PtrQs

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PtrQs!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres RosetteNord 121 DSC08241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bonne qualite'. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres RosetteSued 122 DSC08269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tres bonne qualite' selon moi. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BraunschweigerDom ImervardKreuz DSC00069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Chartres RosetteSued 122 DSC08269.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Chartres RosetteSued 122 DSC08269.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bienenfreund PhaceliaTanacetifolia DSC03005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 06:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Chartres_cathedral_en_lumiere.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

  Done - I added the geocoding--PtrQs (Diskussion) 09:57, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment - I think there's a question of whether this photo is clearly better in scope than File:France Eure et Loir Chartres en lumieres 2006 Eglise Saint Aignan 01.jpg, and File:France Eure et Loir Chartres en lumieres 2006 Eglise Saint Pierre.jpg may be the best. How would we resolve this question? Would you like to narrow the scope by adding the word "Cathedral"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for your advice - and the en-lumiere-hint for some visitors ;-) --PtrQs (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Category:Chartres_en_lumieres to Category:Chartres_cathedral_en_lumiere --PtrQs (talk) 00:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Question What about copyright (as by the Eiffel tower illumination)? There is no FoP in France. --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:05, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support without prejudice to the FoP issue. That would be best decided by nominating the photo for deletion for copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! COMMONS PontCroix DSC08170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight unsharpness in the corners but in general very high quality, good composition and an excellent retro photo. -- Ikan Kekek 00:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BenzingerodeMenhir 20170128c PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FriedhofBraunschweig DSC01020 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dllu 04:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LA Franzelinhaus 201702 DSC01262 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, and sharp enough for QI. Ikan Kekek 02:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:PhareDeLaVieille DSC08477 BW PtrQs.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:PhareDeLaVieille DSC08477 BW PtrQs.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PointDuRaz DSC00375 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The sky needs a bit of noise reduction, otherwise QI for me--Moroder 13:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)  Done. Thank you Moroder - and I made the white crests white. OK now? --PtrQs 00:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 13:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BrockenImRegen DSC00855 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful composition; quality is sufficient for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 02:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres RosetteOuest baie 050 lancetteCentral DSC08238 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres baie 005 DSC08251 DSC0853 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chartres RosetteSued 122 Detail DSC08258 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BraunschweigerDom Vierung WB2485 DSC00065 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:18, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama HalberstaedterDom 01 DSC01338 ER PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The empty square with the long shadows reminds me of De Chirico, except for the cars and such. -- Ikan Kekek 04:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PhareDeLaVieille DSC08079 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bonne qualité. -- Ikan Kekek 04:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:BraunschweigerDom Vierung WB2485 DSC00065 PtrQs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:BraunschweigerDom Vierung WB2485 DSC00065 PtrQs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama AdolfStrasse 01 DSC01419 03 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I would crop away nearly 1/4 at the top and 1/10 at the bottom --A.Savin 11:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  Done For this type of architecture I prefer the more static square format, but as my hardest critic (also called wife) shares your view .. --PtrQs 23:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 10:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EuropeanHerringGulls B tugOfWar DSC03230 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Are they fighting or sharing? -- Ikan Kekek 01:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)  Comment They're fighting, but when the fish's spine snaps, they have a win-win situation - see 'other versions' of this image.--PtrQs 11:51, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang SaeulenTraeger DSC04709L DSC04710R Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang Saeule BlattKapitell DSC04718 BW PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang KapitellVoegel DSC04715L DSC04713R Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang A DSC04684 BW rectiLinear PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	For seeking friendly solutions to problems instead of confrontational. This is the kind of behavior this site needs more of. Thank you! cart-Talk 16:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Response to QIC feedback

Thanks for your feedback on my nominations, File:Ship in the SF Bay fog (40406).jpg and File:Marin Headlands (50849).jpg. My apologies for taking a while to respond to what you said. I've now uploaded new versions of both. For the ship, I can't say I have a lot of experience with color denoising, so I'm not sure if I addressed what you intended? For the other, I did a fairly mild manual defringe of the horizon -- please let me know if it still needs more? Also, I didn't get to the latter before it was archived, so it's now under August 31. Thanks! — Rhododendrites ^talk |  04:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Decke DSC05610 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Windows look a little odd if you think about them too much, so someone might request a perspective correction, but beautiful and good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Haupfschiff B DSC05571 RectiLinear PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 06:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom DSC05568 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One of the stained glass windows on the right looks blown, but the composition is great and the general level of quality is really solid, IMO. I don't think perspective correction is required for the right and left. -- Ikan Kekek 06:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Effective resolution

I'm a bit confused about your comment concerning effective resolution at QI for File:Maria cloud deck Assateague VA1.jpg. Can you provide a little more context? The image is 5472x3900, and while I did have to adjust exposure and contrast a little (slightly overexposed in the RAW version), I don't see a marked deterioration in quality as a result of the adjustment. My chief concern at the time was salt spray on the filter, as it was very windy and difficult to shield the camera, but it stayed reasonably clean. It may be that conditions at the time, with blowing sand and moisture, and atmospheric turbulence, weren't working in my favor. Acroterion (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• Hello @Acroterion: If I look at your picture, I see - in the small version - a picture in beautiful colors, showing a composition, where I instantly wish to stand on that beach and feel the wind in my hair. The problem begins, when I open the picture in full resolution. Unfortunately the details of waves and sand are blotchy and the persons on the right are distorted by the non-linear perspective of your lens. In result of this it is not possible to find any sharp area in the image. So with 'effective resolution' I'm talking about the length of pixels, which are distinguishable in full view of the image.
  It's a pity that the conditions did not allow you to make the picture you wanted to; but even giving myself a certain tolerance in reviewing pictures I really like, this is definitely off the QI standard. Btw: if you can't follow my reasoning, feel free to move your image to CR by marking it with 'Discuss' instead of 'Decline'.
  Hoping to have answered your question with enough detail, PtrQs (talk) 00:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, that helps a lot, and I appreciate your review. Now that you mention the non-linear perspective, I did adjust the perspective in Photoshop to keep the people from leaning into the picture - it was definitely not an environment in which I would take a tilt-shift lens. I've found that creates artifacts in images with lots of sky, and I see what you're talking about. I always appreciate constructive feedback, and this helps. Having looked at the sky in detail I agree with your assessment. Acroterion (talk) 00:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

By the way, the "wind in my hair" was certainly there, but the day before the wind was stronger, visibility was terrible, and I ended up with sand in my upwind ear - and it wasn't even a tropical storm force wind. Acroterion (talk) 01:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

How to visit peaks in Jotunheimen and other places in Norway

Hi PtrQs!

You actually don't need to book a tour to those areas, or any of the mountains areas in Norway, because the tourist lodges welkom all skiers, hikers and walkers. So, then in the high seeson, in the utermost consequens, you may have to sleep on a madreass at the livingroom floor. If you dont belive me you can read the artikkel "Den Norske Turistforening" at the german wikipedia.

Even if this mountain peeks looks dramatic on this picture, many of them is not so difficult to explore, espesialy at sommertime. You can see how the group I was with, managed it, see illustration.

Steep groove up against the Storebjørn

If you are are a well experienced cross country skier you can book the tour with thise toure: www.dntoslo.no/aktiviteter/91279/848404/ or some of the others arranged trips with volenter guids. But be awere that the trip up to the peak is not so likely to happend, becose it is not part of the program. It was actualy done becose I convinced the guides that I did know the spesial climbing rute (on the picture). But if you're lucky you can get a leader who knows this unusual way up.

More pictures from thise trip, you can see here: flickr/s/aHsm3McbvA

Kind regards --Frankemann (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180102 Braunschweig Burgplatz Panorama DSC07785 mid equiRect PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171122 RueckHolz Schlosshof HerzJesuKapelle DSC07282 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171122 RueckHolz Schlosshof HerzJesuKapelle DSC07281 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:58, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171122 RueckHolz Schlosshof HerzJesuKapelle DSC07289 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170227 Panorama Reutte 03 DSC00914 H PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 23:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170902 KoenigslutterKaiserdom Hauptschiff A DSC05489 Rectilinear 03 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170912 BraunschweigerDom Westwerk DSC05563 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Really nice! Could you remove the red CAs, please? --Basotxerri 19:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Thank you for that advice! Done --PtrQs 22:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171231 Braunschweig Rathaus DSC07777 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now, good job! --Poco a poco 20:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180816 Hopfensee AllgaeuerAlpen DSC00510 HK PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)

			* Happy Holidays 2019, PtrQs! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180225 BraunschweigerLoewe DSC08437 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180224 BraunschweigerDom vonSuedOst DSC08413 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GT1976 21:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171231 Braunschweig Burgplatz Nacht DSC07770 small PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171017 BraunschweigerDom SeitenschiffSued 02 DSC06745 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171029 SchlossFassade RL breit DSC00157 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20150215 KlosterAmelungsborn ohneVierungsturm DSC01037 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20140327 Rostock Marienkirche DSC09871 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Pantokrator DSC05568 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 18:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KoenigsLutter KaiserDom LoewenPortal Rechts DSC04776L DSC04775R Detail Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171126 Lechaschau Ottilienkapelle DSC07471 16b9 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful, you really transport me there. -- Ikan Kekek 03:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LA MartinsKapelle 201702 DSC01254 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KoenigsLutter KaiserDom LoewenPortal Links DSC04778L DSC04779R Detail 1 Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panorama Reutte Ehrenberg Highline179 DSC03793 mid PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08364 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08332 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight corner unsharpness but fine for QI. --King of Hearts 03:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08429 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08431 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08440 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20171001 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC06295 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08394 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180816 Hopfensee AbendStimmung DSC00509 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190117 Waengle Widum DSC07252 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180816 Hopfensee SUG DSC00521 PtrQs A.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20181105 BR296 ZBAHalleNord DSC09364-2 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Images

Do not have to be perfect. Adequate suffices. I know it's a painful process, which is why I haven't reviewed any of your QI nominations. Yet. And if you're unhappy, you're fully open to fix it yourself. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Danke

Einfach mal ein Dankeschön für deine konstruktiven, lobenden Kommentare in den letzten Tagen. Wir sind uns ja noch nicht im realen Leben begegnet, aber ich überlege, ob ich dieses Jahr zur WikiCon nach Wuppertal komme. Falls wir uns dort persönlich kennenlernen könnten, würde mich das freuen. Viel Erfolg und Spaß weiterhin hier auf Commons und beste Grüße aus Kalifornien, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear PtrQs,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Good evening,

Stains removed. Thank you. Sincerely.--Famberhorst (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PtrQs,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PtrQs,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi PtrQs,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20150429 Schoeningen PrzewalskiPferd DSC05760 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2019 - September - Horses/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture 20160816 KuehtaiTirol ZweiPferde DSC07078 PtrQs.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Horses, in September 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:40, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190619 MagnoliaObovata Destedt DSC08923 crop PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190618 MagnoliaObovata Destedt DSC08882 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:27, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190619 MagnoliaObovata Destedt DSC08908 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:07, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190707 Braunschweig StKatharinen DSC09075 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190604 Braunschweig StKatharinen DSC08398 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190707 Braunschweig StKatharinen DSC09084 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190501 BraunschweigerDom SouthWest DSC08198 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20190501 BraunschweigerDom Nave DSC08135 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180609 Braunschweig HauptBahnhof DSC08943 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Rather sad motif, but the quality is good. --Milseburg 11:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, PtrQs! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

20190519 Destedt OrangerieSpiegelung DSC08315 PtrQs.jpg

Da ich vor kurzem Fotos von einer Christbaumkugel machen wollte, verundert mich dieses Foto etwas. Eigentlich müsste der Fotograf oder wenigstens der Fotoapparat im Foto auftauchen. Ist das nachträglich entfernt?--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Hallo @Giftzwerg 88: Das Stativ und die Kamera sind sichtbar - aber dank der Verwendung eines Teles (135mm) und der Verkleinerung des konvexen Spiegels kaum sichtbar. Man sieht in der Vollansicht in der Türmitte die schrägen Beine des Stativs und darüber als kleinen schwarzen Kreis die Frontlinse. Da ich an diesem Tag eigentlich die Magnolien im Gutspark photographieren wollte, hatte ich den Funkauslöser nicht dabei und musste mit Zeitauslöser und einem kleinen Sprint arbeiten, um nicht selbst auf dem Bild zu erscheinen ;-) Viel Glück bei den nächsten Versuchen! --PtrQs (talk) 21:40, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Ja, jetzt wo du es sagst. Ich habe nicht außerhalb des Raums gesucht. Eine Kamera im Raum würde man tausend mal in den Reflexionen der Kerzenleuchter wiederfinden, es wäre sehr schwer, das alles im Post zu retuschieren.--Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 21:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 05:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200419 Destedt MagnoliaObovata DSC01774 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 01:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200419 Destedt MagnoliaObovata DSC01783 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200421 Destedt MagnoliaObovata DSC01864 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200419 Destedt MagnoliaObovata DSC01796 DSC01797 merged PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful! How many photos did you stitch? -- Ikan Kekek 01:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)  Comment @Ikan Kekek: Thanx. I stitched just two pictures, as I could not get the silver leaf in focus with the rest. And then it took some time to wipe the artefacts in between, as PTGUI is not really fitted for such non-panoramic work. --PtrQs 16:33, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200426 Destedt MagnoliaObovata Blaetter DSC01890 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200426 Destedt MagnoliaObovata Blaetter DSC01887 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:58, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200529 MagnoliaObovata DSC02517 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200529 MagnoliaObovata DSC02513 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200809 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03184-2 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments All 3 flowers are quite sharp. A little underexposure might help bring out the highlights. --Tagooty 07:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200812 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03453K1 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 11:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:20200813 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03702 PtrQs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20200813 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03702 PtrQs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200812 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03453K1 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200813 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03641 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20200812 EchinopsisOxygona DSC03461 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2020 - October - Long distance views/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture 20181020 Reutte ZugSpitze SAG DSC00927a PtrQS.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Long distance views, in October 2020. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, PtrQs! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2020 - December - Allée/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Second Place
	Congratulations! Your picture 20150319 Volzum Nacht DSC01473 PtrQs.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Allée, in December 2020. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20120930 Plozevet DSC09612 PtrQs.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:08, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20150926 Bretagne IleDeSein DSC07804 PtrQs.jpg

And also:

• File:20150926 MonumentDesFrançaisLibres IleDeSein Bretagne DSC07805 PtrQs.jpg

Yours sincerely, Rehabmamet (talk) 16:11, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210811 EchinopsisOxygona DSC08836 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely, good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20201219 BraunschweigerZeitung HinterBruedern DSC05092 K4 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 01:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2021 - August - Contre-jour/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture 20210811 EchinopsisOxygona DSC08836 PtrQs.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Contre-jour, in August 2021. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 02:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, PtrQs! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:20130816 Kuehtai TunnelUnderSkiingSlope DSC07218 PtrQs.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20130816 Kuehtai TunnelUnderSkiingSlope DSC07218 PtrQs.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220720 Agapanthus praecox DSC05212 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220724 BlaugrueneMosaikJungfer AeshnaCyanea DSC05274 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:43, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, PtrQs! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2022! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear PtrQs,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2022, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 150K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 35 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2022.

Kind regards, Wiki Loves Monuments team, 09:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20210131 twig withBuds coveredByIce DSC05404 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ice crystals showing tower-like structures, basically hexagonal cones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is too broad.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for your review. As up to now there is no smaller categrory within Close-up photographs of frost, I'd change to the smaller Close-up photographs of hoar frost. If that's still too broad I'll think about creating some new categories within Ice crystals differentiating by the number of dimensions of the crystal structre. --PtrQs (talk) 13:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

It’s about this photo

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image 20210131 twig withBuds coveredByIce DSC05404 PtrQs.jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck! --Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:20210131 twig withBuds coveredByIce DSC05404 PtrQs.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20210131 twig withBuds coveredByIce DSC05404 PtrQs.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20180110 Halle AmGueterbahnhof RottenPlaces DSC07887 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20220515 MS Utting Ammersee DSC03805 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 02:55, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20150922 Belem DSC06852 16x9 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20230711 GrossePechlibelle PaarungsRad IschnuraElegans mating DSC01541 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo PtrQs,

Sieger 2022 – Kloster Paulinzella

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2023 findet zum dreizehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat Radomianin mit einer Gesamtansicht von Kloster Paulinzella gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2022 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden – zum Beispiel die Denkmallisten in Waltershausen in Thüringen oder in Fulda.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Für das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden können. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr „drei Sonderpreise für Bilder von Friedhöfen“ ausgelobt. Zugelassen sind für den Sonderpreis auch Fotos von Friedhöfen, die nicht denkmalgeschützt sind.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos via the new Upload-Map 

Upload your photos for the special price 

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 12:22, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten

✴ Happy Holidays, PtrQs ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 15:54, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20240414 Krabbenspinne in Tulpe MisumenaVatia DSC06178 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)