchodolski - Münchener Löwenbräu, Märzenbier.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 18:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Julie Wolfthorn - Portrait der Bildhauerin Karla Friedel, 1931.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Julie Wolfthorn - Portrait der Bildhauerin Karla Friedel, 1931.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Julie Wolfthorn - Portrait der Bildhauerin Karla Friedel, 1931.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jotzet (talk) 11:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Yo Ho HoEdit


Thank you, Lotje, and all the best for you :-) Mutter Erde (talk) 06:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hans Otto, Wilmersdorfer Waldfriedhof Stahnsdorf - Mutter Erde fec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:57, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Herz-Mann-Sky in der Mariahilferstrassen, Wien.jpgEdit

@Mutter Erde: has the word Preisrätsel been spelled Preisrähtsel in the past, or was that done with a purpose you think?   Lotje (talk) 13:08, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, in Germany they decided in 1907 to renew some spellings, for example to eliminate the "h" in Thier (today Tier) or in That (today Tat) . I guess together with the Austrian linguists. So, Preisrähtsel was then (before 1907) correct, but today it is a mistake. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Mutter Erde!   Lotje (talk) 13:30, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Margarete Schön by Hanni Schwarz.jpgEdit

 
File:Margarete Schön by Hanni Schwarz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GMGtalk 11:42, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Ferdinand Sauerbruch 1927, by Franz Grainer.pngEdit

 
File:Ferdinand Sauerbruch 1927, by Franz Grainer.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 00:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Harro Magnussen - Friedrich der Große in seinen letzten Tagen.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


File tagging File:Ausstellungskatalog Arnold Topp & Nell Walden, April 1917.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ausstellungskatalog Arnold Topp & Nell Walden, April 1917.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Chiyako92 (talk) 18:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Scans from UB HeidelbergEdit

Hi ME, sorry to bother you, but some of your uploads in Category:Herwarth Walden, ein Lebensbild, 1963 coming from [2] could probably be copyvios. Obviously, you adopted the license CC-BY-SA from en:Heidelberg University Library where the book was scanned [3] - but in this case the book‘s author died 1975 and some of the photographs and drawings are not old enough, too. I‘ve notified the librarians that they might have some illegal material in their published scans. Ongoing discussion is here [4] on dewiki (german language). (I’m aware that you have been blocked on dewiki and must not comment there, but at least you should know about it.) Greetings, —MBq (talk) 15:22, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Was soll daran ungewöhnlich sein (oder gar illegal) wenn die Erben von Herwarth und Nell Walden die Rechte an Nell Waldens Erinnerungsbuch an eine öffentliche Bibliothek abgeben? Mutter Erde (talk) 15:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Vielleicht haben sie das. Oder es ist ihnen egal. Aber die Rechte der Fotografen und Künstler, von denen die Abbildungen im Buch stammen, können sie nicht weitergeben. —MBq (talk) 21:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, hier ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum#Bitte_durchsehen ) wäre übrigens noch ein klassischer Platz um diesen Fall zu diskutieren. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 07:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Richard Riemerschmid - Jugend Nr. 26, 1896.pngEdit

 
File:Richard Riemerschmid - Jugend Nr. 26, 1896.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nell Walden, gezeichnet von Oskar Kokoschka, 1916.pngEdit

 
File:Nell Walden, gezeichnet von Oskar Kokoschka, 1916.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Herwarth Walden. Zeichnung von Béla Kádár, 1924.jpgEdit

 
File:Herwarth Walden. Zeichnung von Béla Kádár, 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 12:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Herwarth Walden, gezeichnet von Edmund Kesting, 1932.pngEdit

 
File:Herwarth Walden, gezeichnet von Edmund Kesting, 1932.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 12:47, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Herwarth Walden vor der Portrâtbüste 'Walden' von William Wauer, 1918.jpgEdit

 
File:Herwarth Walden vor der Portrâtbüste 'Walden' von William Wauer, 1918.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Der Prinz von Theben (Else Lasker-Schüler), gezeichnet von Karl Schmidt-Rottluff, 1911.pngEdit

 
File:Der Prinz von Theben (Else Lasker-Schüler), gezeichnet von Karl Schmidt-Rottluff, 1911.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 13:17, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

File:William Wauer 1919.jpgEdit

 
File:William Wauer 1919.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Goesseln (talk) 21:59, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Sergei Eisensteins 'Streik'. Filmplakat von Mihály Bíró.jpgEdit

 
File:Sergei Eisensteins 'Streik'. Filmplakat von Mihály Bíró.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Regasterios (talk) 13:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nell Walden 1952.jpgEdit

 
File:Nell Walden 1952.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 18:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Rudolf Blümner und Herwarth Walden, 1917.jpg & File:Rudolf Blümner und Nell Walden, 1917.jpgEdit

Dear M, Erde.

Just curious. Are both these images free from 1917? Nell Walden died in 1975 but in the second image, no photographer is stated. If its an anonymous photographer, it could be OK but I'm not a legal expert. If you think its not OK, please consider filing a DR on them both as the uploader. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Somehow I wonder if this image is not free now. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Leoboudv, I have put a DR on the first file. For the second photo Nell and Herwarth Walden (1878-1941) have changed their seats. So we can keep the second file. The third file has to go, because Edmund Kesting died in 1970. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 07:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your kind reply. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:21, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

These 3 images belowEdit

Dear Mutter Erde,

If these three 1914-1916 images are OK for Commons, please consider changing the license. The author is unknown. I think it is OK but the license may be wrong. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Leoboudv, thank you for kind reminding. I have changed the licences, furthermore for File:Peter Altenberg im Sommer 1906.jpg and File:William Wauer 1919.jpg. I hope, that was OK. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 06:57, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
  •   Done: All images marked now. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Horst Bosetzky - Friedhof Stubenrauchstraße - Mutter Erde fec.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mutter Erde (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Mutter Erde".