Open main menu
Information icon.svg This user is, of their own volition, no longer very active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies.

Contents

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Méduse1819Edit

License tags still need to be fixed. Same for Commons:Deletion requests/File:Павел Россиев "На севере диком" книга 1904 год pdf.pdf. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:17, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi, feel free to update the relevant pages. Natuur12 (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
This should be done before or at time of deletion request closure. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko perhaps I missed a policy update but could you please point out which policy states that the license info needs to be updated by the closing admin? Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be lazy but you can't nominate dozens of historical files which have wrong license info because someone made a newbie mistake and then expecting the closing admin to do all the work. Natuur12 (talk) 16:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Problem with license tags were stated in both reasons. If it was not fixed, why deletion requests were closed? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: Because the files are not copyright violations and there aren't any scope issue's either. For wrong license tags we have {{Wrong license}}. Anyone can add this template. For another example of using this template after a DR was closed as kept, see here. Natuur12 (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
At least in ex-USSR countries authors have right for name forever. So claiming own work over other person work is copyrights violation. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko: And your point is? File:Павел Россиев "На севере диком" книга 1904 год pdf.pdf already had the correct author information and the other files are most likely Canadian. If you're so worried about the license info. Feel free to update the info yourself. I'm not going to resolve your issue when you are perfectly capable of resolving it yourself. Either provide that policy quote I asked for or consider this discussion over. Natuur12 (talk) 17:18, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
Please read first statement in this section. Administrator who closes deletion request is responsible to verify that issues (by the word, Commons:Licensing#License information) fixed or fix them himself/herself. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
@EugeneZelenko The English version doesn't mention "Administrator who closes deletion request is responsible to verify that issues". I'm not arguing that the license and author info shouldn't be fixed but when it's not fixed it doesn't necessarily follow that a file should either be deleted or the admin who closes a DR should fix the license info. I'm done discussing this issue. Natuur12 (talk) 15:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

DeletionsEdit

Re these deletions, I have been in contact with someone from Wild Republic to see if the tiger mascot was their product and see if they would be willing to release the copyright for one or more specific images. They thought the mascot looked like CK Tiger Cub (item # 19372), copyrighted in 2016 for the 2017 Model Year, Registration Number: VAu 1-255-178, however they thought it was hard to tell because of the mascot's t-shirt. I believe most of the files of this mascot have already been deleted, but they would want to see the images and the context they are being used before providing an OTRS ticket. I'm not sure of all of the images, but I think two of them were File:Wikimania 2017 - Building a Better Dispute Resolution System 7490.jpg and File:Purrrrrcy_Head_Tiger_Legal_Team.jpg What is the best way forward with this? Best, Avery Jensen (talk) 23:36, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Dear Avery Jensen,
There's a picture of the tiger here. (Same picture as Purrrrrcy Head Tiger Legal Team.jpg). This one won't be deleted because the WMf can host fair use files at their own non community website whilst Wikimedia Commons cannot. Perhaps an online picture will come in handy. I noticed that you listed your email address at your user page. If you want I can check the deleted files and mail them or share them via Wetransfer. Whatever works for you. Regards. Natuur12 (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Much appreciated. Yes, please send. Avery Jensen (talk) 17:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
@Avery Jensen you got mail. Natuur12 (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, but there was some difficulty with the email, could you try again? Avery Jensen (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
@Avery Jensen: are you able too open zip-files? Natuur12 (talk) 18:55, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I suppose so. I think you can just right-click and it should open by itself. It is not for me though, it will be passed on. I don't know what size files I can email, I had problems with this before. If I have problems forwarding the email, I suppose I can put it in a google-doc and email the link. Just to be clear, the files are
  • File:Wikimania 2017 - Building a Better Dispute Resolution System 7490.jpg
  • File:Wikimania 2017 - Building a Better Dispute Resolution System 7491.jpg
  • File:Wikimania 2017 - Building a Better Dispute Resolution System 7492.jpg
  • File:Purrrrrcy Head Tiger Legal Team.jpg
Avery Jensen (talk) 00:44, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
@Avery Jensen: I send them again. This time using wetransfer. Natuur12 (talk) 14:27, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Notre DameEdit

You deleted the Notre Dame video because it was "from Twitter" but it is my understanding that it was from Youtube under a CC license, if you check the provenance information. Can you clarify? @Ainali: Link for deletion: [1] -- Fuzheado (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

The source is here, still with a CC BY 3.0 license. Ainali (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear Fuzheado and Ainali,
As explained in the deletion summary. This is a blatant case off license laundering. The YouTuber took the video from Flickr and uploaded it too his own YouTube account. The YouTuber is from Bangladesh and hasn't ever uploaded own work. Two hours before uploading the Notre Dame video he uploaded another video, clearly not shot in Paris. Plus, the date of the original tweet predates the upload date at YouTube. Please pay a bit more attention when uploading high profile pictures/video's/screenshots of current events. Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Ah, I was to naïve this time. Thanks for keeping your eyes open! Ainali (talk) 22:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Incendie Notre Dame de Paris.jpgEdit

I have a new version of the file (straight and tonal correction), can you please briefly unlock? Similar to File:Notre Dame on fire 15042019-1.jpg --Ralf Roletschek 20:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@Ralf Roletschek: I can't help you with that I'm afraid. I already reduced my protection but File:Incendie Notre Dame de Paris.jpg is also cascade protected and that's something I can't undo. The only solution would be if an administrator uploads the file. (I'm currently in the middle of something and therefor can't do it). Natuur12 (talk) 20:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Ok, i have upload it with another name. Can you insert the other version File:Incendie Notre Dame de Paris-2.jpg, the file is to me totaly protected. --Ralf Roletschek 20:20, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ralf Roletschek: the file merge is done. Natuur12 (talk) 21:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Pending Confirmation for File:Sirio berati foto portret.jpgEdit

Hello, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sirio_berati_foto_portret.jpg is till pending confirmation after 15 days. The licence can be found on https://sirioberati.com/licence

— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs)
Hi Andinano12,
I also did a license review for this file. Someone from volunteer email response team will have a look at the rest after they worked their way through the backlog. Natuur12 (talk) 17:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Natuur12".