Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, NAC!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


Contents

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


File:SEFT BDe 4-4 6 SanVittore 211012.jpgEdit

 
File:SEFT BDe 4-4 6 SanVittore 211012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jnn (talk) 14:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

A cookie for you!Edit

  Thank you very much for your work on categories of the Orbe-Chavornay railway ! Abaddon1337 (talk) 19:55, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Catégories du matériel roulantEdit

Je constate que tu introduis beaucoup de nouvelles catégories pour le matériel roulant. D'abord merci pour ton travail mais quand même une remarque. Il ne me semble pas avantageux de séparer trop les séries identiques ou similaires, par exemple Be 4/4 11...15 du MBC. Il faut chercher trop dans les sous-catégories si on définit une catégorie par quatre ou cinq photos. C'est plus agréable d'avoir au moins une dizaine par sous-catégorie. Merci!-- Gürbetaler (talk) 20:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Je me suis aussi posé la question. J'ai décidé de faire ainsi, afin de pouvoir insérer un renvois depuis la catégorie (à créer) des Be 4/4 TRAVYS-ysc. Si t'as des propositions meilleures, je suis preneur. ;-) Il serait néanmoins dommage de perdre le lien entre la Be 4/4 15 du BAM et ses "sœurs" de Travys. NAC (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Dans un cas comme ça je propose: BAM Be 4/4, YSC Be 4/4 et une catégorie ACMV Be 4/4 1981 dessus.-- Gürbetaler (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
D'accord, je vais procéder ainsi, merci. À propos de Travys, saurais-tu si la dénomination de Be 4/4 II qu'utilise Travys sur son site est-elle courante? Stolz dans Triebfahrzeuge der Schweiz ne l'utilise pas, par exemple; sur les véhicules, d'après les photos, il n'en est pas question non plus. NAC (talk) 09:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Cette dénomination Be 4/4" ne se trouve pas ailleurs, elle n'est donc pas courant.-- Gürbetaler (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Merci! NAC (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 01:12, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! NAC (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Ponte Corcapolo 030514.jpgEdit

Hallo NAC,
ich bin zufällig gerade über dieses Bild von dir gestolpert und wollte dich fragen, ob du weißt, dass es gerade einen Photo-Wettbewerb zum Thema Brücken gibt, wo dein Bild gut dazupassen würde. Vielleicht magst du ja ein paar einreichen?
Ganz liebe Grüße, Anna reg (talk) 13:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, ich schaue mal; danke für den Hinweis! Liebe Grüsse, NAC (talk) 13:22, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Gern geschehen. Anna reg (talk) 14:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Immagini di carrozze FFSEdit

Caro NAC, ho fotografato due carrozze svizzere, ma non sapendomi orientare fra le serie lascio a te l'onere di categorizzarle. Le trovi qui e qui. Grazie!--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 13:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Fatto; in entrambi i casi si tratta di CU I (la semipilota è una ex-ABt 50 85 38-33 900-921). NAC (talk) 14:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

File:FS_625100_Luino_xx0793.jpgEdit

Caro NAC, non vorrei sbagliarmi, ma quelle sulla destra non mi sembrano delle carrozze tipo 1955/57: quella di prima classe dovrebbe essere una tipo 1946 con i finestrini ricostruiti, le altre due visto il profilo del tetto sembrano delle tipo 1959.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 08:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Può darsi; non sono un esperto. Correggi pure. Ciao e grazie, NAC (talk) 08:34, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

CategoriesEdit

Hi,

I have noticed the creation of those two categories : Category:First class train interiors in Switzerland and Category:Second class train interiors in Switzerland. Thanks for that.

I just want to ask you a small question. What are the criteria to add pictures on those two categories ? Are those categories refering prior or after 1956 ? E.g. those 3 pictures File:BC4563SBBCFFFFS-20121014i.jpg, File:LE B11 - intérieur.jpg and File:Blonay-Chamby Régional des Brenets - 11 - 02.jpg are in the category : Category:Second class train interiors in Switzerland. However, those cars are, after 1956, first class passenger cars. They kept the old classification for reasons of museum material.

Anyway, it is not consistent to put them in the same category as this kind of photos : File:FFS B 50 85 21-73 348-7 interno 011213.jpg or File:FR B 54103 interior Landquart 010215 1.jpg.

Would it be appropriate to create categories for historical material and therefore also a category for the third class cars?

So what is your suggestion ?

Best regards --Abaddon1337 (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Salut,
c'est une bonne question; en ce qui concerne la B11 du LEB, à mon avis, il s'agit bien d'une voiture de seconde classe (B); plus de problèmes se posent aussi pur les actuelles "C" historiques: ces voitures ont-elles vraiment gardé une classification de 3ème en 1956, ou ont-elles reçu une classification de 2nde pour redevenir de 3ème alors qu'elles sont devenues "historiques"? Il faudrait peut-être demander à quelque usager plus expert (Gürbetaler, p.ex.)... NAC (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Ok merci. Désolé, je ne savais pas que tu parlais français. Je vais lui demander. --Abaddon1337 (talk) 12:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Borse Alessio Guidetti per Wikimania 2016Edit

 
Ciao, un messaggio dalla Commissione Borse Alessio Guidetti

Ciao, come forse saprai quest'anno Wikimania, il raduno annuale delle comunità Wikimedia, si terrà a Esino Lario (Lecco) dal 22 al 28 giugno.

Come per le scorse edizioni dell'evento, anche per il 2016 l'associazione Wikimedia Italia intende rendere disponibili alcune borse di partecipazione.
Potete trovare il bando di partecipazione con tutti i dettagli a questo link.
La scadenza è il 30 aprile 2016, ore 23:59 CEST.

Trovate invece tutte le informazioni su Wikimania Esino Lario sul sito ufficiale dell'evento
Grazie, e un sincero augurio di buon lavoro e buon divertimento sull'enciclopedia libera :-)


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da queste liste


Alexmar983 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

File:6 Bucuresti Parliament 130916.jpgEdit

 
File:6 Bucuresti Parliament 130916.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpgEdit

 
File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 14:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpgEdit

 
File:Merkel Koblenz Sachsenstrasse 050913.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 22:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:63-64 36-43 20 Vallorbe-Domodossola.pdfEdit

 
File:63-64 36-43 20 Vallorbe-Domodossola.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

190.13.216.1 01:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Railpool 185 705-1 Domodossola 150811.jpgEdit

Hi, did you add Category:Rail transport electrical substations here because of the building in the background, or because of the locomotive? Is it a mobile substation? --Te750iv (talk) 20:22, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi @Te750iv:, I added the category because the locomotives were a sort of substation (I'm not a technician...); that was after the 2011 fire into the Simplon tunnel. NAC (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the helpful reply; very interesting issue. I've now added some information and used one image for dewiki. --Te750iv (talk) 17:20, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "NAC".