Open main menu
Lapin.svg
You can of course leave me a message here,
but I am not that often around, so the swiftest way to contact me is
on my hu:Wikipédia talk page

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Pallerti!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

szia

  This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Pallerti (talk) 14:39, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

hogy kel ojat feltöltemi mint például ez szerkesztő ijesmiket

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Levente 2 (talk • contribs) 2014. november 2., 11:06‎ (UTC)
Minek magyarázzam el, megértenéd? Úgy, mint azt, hogy hogyan kell aláírni? --Pallerti (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

File:András Kozák.jpg

 
File:András Kozák.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Queryzo (talk) 14:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

File:András Kozák.jpg

 
File:András Kozák.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 17:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Péter Máté.jpg

Szia! Személyeknél a nevére kellene kategorizálni a képet. Így egyszerűbb beilleszteni az infoboxba. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 20:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

@Tambo: kösz a tippet, elég sokat kínlódtam a HotCat-tel, hogy valamilyen kategóriát találjak és valahogyan ez a teljesen kézenfekvő ötlet eszembe sem jutott. --Pallerti (talk) 15:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Trademarks

Hi Pallerti. You need to read this. --Leyo 12:36, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Müller Péter fénykép törlés

A kép törlésével kapcsolatban üzenet a vitalapomon található.   Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 21:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Budapest, Uri utca 9. Barlanglejarat.jpg

Szia! Védelem kellene ennek a képnek, Fauvirt mondta esetleg tudnál segíteni a zoknibábok ellen (77.234.45.134 és 77.234.45.138). Köszönettel. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 14:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

@Globetrotter19: Én sajnos itt a commonson nem tudok ebben segíteni, mert itt nem vagyok admin de közben meglehetősen eszkalálódott a helyzet és egy kicsit én jobban képbe kerültem: röviden össszefoglalva: a Wikidata szerkesztései vissza lettek állítva, itt a commonson szintén, az enwikin leürítve a szócikk ellenőrizhetetlen információk betömködése miatt, illetve egy csomó projektben blokkolva lettek zoknibábjai. A legújabb fejleményként a Budavári Labirintus cikkről itt indítottam egy törlési megbeszélést, örömmel fogadnám, ha kifejtenéd ott a véleményedet. Itt tudod megtenni: https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:T%C3%B6rl%C3%A9sre_javasolt_lapok#Budav.C3.A1ri_Labirintus --Pallerti (talk) 18:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Láttam! Köszönöm a közremüködést. A hozzászólást megtettem! - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
@Globetrotter19: Köszönöm szépen! --Pallerti (talk) 18:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your deletion request

Hi Pallerti,

i have reset your delete request. Reason: All images were uploaded in 2009 to commons. They are probably used on the web pages. Examples:

This pages is from 2010.

For this picture and some others you have specified this source. There the pictures have a lower resolution.

Best regards, Hystrix (talk) 19:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Hystrix: Hi Hystrix, you are right, indeed, after so much time it is not easy to find the real source of a photo, however the situation is more complicated: the former operator of the cave posts threatening comments on huwiki on the talk page of the article, demanding removal of copyrighted material. He claims his material is used without permission. The photos are not linked to the article any more. I do not find it confirmed that that they have been created by user:Krokip and he is allowed to publish them under free license, considering that they are of very low resolution and alsmost all of them can be found on the webpage of the former operator. In addition, since a few days it can be read on the website that in spite of the court rulings the operator of the cave (the new operator) deliberately tries to mislead the public with the aid of a few wikipedians. (Of course, we do not know of any court rulings, obviously this is plain threatening). The decision is yours, but I think these photos must be deleted due to their unclarified nature. Best regards, --Pallerti (talk) 18:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Die Bilder habe ich nochmals zur Löschung vorgesclagen. Frohes Schaffen noch, Hystrix (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Luigi (Wii Games Summer 2010 - Luigi and Mario (4975312533)).jpg

 
File:Luigi (Wii Games Summer 2010 - Luigi and Mario (4975312533)).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Y.haruo (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:Moson-Danube_floods_in_2013

Globetrotter19 (talk) 16:46, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 06:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Rainer Péter (ME).jpg

Bocsánattal tartozom én is, mert sajnos én sem vettem észre az engedélyben a beleírt tiltást. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 19:30, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

@Hungarikusz Firkász: ugyan, ne viccelj, megesik ez, látod még úgyis, hogy ketten nézzük és ketten nem vesszük észre. Még szerencse, hogy valaki résen volt és rögtön tudta jelezni IRC-n az OTRS-adminoknak. --Pallerti (talk) 19:36, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Egyébként is, mással is előfordult már ilyesmi, csak ott sikeresebb volt a végkimenetel. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
@Hungarikusz Firkász: Igen emlékszem rá, de legalább most megtudtuk, hogy mi ilyenkor a helyes eljárás, így kell ezt csinálni. --Pallerti (talk) 20:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Igen-igen. Csak nekünk valahogy, valamiért ez a fajta eljárás nem jutott (volna) eszünkbe. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 01:10, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Képek

A feltöltött képeim mind saját készítésűek. Ha csak közkincsű (60-70 éves) műveket lehet fényképezni, akkor csak a Zola kötetről készült kép maradhat, a kötet az 1920-as években lett kiadva [1]. 12akd (talk) 10:59, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

@12akd: Attól, hogy a huszas években lett kiadva még nem következik egyenesen, hogy közkincs régi, mivel a szerző elhunytát követ hetvenedik évben lenne közkincs, amennyiben ismert a szerző személye, amennyiben pedig ismeretlen, azt meg kell indokolni, hogy miért nem lehetséges a szerző személyének megállapítása. --Pallerti (talk) 11:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Pallerti".