Open main menu

User talk:Olivier LPB/Archives(Beginning - 13 February 2017)

< User talk:Olivier LPB
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Olivier LPB!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:52, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Contents

File source is not properly indicated: File:Andreas Hönisch.JPGEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Andreas Hönisch.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Andreas Hönisch.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Logo-Année-de-la-foi francais.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo-Année-de-la-foi francais.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo-Année-de-la-foi francais.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Motopark (talk) 17:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permissionEdit

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 17:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Logo-Année-de-la-foi francais.jpgEdit

 
File:Logo-Année-de-la-foi francais.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 20:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Olivier LPB,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)


Merci et demandeEdit

Bonjour Olivier !

Merci beaucoup pour les photos de Mgr Aumonier et Mgr Leborgne !

Y a-t-il une chance que tu puisses rencontrer et photographier fr:François-Xavier Bellamy et fr:Pierre-Hervé Grosjean ? Ce serait super d'illustrer ces articles...

Bonne continuation ! Peter17 (talk) 11:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Peter17 : Depuis le temps que je voulais faire ces photos, je n'ai pas raté l'occasion. Pour Bellamy, je vais normalement pouvoir faire bientôt ça, par contre l'abbé Grosjean cela va être plus difficile. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Peter17 : Abbé Grosjean fait ! Même si je ne suis pas très fier de la photo Olivier LPB (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
Super ! Merci ! Peter17 (talk) 07:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Cardinal Ernesto RuffiniEdit

Hola. bonjour. hello.

  • Por favor, traslada tu petición a la nueva pagina de peticiones.
  • S'il vous plaît déplacer votre demande vers la nouvelle page de requêtes.
  • Please move your request to the new page requests.

--SajoR (talk) 20:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

  Done Olivier LPB (talk) 21:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Jean-Gabriel DiarraEdit

Salut Olivier !

Je pense avoir identifié l'évêque africain sur ta photo : Mgr Jean-Gabriel Diarra, évêque de San au Mali.

En effet, si tu zoomes sur sa croix épiscopale, on peut voir les frontières du Mali. J'ai tapé les noms de tous les évêques du Mali sur Google images et trouvé ça : [1] ; on le voit particulièrement bien sur cette photo : [2]. L'autre évêque sur cette photo est Mgr Jean Zerbo. On peut différencier les deux grâce à Google images.

Avec ton autorisation, je vais renommer ton fichier. Merci pour cet import ! Peter17 (talk) 14:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Salut Peter17 ! Merci beaucoup de ton identification, en effet le doute n'est guère possible ! Je te laisse renommer en conséquence, il faudrait je pense créer sa fiche en français. Olivier LPB (talk) 08:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Coat of armsEdit

Hola/Helllo Olivier LPB!

Oficialmente el escudo de armas del arzobispo Jean-Louis Bruguès usa una cruz procesional de dos varas, y no una sencilla. Actualmente los arzobispos de titulo personal no usan la cruz simple, no tengo idea por que esta en desuso. Por favor, antes de editar alguno de mis escudos, consulta con migo los cambios que quieres hacer, por ejemplo has agregado el palio a los escudos de algunos arzobispos metropolitanos, aunque ellos lo pueden usar, oficialmente su escudo no tiene palio.

Online translation: Officially the coat of arms of Archbishop Jean-Louis Bruguès uses a processional cross of two sticks, and not a simple. Currently the archbishops of personal title do not use the simple cross, I have no idea why this disused. Please, before editing any of my coats, check with me the changes you want to make, for example you have added the Pallium to the arms of some metropolitan archbishops, although they can use it, officially your shield has no Pallium.

--SajoR (talk) 18:19, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@SajoR: :
Français : En fait je croyais que sur wikipedia on preferait mettre les blasons selon les normes heraldiques
English: In fact I thought wikipedia was preferred to the shields as heraldic standards
Olivier LPB (talk) 19:44, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Re: File:Coat of arms of Enrico Enriquez.svgEdit

Hello!

There are 2 images on araldicavaticana.com. I followed the image on the left side. I usually follow the image with the person's portrait (which is the one in the left; the coat of arms of depicted on the right hand corner).

- John Ronn talk 12:43, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

MerciEdit

Merci de m'éclairer ! Je croyais que les vieilles images de personnes mortes il y a plus de quatre vingts-ans étaient dans le domaine public ? Thomon User talk:Thomon 19 octobre 2014 21:34 (UTC)

@Thomon: : ce n'est pas parce que la personne est morte il y a 80 ans que cela marche, cela dépend de la mort de l'auteur de la photo ! Par contre quand tu es sur que l'auteur est bien mort il y a plus de 70s, ce n'est pas un licence CC-BY-4.0 qu'il faut mettre mais bien une licence de domaine libre du genre {{PD-Old}}, car selon wikimedia quand tu fais une copie conforme de l’œuvre, c'est bien les droits de l’œuvre qui compte et non ta copie. Cordialement Olivier LPB (talk) 23:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup pour les précisions ! Thomon (talk) 15:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear license reviewerEdit

 
If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Olivier LPB, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 15:04, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Pas sur du bandeau de licenceEdit

Bonjour Sanchéen, je vois que tu as importé sur commons de nombreuses photos des évêques de Saint-Dié. Soit en remercié. Mais pour les derniers évêques :

Je ne suis pas du tout sur qu'elles soient dans le domaine public au vu de leurs dates de mort qui fait qu'il y a peu de chance que l'auteur de la photo soit mort il y a 70 ans. Peux tu apporter des précisions à ce sujet ? Cordialement. Olivier LPB (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)


Bonjour Olivier LPB,

J'ai peut-être été négligent sur la possibilité de poster les photos : pour Mgr Brault et Mgr Marmottin, ce sont des photographies du livre cité dans les sources (Vosgiens célébres) sans sources indiquées à côté de la photo ou en fin d'ouvrage. Pour Mgr Marmottin, c'est une image pieuse (avers : portrait et revers : blason) avec pour légende "photo Mascré". Pas d'autre indication.

Si la possibilité est douteuse, peut-être faudrait-il les supprimer? Vous avez assurément plus l'habitude que moi, faites-les disparaître s'il le faut! Cordialement, Sanchéen

Re: Vote for deletionEdit

Oh, so sorry!!!! I know it is forbidden. In esWiki we use different templates, so I was just trying to figure out which template was the "delete" one with the preview, and I forgot to undelete me. Again, I am so sorry for this, and thanks for tell me so. Greetings. Albertojuanse (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

@Albertojuanse: ok, but be careful next time in the translation   Olivier LPB (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queuesEdit

Hello Olivier LPB. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:VATICAN-POPE-CONCLAVE-ANNOUNCE.jpgEdit

 
File:VATICAN-POPE-CONCLAVE-ANNOUNCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 19:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Diarmuid Martin in 2013.jpgEdit

 
File:Diarmuid Martin in 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Korea Pope Francis Haemi Martyrdom Holy Ground 04.jpgEdit

Bonjour,

Quand tu téléverses des images depuis Flickr, peux-tu faire attention à bien mettre l'URL correcte de la photo dans la source et a téléverser la taille originale de l'image ? Pour COM:LR, c'est le modèle {{FlickrReview}} qu'il faut utiliser pour les images Flickr et pas {{LicenseReview}}. Merci ! Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Bonsoir  , en efait il y a un problème avec les images provenant de korea.net, en effet l'import direct via flickr par Uploadwizard n'est pas possible, et quand j'essaye d'uploader le meilleure format cela ne m'est pas possible non plus. Olivier LPB (talk) 21:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Ouais désolé j'ai remarqué ça après avoir posté mon message, je suis en train d'y remédier en retirant avec un logiciel les métadonnées dans les fichiers qui posent problème à la main et je vais les importer.   Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  Done Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Luciano Perlo.jpgEdit

 
File:Luciano Perlo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

RemerciementsEdit

Merci beaucoup pour les photos de Mgr Aumonier et Mgr Leborgne !

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Beltonen (talk • contribs) 17 novembre 2015 à 09:25‎ (UTC)
@Beltonen: De rien ! Olivier LPB (talk) 16:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: Coat of arms of Xavier Novell i Gomà.svgEdit

Hola/Hello Olivier LPB!

Yo no tengo la descripción heráldica, me basé en la imagen oficial para realizar el escudo. Analizando dicha imagen me di cuenta que tanto la cruz episcopal, como la cinta que contiene el lema son de oro, pero la torre tiene un tono diferente, llegué a la conclusión que la torre es al natural, aunque en algunos casos, dependiendo del tamaño de la versión oficial, se puede confundir con oro. Una torre de oro sobre fondo de plata no es correcto, así que la idea que sea al natural es más coherente.

¿Usted trabaja con capas, cuando hace un escudo?. Analizando tu versión del escudo de mons. Jaume Traserra i Cunillera, veo que la montaña azul está encima la linea que limita el escudo. Mire este vídeo, así es como yo trabajo, puede ver como utilizo las capas, y su gran utilidad.

Online Translation: I don't have the heraldic description, I based on the official image for the shield. Analyzing the image I realized that both the episcopal cross, as the tape containing the motto are gold, but the Tower has a different tone, I came to the conclusion that the tower is natural, although in some cases, depending on the size of the official version, can be confused with gold. A tower of gold on silver background is not correct, so the idea that is natural is more coherent.

Do you work with layers, when you make a shield.? Analyzing your version of the coat of arms of mons. Jaume Traserra i Cunillera, I see that Blue Mountain is above the line that limits the shield. Watch this video, this is how I work, you can see how I use layers, and their usefulness.

--SajoR (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Re:Coat of arms of TouvetEdit

Hola/Hello Olivier!

¿Cómo te va con el escudo de mons. Touvet? Si usted tiene algún problema, acá estoy para ayudar.

English: How you doing with the coat of arms of mons Touvet? If you have any problems, I'm here to help.

--SajoR (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Hola I just now uploaded it, can you see and comment ? @SajoR: Olivier LPB (talk) 08:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paul Poupard par Claude Truong-Ngoc août 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dom Louis-Marie de Geyer d'Orth en 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Reuse of an imageEdit

Oliver, I am producing a documentary and would like to include your image Richard_Gyhra_et_WTO_Public_Forum_2014. Would you please contact me at mmpmiraclemedia@optonline.net for further discussion.

Regards, George Watson

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Miracle Media Productions (talk • contribs) 20 juin 2016 à 23:53 (UTC)
@Miracle Media Productions:, hello the photo is not mine as specified ont he presentation page of the file but a production of WTO. Olivier LPB (talk) 05:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

@ Olivier LPB Many thanks for your reply and for correcting me on the owner (WTO) of the image.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Miracle Media Productions (talk • contribs) 21 juin 2016 à 14:17‎ (UTC)
@Miracle Medias Production: you're welcome, but don't forget to sign your message with this code : ~~~~ , thanks Olivier LPB (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louis-Marie de Geyer d'Orth portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean Pateau portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Saint-Rémy d'Eyvigues en VIEdit

C’est un bon choix, mais ton scope n’est pas parfait. Nous avons l’habitude de donner l’orientation de la vue ce qui permet de pouvoir labialiser d’autres points de vues s’ils sont remarquables. Je te propose de changer ton scope par {{c|Église Saint-Rémy d'Eyvigues}}, NE exposure. Bonne journée --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: d'accord ! Merci de ta vigilance Olivier LPB (talk) 15:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of Beaumont-Village.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Rémy d'Eyvigues, NE exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paul Poupard portrait in clergyman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Birth catEdit

So, that's quite funny but according to you David Boaz was never born! Ww2censor (talk) 09:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello @Ww2censor: we don't put the category of the birth, if the subject has his own category : Category:David_Boaz has the birth. Olivier LPB (talk) 09:37, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Oh, ok, I suppose that makes sense. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 09:40, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Michel Aupetit with Zucchetto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Éric Aumonier with Zucchetto.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Mise à jour des correspondances sur les tracés de lignes de transport parisiennesEdit

Bonsoir ,Olivier LPB,je voudrais que tu mets à jour (en 2016) les correspondances des stations, avec les lignes de transports (Métro, Transillien,Tramway ,Rer et lignes de Bus spéciales) soivent affichés et indiqués sur les plans des lignes horizontales et qu'ils soivent mis à jour (en 2016) que ce soit pour les correspondances avec les 16 lignes actuelles du Métro Parisien, les 9 lignes actuelles du Tramway d’Île-de-France, les 8 Lignes actuelles du Transillien, les 5 lignes actuelles du RER, les lignes de Bus spéciales actuelles (TVM et Bus 393) et certaines lignes du TER.Je veux que tu affiches la correspondance à distance comme sur les plans de lignes de la Ratp via ce lien (https://image.freepik.com/icones-gratuites/personne-qui-marche_318-29235.png). Je souhaiterais aussi que tu affiches les logos des lignes TVM,BUS 393,T6,T7 et du T8 pour qu'elles soient bien visibles comme correspondances sur les plans de lignes et afficher toutes les stations en correspondances avec un point blanc sur le tracé comme pour ce lien : http://p6.storage.canalblog.com/62/36/1127997/88297517_o.jpg. Et n'oublie pas d'afficher la correspondance avec le T9 à Vitry Centre sur le tracé de la ligne 15 Sud du Grand Paris Express

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexY75 (talk • contribs) 02:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Répondu sur sa page de discussion Spécial:Diff/205058099 Olivier LPB (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Le problème est que je ne sais pas modifier une image existante et je ne comprend rien du tout aux consignes que donne les pages wikipedia sur les images.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexY75 (talk • contribs) 15:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Bonjour @AlexY75: d'une part merci de signer vos messages SVP !! D'autre part, il faut télécharger l'image à modifier, la modifier puis réimporter la nouvelle version. Merci de ne pas effacer vos messages au fur et à mesure. Olivier LPB (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows of Église Saint-Jean-Baptiste-de-la-Salle (Paris) - Saint Genevieve.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Félix de Guignonville SW exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Portrait of Melissa Louise Hitchman.jpgEdit

 
File:Portrait of Melissa Louise Hitchman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GRuban (talk) 00:46, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Światowe Dni Młodzieży - 28488303702.jpg - PolishEdit

This file, and the 20 or so others you uploaded at the same time, are labeled in Polish, not English, as you marked them. --GRuban (talk) 00:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stained glass windows of Église Notre-Dame-de-la-Salette (Paris) - Sainte Philomène.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of François Touvet .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Thomas Aquinas by Carlo Crivelli.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Coat of arms of Andrzej Czaja.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Caprais de Carsac - Exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carsac-Aillac - Statue of Notre-Dame-des-Champs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Caprais de Carsac - Main Altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

LouveteauxEdit

Bonjour Olivier. Votre revert sur cette image ne fait vraiment pas avancer les choses car vous supprimez un titre inexact pour un autre qui l'est tout autant. Mea culpa si j'ai mal identifié l'uniforme GSE (c'est ppourtant la description sur la page consacrée au louvetisme) mais ce ne sont certainement pas des jeunes du SF. Peut-on à votre avis renommer ce fichier "louveteaux des Scouts Don Bosco" ? A défaut, ce sera "Louveteaux français non identifiés". FSS, Phiérithros (talk) 15:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour @Phiérithros: j'ai répondu sur la page de discussion. Tout est dans l'interprétation de "scoutisme français". Olivier LPB (talk) 09:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Je vois mal comment on pourrait comprendre autrement la mise entre guillemets que comme une référence au mouvement. Phiérithros (talk) 13:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
@Phiérithros: je ne suis pas oppose à une reformulation, mais j'essaye d'expliquer l'esprit de la description de AkelaNDE. Olivier LPB (talk) 14:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Ok je viens de piger en quoi ça venait de AkelaNDE. My mistake sur ce point. Mais ça reste quand même une formulation très discutable voire inexacte. Une idée de nouveau nom du coup ? Phiérithros (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
@Phiérithros: ben euh je sais pas trop, un peu du genre "louveteaux français...", qu'en penses tu ? Olivier LPB (talk) 12:45, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy door of Saint Peter's Basilica - General view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Vérification OTRSEdit

Salut Olivier,

Je me permets de te solliciter car tu es vérificateur OTRS, je crois.

Christophe Dickès a envoyé un email à permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org à propos de File:Christophe Dickès - 1.jpg.

Pourrais-tu vérifier et marquer le fichier comme validé, stp ?

Merci, à bientôt ! Peter17 (talk) 12:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour @Peter17:, je ne suis pas membre de l'équipe OTRS mais seulement des vérificateurs de licences (attestation qu'à l'instant t le fichier indique bien la licence sur le site en question). Olivier LPB (talk) 14:35, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de la maison Martin d'Alençon - Dome - View from inside.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Cyr et Sainte-Julitte d'Anet - View from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Loup-de-Sens de Ferreux-Quincey - view from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Étienne de Boissy-Fresnoy - View from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre de Courdemanche - View from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Cyr et Sainte-Julitte d'Anet - View from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapelle de Saint-Joseph de Beauvais - view from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Paul de La Roche-Mabile - View from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Saint-Omer - View from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Arturo_Sosa_SJ.jpgEdit

Greetings.

I wonder what type of documentation do I need? I was given that picture directly by the Communication Office of the Jesuits' 36th General Congregation, specifically to be put it in the English and Spanish wikipedia articles, which I was ask to create. This is the same photo used for all press releases announcing when Arturo Sosa was elected Superior General of the Jesuits. I normally use general use pictures when I edit articles. This is the first time I am asked for documentation.

Thanks for any help you can provide with this.--Coquidragon (talk) 05:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, in fact " a general photo of communication" can't be accepted on commons. The photo must be in public domain or in creative commons. You have to find the author of the photo and ask him the permission to put his photo in public domain or in creative commons. And with this permission, send a message to Commons:OTRS, to confirm the licence of the photo. Olivier LPB (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
@Coquidragon: Olivier LPB (talk) 09:10, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Maladjusted scopeEdit

Excuse me can you tell me why the scope is maladjusted? I tried to change it and I wanted to send notification to you but I couldn't. Have you some advice to make better the scope? Can you be more explicit? I'm still not very practice of these procedures.

Thank you for advice.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by LunaLinda (talk • contribs) 15:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Ménil-Erreux - View from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame d'Orvaux - View from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame du Bourg in Agen - Stained glass of Francis of Assisi receiving the stigmata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Croix de Ciboure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Armel de Plouharnel - View from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Médard de Limoges-Fourches - View from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre-ès-Liens de Bégaar - View from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Julie Bishop - Portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Coat of armsEdit

Hola/Hello Olivier

Me alegra que estés interesado en los escudos de armas eclesiásticos, y especialmente que ademas me des los créditos de los elementos que usas, solo te pido, por favor, que me avises con tiempo cual de los escudos de la lista de pedidos vas a realizar, ya van varias veces que hago un escudo, lo voy a subir y tu ya lo tienes hecho, todo mi tiempo y trabajo lo perdí.

Online translation: I am glad that you are interested in the ecclesiastical coat of arms, and especially that you also give me the credits of the elements you use, I only ask you, please, let me know in advance which of the shields of the list of orders you are going to make , I go several times I make a shield, I will go up and you already have it done, all my time and work I lost it.

--SajoR (talk) 17:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

@SajoR: Oh I am sorry ! I would be more careful next time.
Spanish translation Oh, lo siento ! Sería más cuidadoso la próxima vez.
Olivier LPB (talk) 20:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jean-Louis Tauran - Coat of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église de la Nativité-de-la-Vierge de Pargues - View from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kurt Koch - Portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

File:Barack Obama with Mario cardinal Poli in 2016 in Argentina.jpgEdit

 
File:Barack Obama with Mario cardinal Poli in 2016 in Argentina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Saint-Austremoine - Issoire - Chapiteau Vierges sages.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapiteaux de l'église Saint-Austremoine d'Issoire - Wise virgins.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Maurice de Treteau - View from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Pierre-et-Saint-Martin de Cindré - View from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vitraux de l'église Saint-Austremoine d'Issoire - Life of Saint-Anne.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathédrale Saint-Étienne de Bourges - View from SE by night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Barthélémy de Trézelles - View from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vitraux de l'église Saint-Austremoine d'Issoire - Life of Saint Joseph.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de Thionne - View from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of St. Sebastian (Berlin) - 360 panoramics.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Martin de Chantenay-Saint-Imbert - View from O.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lode Aerts - Coat of arms.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Saint-Austremoine - Issoire - Vie de Sainte-Anne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vitraux de l'église Saint-Austremoine d'Issoire - Life of Saint Austremoine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Escudo de Medellin-Ornamentos exteriores.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Olivier LPB/Archives(Beginning - 13 February 2017)".