Open main menu

Daphnis protrudensEdit

J’inaugure te nouvelle page de discussion pour te remercie de la promotion inespéré des cette espèce qui, contrairement à moi, le vaut bien. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Janus (two-headed tortoise) (Testudo graeca)- General view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coat of arms of Beaumont-Village.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coat of arms of Paul Henri Delatte.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

HylesEdit

Je viens de voir deux promotions en QI pour Hyles je t'en remercie.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Henri Delatte - Coat of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de Sauguis - View from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Hyles and AllEdit

Merci pour les 3 hyles de ce matin en QI!--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

75px|center|
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Xylophanes mirabilis mounted specimen, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Xylophanes mirabilis mounted specimen has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bishop Patrick McKinney Immingham 10.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Bishop Patrick McKinney Immingham 10.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bishop Patrick McKinney Immingham 10.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:30, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio (bis).jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio (bis).jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio (bis).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Spotkanie z Nuncjuszem Apostolskim Abp. Salvatore Pennacchio.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 02:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 2.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 2.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:New Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Church to Barbados - 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Ronhjones  (Talk) 03:11, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
@Ronhjones: Hello, you have done a mistake, you can't change like that the licence. The bot has already validate the licence, but the author in flickr has probably change the licence on flickr after that. So no problem and I will revert your contribution if it is that. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

PDMEdit

Public Domain Mark is not an irrevocable license as required by commons, and does not equate to cc-zero.Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:12, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

You don't understand, photos was published in Creative common licence. And after uploading in commons the author in flickr has changed the licence. The bot of uploadwizard confirm my words. So please stop change the licence tag. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

En français : les photos ont originellement été postées sur flickr sous licence creative commons. Le bot l'a vérifié lors de l'import. Que l'auteur du compte flickr change d'avis parès coup laisse néanmoins la licence libre irrévocable, néanmoins si ce dernier passe la licence en domaine public, cela ne pose pas de soucis. 11:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: peux tu venir m'expliquer si j'ai mal compris ? Olivier LPB (talk) 11:51, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Les images avec "Public Domain Mark" ne sont pas acceptées sur Commons, car ce n'est pas vraiment une licence. Il faudrait demander au titulaire du compte de changer la licence en {{cc-0}}. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Cardinals Paul Poupard and Adrianus Johannes Simonis in 2017.jpgEdit

 
Cardinals

Hello Olivier LPB, I saw this file in Category:Ad Simonis. What makes you think the cardinal on the right is Mgr Simonis? I think this is not correct. But I don't know who else it might be. - ArjanH (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@ArjanH: Hello, I have used the fr:Composition_actuelle_du_Collège_cardinalice to know which cardinal can be sit near Poupard. And I have hesitate between cardinals Friedrich Wetter and Ad Simonis. Olivier LPB (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
@Olivier LPB: Thanks for your quick reply! Honestly I think it is neither one or the other, but looking at their hair it should be cardinal Wetter. Simonis only has hair on the sides of his head... Did you count alphabetically or is there another way of positioning the cardinals in the room? - ArjanH (talk) 10:51, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
In fact because this is a consistory, they must be in protocolary order (except for special positions like the secretary of State). I must see the video again to verify if in this configuration it is the descending order or ascending. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gwenriche‎Edit

Bonjour, Pourriez-vous reformer votre message. Merci, et cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

  Done Olivier LPB (talk) 08:48, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Armoiries de Mgr DollmannEdit

Bonjour Olivier LPB,

Est-il possible de modifier les armoiries de Mgr Vincent Dollmann svp ? Il est archevêque de Cambrai depuis le 15 août 2018, mais ses armoiries sur Wikipédia sont toujours celles d'un évêque. Il n'est pas métropolitain et n'a pas le privilège du pallium, mais il faudrait néanmoins lui ajouter une rangée de houppes vertes au chapeau et une croix à double traverse derrière l'écu. Si vous pouviez vous en occuper, je vous en serai reconnaissant.

Merci d'avance. In Christo.

Arg95 (28.03.2019)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arg95 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Bonjour @Arg95:, en effet je peux m'en occuper. En fait généralement on ne modifie pas tout de suite car il arrive souvent que le prélat change de blason en changeant de siège, donc on attend de connaitre le blason si changement. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Olivier LPB".