User talk:Natuur12

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bucznik 1930 r. widok od pd. zach..jpgEdit

Good day for you Mr. Natuur12

Excuse me please, but why you deleted file: Bucznik_1930_r._widok_od_pd._zach..jpg of the photo from the commons (4-th September 2015)? This photo dates from 1930 year and from my private archive. Please answer to me on my email: With the greeting Łukasz Konarzewski

Dear Łukasz Konarzewski,
Photographs from private archives are often problematic. In this case we don't know when or even if the file has been published before. We need evidence of the photographs publication date in order to determine the copyright status of the file. Now we have to assume the worst case scenario meaning that we assume that the work is unpublished and the author unknown. And unpublished works with unknown authors are protected for 120 days after creation in the United States.
Kind regards,
Natuur12 (talk) 11:23, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Mr. Natuur,

thank you very much indeed for your answer. The photograph of this case is about 85 years old and is made by unknown author. This photograph was published two times at least in: Zamek Prezydenta Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej w Wiśle, Kraków 2005, s. 48-50 ISBN 83-921543-0-4 - publisher - Fundacja Międzynarodowe Centrum Kultury in Kraków; and on,pl,mapa-kultury,129972.html – publisher - the portal of Narodowe Centrum Kultury in Warszawa (polish state's cultural institution) in 2014 year

In the polish low, the intellectual works (also the photographs) are protected for 70 years. After this time the ownership of copyright belong to current owner. I thougt so it is legal.

With the greetings and wishe - have a good day Łukasz Konarzewski

Dear Łukasz Konarzewski,
I believe you are misinterpertating the Polish copyright law. In Europe there is something called the publication right but this only counts for works that are unpublished. I don't know if the Polish law has a provision like this but being the owner of a photograph which has been published doesn't make you the copyright holder. For now there is not enough evidence that the work is anonymous which complicates matters. We do have {{PD-Poland}} but it is really hard to prove that an image like this is really published without a valid copyright notice before 1994. I am not saying that this file is de facto a copyright violation but providing enough evidence that this file is not will be a tough challenge. Natuur12 (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by MatthisvalerieEdit

Hi Natuur12, I saw that the photos uploaded by User:Matthisvalerie were deleted. She has been taking the pictures herself at events in London and dropping by the Wikimedia UK office for help uploading them. Would it be possible to restore the images? Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

@Richard Nevell (WMUK): I undeleted them based upon your explenation. If you can vouch for them, than that is good enough for me. Natuur12 (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Reasoning? Arguments?Edit

Hi. About your closure of these BSicons (search 19:34). Could you specify why & how you reached that conclusion? (sort of funny, the search will yield two closures by you in one minute - how thorough does that look?). I'd like to read your evaluation of the arguments. -DePiep (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC) [My home talkpage: en:User talk:DePiep ].

See here. Your contribtutions regarding that discussion where merely ad hominem just like your message at my talk page is merely an ad hominem. You didn't follow the enaming quidelines for Biscoins and in the meantime new files have been created which do follow those guidelines and therefor your uploads are redundant. Plus the quality of your uploads wasn't that good either, scaling issue's. Sorry but when the only defence against deletion is a list of cheap fallacy, deletion is the only logical outcome. Natuur12 (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Dank u welEdit

Hi, Natuur12 Emblem-fun.svg Thank you for your speedy deletion on the copyvio file. Dank u wel. --Tokorokoko (talk) 09:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome :). Natuur12 (talk) 10:56, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Upload problem (do not appear)Edit

Hi Natuur, i upload better versions for five photos of the Wikipédia french article Grande Mosquée de Kairouan but the last version of these photos do not appear when I click them from the article. The versions which have to appear are :

  • File:Vue aérienne de la Grande Mosquée de Kairouan - aerial view of Kairouan's Great Mosque.jpg [1](version of 3 octobre 2015 à 07:39 ; 1,26 Mio)
  • [2] (version of 2 octobre 2015 à 04:37 ; 606 Kio)
  • [3] (version of 2 octobre 2015 à 04:18 ; 1005 Kio)
  • [4] (version of 2 octobre 2015 à 04:49 ; 507 kio)
  • [5] (version of 2 octobre 2015 à 04:27 ; 580 kio)

As i said the problem is that these versions do not appear from the wikipedia article. I wish your help. Cordially, Passionné d'architecture (User talk:Passionné d'architecture) 08:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Natuur, same thing concerning this file : Vue aérienne nocturne de la Grande Mosquée de Kairouan.jpg [6](version of 3 octobre 2015 at 23:25 ; 5,07 Mio) Cordially, Passionné d'architecture (User talk:Passionné d'architecture) 23:31, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Good morning Natuur, also this file : Vue intérieure d'un porche de la Grande Mosquée de Kairouan.jpg [7] (last version 7,6 Mio). Cordially, Passionné d'architecture (User talk:Passionné d'architecture) 07:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Dear Passionné d'architecture,
The files are visible at my PC perfectly but I do have issue's with some other files (mostly .gif). If you want I can open a bug report. Natuur12 (talk) 13:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Didn't last a monthEdit

We're back to the problems (although without obvious verbal insults)... Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-smj.png. Barely lasted one month. Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I replied at his talk page. Natuur12 (talk) 19:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Philippe II, Duke of Orléans.PNGEdit

Hello, just thought I'd ask why you declined the move of the image in the title? Just curious. :) Simplegoose (talk) 18:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

The name is not completely meaningless and we simply don't allow moves when the new name is only better. Natuur12 (talk) 18:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
But surely the name I suggested was more informative? Simplegoose (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Yes it was but that is not a reason to rename a file. That said, I can't say that you are completely wrong since criteria 2 is pretty broad. Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Brooke Elliott.jpg?Edit

Why did you delete this file? It was properly licensed at as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brooke Elliott.jpg determined. --GRuban (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

My bad, it was nominated for speedy deletion with as rational Marking as possible copyvio because even if the source video is marked on YouTube as creative commons it's clearly a collection of copyrighted pictures. Which is true and therefor we cannot hoste the entire video but I should have taken a closer look because this shot is legit. Natuur12 (talk) 21:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! --GRuban (talk) 21:40, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Natuur12".