User talk:Rüdiger Wölk
[Pourquoi avez vous supprimé mon portrait labor_2006 sur ma page utilisateur http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Labor
Löschwunsch eigener BilderEdit
Hallo Rüdiger, es wäre schön, wenn du als Admin diese Bilder, die ich beim Umzug vom Wikivoyage-Shared (=aufgelöste Bilddatenbank von Wikivoyage) aussortiert habe, löschen könntest. Ich hoffe es geht unbürokratisch ohne offizielle Löschdiskussion (ist überflüssig). Es handelt sich um eigene Bilder bzw. Werke. Vielen Dank und Grüße --Dirk Schmidt (talk) 21:12, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!Edit
|The Photographer's Barnstar|
|Bin neulich auf deine Bilder gestoßen, super Aufnahmen! -- Steinsplitter (talk) 14:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)|
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:36, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Dear Rüdiger Wölk, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Hi Rüdiger Wölk! This is just to inform you that earlier today, you had your adminship privileges revoked on Meta by a Wikimedia steward. Thank you for you service as an administrator, and I hope you will stay active on Commons as a regular contributor. Of course, please do feel free to re-apply for adminship when you get more active. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletionEdit
|Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.