User talk:Salix

User talk:Salix/Achive1

Welcome to talk to me / Bienvenue pour une discussion.

User talk:Thérèse Gaigé

RenommageEdit

Hello, Salixounette. Pourrais-tu renommer Category:Poospiza cabanis en Category:Poospiza cabanisi (cause : typo) ? Merci d'avance. Bzoo, VonTasha (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Merci ! VonTasha (talk) 12:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Renommage (bis)Edit

Hello, Salix ! Il me semble que sur Commons, la règle est d'utiliser soit l'anglais, soit la langue d'origine d'une oeuvre. Or cette catégorie traite d'une oeuvre anglaise : en:The Voyage of the Beagle. Cette page devrait donc être renommée. Pourrais-tu t'en occuper ? Merci d'avance ! Bzoo, VonTasha (talk) 15:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Procédure SULEdit

Hi, I am a major contributor as Salix on fr.Wp and I am known as well on Commons. I would like to have the same user name on en.Wp if possible. --Salix (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Votre aideEdit

Bonjour Salix,
- Je vous ai laissé un message ICI (pour la continuïté du sujet traité)
- Par ailleurs, si vous pouviez traiter ces 2 petits problèmes..?
1- Cette photo a été télechargé 2 fois dans la minute ! en retirer une version.
2- Retirer cette photo (d'une définition médiocre) remplacée par celle-ci de meilleure qualité... Là, c'est de ma faute !
D'avance merci pour votre intervention - Amicalement - --Wayne77 (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

La honte...Edit

Hello, Salixounette ! Fralambert m'a grillée en flagrant délit de confiance aveugle et a soulevé un lièvre : File:Adlumia fungosa flower.jpg et File:Adlumia fungosa habitus.jpg ne sont pas des Adlumia fungosa... mais des Category:Asclepias syriaca. Comment doit-on faire pour remettre tout ça à sa bonne place ? Bzoo, VonTasha (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Salut Von Tashounette Tu es certaine de l'espèce ? Dans ce cas il va falloir renommer, re-décrire et re-catégoriser tout ça, mais aupavant il faudrait peut-être que tu exposes le problème à Michael w qui a fait la photo, non ? --Salix (talk) 19:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
Oki, ma lapinette, j'y vais. Ah bin il est OK : c'est ici : de:Benutzer Diskussion:Michael w. Bzoo, VonTasha (talk) 06:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Je vois que j'arrive après la fête VonTasha-chat ! Fralambert a déjà tout rangé ! --Salix (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
Ah bin mince alors, je ne savais pas que Fralambert pouvait renommer sur Commons. Si j'avais su, j'aurais traité directement avec lui et je ne t'aurais pas dérangée... Au temps pour moi... Bzoo, VonTasha (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
C'est toujours un plaisir de te croiser au détour d'un wikiprojet, VonTasha  . --Salix (talk) 17:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
VonTasha Ça sert à quoi avoir des droits quant qu'on ne utilise pas.   --Fralambert (talk) 00:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Pourquoi dis-tu cela à VonTasha ??? --Salix (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Je dois avoir pris trop de vin du rang Saint-François-de-Pic-Dur (mais pourquoi Saint-Sévère a des noms de rue si long? Ils ont comme seulement trois chemins dans la municipalité) --Fralambert (talk) 03:29, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


Content being used with or without permission ?Edit

Your image File:2008-08-Agaricus-Stuttgartx7.JPG is being used by this commercial App https://itunes.apple.com/fi/app/sienikirja/id833470386?mt=8 I wonder if you gave a permission as they do not mention you in credits? Zilppuri (talk) 15:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Zilppuri, no I gave no permission. What can be done ? --Salix (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Salix! Apple has a form you can fill here . You simply provide your contact details, a link to the App and then description of the issue there. It seems your photo is both used inside the app (in Peltoherkkusieni section) and in the marketing material in store. The App seems to use Commons stuff heavily, but inside the Info section claims that all the photos are by one person outside Commons (although not the actual author of the App). Zilppuri (talk) 08:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Zilppuri. Let's see what happens next... --Salix (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
No problem Salix! If there is no reply, you can file a DMCA takedown by Apple Zilppuri (talk) 18:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
FYI Salix. There is another App by the same author now Sienikirja aloittelijoille using the same content. This is a beginners version of the guide. Seems that the original App was removed yesterday - probably due to copyright claims.
Pirates ! Thanks for your vigilance Zilppuri  . --Salix (talk) 14:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Altough, I must correct: It seems that the actual photo is not used in this another App. It is "only" used for advertising it. Which seems as wrong still. Although one would only know this after buying the App. Zilppuri (talk) 18:11, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

salutEdit

hello, vous mavez laissez un message me demandant de fournir plus de description sur les fichiers photos que je televerse, j'imagine qu'un en particulier a retenue votre attention, mais lequel. Voulez vous que ds le nom du fichier je rentre plus d'information? Amicalement Cedricguppy. (talk) 20:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Bonsoir Cedricguppy. En fait un peu tous, mais j'avais remarqué ce manque au départ sur les photos d'agoutis noirs alors qu'il y a sur l'article de Wikipédia en fr une légende assez inutile précisant une localisation à la place d'une précision sur l'espèce elle-même. En lisant les descriptions sur Commons, exemple "Morelia viridis - python vert - loury cedric - wiki", on dirait qu'ils proviennent d'un lieu nommé loury cedric, situé à Wiki. Or l'identité de l'auteur se place à "Auteur" et la mention wiki est inutile sur un... wiki   ! Dans la description il est en revanche utile d'ajouter le lieu et la saison où on l'a rencontré, ainsi que le sexe ou l'âge de l'animal si on les connaît, afin de faire des comparaisons d'un spécimen à l'autre ou de détecter des particularités. Expliquer tout cela sur Commons permet l'indexation précise des images et évite aussi d'alourdir inutilement les légendes de Wikipédia, quand ce n'est pas utile pour la bonne tenue de l'article. Ce serait dommage que vos jolies photos ne servent pas à grand chose à cause de cela. --Salix (talk) 21:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Desolé pour les deux Pseustes poecilonotus que je viens de passer (dont aucune page n'est ouvert sur commons), mais je promet de regarder plus en détail a l'avenir :)
@ Cedricguppy, ce n'est pas grave. On oublie tous des trucs, surtout au début. Par exemple, n'hésitez pas à préciser "Paris, Ile de France, France" pour aider les étranger à catégoriser. Exemple de modification utile à faire (n'hésitez pas à annuler si cela ne vous convient pas). --Salix (talk) 21:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Je viens de passer 3 Python molurus sa semble mieux catégoriser, mais toutes les info ne me sont pas forcément connu. ++ Amicalement Cedricguppy. (talk) 21:50, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
@ Cedricguppy. Il suffit de faire au mieux avec ce qu'on sait, inutile d'inventer. C'est toujours plus facile à celui qui a pris les photos d'ajouter des précisions qu'à d'autres d'essayer de les retrouver par la suite, surtout hors du contexte. Au passage, j'ai créé une Category:Reptiles in Ménagerie du Jardin des Plantes‎  . --Salix (talk) 21:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Saule pleureur.jpgEdit

  File:Saule pleureur.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

185.67.177.65 14:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

A couple of the photos shown on your user pageEdit

Hi, I was poked by another editor to take a look at a couple of photos you have under the 'Kindely offered to use as mine' section of your user page, and felt I should ask. First...

You describe this image as your 'own work', copyrighted by you, but it appears to a a professional portrait of a celebrity. Hunting around a bit, I located what appears to me to be a much wider crop of the same image at http://www.mayanne.fr/photo-armelle-khourdoian-maciej-pukulski.htm with what appears to be a photographer's name at the bottom right. If this is actually an older photo that you cropped, technically cropping it to a 'generic headshot' is not something that would give you a copyright in the image.... you deserve attribution for your edits to it, but the copyright still belongs to the original photographer, and we must attribute them and demonstrate permission for it's use. If you actually are the 'original photographer', then because it was published in a wider form elsewhere you should really send in an OTRS ticket to avoid the question in the future.
This painting is obviously in the public domain because of it's age, and should be described as the 'work' of Jacques-Emile Lafon, and dated 1867, with you given credit for the photography. Other than the inclusion of the 'three-dimensional' frame in the full image, {{PD-Art}} seems to clearly apply... they are 'faithful reproductions' of a two-dimensional work that is in the public domain, and while you are perfectly entitled to request attribution as the photographer (and deserve it) it's not a request that is based on you owning a copyright in them (other than, like I said, the very minimal aspect of your photography of the frame itself).
There is actually a specific version of the {{Information}} template, {{Art Photo}} that can be used to make attribution for the artwork itself, and the photography, clearly seperate.
Like I said, someone else asked me to take a look at these, and I'm not 'yelling at you', just asking you to address the issues raised. Thanks. Revent (talk) 00:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Revent. Well, I had forgoten those old uploaded files ! Concerning the choice of a proper licence, plants and animals are easier... The author rights of the first one has been offered to the artist who sent it to me, so we thought at that time that it was easier to upload it as mine. I will try to get a proper OTRS ticket as soon as possible. You can delete the three other ones if the present licence is not correct, because the owner of the painting did not want those photographs to be in public domain. --Salix (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
@Salix: As far as the images of the painting, I don't think I really 'can' just delete them without a discussion, since the painting itself is pretty clearly PD (as the artist himself died in 1886). The current owner certainly has the right to restrict photography, but they don't own a copyright in the painting itself (or even 'faithful reproductions' of it, under the Bridgeman ruling). They aren't really a copyright violation, just currently tagged incorrectly (other than the very minimal claim you have to the photography of the 3D frame).. they would in fact legally be PD, whether the current owner of the actual painting wants them that way or not. What you 'can' do is open a discussion about a courtesy deletion, but since the image is actually in use on several wikis you might have trouble getting a consensus for it. Sorry to stir up drama (like I said, someone poked me about it). Revent (talk) 00:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
@Revent: I have asked the pianist for an OTRS (if they understand what to do !), and I will try to contact the owner of the painting or to delete those files, but it's a pitty... --Salix (talk) 12:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Indeed, it is... hopefully the owner will be okay with it, or something can be sorted out. Personally, I would not have stressed the painting images unless if it wasn't brought up (they are actually 'more free' than indicated) but... someone could legally use them as PD anyhow (again, per en:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp., which we cite often), regardless of the stated license, and I'd hate for that to cause drama for you at some later point. Revent (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Capture_d'écran_pédagogique_de_Wikipédia_en_français_avec_éditeur_visuelEdit

Carnby (talk) 20:23, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Salix".