Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, NicoScribe!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Contents

category:Carl NewmanEdit

in the future disambiguate categories, do not delete them, it is disruptive. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 14:28, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Slowking4. Well, the three files were in a wrong category ([1], [2], [3]) so I have thought that it was OK to remove it. I am sorry for this disruption. Thanks for the advice. --NicoScribe (talk) 18:23, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!Edit

Hi NicoScribe,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | മലയാളം | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

I also granted you the rollback right. jdx Re: 17:45, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Uploading an ImageEdit

PLEASE I need someone to properly attach an image to a wiki page I read that lacks image.

I added a link on the page indicating a proper image for that page. Please kindly help by attaching the image well & referencing it to proper image owner. Thanks alot for improving Wikipedia. Below is the affected page.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mambilla_Power_Station Ebere Jude (talk) 16:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Ebere Jude: I have made this modification. Is it OK for you? Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 16:58, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Unexplained revertsEdit

NicoScribe why provide a "question mark" without properly explaining your reverting of good fix of a inter-wiki link of a featured picture linked discussion whereas as opposed to a not present/existent, error-prone discussion link to a FOP on English Wikipedia. I suggest you stop doing this stuff as noticed on undoing, often providing unknown rationales, may lead to unpleasant edit wars for even uncontroversial IW-fix. Do not even noticed the revert, after having glance on my contributions. Please AGF before performing such actions, and use a descriptive edit summary. --182.58.165.9 16:51, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Small hint if you disagree (and probably) continue a disruption; see- en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/La Jaconde (current fix to WI-link) and this:- en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/La Joconde, correcting discussion links to show establishment of consensus and reverting improperly with a undesirable, completely bonk edit summary of a character ("?") is doing such bad will credit to its page (on English Wikipedia) itself. Using user rights with responsible manner is what I care. Patrolled (rollback) editing was not used, fairness achieved, revert back to improper version: nope. --182.58.165.9 16:57, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Yes, my edit was an error. I am sorry. Thank you! Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 18:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Message from KaschmoneyEdit

U suc Kaschmoney (talk) 18:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Kaschmoney: did I make an error ? Do you remember it or the relevant page? Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "NicoScribe".