Open main menu
I will often respond to messages left on this talk page here, not on the talk pages of the users who left them.
If I wrote on your page, I am watching it, so replying there is probably best.
Archive
Archives

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Loco 2014 - Fondering & Prince Koloni - 9668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI. --P e z i 20:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Loco 2014 - Fondering & Prince Koloni - 9635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 13:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Loco 2014 - Stéphane Castry - 9413.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Smial 10:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Aide sur la procédure de suppression de fichierEdit

Bonjour,
Je me permets de demander ton aide à propos d'un fichier à supprimer. J'ai créé hier matin un sujet sur le Bistro à propos de deux fichiers presque identiques dont le premier est manifestement à supprimer comme je l'explique ICI. Pour accélérer le traitement, j'ai posé sur ce fichier une proposition de suppression. Mais, celle-ci indique que la demande est incomplète parce que je n'aurais pas créé de sous-page ad hoc. Or, celle-ci existe : Commons:Deletion requests/File:CHEPY.JPG. Pourrais-tu regarder ce qui ne va pas. Merci d'avance. Cordialement. Geralix (talk) 16:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Ma demande est devenue sans objet car le fichier vient d'être supprimé. Geralix (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nave of the Ste Cécile Cathedral - 2014-02-22.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nave of the Ste Cécile Cathedral - 2014-02-22.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarah Chepchirchir - Paris Half Marathon - 5222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

timestamp for archive: PierreSelim (talk) 07:01, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rio Loco 2014 - Stéphane Castry - 9402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good for me.--Lmbuga 18:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

DeletedEdit

Estimate PierreSelim:

Files are used by reversals. Se usan los archivos por reversiones. Soi usan los reversiones archivos por.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buenos Aires 1972.jpg
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Buenos Aires 1954.png

You propose an edit war? ¿Propones una guerra de ediciones? Vous proposez une guerre d'édition?


Greetings: Girardelli G. Escucho 14:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

I proposed that each project choose the media it prefers. French Wikipedian have found an interest in this version of the File, so we keep it, this is a common practice we do here in Wikimedia Commons, we do not judge what is useful to another wiki. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 
All map images in this gallery could be recreated using vector graphics as SVG files. This has several advantages; see Commons:Media for cleanup for more information. If an SVG form of this image is available, please upload it and afterwards replace this template with {{vector version available|new image name}}.
Ceux-ci sont d'ordre politique. Girardelli G. Escucho 14:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry, there is no SVG version of the file used on the french wikipedia. The SVG you propose is not a better duplicate, it's something else which is in spanish. If you disagree, we can ask other opinions on the admin noticeboard COM:AN. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Il est français! Pourquoi écrire en anglais?
Courtoisie, pourrait répondre sur ma page de discussion. Ainsi, le wiki laissez-moi savoir.
Fichiers à supprimer proposées sont en espagnol.
fr.wikipedia.org est le monde, mais le montage utilisateurs enregistrés, en particulier pour les francophones.
es.wikipedia.org est le monde, mais la modification des utilisateurs, en particulier les hispanophones enregistré.
L'Oscar et Juan Galvez Autodrome est argentin, ou hispanophones.
Qu'est-ce que vous voulez? revenir au papier Encyclopedia Britannica, les tablettes d'argile des Sumériens, ou simple transmission orale du savoir.
bmp, jpg, gif, png, svg, tout devient obsolète au fil du temps. Ce que le français va continuer à les soutenir?Ils n'ont rien logique d'utiliser png et jpg,
juste sectarisme.
Avec le plus grand respect:

Girardelli G. Escucho 17:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Si c'est pour m'insulter sur ma page de discussion, je vous souhaite bon vent. Je n'ai pas que cela à faire de perdre mon temps avec quelqu'un qui ne comprend pas les pratiques de notre projet et qui est grossier. Je ne vous réponderais plus. Bonne journée. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

UrgentEdit

Bonjour Pierre. Samedi prochain nous remettons la médaille de la ville de Toulouse à Meave Leakey et Richard Leakey il y aura aussi des paléoanthropologues dont tu trouvera la liste sur notre site. [www.tahfr.cnrs.fr ici] et Yves Coppens. C'est à la salles des Illustres. Tu peux venir avec Caroline. Si tu ne peux pas un wikipédien pourrait il venir tirer le portrait de ces braves gens... Merci --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus, Léna:: Bonjour Archaeodontosaurus, c'est une idée très interessante, sais-tu si on a besoin d'invitation ou si on peut arriver "comme ça" sans problème ? --PierreSelim (talk) 08:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Il faut une invitation mais je serai là ou bien j'en ai je peux te la faire passer (pour deux personnes). Le vendredi soir ils seront également fêter au Muséum (amphi Picot) avec remise de médailles de l'université. Dis moi ce qui vous arrange le mieux. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Je pense que la salle des illustres est plus pratique pour faire des photos (l'amphi picot est assez sombre de mémoire) --PierreSelim (talk) 09:41, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Ca serait à quelle heure ? Ca m'intéresse de venir, je rejoins Pierre-Selim pour la remarque sur les photos mais suis aussi dispo vendredi soir et je pense que ça peut être intéressant de couvrir les deux ? Léna (talk) 09:47, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Vous êtes les bienvenue les deux jour vendredi 19:15-20:00 et Samedi 19:00-20:00. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Ok, on devrait venir aux deux du coup! --PierreSelim (talk) 05:27, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Gros raté pour ma part hier ... je suis arrivée trop tôt, j'avais pas vu que c'était 19h15 et non 19h :( --PierreSelim (talk) 08:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Surtout que c'est pour cette semaine. 26 et 27 septembre. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Je vais mettre cela sur la carte de la fatigue :). Bref, j'ai pu prendre des photos sympa du défilé des géants samedi soir :-) --PierreSelim (talk) 07:01, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
  • as tu reçu mon Email? La photo devant le théâtre est très attendu. Si toi ou Caroline ne pouvez venir il me faut un plan B. Je préférerai, et de loin, que ce soit vous qui la fassiez. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 OK pour moi, désolé, j'ai complètement oublié de te répondre hier soir. --PierreSelim (talk) 09:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Alex-Ebert1011.jpgEdit

 
File:Alex-Ebert1011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tristan Loper (talk) 23:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Oversight attention neededEdit

INeverCry 02:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

COM:SPLITEdit

Hi, could you please move the top version of File:BSicon uABZmgr.svg back to File:BSicon mABZrf.svg? That's what I meant at COM:SPLIT... Thanks. YLSS (talk) 13:32, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

OSEdit

INeverCry 04:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)


I'm not sure if mine is related to INeverCry's OS request, but anyway I have OS request too. — revimsg 18:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Upload issuesEdit

Hello pierreselim

J'ai besoin d'aide !!! Enfin, pas moi. user:erinamukuta. Ce week-end, elle organisait une chasse photo suivie d'une session d'upload de groupe. Connexion trop pourrie... ils n'ont pas réussi à uploader les photos. Est-il possible que quelqu'un lui donne un coup de main ? Et si oui, comment faire ? Il doit y avoir un peu plus de 100 fichiers. Je présume qu'elle doit pouvoir les mettre sur une dropbox en prenant beaucouuuuuuup de temps. Je suis totalement incapable de la piloter pour utiliser Commonist (je ne sais pas comment ça marche). Est-il possible que quelqu'un les upload pour elle ? (enfin, eux). Anthere (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

@Jean-Frédéric, Anthere: Une solution pourrait être de tout mettre sur flickr, puis d'utiliser un outil pour le transfert vers Commons. J'essaye de réfléchir à cela. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:50, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Erina a réussi à les uploader sur une drop box... https://www.dropbox.com/sh/cp6mm5eg8381lp6/AACzwBArUyw4rZeo06HkipxYa?dl=0
Qu'est-ce que tu suggères ? Je peux lui demander de préparer un fichier tableur incluant nomfichier, auteur, licence, description, categories mais quel serait le meilleur format pour cela ? Anthere (talk) 19:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Toulouse marathonEdit

Hello !

Je t'ai vu en train de prendre les photos sur le pont neuf lors du marathon de Toulouse. Je t'ai appelé mais je sais pas si tu m'as reconnu... Je pense aussi avoir vu Léna sur le pont des catalans. Je l'ai appelée mais elle n'a pas répondu. Elle était là ? Udufruduhu (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Je t'ai entendu, et entre aperçu dans la masse. Léna était bien pont des catalans en début de Marathon. --PierreSelim (talk) 14:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
ah je me disais bien aussi :-). En tout cas c'était une belle course. Udufruduhu (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! November 11th ceremony in Toulouse in 2014 - 3826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good --DXR 22:05, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! November 11th ceremony in Toulouse in 2014 - 3869 - Moudenc, Mailhos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. Maybe a dust spot (see note)--Jebulon 16:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marathon de Toulouse 2014 - 3005 - Handisport - Pont Neuf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support maybe a bit dark, however good and nice --Christian Ferrer 09:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

WLMEdit

Hi

I see, you are jury member of international WLM. So I have a question about evaluating of photos. What are you doing if user uploads new version of photo? Do you count this version during evaluation? And what if it was uploaded as different file like this photo is better version of this one?--Anatoliy (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Anatoliy,
I would count the last uploaded pictures within the date of the contest. If it is uploaded as separated files, I would evaluate both files: meaning that if one was uploaded after the end of the contest, it would not be evaluated. I hope it helps. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:51, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marathon de Toulouse 2014 - 3266 - Claude Issorat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 08:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!Edit

  * * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 20:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC)  

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-2015 Crabos A - Toulouse vs Albi - 6533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-2015 Crabos A - Toulouse vs Albi - 6555.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-2015 Crabos A - Toulouse vs Albi - 6551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Excellent quality and composition.--ArildV 10:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! November 11th ceremony in Toulouse in 2014 - 3769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 10:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 30.JPGEdit

 
File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 30.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vikiçizer (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 28.JPGEdit

 
File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 28.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vikiçizer (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 08.JPGEdit

 
File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 08.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vikiçizer (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 26.JPGEdit

 
File:Lac d'Annecy 20120101 - 26.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vikiçizer (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ismo Vorstermans.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 22:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eglise Saint-Pierre des Chartreux - Maitre Autel.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eglise Saint-Pierre des Chartreux - Maitre Autel.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Jarekt, You could probably have droped me a word without puting the template as this is an obvious mistake. Well, I'm adding the licence tags. --PierreSelim (talk) 18:56, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Pierre, sorry about impersonal template, but I an using a batch script and the same exact message goes to people that have been editing for a day and for a decade. In the last batch there were 233 files that were uploaded without a license within last several days. Once I even added it to my own page. --Jarekt (talk) 19:23, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Don't be sorry Jarekt, I overreacted. Thank you for checking the files, and the most important thing is that files now have proper licence and are usable for people. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulousaine de l'automobile - 7441 - BMW i3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 16:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

File:TE M8401.jpgEdit

Coucou, est-ce que tu pourrais vérifier le ticket OTRS 2015040710018362 qui est sur File:TE M8401.jpg ? Mirceaoctavian (talk · contribs) a importé un lot de photos prises par un autre, mais seule celle-ci porte un ticket OTRS, les autres n'ayant même pas la même licence. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Il semblerait que le ticket soit OK, mais du coup j'ai dû l'ajouter à la main sur les autres fichiers, qu'il faut donc vérifier. Qu'une pluie de chocolatines s'abatte sur toi, tout ça. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:37, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Foot US - Women French Championship - Day 2 - Ours vs Argocanes - 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. A QIC Sports section would be nice. --Kadellar 00:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Foot US - Women French Championship - Day 2 - Ours vs Argocanes - 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kadellar 00:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin - 0339 - 17052015 - Potsdamer platz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin - 0266 - 16052015 - Brandenburger Tor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:28, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Dario Taraborelli at Wikimania 2014Edit

File:Wikimania 2014 - Day 2 - 1781.JPG and File:Wikimania 2014 Day 2 (14917324321).jpg seem to be duplicates but their colors are strangely different. How is that? --Ricordisamoa 01:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Ricordisamoa, the difference comes from a different choice of white balance.
--PierreSelim (talk) 06:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
If both should be kept, why can't the former use the full res? --Ricordisamoa 21:42, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Probably should delete and redirect the former. It can't be full res, because I'm shooting RAW+small jpeg, hence the jpeg are only 2592 pixel wide :) --PierreSelim (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-25Edit

15:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-26Edit

15:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-27Edit

15:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

OversightEdit

Please could you oversight the most recent IP address here, as I forgot to log in. --Reception123 (talk) 18:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

@Reception123: it's done --PierreSelim (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. --Reception123 (talk) 06:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
You're welcome. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:14, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-28Edit

15:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-29Edit

15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-30Edit

03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-31Edit

15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-32Edit

15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ciudad de Mexico - 1194 - Auditorio Nacional.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-33Edit

14:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-34Edit

16:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-35Edit

13:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-36Edit

21:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eglise Saint-Pierre des Chartreux - Maitre Autel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:25, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toulousaine de l'automobile - 7425 - Porsche 911 Carrera (2011).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 20:43, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-37Edit

17:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-38Edit

16:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 15 DecemberEdit

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnum wikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • TranslateGet help

Return to the user page of "PierreSelim/Archives/6".