Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nuklear!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Nuklear!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Epibatidine edit

Hi Nuklear. I just wanted to let you know that I have reverted your change to File:Epibatidine structure.png. I like your image fine, but the file I uploaded is intended to conform to w:en:Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing. Please feel free to upload your version as a separate file. Thanks. Edgar181 (talk) 14:40, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Pictet-Spengler Reaction Mechanism.png edit

Hi Nuklear. I've reverted your change to File:Pictet-Spengler Reaction Mechanism.png. Please do not upload your file over existing files. Please upload your version as a separate file. Thank you. --Choij (talk) 04:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Alprazolam_synthesis.png edit

 
File:Alprazolam_synthesis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Serotonin.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 13:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Methylphenidate.png edit

 
File:Methylphenidate.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Testem (talk) 08:13, 25 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Bupropion1.png edit

 
File:Bupropion1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 18:57, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Structural formulae edit

Dear Nuklear,

may you draw your formulae more according to the Manual of Style?--Kopiersperre (talk) 19:16, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Dextromethylphenidate.svg edit

 
File:Dextromethylphenidate.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Methylphenidate.png edit

 
File:Methylphenidate.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 16:06, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


Abacavir edit

Nuklear your synthesis is incorrect, you make the wrong stereoisomer in the final product. In essence you make the 1,2-product, not the 1,4-product. look at the strucures!! ok thanks, i edit to correct mistake. sorry i did that, my mistake. although, dan drew wrong isomer in his book 6 which probably distracted my attention.

File tagging File:Nuklear logo.jpg edit

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nuklear logo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nuklear logo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Motopark (talk) 10:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I just copied it from google image search engine. I didn't realize that special permission was required to copy an image.

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission edit

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 10:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ropinirole edit

Your synthesis diagram for ropinirole is incorrect as it depicts synthesis of the N-isopropyl analogue not the N,N-di-n-propyl like it should be. Meodipt (talk) 02:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I know but wit h the secondary amine was how Dan drew it in his book 6 page 132. Could not access journal article no password and cost $35 to view it--Nuklear (talk) 20:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vector graphics please edit

Dear Nuklear,

you've uploaded a huge amount of drug syntheses. I want to give thanks to you but it's futile and a waste of your effort, when you don't upload them as SVG (see Commons:Transition to SVG). Does your structural drawing program allow the output of SVGs?--Kopiersperre (talk) 17:46, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok, here is one I uploaded for you in .svg then:

 
Almitrine synthesis

I hope that you like seeing this in .svg rather than .png format, per your request sir.--Nuklear (talk) 20:45, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the prompt change. Why is there a lonely hydrogen in the left bottom of the graphics?--Kopiersperre (talk) 23:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

en:Diloxanide furoate edit

Dear Nuklear,

may you draw the synthesis of the amebicide diloxanide furoate?--Kopiersperre (talk) 00:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:BMS-820836.svg edit

 
File:BMS-820836.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 01:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Clemastine synthesis.png edit

 
File:Clemastine synthesis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 01:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:DHEA structure.png edit

 
File:DHEA structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 01:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Dianabol.png edit

 
File:Dianabol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 01:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Error in Nitroglycerine synthesis figure edit

Your figure File:Nitroglycerine synthesis.png Shows the molecules containing four carbons. There are only three carbons in these structures. Remove the left most carbon and attach the hydroxyl to the middle carbon - similarly attach the nitroxy group to the product - 1,2,3-Trinitroxypropane (3-carbons).

Wikipedia 'List of cocaine analogues' article images needed edit

Hello,

I notice you make a lot of molecular structure 2D images. I am currently restricted to a library computer and cannot make images for upload.

I was wondering if you could assist me in my endeavor of adding certain images for inclusion at the Wikipedia 'List of cocaine analogues' page.

What I need is mostly those from Singh's SAR of Cocaine paper (45 pages in on the page finder; pg. 970 or so as enumerated on the paper itself: the chemical structures 183a-(through)-d, 184a & b, 185a-d, 186-188 on 'Scheme 42', on pg. 50 (974) structures 196a-o, 197a-g, 198a-e, 199a & b, 200 & 201a-e ... and more down to page 61 or so; namely N-modified analogs & such.)

Any help making these would be greatly appreciated. Nagelfar (talk) 21:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sure, just give me a few days & i'll look into it and try and help you with it.--Nuklear (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the much needed "R=..." images... Hey, I had a question maybe you know the answer to: Is the IUPAC on given on 2'-Acetoxycocaine wrong? It is:
(1R,2R,3S,5S)-Methyl 3-((2-acetoxybenzoyl)oxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate
Though using the IUPAC of cocaine as a starting point my assumption would be it is supposed to be:
methyl(1R,2R,3S,5S)-3-(2-acetoxybenzoyloxy)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate
Is the stereoisomerism of this analog different in this case, and if so, would it be in other cases? If not, what is the nature of the orientation of this error and how does it related to the isomers? Nagelfar (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I ran both names through CD and I get exactly the same structure in both cases.
So, both names are recognized by CD "convert name to structure" function.--Nuklear (talk) 03:53, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The structures through www.chemicalize.org are different in that one has two shaded wedge bonds (between the 2beta position & half the nitrogen bridge) and the other they are solid wedge bonds, not shaded. I thought this had to do with isomerism.
Anyhow, I will continue to revert any "ban reverts" they put on you in the 'list of cocaine analogues' article. There is discussion on my Wikipedia user talk page to the effect that such will be tolerated but that they are considered "my edits" apparently. The images [1] & [2] need to be upgraded, the nitrogen is off and half the bridge is missing, but otherwise thank you! (For aesthetic consistency through the article I'd like the OBz abbreviation to be the fully drawn out benzoyloxy, though, but that's just personal taste.) Nagelfar (talk) 18:45, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I changed my mind, I like the OBz abbr. in the boxes ;-) I still need your help with those "R" & "X" images. Nagelfar (talk) 00:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks alot for your input to try and get done this free work. I'll look into it and try and help you as far as possible.--Nuklear (talk) 04:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Misplaced N groups edit

 
another example

Dear Nuklear, in many of your schemes there is a ChemDraw bug, which misplaces things stacked over a Nitrogen (NMe or NH). (For example see old version of File:Theophylline synthesis 1.svg) Could you please fix this with Inkscape before you upload?--Kopiersperre (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your advice. I wrote to PerkinElmer already to tell them about the problem but had no idea how to fix it.--Nuklear (talk) 09:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed edit

22:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Nuklear; your 'List of phenyltropanes' page: edit

I'm going to get to all of S. Singh's tables from here and include them but I need some of your input. Should I just title them like in that paper (i.e. 3β-(4′-Substituted Phenyl)tropanes (as sub-cat. of Phenyl ring substituted phenyltropanes) … etc.) or should I go through the classification system you have in place. (i.e. 2-Carboxymethyl esters … β,α Stereochemistry … Tricyclic Tropanes … & et cetera) if it's the latter I'm going to need your help, and if its the former how should I interpolate the tables to be incorporated between your system in place? Or should we work together and just overhaul the whole schema of the article as it now stands for something that can easily incorporate the fifty some pages Singh dedicated to phenyltropanes in that paper along with the RTI research you've already transcluded? Please get back to me, I can also do edits for you if they're constructive and you're otherwise hindered by edit-restrictions due to past policy faux pas. Nagelfar (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok, he got things like meta-substituted I didn't bother about, just add those in if you want to I don't mind either way.--Nuklear (talk) 07:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean by meta-substituted? Which ones are those in the paper? (Give me a page number and I'll get them done, or some other way to decipher what you mean by meta-, if you mean substitutions of substitutions I need your input, you're more astute than I, give me the compound numbers (e.g. n-(through)-n) and I'll incorporate their tables). I still need those R-substitution/modification images in my tables at my cocaine analogues list, too. BTW Nagelfar (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

There's a few meta compounds on 933 but only dat is recorded. i included them. if u want to include anymore then be obliged, but i can't be bothered with it anymore it's getting boring now.--Nuklear (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK, I understand. I'll get to the 16 & 17s, and any other I see with both an X & Y. If your interest is ever piqued again, throw me a line at which ones need to be included (did you get to the metal chelated ones?) which numbers from Singh's paper, and I'll do it for you. (On page 961 (37th) scheme 32 has ones that have a W, X, Y & Z 6/7 substitution!) Nagelfar (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Nuklear Power.jpg edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nuklear Power.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 18:21, 31 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Verbenol structure.svg edit

 
File:Verbenol structure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 14:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

The quality of the chemical structure File:31,345 structure.svg is disputed edit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:31,345 structure.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 23:18, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


That's really picky saying Me could be confused with metal, to an organic chemist would know straight away what it means. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nuklear (talk • contribs)

Not every reader of Wikipedia is an organic chemist. See also en:MOS:Structure drawing#General. --Leyo 08:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Bodroux-Chichibabin hexanal.svg is disputed edit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Bodroux-Chichibabin hexanal.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 06:48, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


File:Ronidazole synthesis.svg edit

 
File:Ronidazole synthesis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 21:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Inquiries edit

Baclofen edit

Dear Nuklear,

may you please redraw File:Baclofen synthesis.png and File:Baclofen synthesis 2.png as SVG?--Kopiersperre (talk) 11:31, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ezetimibe edit

May you please draw a synthesis?--Kopiersperre (talk) 16:30, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Swastika formulas edit

 
Hi.

I was slightly shocked finding that Formula in the enwiki article. Are you aware that the swastika is a worldwide known symbol of one of the most cruel criminal political movement in history, and in some countries that sign is also illegal? So, i intervened in enwiki. May i ask if you made more drawings similar to that? --Itu (talk) 07:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes there was one other instance of chemical formulae that could be drawn in a swastika like design. If you take meprobamate which is derived from methyl propyl malonic ester and then to do the diethyl analog. That was the only other example I have come across. This is scientific chemical formulae though rather than artistic drawings.--Nuklear (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I found another swastika formula in the book I was studying today called Petrichloral.--Nuklear (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also for Loprodiol.

Your list of PTs edit

I've been doin' some work on it. Tell me what you think. (and let me know if you'd like to add any notes that I can include/adopt as my own for you) Best regards, Nuke. Nagelfar (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Check it out now, Nuklear. ;-j Nagelfar (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Aminometradine synthesis.svg edit

 
File:Aminometradine synthesis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 13:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Pirbuterol synthesis.png edit

Hi Nuklear, from which patent did you take the scheme? It seems that from https://www.google.com/patents/US3700681 but I cannot see there the alkylation step with t-BuBr. In other Pfizer's patents t-BuNH2 is used to react with an oxirane system. Regards, Michał Sobkowski (talk) 07:34, 11 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okay thanks I still need to look into this perhaps, I copied it from Lednicer book2 what was written.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pirbuterol&oldid=666191118

You checked all the patents? because I didn't have time to look into all of it.--Nuklear (talk) 10:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Cinepazet.png edit

One double bond has 'crossed lines'. Please fix!--Kopiersperre (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

IUPAC says (page 1961): “A crossed double bond has sometimes been used to indicate unspecified double bond configuration or a mixture of configurations. This type of bond is not considered acceptable for general use, although it may still be required by some computer software.”
In addition, “Me” and “Et” should not be used. --Leyo 23:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Amisometradine.svg edit

 
File:Amisometradine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 22:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Bromisoval synthesis.svg edit

 
File:Bromisoval synthesis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 22:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Winthrop tetracaine synthesis.png edit

Please correct your mistake or return the old image. WBR, BattlePeasant (talk) 04:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Diethylthiambutene synthesis.svg edit

 
File:Diethylthiambutene synthesis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 18:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your "boring to you" List of phenyltropanes edit

Hey Nuklear, me and user:Edgar181 have done quite a bit of work filling out your List of phenyltropanes WP page, check it out, see if it piques your interest on adding whatever remaining RTI structures we couldn't find. For instance, we couldn't find RTI-262: don't know where your main source was from, but the few omissions and corrections yet to do would be appreciated, you may be bored of it, but for some reason it still holds my interest, hoping all the effort in the interim piques a bit of follow-up interest with the pages original author, at least; At least check out it's current/latest permutation. Nagelfar (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

(In response to yours, on my talk) Good to hear back from you finally, as well, Nuklear: I presume what you mentioned to me is a chemistry-oriented (and not just information) database? Grey-market pharmaceutical synth, how-to's etc.? (I've been thinking of adding Singh's PT synth. schematics to wiki-How-To with inter-wiki links, as a matter of fact, from here on the WP pages. I don't know if you're familiar with bluelight.org, specifically Neuroscience and Pharmacology discussion; there are very connected, intelligent, people there. Pen & paper penpals with established chemists (I know a friend in England, Sean, who writes back and forth with a well known retired chemist; said he could pull some strings ands get my U.S. felonies expunged for a visa for greymarket enterprising; this was years ago the offer came up in conversation) Nagelfar (talk) 19:34, 20 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:M-Hydroxyphenyl Derivatives.svg edit

 
File:M-Hydroxyphenyl Derivatives.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:28, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Unblock edit

{{unblock|reason=I haven't been able to contribute to this site for a number of years now over 10 years.}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.212.47 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 19 February 2019‎ (UTC)Reply

Innuendo by the IP. Nuklear is/was not blocked here, and is a Commons user during recent years. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

The quality of the chemical structure File:Lu-AA42202.svg is disputed edit

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Lu-AA42202.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users, and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Chem Sim 2001 (disc) 21:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


File:Homopipramol2.svg edit

 
File:Homopipramol2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 03:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:PAL-542.svg edit

 
File:PAL-542.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 04:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Amitriptyline triangle.svg edit

 
File:Amitriptyline triangle.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:JNJ-Efavirenz conjunctive.png edit

 
File:JNJ-Efavirenz conjunctive.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Parkinson.svg edit

 
File:Parkinson.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Xfiles.png edit

Hi Nuklear. What is the right title for File:Xfiles.png? Please use {{Rename}} for that, rather than {{Delete}}. Also, I noticed that you've made multiple malformed deletion requests. When you want to delete a file with the {{Delete}} template, you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion. Alternatively, you can click the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, under the "tools" section, which does all of the work for you. Please do one of these, otherwise you create a lot of work for other people. If you don't see the "Nominate for deletion" link in the left sidebar, you can use the JavaScript method of enabling AjaxQuickDelete on Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets once and then refresh once.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 08:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Regards, Marbletan (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Anagestone acetate.png edit

 
File:Anagestone acetate.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Marbletan (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Cericlamine structure.png edit

 
File:Cericlamine structure.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:34, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Azaspirone-butyrophenone.png edit

 
File:Azaspirone-butyrophenone.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Bolmantalate structure.svg edit

 
File:Bolmantalate structure.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply