Open main menu
 My main page 
My main page
 Discuss 
Discuss
 Themes 
Themes
 Visited Countries 
Visited Countries
 Campaigns Wikimedia 
Campaigns Wikimedia
 Campaigns Wikimedia 
Campaigns Wikimedia
 

Archives 2014

Contents

Quality Image PromotionEdit

2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (10).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

thank you! OK, thank you for this invitation--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:51, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
The leaves are distracting, but I think despite the compositional weakness, it is good enough. --Ram-Man 02:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (14).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ram-Man 02:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (6).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

St-vincent sur jard , la côte (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St-vincent sur jard , la côte (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (17).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-Cambodge Ta Prohm (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}
St-vincent sur jard , la côte (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St-vincent sur jard , la côte (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Amiens, les hortillonnages, (12).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amiens, les hortillonnages, (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Really good quality. There are some small blurrish parts on the right side, but its not so significant --Hubertl 23:09, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Talmont-Saint-Hilaire Port Bourgenay (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Talmont-Saint-Hilaire Port Bourgenay (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 23:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Talmont-Saint-Hilaire Port Bourgenay (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Talmont-Saint-Hilaire Port Bourgenay (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 23:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Malibu, Western Malibu, (Californie).jpeg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malibu, Western Malibu, (Californie).jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 19:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Khustain Nuruu National Park (7).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khustain Nuruu National Park (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. I like this very much! --Moroder 12:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Londres.- House of Parliament 2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Londres.- House of Parliament 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment IMO it's too dark and tilted CCW.--XRay 10:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you, darkness and tilt corrected --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support IMO acceptable now.--XRay 06:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Londres.- Oceanic Village.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Londres.- Oceanic Village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me, even when weak. Though of the blueish. Third opinion appreciated.. --Hubertl 17:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Lille, Hôtel de la Préfecture du Nord (Fiche Mérimée PA00107725)..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille, Hôtel de la Préfecture du Nord (Fiche Mérimée PA00107725)..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and QI for me, even when it´s not very sharp --Hubertl 15:07, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (5).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --XRay 16:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (6).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:06, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Beselare (Belgique).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beselare (Belgique).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Already OI for me, you could think about perspective correction with ShiftN --J. Lunau 14:50, 24 February 2015 (UTC)* Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment yes I know the Shift software I've used a lot before Gimp. I would have the test again in difficult perspectives--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (7).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambodge Banteay Srei Temple (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK now. --Bgag 14:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Le Bouddha couché du Temple Baphuon...jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Bouddha couché du Temple Baphuon...jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Dnalor 01 20:28, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - December - Household items in use/WinnersEdit

Bottle openers.JPG Photo Challenge Winner
Camera2 mgx gold.svg
Congratulations!

Your picture Bottle openers.JPG won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Household items in use, in December 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Pounding in Laos.jpg Photo Challenge – Second Place
Camera2 mgx silver.svg
Congratulations!

Your picture Pounding in Laos.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Household items in use, in December 2014. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Chosing next month's theme (April)Edit

Hello Pierre Andre Leclercq,
we decided some months ago to ask the challenge winners if they could help to decide the themes for the next month needing themes - in this case April.
If you are ready to help us, just start a section on commons talk:Photo challenge (e.g. April themes), where you post your suggestion / decide which of the posted suggestions (e.g. from the other two winners) you like best. If you are looking for ideas, here's a list of suggestions that are waiting to be chosen - but you are welcome to propose another theme.
Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 09:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello Anna reg,thank you to you for inviting me to assist in the selection of future themes to be proposed to Photo Challenge. With pleasure, I'll post some suggestions in the list of suggestions that are waiting to be chosen. Best regards.---PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 10:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
You are always welcome to do that - but my question was actually if you could help to decide the two April themes by choosing one favourite and posting that on the Photo challenge talk page. Best wishes, Anna reg (talk) 14:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Anna reg , since you ask me to make proposals for the Challenge April Photo, I suggest: "Analog photography I: Analog photography equipment" et "Analog photography II: Analog photographs".- I have posted my proposition in "Commons talk:Photo challenge".- Best wishes,--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 14:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! I took the liberty to add the links to your suggestion - hope that's fine with you. --Anna reg (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Angkor Wat, Siem Reap, Cambodge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Angkor Wat, Siem Reap, Cambodge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 01 March 2015 (UTC)
Siem Reap, Victory Gate.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siem Reap, Victory Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:20, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Model healthy village Laos (11).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Model healthy village Laos (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Fine. --Palauenc05 11:47, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Pouchkine.- le palais de Catherine (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pouchkine.- le palais de Catherine (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 18:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Saint-Pétersbourg.- palais de Pavlovsk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Pétersbourg.- palais de Pavlovsk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 22:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Page utilisateurEdit

Bonjour collègue,

Étant natif de la préfecture de ce département, je suis dans l'obligation de te signaler que, contrairement à ce que tu annonces dans ta page de présentation, la Charente-Maritime n'est pas dans la région Pays-de-Loire, mais dans la région Poitou-Charentes...

Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Jebulon
Un grand merci pour ton intervention. Je corrige donc immédiatement mon erreur.
Il est vrai qu'avec la réforme des Régions il va me falloir revoir cette page de présentation, dans son ensemble... celà ne va pas être une mince affaire.
Bien cordialement, --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 10:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Cathédrale Saint-Sauveur-sur-le-Sang-Versé de Saint-Pétersbourg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Sauveur-sur-le-Sang-Versé de Saint-Pétersbourg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 17:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Moscou.-Place Rouge Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-Kazan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscou.-Place Rouge Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-Kazan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Where is Nathalie? Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:45, 04 March 2015 (UTC)
Saint-Pétersbourg.- palais de Pavlovsk (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Pétersbourg.- palais de Pavlovsk (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 17:46, 04 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Le Puy de Sancy (8).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Puy de Sancy (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 23:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Le Puy de Dôme (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Puy de Dôme (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 23:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Le Monastère Gunji érigé par un prince mongol en mémoire de sa fille au XVIII° siècle (4).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Monastère Gunji érigé par un prince mongol en mémoire de sa fille au XVIII° siècle (4).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 16:01, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Le Puy de Dôme (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Puy de Dôme (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 09:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Courtrai.- moulin musée, d-hotel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courtrai.- moulin musée, d-hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 20:56, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Saint Palais sur Mer.- la plage.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Palais sur Mer.- la plage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 22:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

L'Île d'Aix Phares.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Île d'Aix Phares.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Too much water. See the note for the proposed crop. --Halavar 23:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your review.✓ Done the crop you have proposed.- Please care to take another look?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. --Halavar 12:54, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

L'Ile d' Aix.- Mairie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Ile d' Aix.- Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 15:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Bailleul, le Beffroi.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bailleul, le Beffroi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Meteren Chemin du Vierayms.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meteren Chemin du Vierayms.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Lille, 13 rue du Pont Neuf PA00107706.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille, 13 rue du Pont Neuf PA00107706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:42, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Lille- Place du Vieux Marché aux Chevaux .jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille- Place du Vieux Marché aux Chevaux .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:44, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Meteren Vallon de Méteren becque (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meteren Vallon de Méteren becque (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me --Hubertl 21:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Meteren Vallon de Méteren becque (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meteren Vallon de Méteren becque (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me --Hubertl 21:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Middelbur le village Ndebele,.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Middelbur le village Ndebele,.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Mémorial d'Ascq.- Villeneuve d'Ascq (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mémorial d'Ascq.- Villeneuve d'Ascq (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Mémorial d'Ascq.- Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mémorial d'Ascq.- Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

A la maison Commune Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A la maison Commune Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
L'Avenir Villeneuve d Ascq.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L'Avenir Villeneuve d Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 07:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Lille, l' estaminet 4 fils Aymon, 55 rue de la Barre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille, l' estaminet 4 fils Aymon, 55 rue de la Barre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not the best composition (because of the motive itself, I presume) but good for QI --Hubertl 17:28, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Hucqueliers Le monument aux Morts.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hucqueliers Le monument aux Morts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 22:50, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Lille 50 rue Gustave Delory (Fiche Mérimée PA00107912).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille 50 rue Gustave Delory (Fiche Mérimée PA00107912).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 00:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Ruches des abeilles noires.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Ruches des abeilles noires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 17:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Villeneuve d'Ascq Église Saint-Sébastien (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq Église Saint-Sébastien (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now for me. --Hubertl 11:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air pigeonnier de Frethun.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air pigeonnier de Frethun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Forges d' Hondschoote.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Forges d' Hondschoote.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

2014-04-06 Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-04-06 Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. A bit dark on the right side --Moroder 00:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

L'Île-GrandeEdit

Bonjour, votre image File:Ile Grande, plage au bout de l'impasse Run Losquet.jpg a un souci: - Ce n'est pas l'Île-Grande, puisque c'est une île plate - Le littoral de Pleumeur-Bodou ne ressemble pas du tout à cette photo. La localisation étant fausse, la catégorisation (plage du Finistère) est peut-être la bonne? Bien cordialement--Spendeau (talk) 11:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Spendeau Merci à vous pour cette remarque. Mais je suis presque certain que cette photo a été prise sur l' Île Grande, dans le quartier de saint Sauveur en face de l' Île Trönnéo et Karreg ar Merk, le 25 mai 2003. Je suis allé sur l"île Grande, quatre fois entre 2003 à 2007, et cette photo a été prise lors d'une ballade de Toul ar Stand vers plage au bout de l'impasse Run Losquet. Cordialement.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 13:27, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
    • J'habite à 5km de l'Île-Grande, c'est pour ça que j'ai un doute; j'ai posé la question sur le projet Bretagne pour savoir si quelqu'un reconnaît l'endroit. Merci d'avoir répondu.--Spendeau (talk) 14:37, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
      • merci pour cette démarche de vérification auprès du projet Bretagne, si j'ai fait une erreur faites le moi savoir, de manière à ce que je la corrige, sur panoramio et flicker.- Cordialement --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 15:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
        • Je pensais au Yaudet près de Lannion et en fait, une personne a trouvé, il s'agit de l'autre rive du Léguer; j'ai rectifié les cordonnées sur la photo, la légende et la catégorie, reste à modifier le nom de la photo (que je ne sais faire)! Bonne continuation.--Spendeau (talk) 20:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
          • Un grand merci, Spendeau décidément ma mémoire me fait défaut... c'est vrai qu'à l'époque les GPS n'étaient pas courants. C'est donc bien sympathique d'avoir fait des recherches précises sur ce lieu.. Le nom du fichier a été corrigé, dans les commons mais aussi sur flicker et sur Panoramio. Cordialement à vous.---PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air germoir de Warhem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air germoir de Warhem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Now, ok --Billy69150 18:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Méteren.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, Musée de Plein air Méteren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Much better --Crisco 1492 01:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

1961 Chrysler New Yorker, front view (low).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1961 Chrysler New Yorker, front view (low).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, perhaps a big tight at left and right--Lmbuga 22:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
1961 Chrysler New Yorker, rear view.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1961 Chrysler New Yorker, rear view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good Imo--Lmbuga 22:25, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Primevère Polyanthus (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primevère Polyanthus (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice composition, QI for me --Hubertl 02:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Buick Skylark (Back view) 1972.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buick Skylark (Back view) 1972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
This is, what I would call a proper back. QI for me, even when the crop is not centered. --Hubertl 11:26, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Chevrolet impala profil gauche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevrolet impala profil gauche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 05:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

2014-06-22 Duke's Club.- Chevrolet.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-06-22 Duke's Club.- Chevrolet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 00:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Chevrolet Bel Air Avant à Carmel Californie.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevrolet Bel Air Avant à Carmel Californie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 04:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Buick Skylark (front view) 1972.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buick Skylark (front view) 1972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nothing wrong for QI, the fact, that it is not centered perfectly is not essential. --Hubertl 15:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

1941 Buick Series 70 Duke's Club.- Villeneuve d'Ascq (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1941 Buick Series 70 Duke's Club.- Villeneuve d'Ascq (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 18:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Dodge Charger 1971 (Profile gauche).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dodge Charger 1971 (Profile gauche).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

1941 Buick Series 70 Duke's Club.- (Profil) Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1941 Buick Series 70 Duke's Club.- (Profil) Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 11:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment. Is the rear axle of the car broken? ;-) -- Spurzem 16:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment the back of the car was really low Face-smile.svg --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 09:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
I meant the inclined wheel. -- Spurzem 16:01, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Bakersfield, (CA) Truck Kenworth at Flying J Travel (5).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakersfield, (CA) Truck Kenworth at Flying J Travel (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 19:49, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
seems off vertical and too tightly cropped --Charlesjsharp 22:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Aubechies, L'église Saint-Géry (xie siècle).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aubechies, L'église Saint-Géry (xie siècle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI -- Spurzem 16:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Aubechies (Belgique).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aubechies (Belgique).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI, nice composition -- Spurzem 16:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Aubechies, L'église Saint-Géry et son cimetière.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aubechies, L'église Saint-Géry et son cimetière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me now --Hubertl 07:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Aubechies section de Beloeil (Belgique) (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aubechies section de Beloeil (Belgique) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me now --Hubertl 07:55, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Aubechies section Chapelle Saint Géry (Belgique).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aubechies section Chapelle Saint Géry (Belgique).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok for me, third opinion appreciated --Hubertl 07:56, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

La Pen'tiere Avesnelles (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Pen'tiere Avesnelles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nord (département_français).--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:06, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Good quality -- Spurzem 21:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

La Pen'tiere Avesnelles.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Pen'tiere Avesnelles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nord (département_français).--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:04, 15 April 2015(UTC) * Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Hubertl 06:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

2012-09-23 Kerascoêt village (7).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-23 Kerascoêt village (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Flêtre Café de la Mairie.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flêtre Café de la Mairie.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Excellent compostion. Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

GERBEROY Le vieux logis.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GERBEROY Le vieux logis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now. QI for me --Hubertl 17:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Champassak, Vat Phu (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Champassak, Vat Phu (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Wiki loves Earth.Edit

Bonjour Pierre André,

Au nom des organisateurs du concours, je vous remercie pour votre participation à Wiki loves Earth. Malheureusement, je suis au regret de vous annoncer que certaines de vos photos ne pourront pas être conservées sur Commons. Il s'agit de File:Réserve naturelle nationale de la dune Marchand.jpg et File:Villeneuve d' Ascq le Parc du Héron.jpg. En effet, la réglementation sur la propriété intellectuelle en France interdit de reproduire les panneaux signalétiques sans l'autorisation de leurs ayant-droits et les projets Wikimedia s'attachent à respecter cette réglementation. Nous essayons de faire évoluer les choses, mais en attendant, ces photos ne peuvent rester en ligne et j'ai donc dû demander leur suppression à titre préventif. Cela n'a aucune incidence sur votre participation au concours et j'espère que cela n'entamera pas votre motivation !

Amicalement, --EdouardHue (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Face-smile.svg Thank you. EdouardHue.- Je ne connaissais pas cette particularité de la réglementation sur la propriété intellectuelle en France. Je viens hélas de poster recemment de nouveaux fichiers pour lesquels leur retrait s'imposera.
File:Besse-et-Saint-Anastaise Massif du Sancy (3).jpg File:Vred.- Parc naturel régional Scarpe-Escaut Le Terril de Germignies-Nord (2).jpg et File:Vred.- Parc naturel régional Scarpe-Escaut Le Terril de Germignies-Nord (1).jpg.
Ma motivation en restera bien évidemment intacte - Cordialement à vous.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 16:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Les subtilités de la loi sont trop nombreuses et complexes pour être connues de tous, malheureusement. En voici l'illustration ! Pour les deux nouvelles photos que vous signalez, j'aimerais considérer que l'exception dite de minimis s'applique, contrairement aux deux précédentes où les panneaux étaient clairement l'unique sujet représenté. Je choisis de ne rien faire pour le moment Face-smile.svg. --EdouardHue (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. No noise. --Hubertl 23:53, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Canny-sur-Thérain.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canny-sur-Thérain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok for me. Not dark enough for declining --Hubertl 17:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - May - PanoramasEdit

I'm afraid I have had to remove File:Champassak, Vat Phu (2).jpg since they it not first uploaded to Commons in May 2015, per the Photo Challenge rules. I appreciate you have reprocessed/cropped it, but it is still the same photograph. -- Colin (talk) 20:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Colin I actually thought it best with a. "restating / cropped" picture and to propose it in IQ. -. So I'll upload another picture within the rules of the challenge. With my apologies for this error, best regards.
fr: Je suis désolé. Je pensais que ce serait mieux de présenter une image "retraitée et recadrée" et de la proposer dans "Quality Image" au préalable. Je vais envoyer une autre photo qui sera faite dans les règles du "Challenge". Avec mes excuses pour cette erreur, meilleures salutations à vous.

--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 21:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Saint Léger (Estaimpuis)..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Léger (Estaimpuis)..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 09:42, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --King of Hearts 20:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (5).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veryac'h Plage de Kerloc'h (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for QI. --C messier 13:08, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth: files have to be uploaded during the contest periodEdit

Hello, i noticed you reinserted the WLE 2015 template to images you uploaded before the contest began, like here [1]. One image was uploaded in 2014, the other in March 2015. WLE 2015 France started on 2015-05-01, so please do not revert again (and i ask you this, not only because your edits broke the statistics display).

Please see http://wikilovesearth.fr/post/117697026816/reglement and Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2015/Rules & FAQ for the rules. Holger1959 (talk) 11:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

( English) Hello Holger1959. Sorry, I had not realized that the competition required the WLE 2015 photos uploaded in the period from May 1 to May 31 So I downloaded pictures erroneously assessed and promoted "Quality Image Promotion" which predated this period. Be assured of my apologies
(En français) Bonjour Holger 1959. je n'avais pas compris que le concours, WLE 2015 exigeait des photos téléchargées dans la période du 1 mai au 31 mai. J'ai donc téléchargé par erreur des photos évaluée et promues "Quality Image Promotion" qui étaient antérieures à cette période. Soyez assuré de toutes mes excuses.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 14:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
no problem :) thank you for your understanding, and for so many nice photos (even if 2 of them are now not eligible for WLE 2015). Holger1959 (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Le Puy de Sancy (2014).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Puy de Sancy (2014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Le Puy de Dôme rando (2014).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Puy de Dôme rando (2014).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 16:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth BrazilEdit

Bonjour,

Pour information et bien que je m'occupe surtout de Wiki Loves Earth France, il me semble bien que File:Cataractes d' Iguazu (3).jpg est admissible à l'édition brésilienne de Wiki Loves Earth 2015.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 14:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, VIGNERON
merci à vous pour cette information, voilà, qui est fait en espérant ne pas avoir commis d'erreur dans les codifications ci-dessous mises (sans leurs balises) :
"Wiki Loves Earth 2015|br" "Images from Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Brazil to check"
Cordialement.- --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 16:26, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Lille, la Vieille Bourse (PA00107639).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lille, la Vieille Bourse (PA00107639).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:20, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Noordpeene, Chemin du Tom.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noordpeene, Chemin du Tom.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 18:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Excuse me, but haven´t you read?Edit

This CIC-process was already finished. After 10 Days. I closed it, according to the rules. Now you opened it again. Tell me, how many days should we keep open the discussion? One month, half a year? If you want to organize the Quality Image consensual review, please do it. But then please do it completely. Not just voting. --Hubertl (talk) 21:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Hubertl it is a mistake on my part... I am sorry. I reopened this file at a late hour in the night, I mistaken with other.- Best regard- --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 07:41, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Quièvelon l’imposante ferme du Mesnil.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quièvelon l’imposante ferme du Mesnil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
This one is better than the previous one. * Symbol support vote.svg but not absoltely convinced, though QI for me. --Hubertl 15:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Locmariaquer Entrée des Pierres Plates.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Locmariaquer Entrée des Pierres Plates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me. --Hubertl 07:33, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Noordpeene, les prairies du Schoubrouck.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noordpeene, les prairies du Schoubrouck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me. --Hubertl 10:24, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Artres la vallée de la Rhonelle (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artres la vallée de la Rhonelle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 19:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Morgat.-Rochers du Beg ar Kador.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morgat.-Rochers du Beg ar Kador.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality for this camera. --Hubertl 15:48, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Yucca flaccida plage Saint-Philibert, Morbihan..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yucca flaccida plage Saint-Philibert, Morbihan..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me --Hubertl 05:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Villeneuve d'Ascq, château du Sart, Club house du Golf du Sart.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villeneuve d'Ascq, château du Sart, Club house du Golf du Sart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
In my opinion f4 not ideal, but good quality.--Famberhorst 17:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Vilnius.-Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul.- Autel de la Vierge couronnée.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilnius.-Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul.- Autel de la Vierge couronnée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not perfect, but ok --Poco a poco 17:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Old Riga Vecrīga Town Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Riga Vecrīga Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Please check your image. It's leaning out. --XRay 16:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
And there is noticable barrel distortion. --C messier 16:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
✓ DoneCorrections done to the noticeable barrel distortion and in the tilted pic.Please care to take another look?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:44, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Crop at the bottom not the best (half people), but IMO QI. --XRay 12:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)


Quality Image PromotionEdit

Vilnius.- Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilnius.- Église Saints-Pierre-et-Paul (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 03:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Le château de Rundal (Rundal Pils) (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le château de Rundal (Rundal Pils) (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 03:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Le Chateau Trakai (Lituanie) (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le Chateau Trakai (Lituanie) (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Xicotencatl 05:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Tallinn.- 26 Pikk House of the Brotherhood of Black Heads (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn.- 26 Pikk House of the Brotherhood of Black Heads (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support--Jebulon 19:35, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Vilnius N-D de la Porte d'Aurore Vilnius.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilnius N-D de la Porte d'Aurore Vilnius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support OK. --C messier 17:23, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Tallinn rue Pikk La maison du voyeur.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tallinn rue Pikk La maison du voyeur.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Modèle été des villesEdit

Bonjour, Pierre-André

Je te signale que, pour la campagne L'été des villes, les fichiers doivent contenir le modèle {{L'été des villes}} et la Category:Uploaded via Campaign:ÉtédesVilles, et non Category:Images from Été des Villes 2015 qui est inclu dans le modèle {{L'été des villes}}. C'est due a une faute de programmation, voir Le message de Jules78120. Pourras-tu y tenir compte quand tu utilises commonist? Je l'ai fait pour tes fichiers déjà téléchargés. Amicalement --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:11, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Havang(nl) merci pour tes précieux conseils. Il est vrai que je m'y perds un peu dans les catégories. Le plus simple pour moi sera télécharger mes photos avec UploadWizard. Bien amicalement. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Entre-temps, on a adapté le modèle {{L'été des villes}} qui contient maintenant les deux categories et qui est donc suffisant à lui seul pour les categories de la campagne. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2015 - June - Collections, Collecting and Collectables/WinnersEdit

Muselets Champagne.jpg Photo Challenge – Third Place
Camera2 mgx bronze.svg
Congratulations!

Your picture Muselets Champagne.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Collections, Collecting and Collectables, in June 2015. You can find the results of the challenge here.

Photo challenge/2015 - August - Personal Protective EquipmentEdit

salut Pierre André. J'avais viré la photo Mission Apollo XIII à Universal Studios Hollywood.jpg du Photo challenge, vu que je croyais qu'elle avait été téléchargée en 2012. Désolé, je me suis planté. Je la remets de suite. Bon courage pour la "deletion request" et tout les trucs en anglais ci-dessus que j'y comprends rien.--Classiccardinal (talk) 23:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Classiccardinal. tu n'es pas le seul a demander la suppression de cette photo relative à l'attraction du vaisseau spatial Apollo XIII. La question qui se pose, est en effet celle de la possibilité de violation du droit d'auteur (images du film Apollo 13) avec les trois astronautes découpés dans du carton et qui sont mis en exposition permanente. Pour éviter tous litiges mieux vaut peut être retirer cette photo qui me semblait originale. Cordialement--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Challenge versus campainEdit

Bonjour, Pierre-André, La campagne Été des villes du 21 juillet au 21 septembre n'est que simple campagne sans concours, alors on n'est pas critique sur les dates du télechargement et la date d'addition du modèle l'été des villes ; mais le challenge Wiki Loves monuments est un concours avec des règles strictes, seul les photo's télechargé entre 1 et 30 septembre peuvent participer au concours. File:Lille, Hôtel de la Préfecture du Nord (Fiche Mérimée PA00107725)..jpg téléchargé en février, et donné le modèle WLM aujourd'hui est donc hors concours, et ne devrait pas avoir le modèle WLM. Amicalement--Havang(nl) (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Havang(nl) merci de m'avoir précisé que le challenge Wiki Loves monuments est un concours pour lequel les photos devaient être téléchargées entre 1 et 30 septembre. Je n'avais pas compris cette règle stricte et j'ai donc ainsi téléversé quelques autres fichiers par erreur pour lesquels je m'en excuse. Bien amicalement à vous. --Pierre André (talk) 15:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Lien vers statistiques WLM où on trouve les dates de télechargement: http://stats.wikilovesmonuments.cl/france. Seront même hors concours WLM les téléchargements après minuit en France mais avant minuit UTC qui compte pour le concours (2 heures de décalage!)--Havang(nl) (talk) 15:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Face-smile.svg Thank you. dommage que je ne serais pas beaucoup là en Septembre. Bon WLM à vous. --Pierre André (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 en France, Edit

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 Votre photo « Salle des Preux du Château de Pierrefonds (2).jpg » a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du . Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot. Salle des Preux du Château de Pierrefonds (2).jpg

Trizek from FR 15:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour Trizek|from FR, un grand merci pour cette distinction. C'est avec plaisir que je porterai le tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Cordialement --Pierre André (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 : Bonjour Trizek j'ai bien reçu mon tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. C'est super sympa. Bonnes fêtes de fin d'année. Cordialement.--Pierre André (talk) 13:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Aerial photographsEdit

Hi there! Three of your uploaded aerial photographs listed as taken in Tallinn, are actually not taken in Tallinn. I thought you might actually know where these are taken and fix the incorrect information.

Best regards! Flying Saucer (talk) 22:50, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Flying Saucer these photos were taken during takeoff of the aircraft in Tallinn.
I think they target the center of the historic city and the business center. If this is not the case can you tell me their precise geolocation.
Face-smile.svg Thank you. Thank you, best regards. --Pierre André (talk) 10:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

SalutEdit

Hi Pierre...it's all ok? Salut --LivioAndronico (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

hi LivioAndronico. Yes all it's OK, thank you! I returned from a trip Sri Lanka in the last few weeks, and since I'm very overwhelmed. I think it will get better after the year-end holidays. Happy christmas, to you. Sincerely soon --Pierre André (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Galle Closenberg Hotel (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galle Closenberg Hotel (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 10:01, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Dambulla Temple d'or (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dambulla Temple d'or (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now for me, even when the shadows still strong --Hubertl 14:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Dambulla Temple d'or (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dambulla Temple d'or (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok now for me, even when the shadows still strong --Hubertl 14:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Lankatilaka Temple (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lankatilaka Temple (5).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 15:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Weligama beach (6).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weligama beach (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 13:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Weligama beach (7).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weligama beach (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Weligama beach (8).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weligama beach (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Kandi jardin botanique de Peradeniya (le parc) (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kandi jardin botanique de Peradeniya (le parc) (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 11:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Colombo Temple bouddhiste de Gangaramaya (15).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Colombo Temple bouddhiste de Gangaramaya (15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok for me --Hubertl 15:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Pierre André Leclercq/Archive 1".