Open main menu


File:2012 Michel ID.jpgEdit

 
File:2012 Michel ID.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)


File:Aéroport Roissy CDG-1.JPGEdit

 
File:Aéroport Roissy CDG-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wdwd (talk) 14:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

what happens ??? I am the authoot and full owner of this picture !! but if you dont like it, you can destroy it !!!!

Cher Royonx, je me permets d’intervenir. Merci pour votre photo. Personne ne met en doute qu’elle est de vous. Maheureusement en France la liberté de panorama n’existe pas. Le fait qu’un objet protégé par le droit d’auteur (par exemple un bâtiment) soit visible depuis l’espace public ou même que sa construction ait été financée avec de l’argent public n’est pas suffisant pour que vous puissiez publier votre photo sous licence libre. C’est ce que Wdwd a voulu expliquer dans la page de nomination en pointant vers Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#France. Voyez par exemple l’Article Wikipédia en français fr:Liberté de panorama. Je suis désolé ! (il ne nous reste plus qu’à réformer la législation du droit d’auteur français). Amicalement, Ariadacapo (talk) 18:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Bjr Araiadicapo

Heureux les aveugles les malentendants : ils ne sont pas confrontés aux restrictions de voir ou d'entendre !

MR

Return to the user page of "Royonx".