Hello. According to the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
As long as you give credit which I did.
Was DM the core issue with this one? Because I can still easily rectify its few contested de minimis sections. I was looking for a verdict on the license of the image. czar 21:21, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- I have to admit that it was a bit of a cheap trick to only go for the DM argument since the question if it is DM or not is easier to answer than the licensing question.
- In my opinion we can trust Microsoft Sweden that they have the right to license the intellectual property of Microsoft. Though, asking for clarification via email is preferable since the screenshot also contains a lot of elements that might not be original Microsoft works. Like the background picture. While Microsoft itself probably is quite knowledgeable about copyright we have to be careful when dealing with daughters especially when the stream is run by someone specializes in communication. Natuur12 (talk) 08:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
You closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Wire Issue27v14.pdf as keep. I am letting everyone who weighed in there know that it has been nominated for deletion, again, at Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Josve05a/The Wire v. Stock images.