Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Mutter Erde/Archiv 3/2010-2017

< User talk:Mutter Erde

Contents

File:Viktoria_Luise_Adelheid_Mathilde_Charlotte;_13_September_1892_–_11_December_1980.jpgEdit

 
File:Viktoria_Luise_Adelheid_Mathilde_Charlotte;_13_September_1892_–_11_December_1980.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 19:07, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 04:13, 14 May 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 01:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Dolly Haas - Karl Schenker, Ross.jpgEdit

 
File:Dolly Haas - Karl Schenker, Ross.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 12:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Beria-Transkaukasien.jpgEdit

 
File:Beria-Transkaukasien.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sandstein (talk) 17:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


File:ESC 2007-Natalia Barbu-IMG 2761.jpgEdit

 
File:ESC 2007-Natalia Barbu-IMG 2761.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Didym (talk) 02:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Hannah de Rothschild.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 19:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Charlotte_EngelhardtEdit

Hiddenhauser (talk) 17:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Nabokovs.jpgEdit

 
File:Nabokovs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hoary (talk) 08:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:JamesGuthrieMonument.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JamesGuthrieMonument.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JamesGuthrieMonument.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kelly (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:JamesGuthrieMonumentPlaque.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:JamesGuthrieMonumentPlaque.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:JamesGuthrieMonumentPlaque.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kelly (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

File:JamesGuthrieMonumentPlaque.jpgEdit

 
File:JamesGuthrieMonumentPlaque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AFBorchert (talk) 07:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


Category:Oli.PEdit

Pkbwcgs (talk) 07:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Unblock requestEdit

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "In December 2008 I was blocked for a year. After this I did some edits as an IP, often adding "Mutter Erde", because I had nothing to hide. The next day I was blocked indefinite. Now, about 8 years later, I think I need my nick back, to upload files or move files. Mutter Erde (talk) 09:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)"
Unblock reason: "After 8 years of being blocked, I think you deserve a second chance. It will be entirely up to you what you do with that chance. I would ask you to consider the concerns voiced below and make sure that you stick to constructive editing going forward. Daphne Lantier 03:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)"
This template should be archived normally.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | 中文(简体) | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

  Info The indef block was put in place in December 2008, and I'd have no objection after this time to the user being given another chance. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 11:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Do you accept the reason for your block, and do you promise to behave following Commons policies? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Sure, Mutter Erde (talk) 18:09, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
The reason for the block was quite serious, so I expect quite more than a 4-letter word... Yann (talk) 16:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The reason was "evade [a one year] block". OK, that was not nice. I want to apologize for that. But I want to point out, that this was in fact not a bad deal for the encyclopedia and other media, as you can see in the 2017 list. If you additionally want to check my work of 2016 - no problem. Mutter Erde (talk) 22:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
The reasomn was not "evading a block", but the circumstances that led to the block. -jkb- (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Ein Link ersetzt 1000 Worte [1]. Watch the difference between Dec. 29 and Dec 30. 2008. Mutter Erde (talk) 04:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
I am too not happy about the 2017 contribution list and the not a bad deal comment. It clearly shows us that you don't respect the rules and circumvent problems whenever you can. Playing games of hide and seek is not what the community deserves. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:23, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
We are talking about 8-years-old-stuff. All the involved still active admins were asked [2]. Additionally I present a list of current edits. Have you found a controversal edit? Please tell me Mutter Erde (talk) 07:15, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Controversial or not makes no difference. Editing using an IP while the user account is blocked is block evasion. Why should we trust somebody who obviously doesn't care about community decisions? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
"Community decisions" is a very very very big word. Reviewing the old topic of 2008 (X) you can find a bunch of proposals - from unblock to seven days, to one year and even infinte.
I remember, this was the very first occasion for all coming trouble: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:No_Israel.svg , followed by at least five or more undeletion/deletion requests and probably some more in the last years, I don't know. Today this selfmade work of Admin Osama K. "decorates" around 400 user pages and more websites outside wikipedia, sometimes with a note: Courtesy Wikimedia Commons. A good advertising for wikimedia. (That was ironic).
I have lost this struggle, I'm not interested in a second round. You can trust me Mutter Erde (talk) 19:11, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Contributions in 2017Edit

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2003:45:5C3D:FFCE:1575:2AFA:A511:6F0F

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2003:45:5C6F:C5F5:6948:D8CE:3C72:ED9C

Mutter Erde (talk) 09:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Signs & wondersEdit

Buongiorno. fz JaHn 07:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Tachchen, Dich gibts also auch noch. Ein schöner Empfang :-) Mutter Erde (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Ja, ne. Vielleicht sollt ich umschulen, zum Empfangschef. Oder sowas ähnliches. fz JaHn 21:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Danke...Edit

...für die Extrahierung der Bilder aus "Daheim". Diese alten Zeitschriften enthalten wahre Schätze. Ich habe gerade noch die Vorlage {{Extracted from}} hinzugefügt, um klarer zu Verlinken, wo das Bild herkommt. Im Wikisource-Projekt "Die Gartenlaube" machen wir das übrigens über die Benennung der Dateien, welche die Seitenzahl enthält. Darf ich fragen, was du bezüglich der Bilderextraktion noch geplant hast? --Arnd (talk) 05:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Bittesehr. Je länger ich in Daheim 1868 stöbere, desto besser gefällt mir dieses Blatt. Ich werde den Rest des Jahres auch noch abarbeiten und dann such ich mir eine neue Aufgabe :-). Sag mal, kann man die Gartenlaube nicht benutzerfreundlicher aufarbeiten? Dass man vielleicht schon am Dateinamen erkennt: Hier hat jemand eine wichtige Datei als solche erkannt und sie eben umbenannt. Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 07:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Ich lade mal noch ein paar weitere Jahrgänge hoch. Nur falls dir die Arbeit ausgehen sollte. --Arnd (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
OK, ich schau sie mir mal an. Aber ich brauche zwischendurch auch Abwechslungen, deshalb könnte es dauern... Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 08:06, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Josef_FaresEdit

197.30.0.41 07:43, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 03:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Images from a bookEdit

Apropos your proposals for renaming the images in Category:Memories of my life - being my personal, professional, and social recollections as woman and artist (1907). Those images are from a book, originally taken from the Internet Archive. It is customary for the book name to be present in the title in case of pages from a book. However, the long ID no. is meaningless for us. You can propose changing the ID no. to the relevant page no., but the name of the book needs to be present, being the linking factor. Best, Hrishikes (talk) 01:00, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

First: That are not my "proposals", that are the original descriptions in the book, as here: [3] (aka page 218)
Second: Can't find your argument here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_renaming#Which_files_should_not_be_renamed.3F
Third: I (plus many file movers) have renamed until now around 1200 pictures from many different books, nearly all because of criterion 2 (2. To change from a meaningless or ambiguous name to a name that describes what the image particularly displays).
You are a file mover, so please move the files now. Thank you Mutter Erde (talk) 09:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
See criterion 4 of file renaming: To harmonize the file names of a set of images: so that only one part of all names differs. Images from a book constitute a set of images, and only one part (e.g. page no.) should differ. Hrishikes (talk) 12:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover!Edit

 

Hi Mutter Erde, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/− Guanaco (talk) 04:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. It works ː-) Mutter Erde (talk) 04:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

A giftEdit

  Mother Earth is everywhere
For all your hard work Lotje (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

ː Thank you :-). This is a very nice Moeder Aarde sculpture. I will have an eye on her sculptress. Mutter Erde (talk) 15:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Chris Roberts 2017 - Mutter Erde fec.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:02, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Walter Scheel - Waldfriedhof Zehlendorf.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Copyright discussion on German WikipediaEdit

Hi, Mutter Erde, would you be so kind as to take a look at my userpage on the German Wikipedia. I would like your second opinion. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 11:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi Lotje, I am very sorry, but you and all others cannot use files as https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sterling_Hayden_1953.jpg in German wikipedia. If you click on the German version of the template PD US not renewed you will see the orange colored warning especially for German contributors. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 11:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
I wonder if there would be an easier way to make sure images like this just cannot be added to the Wikipedia's with that kind of restrictions. That would make it much easier. Why do some contributors complicate things by not wanting to make a step to commons and trying to be helpful over here? It is frustrating! I really is. Everybody sitting on his or her island, not prepared to react and instead prefering to use that typical "you idiot" language.   Lotje (talk) 12:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
ː The world is big enough. So big, that you can live very good without a German/Austrian/Swiss wikipedia. Believe me :-). Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Indeed, Mutter Erde, the world is big enough, but... on the other hand, laws can be changed, and this one in the D-A-CH and other areas need to be altered because of OUTDATED and NOT OF THIS WORLD ANYMORE. Just reminds me of the POP in Belgium, where the Atomium initially was not allowed be displayed on the Dutch (read Belgian) Wikipedia. How outdated was that? Actually by adding an interwikilink to commons one could make a little detour... Suppose I do that on the German Wikipedia? Look and see what happens. Lawmakers sometimes need a wake up call.   Lotje (talk) 07:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
According to https://irights.info/artikel/die-harmonisierung-des-urheberrechts/5069 is the EU the right address for any changes. If I would be young and strong, I would write Günther Oettinger or the current de:Kommissar für Digitale Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft my thaughts and complaints. Before asking the EU, I would ask User:Ralf Roletschek, a professional photographer, about the point of view of the German wikipedia. But please only in German language. Regards Mutter Erde (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
Mutter Erde/Archiv 3, ...

Lotje (talk) 05:43, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Löschantrag Hedda EulenbergEdit

Hallo Mutter Erde, nur zur info,

die beanstandenen Bilder gehören als Erbe und Nachfolger von Herbert und Hedda Eulenberg (Meine Großeltern) mir und ich meine, dass sie aus diesem Grunde auch gemeinfrei sind.

grüße== [[:]] ==

 
[[:{{{1}}}]] has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Eulenberg (talk) 14:53, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Hallo Mutter Erde,

ich weiß sehr gut, eben aus Erfahrung mit den Übersetzungen von Hedda Eulenberg, was es heißt "Urheberecht zu verletzen ", aber leider haben Sie nicht gut recherchiert, was einen Wikipedianer nicht gerade auszeichnet. Es handelt sich bei dem gelöschten Bild nämlich nicht um das von Herrn Grubenbecher aufgenommene, sondern von meinem Vater mit einer Kodak-Retina auf der Terrasse von Haus Freiheit aufgenommene. Das Bild von Herrn Grubenbecher ist eine Studio-Aufnahme, wahrscheinlich vor dem 1.Weltkrieg aufgenommen, zu dem Zeitpunkt war Hedda Eulenberg noch mit Möller-Bruck verheiratet. Sie ist auch keine geborene  "Hedda Gabler" sondern geboren                                                                                                                                                                          in Meiderich als "Hedwig Maase". Ich erwarte daher, dass Sie Mutter Erde diesen Lapsus auch wieder geadebiegen, d.h. veranlassen,daß die Löschung zurückgenommen wird.

Eulenberg (talk) 12:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Mutter Erde/Archiv 3/2010-2017".