Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PROPOLI87!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Toscana - premiazioneEdit

 
Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

La cerimonia di premiazione di WLM2019 regionale si terrà a Pescia il giorno 1 dicembre alle h. 17:00, come comunicato anche su Facebook. Qui il volantino.

Tutti i finalisti del secondo round sono invitati a prendere un premio (gli altri partecipanti possono anche essi prenderne uno, ma dopo che avranno ritirato i loro premi i finalisti)

Il 23 novembre, come comunicato anche su Facebook è prevista anche la cerimonia di premiazione locale di Prato e provincia presso la Biblioteca Lazzerini.


Messaggio discusso qui. Per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista


  toscana wikimedia.it

  @WikiToscana

  Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

  toscanawiki

#WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments2019


Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery--15:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Catherine Laurence discussion 14:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

CategorieEdit

Ciao Propoli! Innanzitutto grazie per le belle immagini che stai caricando. Probabilmente da nuovo utente nessuno ti ha spiegato cosa sono le categorie, e le stai mettendo un po' a caso. Te le ho corrette per le ultime foto, dai un'occhiata. Adesso ti spiego, comunque: Commons ha milioni di foto e ci sono diversi modi per cercarle. Il primo, più semplice, è quello per titolo o descrizione, usando la casella di ricerca o Google. I tuoi titoli e descrizioni però non sono particolarmente esplicativi di cosa rappresentino le immagini, dove e quando siano state scattate, per cui rischiano di finire in un calderone dove nessuno le vedrà mai.

Il secondo modo per cercare le immagini è quello delle categorie, che sono come delle scatole ben strutturate in cui andare a colpo sicuro. Diciamo che ogni scatola può contenerne altre, ma non dovrebbe mai contenere più di qualche centinaio di foto, perché diventerebbero inutilizzabili e troppo lunghe da scorrere. Per questo è sbagliato usare categorie generiche per raggruppare le immagini, come "Nature" o "Science"... È sbagliato anche usare le categorie come "hashtag", cioè metterne un po' a caso, perché come ti dicevo ognuna dovrebbe contenere immagini ben specifiche e indirizzate nel posto giusto. Il problema è che non è facile trovare la categoria più adatta, però si può sempre trovare una categoria sufficientemente approssimativa, dove casomai qualche utente esperto poi sposterà poi i file in quella più giusta.

Prendiamo le foto di panorami, luoghi e monumenti: tu parti sempre dal Comune (Florence, Siena, Rosignano Marittimo...) e poi apri la categoria per trovare quella più specifica ("Nature of Siena", "Cityscapes of Florence", oppure un edificio specifico, che trovi sempre raggruppato dentro "Buildings in...", "Churches in...", ecc.).

Prendiamo il caso delle foto naturali: bisognerebbe conoscere la specie di quello che stiamo fotografando, però non tutti abbiamo studiato botanica o zoologia, per cui dobbiiamo arrangiarci. In ogni caso possiamo riconoscere almeno la famiglia o il nome comune ("gabbiano", "volpe", "ape", "papavero"...). Per prima cosa vai su Wikipedia e scrivi semplicemente "gabbiano" nella casella di ricerca. Vedrai che ti porterà al nome specifico della famiglia che è "Larinae". In basso e a sinistra trovi poi un collegamento a "Commons". Se ci clicchi puoi facilmente arrivare alla categoria generica per quella famiglia o specie. Se sei in grado puoi scegliere una sottocategoria più specifica, oppure usa direttamente quella generica.

All'inizio può sempbrare difficile, ma se ci provi vedrai che il sistema delle categorie è affascinante e anche divertente, oltre che utile per trovare sempre l'immagine giusta. Spero di esserti stato d'aiuto, se hai qualche dubbio in merito scrivi pure nella mia talk. --Sailko (talk) 17:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Grazie mille. PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.Edit


Dear PROPOLI87,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Grazie a voi! Ho risposto ben volentieri al sondaggio. PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)Edit


Dear PROPOLI87,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Fragole con zucchero.jpgEdit

La tua immagine è stata ritirata dalla sfida perché era mal posizionato. Si può sempre offrire, ma nel posto giusto, per questo vi consiglio di leggere attentamente i punti formali. cordialmente.Filo gèn' (talk) 09:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

FP nomEdit

I have no idea how you manage to mess up creating the nomination page that much. You have to try again, and this time save the page properly before you add it to the list. BUT since it is the second try, you have to add a "/2", like this: Winter cherry blossom - Prunus Subhirtella Autumnalis Rosea.jpg/2 in the box at COM:FPC otherwise you will just come back to the old nom. I will get rid of the faulty page for you. --Cart (talk) 12:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

It doesn't matter, I give up. I wanted to try again but I'm not good at cards. But look at the file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Winter_cherry_blossom_-_Prunus_Subhirtella_Autumnalis_Rosea.jpg
if it was a valid photo.
Thank you. Regards P.S. This time I managed to keep the metadataPROPOLI87 (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
It is a very beautiful photo and I think it could have chance. At the moment I already have two active nominations, and I can't write the nom for you since it needs to be done from your account. But later when I have a free slot, I will nominate it on your behalf. --Cart (talk) 13:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

I tried again and this time I did it! Thank you!PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

That's great! I'll fix it a bit for you. :-) --Cart (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

RicategorizzazioniEdit

Ciao, vedo che stai caricando abbastanza foto e migliorando progressivamente, sul fronte delle categorizzazioni e dei metadati. Grazie.

Son passato a dirti che l'Italia ha quasi finito di valutare le foto di Wiki Science Competition 2019 e informarti per correttezza che qui come nel caso di altri utenti ho proceduto a ricategorizzare una foto che hai caricato dopo la mezzanotte del 15 dicembre, la deadline italiana di WSC2019.

Fra qualche giorno pubblicheremo i risultati e volevo ringraziarti di aver partecipato anche se non sei arrivato/a in finale. Il motivo principale era la descrizione delle foto, che era probabilmente poco sceitifica, ma visto che probabilmente non vivi lontano se vuoi passare alla premiazione a Pisa quando la fisseremo ti posso spiegare meglio che tipo di foto hanno maggiori chance di vincere per la prossima edizione.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Grazie, mi sto impegnando per migliorare e mi fa piacere che si noti. Ho partecipato con le foto che avevo in archivio, di qualità ben inferiore a quelle che ho visto in prefinale, per cui non mi aspettavo certo di vincere, ma ho seguito tutto e sto seguendo. Sulle foto scientifiche non avrò molte occasioni di scatto, mi sto impegnando invece per il prossimo Wiki loves monuments con una macchina fotografica anzichè un telefono (usato prevalemente per la scorsa edizione) specialmente per la Toscana. Grazie mille! PROPOLI87 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
In bocca al lupo allora :)--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Un grazie per WLM e un libro sulla conoscenza libera per teEdit

Gentile PROPOLI87,

oggi ti scrivo a nome dell'associazione Wikimedia Italia per ringraziarti di aver partecipato a Wiki Loves Monuments Italia. Il tuo contributo è particolarmente apprezzato perché hai caricato oltre dieci foto per Wiki Loves Monuments.

Come piccolo omaggio avremmo piacere di spedirti una copia (tutta in carta riciclata) del libro di Carlo Piana, Open source, software libero e altre libertà. Fornisci un recapito per ricevere una copia del libro.

Il libro comprende anche un capitolo sul tuo lavoro! Si parla infatti di libertà di panorama, cioè la libertà di fare e diffondere foto come le tue, ma tutto l'anno e su tutti i monumenti d'Italia. Finché resta la legge attuale, per aumentare le foto caricabili puoi chiedere a un ente vicino a te di aderire a Wiki Loves Monuments. Speriamo che questo libro ti sia utile per apprezzare quanto hai fatto e per trasmettere la passione della conoscenza libera a una persona a te vicina.

Se desideri una copia ma non puoi fornirci un indirizzo a cui spedirla, contatta la segreteria Wikimedia Italia e troviamo una soluzione insieme.

Grazie ancora e a presto,

Lorenzo Losa (msg) 10:33, 25 February 2020 (UTC) Ho inserito i miei dati. Grazie mille! Saluti.PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 13:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Ho ricevuto il libro, Grazie mille!PROPOLI87 (talk) 06:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 06:56, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

FPCEdit

Don't do anything right now on FPC!! I'll sort it out for you before it gets any worse. --Cart (talk) 21:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

All done. Do NOT use the 'Removal' creation. It is only for voting to delist an existing FP. --Cart (talk) 21:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
I am very sorry, but thank you once again.PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello Cart, I apologize but I need your help again. I submitted the file

File :: Porta_secondaria_sulla_faceta_della_Chiesa_di_Santa_Maria_a_Montepulciano.jpg and I also get the photo alongside. I think I have identified the error on this page to be eliminated but I would not want to make things worse. Can you fix it? Thank you and greetings. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File::Porta_secondaria_sulla_facciata_della_Chiesa_di_Santa_Maria_a_Montepulciano.jpg&action=edit&section=T-1

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Quirico d'Orcia A spasso sulle mura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Please improve categorization before further nominations. --MB-one 11:04, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiore di tarassaco o dente di leone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

File:German shepherd enjoying the sun.jpgEdit

Hello! It is a very nice photo, but before you try to nominate it again tomorrow, do you think you could remove the metal pole/thing right behind the neck of the dog. I think other voters would comment on it too. With that gone, I would certainly support this photo of the beautiful dog. If you don't have the program to do such things, I can do it for you if you like. Have a very pleasant evening, --Cart (talk) 17:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

I will do it, I will remove the rod which is a lantern that is in the garden and at this point also the blue stems in the middle of the olive trees, near the toolbox at the bottom of the field. Then I'll tell you. Thanks a lot. I'll message you here. One question: but do I have to upload replacing the version of the file or do I do the file bis?PROPOLI87 (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLIPROPOLI87 (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I think it would be best if you uploaded the file bis, as a separate file. That way you will not have any extra trouble with the name when you create the new nomination. Otherwise it can be mixed up with the first faulty nomination creation. I have put this, your talk page, on my watchlist so I will see if you respond. If you want to "call" on me, you do it by putting my name and a "u" inside double brackets, like this (look in the code): W.carter. If you do that in a post and sign it during the same edit, I will get an e-mail that you have 'pinged' me. This is how we communicate here. You can do this with any user name. Knowing how to do this is like knowing how to "use the telephone on Commons". :-) --Cart (talk) 19:03, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
OK thanks. I entered the application. Please check if I did everything right. PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 19:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Well, a few small things. Many users want the location written in text in the description and among the categories too, so that it is easy to see even without clicking on the coordinates. You also need to learn to add the gallery. You have to select the gallery from Template:Commons FP galleries and serch for the right subsection. As you can see, I have fixed all this for you. Good luck now! --Cart (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
It was just trying to enter as much data as possible that gave me an error the first time. Now it will take a screenshot of the card and I will take it into account for the next time. Thanks a lot!PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:11, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
If you have a problem with it, you don't have to enter it all directly. Finish the page creation first and then add all the little things later, like I did now. It works just as well. --Cart (talk) 20:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
OK, Thank you PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Due pechinesi e un chihuahua.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. Fixed the category.--MB-one 14:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! German shepherd enjoying the sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, good composition and good lighting. But why is the quarantine period mentioned? -- Spurzem 18:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC):Because in Italy now we cannot leave the house except for urgent needs and therefore also dogs (no more than 200 meters from home). And so the German shepherd photographed is forced into the garden and enjoys the sun.--PROPOLI87 21:41, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Nevertheless. Couldn't the picture have been created the same way a year ago? -- Spurzem 21:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stella di Betlemme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.. - FitIndia Talk Mail 12:05, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Grazie. PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:33, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiori Gialli Del Ranuncolo - Fiori di campo gialli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papavero comune interno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 19:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PAPAVERO COMUNE IN UN PRATO NEL MAGGIO 2020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:27, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 maggio in Italia, inizia la fase 2. Andrà tutto bene. Indossiamo la mascherina e rispettiamo le distanze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support The description could be a bit more about what's in the image but good quality --MB-one 15:14, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regolatore di pressione applicato ad impianto idraulico domestico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 14:32, 1 June 2020(UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PRESS CONTROL - REGOLATORE DI PRESSIONE IN QUESTO CASO DI UN IMPIANTO DI IRRIGAZIONE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The blue case seems a bit distorted. Isn't it? Probably you can correct it. -- Spurzem 14:35, 1 June 2020 (UTC):I corrected it, or at least I tried. Can it be okay now?PROPOLI87 08:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Good now -- Spurzem 17:21, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poppies popped on a wallI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana - preparazioneEdit

 
Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Stiamo organizzando Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2020.

Il concorso si tiene a settembre ma ci muoviamo con anticipo. Purtroppo non all'inizio della primavera come altri anni a causa dell'emergenza COVID-19, ma abbiamo iniziato a fine maggio dopo una pausa di due mesi. Puoi consultare in questa pagina il lavoro in corso.

Ci sono monumenti (o intere amministrazioni) che mancano vicino alla tua zona di interesse? Fallo presente e vedremo di fare il possibile!

Prossimo aggiornamento a inizio luglio, con i comuni nuovi sicuramente aderenti e le integrazioni.

La premiazione 2020 si terrà a Prato.


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista


Per informazioni:

  toscana wikimedia.it

  #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments

  Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

  toscanawiki


Alexmar983 tramite MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigeon drinking at the fountain in Vada (Livorno), after the quarantine the animals get closer and are not afraid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Torre del Faro di Vada (Livorno).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 21:20, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Paille cushion for children with cross-stitch embroidery, all made by me.jpgEdit

català  Deutsch  English  español  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
 
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Paille cushion for children with cross-stitch embroidery, all made by me.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Jonatan Svensson Glad(talk) 21:59, 22 June 2020 (UTC)-the image was created by me, which I sent to my son via whatsup, then I could not find the image file and I had it sent back by my son via whatsup. This step probably caused this inconsistency that results. But I took the picture.PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temporale in arrivo sulla campagna rignanese (Rignano sull'Arno - Fi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mooring chain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment A bit dark --Moroder 18:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. On careful inspection, I suspect the darkness simply mirrors the reality of the chain. --Blood Red Sandman 12:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasoli nella campagna di Reggello (Firenze) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasoli nella campagna di Reggello (Firenze).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:59, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Girasoli in fiore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pastore Tedesco che cerca refrigerio nell'erba fresca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 20:56, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balle di paglia sul Lago di Bilancino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 17:48, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Firenze Panorama del Centro con il Duomo e Palazzo Vecchio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Celeda 15:12, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porta San Niccolò - Piazza Poggi - Firenze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Celeda 15:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana sta per iniziareEdit

 
Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Continua la preparazione di Wiki Loves Monuments per il 2020.

Manca una settimana alla partenza e per chi fosse già in giro ricordiamo le nuove località aderenti, già riportate nelle nostre liste in costante aggiornamento.

Nel 2020 hanno completato l'iter di ampliamento le amministrazioni di Cascina, Pomarance, Pescia, Empoli, San Quirico d'Orcia, Chiusi, Santa Fiora e Piombino, mentre hanno aderito per la prima volta a tempo indefinito il Museo delle Aviotruppe di Pisa e i comuni di Pescaglia, Gallicano, Camaiore, Santa Croce sull'Arno, Casale Marittimo, Quarrata, Montelupo Fiorentino, Buonconvento, Pratovecchio Stia, Sansepolcro, Castiglion Fiorentino, Anghiari, Badia Tedalda e Campiglia Marittima. Ci sono anche adesioni solo per il 2020 di alcune dimore storiche attorno a Pisa.

Risultano al momento richieste formali o informali di partecipazione o ampliamento della copertura da un'altra ventina di enti e amministrazioni, alcune delle quali potrebbero concretizzarsi nelle prossime due settimane. Fate attenzione che alcune delle adesioni solo per l'edizione 2019 nel nord della provincia di Prato e del comune di Massa non saranno probabilmente confermate, ma non sono ancora state rimosse dalle liste.

Qui il video promozionale del 2019 e qui quello della nuova edizione.

Il prossimo aggiornamento riporterà i volantini in più lingue e gli ultimi sviluppi sulle adesioni.

Ricordiamo che la premiazione 2020 si terrà a Prato.


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista


Per informazioni:

  toscana wikimedia.it

  #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesMonuments

  Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

  toscanawiki


Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capra bianca domestica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama di Firenze centro visto dal Piazzale Michelangelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. Well done. Of course details show that the camera/lens used are not great according to today’s standards, but with good, uncomplicated lighting (as here) the quality is still OK. I would second the hint given by other reviewers: It could be worthwhile to invest in a better camera, you seem to be a talented photographer and with a better camera/lens you could probably take very good pictures. No offence, I just want to help. --Aristeas 09:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Targa dedicata a Vallombrosa con le parole dell’Ariosto dall’Orlando Furioso Canto XXII.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 00:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festività Natalizie 2019 a Piazza delle Conserve - Cesenatico 5-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:40, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capra domestica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, though file size is a bit small. --Cayambe 09:33, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Problem in VIEdit

You are welcome in VI but your appointment is not admissible, on the substance and on the form read the rules. You have also damaged the interface, the whole has been repaired. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Sorry, it's the first time, it was recommended to me.PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 09:46, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
    I added the category No violence signs, what and where should I write? I wanted to highlight the No to violence against womenPROPOLI87 (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Toscana è in corsoEdit

 
Ciao, un messaggio da alcune utenze del gruppo locale Toscana

Gazie alla preparazione e al vostro impegno, WLM è un successo in regione anche per questa edizione. Siamo stabilmente primi per caricamenti a livello nazionale: qui potete vedere alcune statistiche. Al momento risultano più reattive le province di Livorno, Siena, Pisa, Prato e Firenze.

Fra i nuovi beni aderenti confermati, e inseriti nelle liste, segnaliamo i comuni di Castel del Piano, Montignoso e la Domus Mazziniana di Pisa. Ci sono nuovi beni anche dal comune di Santa Fiora. Sono comunque in corso le verifiche sulla proprietà di alcuni edifici religiosi. C'è invece un aggiornamento nella lista di San Vincenzo, che aveva autorizzato annualmente nel 2019 e ha ridotto i beni aderenti. Per quanto riguarda le foto panoramiche, vengono smistate direttamente nelle categorie dei comuni e richiedono maggiore manutenzione, quindi vi preghiamo se possibile la cortesia di posticipare il loro caricamento a fine mese quando avremo più tempo di occuparcene.

La campagna sociale in concerto su tutti e tre i canali (per Facebook la pagina Wiki Loves Toscana) prevede ogni quattro giorni una serie divulgativa sulle foto delle edizioni precedenti in bianco e nero (caricate progressivamente qui su Commons) alternata a una serie sulle foto migliori dell'edizione in corso. Ogni giorno nel tardo pomeriggio o prima serata solo su Twitter e Facebook (gruppo ToscanaWiki) viene inoltre postata una foto fra quelle giunte predligendo varibailità di luogo e tema.

Qui i i volantini in più lingue.


per non ricevere più questa tipologia di messaggi rimuovi il tuo nome da questa lista


Per informazioni:

  toscana wikimedia.it

  WikiToscana

  Wiki Loves Toscana, Toscana Wiki

  toscanawiki

Hashtag: #WikiLovesToscana #WikiLovesToscana2020 #WikiLovesMonuments #WikiLovesMonuments2020 #WLM2020


Alexmar983 tramite -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

File:1522 una panchina rossa per ricordare tutte le donne vittime di violenza. No alla violenza sulle donne.jpgEdit

Sorry, if you change an image in any way once it's been given VI status, it should be renominated, because the VI criteria may no longer apply. So I've reverted to the approved version. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

And you did well, thanks! I hadn't thought about it, it's that it is also named in quality and it continues to point out that the magenta shade is present in the letters, so I was working hard to ensure that the letters were perfectly white.PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 15:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onde sugli scogli a Calafuria (Livorno) - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good job fixing both these images. --ReneeWrites 09:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onde sugli scogli a Calafuria (Livorno) - 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --ReneeWrites 09:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - le scale.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 13:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! POPOLUNIA - il castello esterno 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 13:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
  Comment Yes, nice and sharp. I think you should add some more categories that are relevant. One having to do with castles is the one that most immediately comes to my mind. There may be a category of castles in Italy. -- Ikan Kekek 02:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)  DonePROPOLI87 08:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)POPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC):Ikan Kekek, can this photo be nominated for featured in your opinion?PROPOLI87 11:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 11:13, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
It wouldn't pass because there's so much sky that it's out of proportion. Solid quality image, though. -- Ikan Kekek 11:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC):I knew the sky was disproportionate, but for once it came to me well without being posterized I chose to leave it. I could reinseire by cutting the sky and nominate. I try! Let's see what result it gets, out of curiosity!PROPOLI87 12:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - Stemma degli Appiani sulla Porta del Castello.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Good quality and composition but under-categorized. There has to be a category for coats of arms (and maybe subcategories within it), and I'm sure there's a category for depiction of dragons. -- Ikan Kekek 02:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC):  DonePROPOLI87 08:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 08:39, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
OK, I'll support now, but no category for dragons? -- Ikan Kekek 11:50, 22 September 2020 (UTC):I couldn't find any category of dragon badges.I'm sorry. PROPOLI87 12:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 12:16, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

ConsiglioEdit

Caro Propoli87,

ti scrivo innanzi tutto per ringraziarti del tuo impegno e dedizione nel contribuire a Commons caricando le tue fotografie. Anch'io sono un appassionato di fotografia e, osservando i motivi per cui i tuoi scatti candidate a QI a volte non passano, vorrei darti dei consigli per provare a migliorare. Si tratta del mio punto di vista non autorevole da non professionista; spero, però, possano esserti utili e fornirti qualche spunto. Il problema principale che anch'io noto è la mancanza di dettaglio (che forse si può notare meglio su schermi ad alta densità di pixel). Per "mancanza di dettaglio" (menzionata a volte nelle valutazioni) intendo quell'aspetto "smussato" che può assumere ad esempio la sabbia, la terra, l'erba o le superfici ruvide di un castello.

È un peccato, perché la composizione delle tue fotografie è sempre molto buona e alcuni tuoi scatti sono presi davvero nel momento giusto—per la luce e per le condizioni atmosferiche.

Vorrei sottoporti alcuni elementi di riflessione riguardo a questo problema:

  1. Noto che la compressione JPG che usi per l'esportazione è piuttosto alta. Non scenderei sotto il livello di qualità 90/100, come anche consigliato dalle linee guida. In questo modo sei sicuro che la foto quasi sicuramente non subirà un degrado visibile.
  2. Puoi avere grandissimi benefici scattando in raw. Quando scatti in raw, la foto viene salvata con una dinamica molto ampia: questo ti permetterà di fare alcuni interventi (che spesso sono necessari, come abbassare le luci e alzare le ombre quando c'è un cielo luminoso, o aree in ombra) con un margine di manovra estremamente ampio e senza incappare in artefatti. Ciò significa che se, per ipotesi, devi (giustamente) sottoesporre una foto per non bruciare il cielo, potrai poi recuperare il dettaglio nelle ombre in post-produzione, perché la camera memorizza tutte le informazioni che riesce a catturare. Inoltre, la vignettatura e la distorsione della lente saranno compensate in automatico dal software di post-produzione, perché potrà leggere il modello della lente nei metadati del raw; anche ritoccare il bilanciamento del bianco sarà più semplice, perché verrà mostrata la temperatura colore utilizzata dalla camera durante lo scatto.
    Al contrario, scattando in jpg avrai alcuni svantaggi:
    – la foto verrà compressa subito una prima volta e sarà ricompressa una seconda volta dopo la post-produzione;
    – se alteri di molto l'esposizione, possono emergere artifici visibili;
    – in post-produzione sarà più laborioso compensare la distorsione della lente e la vignettatura (più evidenti su scatti più "grandangolari")
    – qualsiasi artefatto della compressione jpeg verrà evidenziato da correzioni prospettiche
    – il tuo margine di manovra per intervenire sul colore (bilanciamento del bianco, saturazione e luminanza di singoli colori) sarà molto ridotto (puoi provare a fare un confronto nel lavorare su un jpg e su un raw per capire la differenza nell'effetto dei tuoi interventi). Anche in questo caso, aumentare la saturazione (anche di un colore specifico) evidenzierà molto prima gli artefatti della compressione jpeg, mentre in raw non li vedrai mai (nemmeno con incrementi estremi).
  3. Un ultimo beneficio del raw, un po' più avanzato, ma importante per quest'argomento, è il fatto che potrai controllare lo "sharpening" (così viene chiamato in Adobe Lightroom) e la riduzione del rumore manualmente in post-produzione. Se scatti in jpeg, questo verrà fatto in automatico dalla macchina fotografica. L'effetto collaterale di applicare molto noise reduction è proprio lo "smussarsi" dei dettagli; la macchina fotografica potrebbe scegliere di applicarne molto durante lo scatto, e questo sarà irreversibile. Inoltre, se volessi aumentare lo "sharpening" su una foto salvata in jpeg, esso evidenzierà anche gli artefatti jpeg.
  4. Non conosco precisamente la dimensione del sensore, ma se le parti ai bordi dell'immagine non ti sembrano a fuoco prova a usare un'apertura di diaframma intermedia (per la mia camera, la Sony Alpha 5000, è f/9 o f/10; magari puoi capire qual è la tua apertura "media" dando un'occhiata al manuale).
  5. Se fai più interventi cumulativi, parti sempre dalla foto originale (di solito è possibile salvare gli interventi di post-produzione in modo non distruttivo).

Un'ultima considerazione soggettiva: prova a non esagerare con quello che viene chiamato a volte "nitidezza" nei software di post-produzione (in Lightroom è "Presenza") perché può rendere il contrasto piuttosto duro e artificiale. Sfrutta piuttosto lo "sharpening" per recuperare un po' di dettaglio.

Spero che qualcuno fra questi spunti possa esserti utile. :) Ciao! --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 14:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Grazie per i consigli che studierò attentamente sulla mia macchina fotografica. Fino all'anno scorso fotografavo solo con il mio telefono cellulare e non so molto di tecnica fotografica, e non ho molto tempo per studiare teoria, però pian piano sto capendo i miei punti deboli e sto cercando di migliorarmi. La nitidezza sembra sia il mio punto debole e spesso esagero in post-produzione. Altro mio punto debole è il cielo, che spesso mi si posterizza. Farò tesoro dei tuoi preziosi consigli e ti terrò aggiornato. Grazie mille. PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 14:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Prego :) Se può esserti d'aiuto, ti elenco alcuni punti teorici chiave in modo basilare che puoi tenere a mente mentre scatti:
  1. Puoi sperimentare con il programma "Apertura". Con questo puoi scegliere l'apertura del diaframma, mentre la camera imposterà in automatico un tempo di esposizione adeguato (se il tempo diventa troppo lungo, comincerà ad aumentare l'ISO = sensibilità del sensore). Con ISO alte aumenterà il rumore (granulosità). Di giorno puoi sempre usare l'ISO minima.
    L'apertura del diaframma corrisponde all' "f number":
    – "f piccolo" (es. f/4) = diaframma aperto = più luce in ingresso, ma profondità di campo stretta (utile se vuoi fotografare un soggetto sfocando lo sfondo = effetto "bouquet")
    – "f grande" (es. f/9) = diaframma più chiuso = profondità di campo ampia (necessaria se vuoi fotografare un paesaggio con l'intero campo a fuoco), ma meno luce in ingresso (aumenterà il tempo di esposizione)
    – l'ottica rende al meglio con le aperture intermedia del diaframma; le aperture più estreme introducono dei difetti ottici (con il diaframma molto aperto aumenta l'aberrazione cromatica, con il diaframma molto chiuso la maggiore diffrazione provoca una diminuzione della nitidezza; inoltre, un diaframma molto chiuso aumenta il tempo di esposizione, con maggior rischio di foto mosse con scarsa luce). Evita quindi "f" estremamente grandi (se ad es. hai da f/4 a f/22, potresti prediligere aperture fra f/8 e f/11, evitando di andare oltre); scegli un "f piccolo" se vuoi deliberatamente profondità di campo stretta (soggetto a fuoco con sfondo sfocato). Se sei in condizioni di scarsa luce (es. crepuscolo o sera), non hai un treppiede (che ti permetterebbe di fare un'esposizione lunga) e non vuoi aumentare troppo l'ISO, apri il diaframma.
  2. Il cielo è sempre problematico, perché di solito è nettamente più luminoso delle altre aree della scena. Quando hai cielo nelle tue inquadrature, un metodo è questo:
    – esponi lo scatto in modo che il cielo non sia sovraesposto (il resto dell'inquadratura risulterà sottoesposto). Per questo, può essere molto comodo dare un'occhiata all'istogramma mentre scatti: se la forma dell'istogramma si avvicina al limite destro del grafico senza toccarlo (o toccandolo senza mostrare un picco sul bordo), il cielo non ha parti sovraesposte.
    – in post-produzione, dovrai alzare le "ombre" (shadows) per correggere la sottoesposizione. Se vuoi un cielo più vivido, puoi anche abbassare le "alte luci" (highlights). In questo modo la scena potrà assomigliare maggiormente a quanto vedeva il tuo occhio. Scattando in raw, puoi regolare luci e ombre in modo molto drastico senza artefatti. Nel ritoccare le luci e le ombre, di tanto in tanto dai un'occhiata alla foto originale per controllare che non ti stia facendo prendere la mano. :)
  3. Se mentre fotografi hai il tempo di accertarti che tutto il quadro sia a fuoco, controlla i bordi dell'immagine: è quella l'area in cui l'ottica è più "debole". Se non lo fossero a sufficienza, magari il campo della scena ha molta profondità (es. soggetto molto vicino e orizzonte) e hai bisogno di aumentare ancora l'apertura ("f grande" = diaframma chiuso = più profondità di campo).
  • Riguardo al problema dei dettagli, nel software di post produzione cerca un modulo relativo al controllo dei dettagli (in Lightroom si chiama "Details" e contiene "Sharpness" e "Noise reduction"). In questo modo puoi dare un tocco di chiarezza alla foto in modo naturale, senza aumentare il contrasto (ma attento a non esagerare). Questo potrebbe far emergere un po' di rumore: se necessario, successivamente usa il "noise reduction", ma con molta moderazione e cautela, perché assieme al rumore smusserà i dettagli :)
  • Mentre in post-produzione sistemi esposizione, ombre e luci, tieni un occhio sull'istogramma. Un'immagine più scura è descritta da una forma concentrata più a sinistra; viceversa, una forma concentrata a destra descrive un'immagine più scura. Se ci sono dei picchi sulla sinistra, sono presenti dei pixel totalmente neri; se ci sono dei picchi sulla destra, sono presenti molti pixel totalmente bianchi (possibile segnale d'allarme per parti sottoesposte o sovraesposte nell'immagine). In sostanza, l'istogramma rappresenta la distribuzione dei pixel per la loro luminosità (bordo sinistro = pixel con luminosità 0, bordo destro = pixel con luminosità 255, in mezzo tutte le gradazioni di luminosità).
    Ciao :) --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Grazie mille, adesso stampo i tuoi consigli e mi metterò a studiare, com macchina fotografica alla mano. Buona giornata! PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)PROPOLI87PROPOLI87 (talk) 07:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Prego, buon proseguimento anche a te! --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 20:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Populonia - Rocca1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 03:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calafuria - Livorno Le onde si infrangono sugli scogli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good enough for me --Vincent60030 16:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocus dopo la pioggia 10102020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 October 2020 (UTC)