STATZET

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, STATZET!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:27, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Debjani Chatterjee actress.jpg

File:Debjani Chatterjee actress.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=464521771905372&set=pb.100050426592593.-2207520000..&type=3 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:06, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Debjani Chatterjee actress.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Debjani Chatterjee actress.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Debjani Chatterjee actress.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Debjani Chatterjee actress.jpg

File:Debjani Chatterjee actress.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Special:permalink/677682026#My First Upload Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

—MdsShakil (talk) 18:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

File:Ishaa Saha.jpg

File:Ishaa Saha.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Эlcobbola _talk 14:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked

You have been blocked from editing Commons. The reason for the block is available in the block log as is the name of the administrator who blocked you. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Note that the duration is indefinite (which is not the same as infinite) per deliberate Flickr washing. This is problematic above and beyond merely uploading copyright violations and requires a very good explanation indeed if you are to resume editing here. Эlcobbola _talk 14:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Elcobbola I'm really sorry for repeated violations.I can't understand the licensing all that and as a new editor I did mistakes and I promise next time I'll not do any mistakes and I'll be maintain all rules and regulations. STATZET (talk) 17:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)" Decline reason: "Unblock template was removed from this request by Taivo to consolidate duplicate requests. (Clean up edit to preserve readability and history.) Эlcobbola talk 20:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

•  Oppose - You found an Internet image, cropped off the actual author's watermark and uploaded it to Flickr, then uploaded it here. You did this despite: 1) using the UploadWizard, the very first page of which is a giant infographic that says "We can’t accept works created or inspired by others. By default, you can't upload someone else's work. This includes material such as [...] most pictures published on the Internet" and 2) when "everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here" (bold in original) appeared twice on this page (!!!). These actions, taken together and in the face of substantial warnings, are not mistakes of a "new editor", but a deliberate attempt to deceive and to disregard common sense (which requires no experience here) and guidance placed directly in front of you. This request does not even acknowledge what you've done, let alone provide the required understanding and credible commitment to discontinue. Эlcobbola _talk 17:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

• Elcobbola Sorry sir that was my mistake and I apologize for it and I promise that I will not do any mistakes in future and I think I need to understand more about all this that was my fault. please guide me how to upload and all that about licenses. STATZET (talk) 18:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

• Elcobbola Please unblock me sir and I assure that next time anything I upload will ask you. STATZET (talk) 17:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• @Elcobbola: Sir, i assure that this is my first and last block and I've learn from this mistake. next time anything I upload I'll ask away.Please unblock me. STATZET (talk) 07:04, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

• @Moheen: can you unblock me ??? and I assure that next time anything I upload will ask you. STATZET (talk) 10:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

  I see zero evidence you've come to understand what a free licensed image is or that you've realised you're some place other than the English language Wikipedia. Try to convey that you have before continuing to spam people, or this account will be further restricted. Vera ^(talk) 12:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

  Noting for the record this user emailed me an unblock request. I'm not aware of having interacted with this editor before, but can't rule out having deleted an upload that was tagged. Their email is timestamped 05:15:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC), which is after the above warning about spamming but after the pending request on-wiki below. The request had nothing new or more-specific than the other messages the editor has written here. DMacks (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

• 1Veertje @Elcobbola: Yeah I understand taken pic only by me is an free also I've realized my mistakes and understand the Wikicommons policies and won't violate them in future, I'm really sorry. Please unblock me. STATZET (talk) 18:16, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

• DMacks @Elcobbola: Sorry I don't have any intention to spam people I've just emailed for to be unblocked and I'm explaining I've just wanted to help that articles to adding pictures and that time I wasn't read the policies all that I've just uploaded and I accept that was my myistake and now I've read all the Wikicommons policies and I'll not violate them on future. Thank you. STATZET (talk) 05:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

• @Elcobbola: Sir I've read and understand all the Wikicommons policies and about what is free license and what is not. I'll not violate them on future. STATZET (talk) 09:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Elcobbola Now I can understand all the Wikicommons policies and I've read all this and also understand that what is free license and also about permissions all that (only upload pictures to Commons that i have taken with my hands, and not to upload the pictures from the internet). I give you commitment that I'll not violate them on future. And now I'm ready to contribute under the policies. STATZET (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)" Decline reason: "So far these are empty words. I have no confidence, that you really understand Commons copyright policies. No evidence is given for that. Taivo (talk) 13:30, 3 August 2022 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Taivo Yeah, I've understand all this that everything I find on the web that is copyrighted and also understand what is own work like taking own photograpy, scatching, own voice recording and own video record. Also understand that if any copyright issue happens then send permissions to volunteer response team (VRT) and I've also understand that fair use image is not allowed here which is only allowed in other Wikipedia projects as per US laws. STATZET (talk) 15:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)" Decline reason: "Procedural decline: account globally locked as LTA; local request thus moot. Эlcobbola talk 14:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

•  Oppose - STATZET continues to ignore the core issue of license laundering and their deliberate attempt to deceive, which is telling. One does not create a laundering Flickr account after seeing their uploads deleted because they didn't understand that "that everything I find on the web that is copyrighted". Verily, exactly the opposite: they do it because they know the copyright exists, is not compatible, and must be manipulated. Note also their stated interest in creating a new account to circumvent the block, which only supports the notion(s) that they have no clue or respect for our policies. Эlcobbola _talk 15:26, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

• Elcobbola As I said that I want to help the article to add image that time I thought Flickr was free that's why I uploaded through it in good faith, Let me explain you that I don't need and don't want to create another account I'm not sockpuppet & I'm happy with my this account and that time you were not replying to my request that's why I asked to a steward as an example that time and I were frustrated that's it. STATZET (talk) 18:13, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

• Note: Elcobbola As I can see you give final warning before block any user but you didn't gave me final warning before block me. STATZET (talk) 19:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

  Our requirement is to "ensure that the user has been appropriately warned". What I can see is "Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing" (bold in original (!!!)), which appeared numerous times above before you cropped out watermarks and used Flickr to lie about authorship. That you offer this OTHERSTUFF nonsense seems a continuation of the shameless failure to acknowledge your misbehaviour.

  Note, further, that as you've continued to ignore 1Veertje's warning about using your talk page for spamming, I've removed your ability to edit it. This is, yet again, the same pattern as all of the above--IDHT and utter lack of competence and reflection. Эlcobbola _talk 19:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)