Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nirmal Dulal!

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Contents

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Nirmal Dulal,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Nirmal Dulal,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Solution for the image: File:Gomphrena globosa Single.JPGEdit

Hello. You are the photographer of the image File:Gomphrena globosa Single.JPG. I'm not sure if the image was edited or not. If so, I suggest you clear the image blurs and not have to be very sharp and without noise. The field is very blurred ago. With the reform of image, intend to nominate it again in FP. If you do not like, leave anyway. Thanks. ArionEstar (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015Edit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Nirmal Dulal, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015Edit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Nirmal Dulal, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events Nepal during 2015Edit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal

Dear Nirmal Dulal, we heartily apologize for the delay due to some situational circumstances. It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 2nd September, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:00 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Events 2015 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

The Wiki Events Nepal Team

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal

Dear Nirmal Dulal, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 11 November, 2017 at Masala Cottage, 2:30 pm onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Nepal in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,
WLM 2017 in Nepal Team

Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal — InvitationEdit

  Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal


Hi Nirmal Dulal, We would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Loves Earth 2018 in Nepal competition during 1 May to 31 May, 2018 and share your great and valuable images with the whole world. We would like to ask a few minutes of your time before you start upload your valuable images from 1 May, 2018. Please use this new survey to submit your mailing address.

Kind regards,
The Wiki Loves Earth Team

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Nirmal Dulal,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in NepalEdit

Hi Nirmal Dulal, The e-mail address of nepaliwiki at googlegroups.com in the Contact us sectionat Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal is not working, I got an error back.

At the moment I only know of this page as the landing page for Wiki Loves Monuments in Nepal. As Nepali is the local language, I hope there will be a page in Nepali too? Greetings - Romaine (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Romaine, Greetings!! I corrected the contact email. also created a landing page in Nepali language and added the link in this page. We will also translate that page in Nepali ASAP. Thanks - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 06:19, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bigbell of Patan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tusha Hiti (Golden Tap) of Patan, Lalitpur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chilancho (South Face).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality but there are artifacts on the sky, maybe from too strong jpeg compression. also the verticals need a slight perspective correction --Trougnouf 17:28, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
  Done Corrected. -- Nirmal Dulal 06:26, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syambhunath 2018-09 (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bhandarkhal Pokhari (Kamal Pokhari).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Top of Krisnna Temple, Patan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WLM 2018 Nepal Photowalk 09-29 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 08:20, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nepali hindu bride.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 10:54, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syambhunath 2018-09 (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aethopyga siparaja seheriae Panchkhal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bhupatindra Malla 2018-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krisnna Temple and Garuda at Patan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:50, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Name should be in the description, otherwise good quality. --Peulle 07:33, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
  Done Name added. -- Nirmal Dulal 10:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikimedia Conference 2018 by Nirmal Dulal (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

VIEdit

Hi, I have noticed that you support all nominations by User:Nabin K. Sapkota, also from Nepal, without much respect for VI criteria and rules. Please stop doing that. Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Yann if you look there carefully you can find that I only supported some among his Nominations, not The all of them, And I supported his nominations as per Quote from Commons:Valued images: "Valued images, on the other hand, are those that are the most valuable of their kind for use in an online context, within other Wikimedia projects", I only supported those Images which were used and useful, and its done with good faith.I respect the Criteria and Rules of VI. —- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Not really. Please read the rules again. Images need to be geocoded, and have a valuable scope. That's not the case for several of your supports. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doko 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:52, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Change in ScopeEdit

Hi Nirmal Dulal, I made changes in Scope here please, review it again. Thanks and regards! -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:34, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Change in VI (Scope)Edit

Hi Nirmal Dulal, I made changes in Scope here please, review it again. Thanks and regards! -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 08:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Change in VI (Scope)Edit

Hi Charlesjsharp, I made changes in Scope here please, review it again. Thanks and regards! -Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 02:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Arjun Kumar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nepalese children reading books in Nepali..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fisheye view of Chilancho.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brides of Nepal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dandi and Biyo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Bhupatindra Malla at Bhaktapur Durbar Square..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kumari.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 09:34, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Doko (basket).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in NepalEdit

  Invitation for felicitation program of Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal

Dear Nirmal Dulal, It’s our pleasure to invite you to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal winners awarding ceremony on 15 December, 2018 at Siddhartha Cottage, Tinkune, 11:30 am onwards. We would like to ask few minutes of your time to provide your details here. Your contribution as a contributor made the Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in Nepal possible. We’d like to have a privilege of having you there.

Kind regards,

WLM 2018 in Nepal Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wedding cake-2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:34, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Discussion about QI assessment of one of your imagesEdit

 
It’s about this image

Hello Nirmal Dulal,

just in case you may have not noticed yet, I just want to give you a hint that there is some discussion about the Quality Image assessment of one of your photographs: please see here.

As far as I can see, the most important point is the perspective. While your photo is very nice in itself, the rules for Quality Images normally require a perspective correction for photographs of buildings, i.e. making all straight lines appear straight. This is best done right in the raw image file conversion process, i.e. in your case in Lightroom. Have you a raw image file for this photograph, i.e. a CRW/CR2/CR3 file? Could you try to create a variant of this photograph with lens and perspective correction applied? (I would suggest to upload it as a separate image with a new file name, because the current version of your photograph has made such success in WLM and should IMHO not be overridden. :–) Or, if you do not want to do this yourself, in the discussion Hans-Jürgen Neubert has already offered to create an improved version for you, and I can can offer the same (i.e., I can try to create a version of your photo which complies to the suggestions given in the QI discussion). It would only be necessary that you could send the CRW/CR2/CR3 file to me or a version converted into DNG file format to Hans-Jürgen Neubert …

No offence, I just want to help a bit. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Aristeas: thanks for help, I just did the nominations, I’m not the author and uploader. I’ll try to reach to the real author for this and let you know soon. Thanks again for your help and notification. —- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Oops, sorry that I missed this! Thank you for pointing this out! I have therefore copied my message (as given above) to the discussion page of the author and uploader of the image.
However, it is a good idea that you try to reach the real author, too. You have already successfully nominated quite some photographs for Quality Images; maybe you can give some hints to the real author about the QI procedure and requirements …
Thank you and best regards, --Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bisket Jatra festival 2018 at the Nyatapola temple, Bhaktapur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2018 - December - Cakes/WinnersEdit

  Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Wedding cake-2018.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Cakes, in December 2018. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:47, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aegithalos concinnus Black-throated bushtit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Barbet (Megalaima virens) (न्याउली).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued image promotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuculus micropterus Indian cuckoo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

-- -- DeFacto (talk). 19:26, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Niltava macgrigoriae Female small niltava.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turdoides nipalensis Spiny Babbler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Phaenicophaeus tristis Green-billed malkoha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Psilopogon virens magnificus Great barbet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dayahang Rai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aethopyga siparaja Crimson sunbird (female).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red whiskered Bulbul (Pycnonotus jocosus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but note rule #3 under "Image page requirements" above: "Quality images shall have a meaningful file name". When this image has a meaningful file name, I will support. -- Ikan Kekek 05:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Ikan Kekek, I requested for renaming. - Nirmal Dulal 06:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  Done- Nirmal Dulal 09:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
  Support Thank you. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Female Mallard Swimming.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Template:Wiki Loves Earth 2019/neEdit

hello! please, if you can, check the text in the template. i have copied from the previous year, i want to make sure i have not ruined anything... thank you! --アンタナナ 11:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi Antanana, I made little correction, but you did a good job. Thank you!! - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 04:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himalayan bulbul जुल्फे जुरेली.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himalayan bulbul (Pycnonotus leucogenys) जुल्फे जुरेली.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A somewhat unfortunate cut-out. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:44, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Cree_panta_bird_32.jpgEdit

Target name already exist, please pick another name.--AldnonymousBicara? 06:25, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Done - 06:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House Sparrow (Passer rutilans) in Nepal by kiran.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-wattled lapwing (Vanellus indicus) 2019 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Emberiza aureola (Yellow-breasted bunting), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimson sunbird female (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:34, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indian Grassbird Wiki Loves Birds Nepal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Graminicola bengalensis (Indian grassbird).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oriolus traillii traillii (Maroon oriole).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great cormorant in Nepal 2019 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Green billed Malkoha (Nepal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Moahim 10:50, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Wattled lapwing Vanellus Indicus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House Sparrow (Passer rutilans) 86.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --SH6188 12:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --大诺史 14:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oriental White Eye (Zosterops palpebrosus) 95.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --大诺史 14:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grey Wagtail Motacilla cinerea, Nepal 19 cm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 08:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidatesEdit

  We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
Dear Nirmal Dulal,
Are you Interested in Film Making/Videography/Cinematography or Animated films? We think you are. Featured video candidates needs your help and you can help by reviewing , nominating your videos for the FV Tag.
You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome !
-- Eatcha (talk) 09:56, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Arial view of Pokhara 03.jpgEdit

This is a very nice picture, but I noticed it looks to be highly compressed. Do you shoot in RAW? If so, you may want to check your JPG compression settings. (a 24 MP picture should be much larger than 2.45 MP). — Rhododendrites talk |  03:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi Rhododendrites, I shot it in RAW. Sorry to say, I tried searching in my backup but didn't find the RAW file (just found a converted JPG with 6.56 MB size). Thanks and Regards -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 09:03, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Ah. Oh well. Well nice job on the image, regardless. I suspect if it were processed differently, it might be a good FP candidate. In case you find the RAW someday. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  15:24, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-bearded Bee-eater मधुमक्षी भक्षका.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maroon oriole - Bird from Nepal by Krishna (107).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oriental turtle dove in Nepal (79).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 12:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-bearded Bee-eater मधुमक्षी भक्षका.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common Mynah (डाङ्ग्रे रुपी) 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality - however, location would be very useful --Podzemnik 06:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:35, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maroon oriole - Bird from Nepal by Krishna (107).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 06:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-throated Barbet (कुथुर्के).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 16:04, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus), Nepal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 10:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-wattled lapwing (Vanellus indicus) 2019 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syambhunath 2018-09 (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 10:29, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dicaeum ignipectus (Fire-breasted flowerpecker).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saras crane by Sanjay Tha Shrestha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White-throated Laughingthrush (82).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shikra (Accipiter badius) 2019 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 07:43, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wedge-tailed green pigeon (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:35, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimson sunbird female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:24, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Striated laughingthrush 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nepali hindu bride.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nepali hindu bride.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Under stars and snows.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yellow-breasted bunting in Nepal 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 10:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Charlesjsharp 09:43, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tricoloured munia (Lonchura malacca) in Nepal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Nabin K. Sapkota 01:42, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Copyright violationsEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | azərbaycanca | বাংলা | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | မြန်မာဘာသာ | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | Simple English | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


 
Hello Nirmal Dulal.

You have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

Consider this your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

— Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Mr Tulsi Bhagat the name "Babin" in Exif metadata of these picture is name of my nephew "Babin Dulal" which was given by myself in there and for your kind information that is my personal camera and I think most of the participants on these event know that I was using that camera and don't try to hide your mistakes doing this mess up here. - Nirmal Dulal (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Enicurus schistaceus (slaty-backed forktail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cuculus micropterus (Indian cuckoo).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Return to the user page of "Nirmal Dulal".