Open main menu

Copyright status: File:Miter and compound saw ratings at 90 degrees.svgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Miter and compound saw ratings at 90 degrees.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Step-by-step White follower synthesis.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Step-by-step White follower synthesis.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Dolby A basic blocks RUS.svgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 17:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

  • My dear mechanical friend, could you please be more specific? What's wrong with PD-ineligible and what makes this one file stand out among scores of other PD-ineligibles? So far it was a valid tag: if it's ineligible it's enough. Did I miss something? Retired electrician (talk) 22:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Xenoturbella bockii longitudinal section.svgEdit

Здравствуйте. Не могли бы вы сделать английскую версию этого изображения? Я бы и сам, да боюсь ошибиться, не столь силён в биологии. Nonexyst (talk) 10:51, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Массовые номинацииEdit

Для однообразных массовых номинаций (одного загрузившего или из одной категории) пользуйтесь, пожалуйста, гаджетом COM:VFC (подключается в настройках). Облегчите жизнь себе и разбирающим запросы на удаление. Sealle (talk) 08:05, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Спасибо. Это несчастье вылезает как сорняк в огороде. Вроде "ещё вчера" снёс всё, что нашёл, а сегодня опять... Retired electrician (talk) 08:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Слайды ХаммондаEdit

  • Re: Category:Hammond Slides. Я вижу, вы поправили описания многих слайдов. Наверное, вы заметили, что я тоже ухаживаю за этой категорией, однако я не убираю эти слайды в Москву. Здесь возможна большая проблема.
  • Некоторые думают так: если в названиях слайдов есть Москва, и если в описаниях слайдов есть Москва, значит, они были сделаны в Москве.
  • Однако эти названия и описания даёт не Хаммонд и не его жена. Названия и описания даёт аспирантка из Вирджинского университета, которая ничего не знает об изображённых местах и людях. Профессор не оставил описаний этих слайдов, и в университете нет даже внятной группировки этих слайдов по подписанным коробкам. Поэтому доверять их названиям и описаниям — очень опасно!
  • Вот пример: File:School Procession Moscow 1964.jpg. Этот снимок сделан в городе Ярославль, однако никто в Вирджинском университете не знает об этом, и потому не может правильно описать снимок.
  • Я надеюсь, что вы вполне уверены в правках, которые делаете в коллекции Хаммонда. Я пишу это только для того, чтобы предупредить: нельзя доверять тем описаниям, которые даёт источник. Там много путаницы.
  • Спасибо. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:55, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
    • В курсе. Перепроверяю по гуглонатуре - если есть возможность. Иногда, тут например, и не соображу - где эту натуру искать. Должно быть, и следов её нет. Retired electrician (talk) 15:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
      • Спасибо! --PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
      • А там магазин галантерея в доме 17. Теоретически можно взять старый телефонный справочник... Правда, где его взять, я и вообразить не могу. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:10, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
        • Нашёл. Вот, чуял что большой дом - где-то на углу Садового кольца. И пошёл по гуглу вдоль окружности... Retired electrician (talk) 20:54, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Здравствуйте, коллега. Обратите внимание, пожалуйста, что в последней партии файлов много изображений отзеркалено, в т.ч. и несколько из тех, которые Вы уже дорабатывали (пример). Некоторое количество я уже перевернул, буду благодарен за помощь. Sealle (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

@Sealle: Так это сейчас вручную делается? Помню, раньше ставил Category:Images to be flopped back, наутро приходил rotatebot и сам заменял. Retired electrician (talk) 01:18, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Вот поворот 90/270 я точно оставляю боту, чтобы без потерь качества отработал, а на эту опцию как-то раньше и внимания не обращал. Спасибо, и тем не менее – чем больше глаз просмотрит, тем вероятнее все проблемные файлы найдутся. Уже перевёрнутые. Будете смотреть – сбрасывайте кэш браузера, а то можем так и два раза перевернуть, боту-то не всё ли равно. Sealle (talk) 01:33, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Inside vox ac30 layout.svgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 22:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


File:German Market in Moscow 1851 map.pngEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 10:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

  • Thank you again, my dear mechanical friend. Your gears and springs bring joy into my dull world. Retired electrician (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

НеопознанныйEdit

имхо ru:Толстой, Пётр Андреевич --Shakko (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

ПортретEdit

Здравствуйте! Это я недавно на странице обсуждений Ле Лоя поднял тему портрета Карла Фридриха Баденского. Сейчас хотел привлечь внимание к такой ситуации. Когда-то ознакомился с немецкой статьёй о вел. кн. Николае Николаевиче Старшем, где он был представлен этим портретом. Много позже я узнал, что на портрете - А. Н. Искандер. Я привёл аргументы на странице обсуждений Николая Николаевича (упор на значок к 100-летию Александровского лицея) и удалил портрет. Правку приняли, а портрет остался позабыт-позаброшен. Переименовать бы, а потом? В статье об Искандере - более полная, хоть и менее чёткая версия. Ссылки "Искандер на Викискладе" в статье нет. Ощущение тоски по приручённому и брошенному зверьку, да и не по-хозяйски это. 90.143.23.35 04:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

@Shakko:, это в вашу коллекцию знакомых незнакомцев. ?? Совершенно не представляю Искандера, но для Н.Н.Старшего, в самом деле, анахронизм. Retired electrician (talk) 06:44, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
можно добавить сюда[1] под вопросом --Shakko (talk) 10:31, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

File:MAKS office on Kashirskoye Highway in Moscow.JPGEdit

Вы добавили категорию Category:Former cinemas in Moscow в файл. Это бывшее здание кинотеатра? Вы уверены в этом? (С «Мечтой» не путаете?) Где про судьбу здания можно почитать? --Brateevsky {talk} 19:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

знаю только то что в викимапии указано. Вернусь в город отпишу подробнее - сейчас с планшета много не разыскать. Retired electrician (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
@Brateevsky:: Бывший "Детский дом культуры", дальше не нашёл - но на плане 1951 года здание уже есть. Кстати, вопрос в связи и ним, и с File:Moscow 1060 (13187554284).jpg - а есть ли сейчас категория для всевозможных домов пионеров и их современных преемников? нашёл глобальную Category:Pioneers Palaces, но не совсем то (и никак не связано с современностью). Retired electrician (talk) 00:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Tashkent Subdivisions Nocolour.svgEdit

 
File:Tashkent Subdivisions Nocolour.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Виталий Болбас (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Tashkent Subdivisions Nocolour.svgEdit

 
File:Tashkent Subdivisions Nocolour.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Виталий Болбас (talk) 20:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

WoopsEdit

Ну, раз уж так, вот вам тоже на заметку. Чья бы мычала и пр.--A.Savin 13:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Moscow, Serebryanicheskaya Embankment 11 and 15 (2012-01-14).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 08:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Low-drop voltage regulator with NMOS and TL431.pngEdit

Copyright status: File:Low-drop voltage regulator with NMOS and TL431.png

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Low-drop voltage regulator with NMOS and TL431.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 08:31, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Rostokinsky cable-stayed footbridgeEdit

Почему "Bridges to nowhere"? --A.Savin 01:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

  • [2] по правому берегу мост упирается в глухой забор. Чтобы куда-либо выйти, нужно обогнуть этот забор слева (но там уже есть 1-й Ростокинский мост) либо справа (а там проход по голубому мостику). Retired electrician (talk) 02:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
    • Судя по вашему описанию, через реку там перейти всё же можно, а мост в никуда выглядит как-то так. --A.Savin 02:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
      • ОК. Cкорее, всё же наоборот. "В никуда" - это завершённый, возможно даже принятый в эксплуатацию, но ... в никуда. А в Маастрихте просто недострой. Retired electrician (talk) 09:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

JPEGEdit

hello.

«Дипломная работа» по операциям с форматом JPEG провалена: Прошу либо освоить приёмы работы как следует, либо оставить перезапись JPEG-файлов другим участникам и сосредоточиться на диаграммах, локации, проверке ориентации кадра и т. п. что получется хорошо.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

  • @Incnis Mrsi:: вы как раз кстати. Готовлю большую перезаливку старых фото 2005-2009 годов, там примерно десять тысяч файлов - варианты уже существующих на коммонсе (в большем разрешении, с коррекцией оптических искажений, часто в ином кропе и т.п.). Эти файлы можно в JPG загружать или ? Проявляю равы в DXO, там только три варианта - JPG, TIFF и DNG. Retired electrician (talk) 20:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
    DNG тут не поддерживается. TIFF — имеет смысл в некоторых случаях, но всё же не для десяти тысяч фото из 2000-х подряд. JPEG для фотографий вполне даже хорош, особенно если выбрать подобающий уровень сжатия. Но проблема с ним в том, что повторное кодирование (а, хуже всего — со сдвигом или ещё каким преобразованием, нарушающем решётку 8 × 8 пикс) приводит к появлению грязи. Один раз сделали всё, что надо (поворот, кадр, γ, цвет…), записали в JPEG (причём желательно, чтоб размеры были кратны 8, а для цветных даже 16), и пользуемся. Любое редактирование (кроме не требующих нового применения DCT операций с квадратиками) следует делать на данных, записанных до первого JPEG. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
    подобающий уровень сжатия - ? 95 из 100 (10 мп → 3...4 Мб) ок? Retired electrician (talk) 09:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
    Надо на конкретные картинки смотреть. Вот это (загруженное участником Chumwa) — многобайт (число «процентов» большое), тут и втрое меньший объём данных смотрелся бы нормально, поскольку большинство деталей всё равно не в фокусе. А вон там примеры, когда напротив, пережали (число «процентов» выбрали малое). Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SirlanzEdit

Hello. Help vote. Thanks you. Pv sindhu (talk) 05:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Image without licenseEdit

File:Moscow, Suvorovskaya 6 July 2009 north 01.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)


File:Moscow, Suvorovskaya 6 July 2009 04.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)


File:Moscow, Suvorovskaya 6 July 2009 03.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 01:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Revox B215 audio PCBs.jpgEdit

Copyright status: File:Revox B215 audio PCBs.jpg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Revox B215 audio PCBs.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The image is an own photo. What the ⋯ is Abzeronow doing? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: Yes, I can see that it's an own work. It doesn't have a license though. Abzeronow (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Is the circuit board copyrighted? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Wouldn't the photograph itself be copyrighted though since it's a 3D object? OK, photo is licensed, nothing else needs to be done. Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Well I hope it's all set. Sorry for the inconvenience. Yes, it's CC0. Retired electrician (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Oops, sorry – the file description page missed a valid license by its author. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:34, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:MOS long-tailed pair - current distribution and gain (BS170 simulation).svgEdit

Copyright status: File:MOS long-tailed pair - current distribution and gain (BS170 simulation).svg

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MOS long-tailed pair - current distribution and gain (BS170 simulation).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:03, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)Edit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | hrvatski | italiano | 日本語 | português | português do Brasil | македонски | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−

 
Thank you for uploading some images! Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into a svg container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Всегда бы рады, да где взять время на рисование свг ... то ли дело вжух принтскрином ... Retired electrician (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Marten duke 2 stands (46192703164).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marten duke 2 stands (46192703164).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Marten duke 2 stands (46192703164).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

official product image, license laundering BevinKacon (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:KEF LS50 Black Edition (40689632041).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:KEF LS50 Black Edition (40689632041).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:KEF LS50 Black Edition (40689632041).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

official product image, license laundering BevinKacon (talk) 12:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Convert technologies plato system c (35545855685).jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Convert technologies plato system c (35545855685).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Convert technologies plato system c (35545855685).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

official product image, license laundering BevinKacon (talk) 12:50, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Retired electrician".