Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Qniemiec!

File:Wilhelm_Rotkiewicz_(1906-1983).jpg edit

 
File:Wilhelm_Rotkiewicz_(1906-1983).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   22:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Levi-Civita Symbol cen.png edit

Hi, thanks for uploading this image, if it's ok I drew a simplified version of the same thing in SVG (SVG was requested). I don't think there is much value in showing the projections of the components throughout the cubic array... what it the importance of the projections? The 3d illustration is enough to show the positions. Also, I didn't label the numbers, just drew arrows, the reader should be able to see which components can be labelled as which. Anyway, is it ok to substitute? If there are any features you want to recover, just let me know. Thanks again. Maschen (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done. In correcting/clarifying the figure I basically modified to your original (including the projections, could be helpful for something). Maschen (talk) 16:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Hoevelmann PET-bottles.jpg edit

 
File:Hoevelmann PET-bottles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🎂CAKE🎂 23:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please use colors that work with red-green color vision deficiency. Clear and strong contrast trumps all, and it's more important to focus on screens with intensive and bright colors, that those semi dark ones, that are optimized for presentations. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.219.179.16 (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Kernfusionen1 en.png edit

It bothered me that this image only showed the decay chains for Nickel-56 and Oxygen-15, when a few other nuclides in the diagram were also quite unstable, so I added the decay chains for Iron-52, Chromium-48, and Titanium-44, which fit nicely into an empty space in the diagram. Rather than recreating it from scratch, I tried to keep it very close to the original in look by editing pixel by pixel with KolourPaint and doing a lot of copying and pasting. I also corrected a few tiny obvious irregularities. However, I couldn't find exactly the same font as you used, and that is slightly noticeable, so you might want to correct that if you think it's important, since you're the one who's most likely to know what the original font was.

Also, I did not add the decay chains for Tritium and Beryllium-8, and I ignored the issue of excited states with the decay of Iron-52 into Manganese-52, since actually Iron-52 decays into Manganese-52m, and Iron-52m decays into Manganese-52, and the excited states both decay with short half-lives into the ground states of their respective elements, and it all seemed unnecessarily confusing and unimportant to try and fit into the diagram.

PS: As a probably unnecessary side-note, I can somewhat read and write German. Also, I'm sort of new to Wikipedia and I'm not sure if I've broke any kind of rule by editing the picture.DubleH (talk) 06:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I just realized that there is no tritium in the diagram. That's helium-3. That's one of two mistakes I made in the comment for when I edited the picture. So now Beryllium-8 is the only unstable "nuclide" in the diagram whose decay path is not shown. (I.e. it is still not marked that Beryllium-8 almost instantly splits into 2 alpha particles if not hit by another alpha particle.)DubleH (talk) 06:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Lot of work! :-) The fonts I use are mostly the commonly available Arial and Courier New. And of course, if one looks deeper in that issue, there is a lot of other fusion and decay reactions, which, if you tried to include them all, would finally leave a complete confusion at the reader's site. So I found it important to focus on the essential, i.e. upbuilding reactions, where e.g. Beryllium-8 is just an intermediate in 3-alpha process, while decays not leading to something up the ladder were ignored. And as far as it concerns Wikimedia rules, as long as you don't claim to be the initial author, but only edited something already existing, it's ok. However, if this led to something very different from the original, where the already existing picture only acted as "building material", this would be a "derivative work" with somewhat different "rulesof the game". Greetings, Qniemiec (talk) 10:05, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Euler diagram - x is not in A.png edit

Copyright status: File:Euler diagram - x is not in A.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Euler diagram - x is not in A.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open! edit

 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open! edit

 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Quinone reduction v0 en.png edit

Copyright status: File:Quinone reduction v0 en.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Quinone reduction v0 en.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:AAI-4 Modus Bamalip (Venn) RGB.png edit

Copyright status: File:AAI-4 Modus Bamalip (Venn) RGB.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:AAI-4 Modus Bamalip (Venn) RGB.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply