To leave me a message on the English wikipedia you may click here.


File:Hillary Clinton official White House portrait.jpg edit

Pay attention to copyright File:Hillary Clinton official White House portrait.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

-68.213.169.171 00:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up. I have contested speedy deletion on the image's talk page. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 11:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Rambo's Revenge!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Sorry I have checked categories there, and will try and remember to add them in future. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your Flickr reviewer request edit

I'm sorry, but you were not promoted. Please try again after you have gained some more experience. Regards, howcheng {chat} 18:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

PD review edit

Approved for PD review. RlevseTalk 09:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

PD? edit

File:Brown pelican - natures pics.jpg How can that be PD when the license is CC? RlevseTalk 17:33, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, sorry. This stems back to when I thought PD review was going to cover all images. I agree this is an incorrect tag and have fixed it accordingly. To my knowledge this was the only non-PD image that I'd tagged. I'm about to comments at PD talk now. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Rambo's Revenge (en.wiki) 09:30, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 3f3cd378224f5e1a52ac850a87db9ed4 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! Rambo's Revenge (en.wiki) 20:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bob Knight image edit

Regarding this edit, thank you for assuming good faith. I did not even realize that the photo was on Flickr. I got it and another one directly from the creator. I delayed sending him the release and getting it back to Wiki, thus the reason why OTRS pending was noted twice. →Wordbuilder (talk) 17:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your Flickr reviewer request edit

Hello,

As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. This means that you can start with reviewing Flickr images. I would like to ask you to be carefull and don't review images you upload yourself.

Did you know that there is a nice script you can use to add to Flickrreview buttons to your edit balk? When you add the code below in your monobook.js and you clear the cache you will see 2 new buttons, one for a good review and one for a failed one.

importScript("User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js");

Please see for more information the Commons:Flickr images/reviewers page, and add {{User trusted}} to your userpage. When you still need help or information feel free to come to my talkpage.

All the best, Huib talk 16:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Deletion requests/File:SRadhakrishnan.jpg edit

Hi, you forgot to list the deletion request and notify the author, I did so. Hekerui (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I deliberately didn't notify the author because they had one contribution since 2006, however I did obviously forget to complete the listing so thanks for fixing that for me. Rambo's Revenge (en.wiki) 18:36, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rambo's Revenge. You have new messages at Commons talk:PD files#Alfonso_Capdeville.27s_image.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Comment on File:MaynardKeenanMP.jpg edit

Hi! The image is an other version of File:Tool-Maynard-Rosklide.jpg and that image was reviewed by the Flickr review bot. So I guess we can asume, that license was free at that time. Will you look at it? --MGA73 (talk) 12:21, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've retracted my speedy, but have left the FlickrR template because I'm not sure how we should go about handling this assumption. Rambo's Revenge (en.wiki) 12:25, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I would say that we should either delete the Flickrreview template or copy the one from the original image: "Review on original: {{Flickr.....". --MGA73 (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yeah I like that second suggestion and see you've added it. Thanks, Rambo's Revenge (en.wiki) 16:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

PD review edit

Hi!

I write to you because you are listed here Commons:PD_files/reviewers#List_of_PD_reviewers.

The Category:PD files for review was flooded some time ago and perhaps therefore PD review seems to have stopped. After some discussion on Commons_talk:PD_files#Has_review_stopped? the category has been cleaned up.

Perhaps you would like to come back and take a look at some of the remaining files?

Thank you!

--MGA73 (talk) 15:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

OTRS permissions queues edit

Hello Rambo's Revenge. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply