Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pink kitty111!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:40, 27 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Asunder screenshot.png edit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Asunder screenshot.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.

العربية  Deutsch  English  español  français  日本語  മലയാളം  polski  português  slovenščina  svenska  Tiếng Việt  +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 14:36, 30 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

well - it was not caused by me, i just exposed the problem to you. sure i can fix it - but you could have done that as well instead of complaining. it's really trivial.--Pink kitty111 (talk) 01:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

vp9 edit

You wrote on the converting video page that commons supports vp9. Unless i missed something that's not true. Why do you think that's the case? Bawolff (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

It is written on that other help page that is linked right next to that section. So I thought this one is likely to be just out of date and copied it over. Also, I just uploaded a VP9 file. While transcoding doesn't seem to be supported yet, Commons obviously accepts the new webm files.--Pink kitty111 (talk) 03:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Well we've accepted them for years. You may or may not be able to view it depending on your browser. Thumbnails definitely don't work. I don't think we should encourage users to upload such files until they actually work properly on commons (With transcoding and thumbnails). Bawolff (talk) 08:55, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Crypto.cat intro.webm edit

 
File:Crypto.cat intro.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

1989 21:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I could have sworn it was available under a free license... :-( --Pink kitty111 (talk) 18:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Heatmap "Banana" edit

It would be very kind of you, if you could try to create an improved (brighter!) version of this "own work" of you; is it possible that your screen is a mirroring one? ... (See also the Diskussion of that image.)

--arilou (talk) 11:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

My screen type has nothing to do with it. I didn't modify the colours of the original output of pngthermal.
Among other things this means that you have the same possibilities as I have to alter or recreate that image. I've uploaded and linked the source file.
But really, I don't understand what you're talking about. The brightest colour is already close to saturating the red channel. And what dark colours are there that you can't easily discern? Most areas are either very bright or uniformly dark blue: Except for that one dark blue colour, nearly all the pixels in the image have a luminance value of 176 or greater. Are we talking about the same file?..--Pink kitty111 (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
I can somewhat follow your argumentation now. I can see how the darker red and black get close to the dark blue on the other end of the scale. But I can't see much of a problem in failing to accurately discern all shades of red: They are just shades of "bad" (compressionwise). But the problem is pretty theoretical and does hardly apply to the specific file at hand, does it?
I thought about the colour choice, too. But I ended up being pretty satisfied with the choice. But just now I get the idea, that the pink/magenta range of the colour spectrum is not used and it might be a better choice to have the red run more into magenta than towards black. We can try and convince the author of pngthermal of the idea - but I don't see much relevance for the file at hand (yet?)...--Pink kitty111 (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oh - he already uses purple: For the filter type. See the left two columns of pixels.--Pink kitty111 (talk) 19:35, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
Wait - white is available! - Do I get closer to what you meant to tell me?.. :-)--Pink kitty111 (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Anyway, I maximised the global contrast now to use full range available. But the difference is barely noticeable...--Pink kitty111 (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Nyan tomcat.gif edit

 
File:Nyan tomcat.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liance (talk) 16:00, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:PNG demo Banana.png edit

 
File:PNG demo Banana.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mayhair (talk) 22:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply