Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Well-read MountainMan!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg edit

Copyright status: File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg edit

 
File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Re-upload immediately after deletion, no license
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Xunks (talk) 16:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:The Battle of David-Bek in Helidzor.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Xunks (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove problem tags edit

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  +/−


 
Hi! It has come to my attention that you have removed a warning which says that a file doesn't have enough information about the source or license conditions. Nevertheless, it seems to me that this information is still missing and I have restored the tag. You may either add the required information or, if you think that required information is already given, put the image up for a deletion request so that it won't automatically be deleted. Thank you.

--Xunks (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:154russian-reform1840-45.gif edit

 
File:154russian-reform1840-45.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 13:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:155Transcaucasia1845-1868.gif edit

 
File:155Transcaucasia1845-1868.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 13:07, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Просьба edit

@Lvova: , здравствуйте. Хотел попросить Вашей помощи по файлам File:154russian-reform1840-45.gif и File:155Transcaucasia1845-1868.gif. На сколько я знаю, сайт http://www.armenica.org/ давал разрешение не публикацию всех своих изображений, не могли бы Вы, пожалуйста, посмотреть, были ли письма с этими двумя изображениями. Буду Вам очень и очень благодарен. Не хотел нарушать ничего, поспешил по неопытности. Well-read MountainMan (talk) 13:32, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Да, письмо есть. По современным меркам у него странная формулировка (разрешают использовать те карты и изображения, которые были на сайте на 1 января 2007 года). Судя по всему, номинировавший файлы на удаление участник этот нюанс знает, судьба файлов зависит от того, когда они на сайте появились. Непреднамеренное нарушение правил на Викискладе, где встречается авторское право всех стран (а ещё права личности, свобода панорамы и всё остальное) - не приговор. Анастасия Львоваru/en 13:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
подскажите, какой выход из ситуации может быть? Обратиться на сайт?--Well-read MountainMan (talk) 14:00, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Если файлы были загружены на сайт после 1 января 2007 года и их очень хочется сохранить в статье - да, требуется получить новое разрешение (на весь сайт или на эти два файла - как уговорите его администрацию). Анастасия Львоваru/en 14:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Lvova: извините, что я Вас опять тревожу. Я полностью перерисовал две карты эту и эту. Но, видимо не совсем правильно оформил авторство, не могли бы Вы посмотреть пожалуйста, а то выставили на удаление. Источник я указал ранее. Спасибо!--Well-read MountainMan (talk) 18:57, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Я бы рекомендовала нажать кнопку "challenge speedly deletion", в качестве автора указать всё-таки себя, а на странице обсуждения удаления объяснить свои действия - в целом, можно и на русском языке, если не имеете ничего против того, что Вас будут стараться понять через автопереводчик. Анастасия Львоваru/en 19:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Lvova: А можете пожалуйста подсказать, где ее найти...не вижу... Я написал на СО файла и отменил коллегу Xunks, как я понял, это не бот--Well-read MountainMan (talk) 19:34, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Administrative-territorial division of Russian Transcaucasia 1840—1845.gif edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Administrative-territorial division of Russian Transcaucasia 1840—1845.gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 18:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Administrative-territorial division of Russian Transcaucasia 1845—1868.gif edit

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Administrative-territorial division of Russian Transcaucasia 1845—1868.gif, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Xunks (talk) 18:46, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Mig-29 Erebuni-Ararat,3.jpg edit

 
File:Mig-29 Erebuni-Ararat,3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violations edit

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


 
Hello Well-read MountainMan.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

--Xunks (talk) 14:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Буду знать Well-read MountainMan (talk) 14:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Вопрос edit

@Lvova: , здравствуйте, можете пожалуйста помочь, как соединить страницу на Коммонс с вики? Что бы в шаблоне отображалась ссылка на страницу с фото? Спасибо Well-read MountainMan (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Сделала, хотя правка выглядит как-то странновато. В общем виде - открываете страницу на Викискладе, в левом меню находите "править ссылки", после нажатия предложат выбрать языковой раздел и указать название статьи. Анастасия Львоваru/en 18:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Буду знать, спасибо! Well-read MountainMan (talk) 23:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply