Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SaltVisor!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:54, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Keter Betts.jpg edit

 
File:Keter Betts.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 01:00, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Michel Petrucciani North Sea Jazz 1993.jpg edit

File deletion warning
File:Michel Petrucciani North Sea Jazz 1993.jpg has been marked as violating policy, because it is considered unfree. This file has been, or will be soon deleted. The file is licensed under a license that does not permit unlimited redistribution, commercial use or the creation of derivative works. Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository, which means that unlimited redistribution, commercial use and the creation of derivative work must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for more information. If you want to ask permission from the author of the file, please do so using a template from Commons:Email templates. For images, you may find it useful to read Commons:Image casebook.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:GrammyAward.jpg edit

 
File:GrammyAward.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

This image was initially uploaded by Colby Sharp to Flickr at https://flickr.com/photos/61421932@N08/14048518715. File was uploaded on April 28, 2014, and is licensed by the author under the terms of cc-by-2.0.
So, the publication https://www.shine.cn/archive/world/2018-Grammy-Awards-returning-to-NYC-beyond14-years-in-LA/shdaily.shtml at May 9, 2017 can not serve as a reason for removal.
--SaltVisor (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi SaltVisor,
I've received your email. But let's discuss this here.
The alleged source, https://www.flickr.com/photos/61421932@N08/14048518715, only states "taken" on April 28, 2014. I see no information when the image was actually uploaded to Flickr. Regrettably, archive.org also hasn't captured this URL[1]. However, a Google-Images search[2] found a higher-resolution version, published on January 26th, 2014 at [3], another one, published on February 11th, 2013 at [4] and another one, published as early as December 12th, 2011 [5]. So, overall, there is some doubt that this image is really the wqork of the Flickr-user.
File:Michel Petrucciani North Sea Jazz 1993.jpg is more easy. On its Flickr-source it is licensed under CC-BY-NC license. NC- & ND-restrictions are not allowd on Commons/Wikipedia; see COM:L for details.
Finally the first of the above listed images simply had no permission/license at all. To the contrary, its source states "© 2012 Betts Family. All images, graphics and text on this site are protected by applicable copyright law as of 2011. If you use any image, graphic or text from KeterBetts.com without express authorization of the owners of said material, you will be prosecuted under any and all relevant laws." --Túrelio (talk) 08:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi, Túrelio
Many thanks for your help and for taking the time.
Concerning the File:Keter Betts.jpg and File:Michel Petrucciani North Sea Jazz 1993.jpg my mistakes are understandable.
And about File:Grammy Award.jpg: solution may be as little trust to "authors" as possible, because any doubts are interpreted against the accused :)
Thank you once again --SaltVisor (talk) 06:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Wrt File:Grammy Award.jpg: it's just a weighing up. I do not claim to have proven anything. We volunteer-sysops simply don't have enough time for an in-depth research of each "suspicious" image. In such a situation you better err on the good side. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Memphis Slim 1972 American Folk Blues Festival.jpg edit

Deutsch  English  español  فارسی  français  hrvatski  italiano  日本語  മലയാളം  Nederlands  sicilianu  Tiếng Việt  +/−


 
A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Memphis Slim 1972 American Folk Blues Festival.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial ( ), No derivative works ( ), or All Rights Reserved ( ), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as   (CC BY),     (CC BY-SA),   (CC0) and   (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 17:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Clarence Williams.jpg edit

 
File:Clarence Williams.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:40, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:36, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply