Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nasjonalbiblioteket-bot!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Kirken på Hidra.Edit

Bildet: http://www.nb.no/nbsok/nb/3701684b8e0a8aa42c258e304ed1501e.nbdigital?lang=no#0. - viser ganske riktig Hidra kirke i Kirkehamn - men det er speilvendt. Bildet er tatt nesten nøyaktig fra nord, og Nordsjøen blir del av horisonten. Da ligger kirken på vestsiden av fjorden og ikke mot øst. Håper det lar seg rette opp.

Hvorfor to eldre bilder fikk tittelen "Eie" forundrer meg også. Eie er navnet på kanalen som deler øya i to, og tettbebyggelsen der, ca. 3 km lengre mot nord og Hidrasundet. --Bjørn som tegner (talk) 15:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:No-nb digifoto 20141003 00004 bldsa PK01998.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:No-nb digifoto 20141003 00004 bldsa PK01998.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

I removed {{PD-old-70}}, {{PD-old}} or similar templates from the files whose authors who died less then 70 years ago. Now the files have no license and unless it is fixed will be deleted in a week. If you know of other reason why those files are in public domain please feel free to add a new license template and alert me and I will remove {{No license}} tag. If you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Skulptur Roald Amundsen - no-nb digifoto 20150225 00105 NB MIT FNR 10852.jpgEdit

 
File:Skulptur Roald Amundsen - no-nb digifoto 20150225 00105 NB MIT FNR 10852.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Deadstar (msg) 13:49, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Kanstadsamlingen - NMF010005-01876.jpgEdit

 
File:Kanstadsamlingen - NMF010005-01876.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Blue Elf (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

AxelPaulsen-bilderEdit

Hei @Profoss:. Hvilken datering er riktig tror du for disse to bildene som for meg ser ut til å være samme fotografi men med ulik presentasjon.

Noe i dine kilder som kan avklare hva som er riktig ? og eventuelt 'rename' den ene som sannsynligvis er feil ? Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Hei, bildet er bot-opplastet basert på Nasjonalbibliotekets bildedatabase, jeg kan ikke si sikkert akkurat hvorfor det er datert med 1885, men jeg mistenker at det kanskje er snakk om en innskrift et sted. For mer informasjon kan du ta kontakt med Nasjonalbibliotekets billedsamling på bilder@nb.no Profoss (talk) 08:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Takker for svar. Med vennlig hilsen Migrant (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Uidentifisert storgård - negativ - no-nb digifoto 20160415 00294 bldsa EYDE00346.jpgEdit

 
File:Uidentifisert storgård - negativ - no-nb digifoto 20160415 00294 bldsa EYDE00346.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vidariv (talk) 11:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Wrong date formatEdit

Hello Nasjonalbiblioteket-bot, i found several images that you uploaded with a date like this: {{Other date|between|1951|06}} (e. g. these). What is meant with that? June 1951? Just tell me and i can easily fix it. Regards, --Arnd (talk) 12:02, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Nasjonalbiblioteket-bot".