Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Beeld en Geluid Collecties

(Redirected from User talk:Openbeelden)

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Openbeelden!

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hello, Beeld en Geluid Collecties!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open ImagesEdit

Even it didn't look this way when the project page was started, now you got more than 50 suggestions. Thanks for this great offer. Mvg -- Rillke(q?) 16:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for getting involved! We're very happy with the result. We will now try to get the 50 videos on Open Images as soon as possible, so they can be used on Wikimedia Commons. Openbeelden (talk)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. -- Rillke(q?) 16:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Waarom ?Edit

Hi, I am wondering why you add the category Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images to items that are already in Category:Media from Open Beelden. Moreover, it looks like you are adding mainly video files, not images/photos, to the Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images category. Something escapes me ? (Nederlands kan ook) --Foroa (talk) 10:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi! The reason has to do with statistics. We use the BaGLAMa tool to track the reuse of the Open Images collection on Wikipedia, the data gathered by this tool gives us useful information on the reuse of our collections on Wikipedia. This is now done for Category:Media from Open Beelden. Recently we added some nature videos from the Stichting Natuurbeelden collection in Category:Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open Images. We would like to keep seperate statistics for these and the other material from Open Images. In the current situation this is not possible since the Natuurbeelden category is a subcategory of Category:Media from Open Beelden. This means that the statistics for Category:Media from Open Beelden will include the Natuurbeelden category. So we thought it was best to move these items to a category that is on the same level. This also in the case other collections will be added to Wikipedia via Open Images in the future. Then we will be able to track those seperately. The media that we place in Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images are mainly Polygoon newsreels that come from Open Images and photos that are made of screenshots from these videos.
I can see your need, but I have a problem on categories with names that don't correspond with a real category system. Please use proper and logical category names and don't call a category "xxx ... images" that needs to contain videos. Anyway, sooner or later, a person will come along and collapse (quite rightly) the redundant categories in one single one as there is no logic documented. --Foroa (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Open Images is the English name for our Open Beelden platform, so the name refers to the platform, not so much to the sort of media used in the category. Do you have a better suggestion?
There is no problem with the name as such, the problem is that there are two categories Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images and Category:Media from Open Beelden, and the first one (... images) contain a subset (a number of videos) of the first one without any discernible logic or relation to the category names. --Foroa (talk) 09:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Ah, I think I get your point. If I rename Category:Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open Images and Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images to 'Stichting Natuurbeelden on Open Beelden' and 'Beeld en Geluid on Open Beelden', will that help? Not all media on Open Images comes from Beeld en Geluid, other archives or users can also upload their media. So the contents of Category:Beeld en Geluid on Open Images and Category:Media from Open Beelden will not be entirely the same. Openbeelden (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Vakantie 1964-517746.oggEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vakantie 1964-517746.ogg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

incorrectly uploaded filesEdit

There seems to be a problem with File:Hollumer Kwelder en Vogelpolle-4804247.png and File:Hollumer Kwelder en Vogelpolle-4804248.png, the actual files were apparently not uploaded, just a generic placeholder. --Didym (talk) 22:49, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

auteur radio oranjeEdit

Als auteur van een radiorede wordt nu Beeld en geluid neergezet. Auteur is bedoeld voor de oorspronkelijke maker van een creatief werk, dus dat lijkt me een foutje? Zie bijv

--Hannolans (talk) 12:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey Hanno, eens. Ik ga dat volgende week even aanpassen. Excuses, eerste upload met de vicuna uploader (hopelijk ook de laatste ;-)). 85jesse (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Invalid datesEdit

The values given for dates in your recent batch of uploads are invalid (e.g File:Red-chested Cuckoo (Cuculus solitarius) (022A-WA03044X0017-0013M0).ogg -> "26053"). I started to replace them, but then thought better of it, as the values may have some other meaning, and need to be kept. Please investigate, and fix. Andy Mabbett (talk) 15:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Andy Mabbett, I'm not sure yet what happened here. Will investigate and let you know how we'll fix it. Thanks for noticing! 85jesse (talk) 15:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Andy Mabbett and 85jesse, thanks indeed, I see that there are 46 instances in which the dates are incorrect (I probably did something wrong when getting the data from spreadsheet to xml), but I will fix this myself today and let you know in this thread when this is done. Cheers, Harrrij (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi Andy Mabbett and 85jesse, all the recording dates are in place and correct now. Cheers, Beeld en Geluid Collecties (talk) 12:11, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wav lijkt niet goed, het gaat nl niet over de Amserdamse beurs, maar is hetzelfde bestand als

--Hannolans (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Dank voor het doorgeven Hannolans. Zonet heb ik de juiste file geupload maar deze is nog niet te zien (20 minuten, 45 seconden geleden toegevoegd aan de Job queue):
Hoe kunnen we de andere file het beste (laten) verwijderen denk je? Deze zou dus verwijderd (of onder water) gezet moeten worden: File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wav Beeld en Geluid Collecties (talk) 14:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Ik heb hem genomineerd voor verwijdering. Dat is volgens mij de makkelijkste manier. Je kan op Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PHOHI-dagblad_over_de_Amsterdamsche_Beurs.wav als uploader bevestigen dat dit bestand inderdaad wegkan --Hannolans (talk) 09:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wavEdit

  File:PHOHI-dagblad over de Amsterdamsche Beurs.wav has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hannolans (talk) 21:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Dank voor het in gang zetten van het verzoek tot verwijdering Hannolans, fijn! Groeten, Beeld en Geluid Collecties (talk) 11:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Lijst voor beweerken de duitse project met de videosEdit

Übersicht der Bearbeitung dort – zu mitmachen! --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 12:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Beeld en Geluid Collecties".