Lange CH-Ketten bitte stapeln edit

--Kopiersperre (talk) 11:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Erledigt. - Nothingserious (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Stains-all edit

Hallo Nothingserious,

würdest du bitte File:Stains-all.png vektorisieren? Mit meinem simplen Programm kann ich keine delokalisierten (gestrichelten) Bindungen zeichnen.--Kopiersperre (talk) 14:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Erledigt -- Nothingserious (talk) 14:58, 17 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

SVGs edit

Hallo Nothingserious,

bei einem Massencheck von SVGs ist mir aufgefallen das File:Cannabicyclohexanol.svg keine XML-Deklaration hat. Das ist zwar nicht zwingend erforderlich jedoch sehr Empfohlen. Firefox zeigt da gerne mal das SVG nur als Text an.

-- Menner (talk) 11:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

PS: Etwa hier: File:Ferimzon.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menner (talk • contribs) 11:41, 03 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Menner, danke für den Hinweis, ich werde mich in nächster Zeit darum kümmern. --Nothingserious (talk) 12:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Perhelion sagt, das das an einem Häckchen zuviel bei Inkscape liegen könnte. Details unter User_talk:Gliwi#Wappen_in_SVG. -- Menner (talk) 13:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ich benutze das Tool 'SVG Cleaner' um die SVGs möglichst klein und kompatibel zu bekommen, dadrin ist besagtes Häkchen tatsächlich angekreuzt gewesen. Morgen oder übermorgen kommen aktualisierte SVGs, je nach verfügbarer Zeit. --Nothingserious (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Menner: , bevor ich jetzt die restlichen Dateien hochlade, sollte es so aussehen wie in der neuen Version von File:(E)-1-Bromo-2-butene.svg? --Nothingserious (talk) 08:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

So ist es gut. -- Menner (talk) 18:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Menner: Erledigt. --Nothingserious (talk) 07:40, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Cysteine biosynthesis.svg edit

Thank you for uploading File:Cysteine biosynthesis.svg as a replacement for File:Cysteine Biosynthesis.png. However, there are a few errors in the new image (I notice that you corrected a few of the errors in the original, though.) In the center structure, the two carboxylic acid groups are drawn incorrectly. Also, the center structure is called w:en:cystathionine. Cystathione appears to be a misspelling (or a least a very uncommon spelling variant). Finally, it would be nice to have the stereochemistry included, which tends to be important in biochemical reactions. Do you think you could correct these issues? Regards, Ed (Edgar181) 13:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Edgar181: Done. Also HotCat seems to be a bit messed up for me lately, added some categories now. Thanks for your input! --Nothingserious (talk) 08:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Nothingserious. Magst du deine Grafik entsprechend korrigieren? --Leyo 10:48, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Leyo and DMacks: Done. --Nothingserious (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank You! DMacks (talk) 19:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Alkanschmelzundsiedepunkt2.svg edit

Hi Nothingserious. I made other version of the file, without the lines. You people decide wich one wanna use. Saludos.
--Kes 47 (?) 07:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

I misspell "which" XD ... De nada (You're welcome in Spanish) :D
--Kes 47 (?) 19:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks for acknowledging my work. I will upload these images in SVG as you said, however it may take a while as my computer with the originals is down and I need it fixing. Regards Simon Caulton (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Commons:WikiProject Chemistry/Deletion requests edit

Hallo Nothingserious. Ich habe deinen DR dort eingebunden, damit ihn alle mitbekommen. Mittels folgender Script-Einbindung lassen sich übrigens diesbezügliche DR automatisch auf Commons:WikiProject Chemistry/Deletion requests einbinden:

// Chemie-Löschanträge
 importScript( 'User:Leyo/del-chem.js' );

--Leyo 21:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fehler in Blosum Matrix edit

Hallo Nothingserious, in deinem Bild zur Blosum 62-Matrix scheint ein Fehler zu sein. So müsste die Zelle Gly/Gly einen Wert von 6 und nicht -6 aufweisen. (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BLOSUM62.png) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neonoia (talk • contribs) 11:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stimmt, ist erledigt, danke für den Hinweis. --Nothingserious (talk) 12:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Octanitrocubane.svg is disputed edit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Octanitrocubane.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 18:34, 7 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


File:Dimethylcadmium structural.svg edit

 
File:Dimethylcadmium structural.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 10:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Lithium tetraborate.svg edit

 
File:Lithium tetraborate.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ed (Edgar181) 20:42, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply