Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, PtrQs!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chartres RosetteNord 121 DSC08241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Bonne qualite'. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chartres RosetteSued 122 DSC08269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Tres bonne qualite' selon moi. -- Ikan Kekek 04:11, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BraunschweigerDom ImervardKreuz DSC00069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 06:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Chartres RosetteSued 122 DSC08269.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Chartres RosetteSued 122 DSC08269.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bienenfreund PhaceliaTanacetifolia DSC03005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 06:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Chartres_cathedral_en_lumiere.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COMMONS PontCroix DSC08170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Slight unsharpness in the corners but in general very high quality, good composition and an excellent retro photo. -- Ikan Kekek 00:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BenzingerodeMenhir 20170128c PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FriedhofBraunschweig DSC01020 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Dllu 04:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LA Franzelinhaus 201702 DSC01262 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good composition, and sharp enough for QI. Ikan Kekek 02:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:PhareDeLaVieille DSC08477 BW PtrQs.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:PhareDeLaVieille DSC08477 BW PtrQs.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PointDuRaz DSC00375 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment The sky needs a bit of noise reduction, otherwise QI for me--Moroder 13:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
  Done. Thank you Moroder - and I made the white crests white. OK now? --PtrQs 00:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --Moroder 13:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BrockenImRegen DSC00855 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful composition; quality is sufficient for QI, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek 02:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chartres RosetteOuest baie 050 lancetteCentral DSC08238 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chartres baie 005 DSC08251 DSC0853 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --DXR 07:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chartres RosetteSued 122 Detail DSC08258 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 04:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BraunschweigerDom Vierung WB2485 DSC00065 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 06:18, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama HalberstaedterDom 01 DSC01338 ER PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The empty square with the long shadows reminds me of De Chirico, except for the cars and such. -- Ikan Kekek 04:08, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PhareDeLaVieille DSC08079 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Bonne qualité. -- Ikan Kekek 04:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:BraunschweigerDom Vierung WB2485 DSC00065 PtrQs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:BraunschweigerDom Vierung WB2485 DSC00065 PtrQs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama AdolfStrasse 01 DSC01419 03 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment I would crop away nearly 1/4 at the top and 1/10 at the bottom --A.Savin 11:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
  Done For this type of architecture I prefer the more static square format, but as my hardest critic (also called wife) shares your view ..   --PtrQs 23:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 10:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EuropeanHerringGulls B tugOfWar DSC03230 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. Are they fighting or sharing? -- Ikan Kekek 01:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)   Comment They're fighting, but when the fish's spine snaps, they have a win-win situation - see 'other versions' of this image.--PtrQs 11:51, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang SaeulenTraeger DSC04709L DSC04710R Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang Saeule BlattKapitell DSC04718 BW PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang KapitellVoegel DSC04715L DSC04713R Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Kreuzgang A DSC04684 BW rectiLinear PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- PumpkinSky 01:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Civility Barnstar
For seeking friendly solutions to problems instead of confrontational. This is the kind of behavior this site needs more of.   Thank you! cart-Talk 16:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Response to QIC feedbackEdit

Thanks for your feedback on my nominations, File:Ship in the SF Bay fog (40406).jpg and File:Marin Headlands (50849).jpg. My apologies for taking a while to respond to what you said. I've now uploaded new versions of both. For the ship, I can't say I have a lot of experience with color denoising, so I'm not sure if I addressed what you intended? For the other, I did a fairly mild manual defringe of the horizon -- please let me know if it still needs more? Also, I didn't get to the latter before it was archived, so it's now under August 31. Thanks! — Rhododendrites talk |  04:17, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Decke DSC05610 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Windows look a little odd if you think about them too much, so someone might request a perspective correction, but beautiful and good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Haupfschiff B DSC05571 RectiLinear PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very pretty. -- Ikan Kekek 06:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom DSC05568 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
One of the stained glass windows on the right looks blown, but the composition is great and the general level of quality is really solid, IMO. I don't think perspective correction is required for the right and left. -- Ikan Kekek 06:34, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Effective resolutionEdit

I'm a bit confused about your comment concerning effective resolution at QI for File:Maria cloud deck Assateague VA1.jpg. Can you provide a little more context? The image is 5472x3900, and while I did have to adjust exposure and contrast a little (slightly overexposed in the RAW version), I don't see a marked deterioration in quality as a result of the adjustment. My chief concern at the time was salt spray on the filter, as it was very windy and difficult to shield the camera, but it stayed reasonably clean. It may be that conditions at the time, with blowing sand and moisture, and atmospheric turbulence, weren't working in my favor. Acroterion (talk) 01:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  • Hello @Acroterion: If I look at your picture, I see - in the small version - a picture in beautiful colors, showing a composition, where I instantly wish to stand on that beach and feel the wind in my hair. The problem begins, when I open the picture in full resolution. Unfortunately the details of waves and sand are blotchy and the persons on the right are distorted by the non-linear perspective of your lens. In result of this it is not possible to find any sharp area in the image. So with 'effective resolution' I'm talking about the length of pixels, which are distinguishable in full view of the image.
    It's a pity that the conditions did not allow you to make the picture you wanted to; but even giving myself a certain tolerance in reviewing pictures I really like, this is definitely off the QI standard. Btw: if you can't follow my reasoning, feel free to move your image to CR by marking it with 'Discuss' instead of 'Decline'.
    Hoping to have answered your question with enough detail, PtrQs (talk) 00:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, that helps a lot, and I appreciate your review. Now that you mention the non-linear perspective, I did adjust the perspective in Photoshop to keep the people from leaning into the picture - it was definitely not an environment in which I would take a tilt-shift lens. I've found that creates artifacts in images with lots of sky, and I see what you're talking about. I always appreciate constructive feedback, and this helps. Having looked at the sky in detail I agree with your assessment. Acroterion (talk) 00:55, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
By the way, the "wind in my hair" was certainly there, but the day before the wind was stronger, visibility was terrible, and I ended up with sand in my upwind ear - and it wasn't even a tropical storm force wind. Acroterion (talk) 01:22, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

How to visit peaks in Jotunheimen and other places in NorwayEdit

Hi PtrQs!

You actually don't need to book a tour to those areas, or any of the mountains areas in Norway, because the tourist lodges welkom all skiers, hikers and walkers. So, then in the high seeson, in the utermost consequens, you may have to sleep on a madreass at the livingroom floor. If you dont belive me you can read the artikkel "Den Norske Turistforening" at the german wikipedia.

Even if this mountain peeks looks dramatic on this picture, many of them is not so difficult to explore, espesialy at sommertime. You can see how the group I was with, managed it, see illustration.

 
Steep groove up against the Storebjørn

If you are are a well experienced cross country skier you can book the tour with thise toure: www.dntoslo.no/aktiviteter/91279/848404/ or some of the others arranged trips with volenter guids. But be awere that the trip up to the peak is not so likely to happend, becose it is not part of the program. It was actualy done becose I convinced the guides that I did know the spesial climbing rute (on the picture). But if you're lucky you can get a leader who knows this unusual way up.

More pictures from thise trip, you can see here: flickr/s/aHsm3McbvA

Kind regards --Frankemann (talk) 20:56, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180102 Braunschweig Burgplatz Panorama DSC07785 mid equiRect PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171122 RueckHolz Schlosshof HerzJesuKapelle DSC07282 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 04:50, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171122 RueckHolz Schlosshof HerzJesuKapelle DSC07281 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:58, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171122 RueckHolz Schlosshof HerzJesuKapelle DSC07289 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170227 Panorama Reutte 03 DSC00914 H PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, Tournasol7 23:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170902 KoenigslutterKaiserdom Hauptschiff A DSC05489 Rectilinear 03 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 19:54, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170912 BraunschweigerDom Westwerk DSC05563 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Really nice! Could you remove the red CAs, please? --Basotxerri 19:36, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for that advice! Done --PtrQs 22:29, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:24, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171231 Braunschweig Rathaus DSC07777 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI now, good job! --Poco a poco 20:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180816 Hopfensee AllgaeuerAlpen DSC00510 HK PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


Happy holidays 2019! ;-)Edit

    * Happy Holidays 2019, PtrQs! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180225 BraunschweigerLoewe DSC08437 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180224 BraunschweigerDom vonSuedOst DSC08413 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 21:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171231 Braunschweig Burgplatz Nacht DSC07770 small PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171017 BraunschweigerDom SeitenschiffSued 02 DSC06745 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:07, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171029 SchlossFassade RL breit DSC00157 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20150215 KlosterAmelungsborn ohneVierungsturm DSC01037 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20140327 Rostock Marienkirche DSC09871 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 19:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170902 Koenigslutter Kaiserdom Pantokrator DSC05568 PtrQs.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 18:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KoenigsLutter KaiserDom LoewenPortal Rechts DSC04776L DSC04775R Detail Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:53, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171126 Lechaschau Ottilienkapelle DSC07471 16b9 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful, you really transport me there. -- Ikan Kekek 03:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LA MartinsKapelle 201702 DSC01254 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KoenigsLutter KaiserDom LoewenPortal Links DSC04778L DSC04779R Detail 1 Stereo PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Reutte Ehrenberg Highline179 DSC03793 mid PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08364 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08332 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Slight corner unsharpness but fine for QI. --King of Hearts 03:51, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08429 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08431 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08440 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20171001 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC06295 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20131003 Schoeningen Palaeon DSC08394 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180816 Hopfensee AbendStimmung DSC00509 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190117 Waengle Widum DSC07252 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180816 Hopfensee SUG DSC00521 PtrQs A.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20181105 BR296 ZBAHalleNord DSC09364-2 PtrQs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality ImagesEdit

Do not have to be perfect. Adequate suffices. I know it's a painful process, which is why I haven't reviewed any of your QI nominations. Yet. And if you're unhappy, you're fully open to fix it yourself. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

DankeEdit

Einfach mal ein Dankeschön für deine konstruktiven, lobenden Kommentare in den letzten Tagen. Wir sind uns ja noch nicht im realen Leben begegnet, aber ich überlege, ob ich dieses Jahr zur WikiCon nach Wuppertal komme. Falls wir uns dort persönlich kennenlernen könnten, würde mich das freuen. Viel Erfolg und Spaß weiterhin hier auf Commons und beste Grüße aus Kalifornien, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Vetgedrukte tekst== Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open! ==


Dear PtrQs,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Good evening,Edit

Stains removed. Thank you. Sincerely.--Famberhorst (talk) 19:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights SurveyEdit

RMaung (WMF) 01:12, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "PtrQs".