Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:SergeWoodzing

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SergeWoodzing!

Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2009/11#Category:Royalty_of_SwedenEdit

Hello SergeWoodzing, you wrote your suggestion into Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2009/11#Category:Michigan_State_University_alumni. I have createdCommons:Categories_for_discussion/2009/11#Category:Royalty_of_Sweden and transferred your text to the new file. See Commons:Categories_for_discussion#Listing_a_single_category_on_this_.22Categories_for_discussion.22_page. --Diwas (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you so much for helping! I hope there will be some input now. SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
FYI, I left a note at Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/11/Category:Royalty of Sweden. Wknight94 talk 15:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you please comment on whether or not you think this discussion from 2009 is still relevant? TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 03:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I think it is, but may need a bit of revision after 5 years. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I prefer to get these discussions resolved by the end of next week. I plan to ask at COM:AN about how best to resolve any outstanding discussions at Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2009, as I don't think it much productive to leave these discussions open for five years. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:15, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Your comment at COM:AN/UEdit

Hi SergeWoodzing, please avoid comments like this which can be understood that you compare a user with a dog. This is inappropriate and does not help the debate in any positive way. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 20:12, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your point of view, but you missed the entry my Pjotr above mine which first referred to Dr Kuiper as a (molested) "dog", in his defence. I was only commenting on that. I would never have called anyone a "dog" inte way you are suggesting and you will find no evidence anywhere that I have ever done anything like that. I could be very offended by this misdirected reprimand of yours, but I am willing to chalk it up to human error. Cordially, SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Turned over to youEdit

This is to certify and confirm, once and for all, that I have turned over my watchlists and work on Swedish and English Wikipedia and on Wikimedia Commons to you, having retired from all three of those projects. You, if anyone, are now to represent the interests of image contributor Southerly Clubs according to the wishes of that organization's Board of Directors. That authorization will be withdrawn here, by an authorized representative of that Board, if and when that becomes timely. EmilEikS (talk) 23:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC), Deputy Chairman, Southerly Clubs.

I acknowledge this message and accept the responsibility, though I have practically retired from Swedish Wikipedia. SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Angela_Romeo.jpgEdit

  File:Angela_Romeo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:38, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Angela_Romeo.jpgEdit

Help! Thx. SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

What has this got to do with me? Stifle (talk) 15:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
You solved this last time which is being used frivolously as one of the arguments in this new situation. Please see the current deletion discussion where that previous case has been dragged into it! SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:09, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
There are several other OTRS agents who have contributed to the discussion and I agree with them. To retain the image the owner of the image should send this email to permissions-commons wikimedia.org. Stifle (talk) 09:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! I am doing my best to initiate that as soon as possible. SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

MBz1Edit

Hi Serge,

English is not my mother language and I often have trouble to decipher the real meaning of the comments I read. And I did not understand what you really mean, and what your targets are, when you say that good work should never excuse cruelty. Maybe I'm being naive but I do not see cruelty (a quite a strong word, by the way) in the actions of any of the persons involved in this dispute. Unless there is something I'm not aware of, all I see is lack of control and a lot of egocentrism. Will you please explain? If there is some implicit criticism to my behaviour, please expain it more clearly. Remaining sweet little an angel in these circunstances is something well beyond my capacity. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! My message has nothing whatsoever to do with you, and I'm very sorry if you took it that way. I began my comments in that section by writing about a certain person's "defense league". No one else intended. Cordially, SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your prompt reply. Yes, that is what I thought but I wanted to be sure. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:46, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Serge, I would really recommend you to reword (consider to change) your latest comment in the PK-thread. --Túrelio (talk) 18:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes? ... What do you recommend? Would you like to censure my honest opinion or prevent me from having it? Or do you support my attempts to stop a very cruel person from continuing to be so without constraints? Or would you like me, too, to quit Commons? Please be more specific! SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
As you are obviously not interested in communication, this is only what you get from me: compare other users here again with rats, you will see what you get. EOD here. --Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't know who you think you are to (1) twist what I wrote and (2) to use that twist of your own making to come here and threaten me. You obviously have a very high opinion of yourself. Keep that off my talk page in the future, please! We all have the right to our opinions here, and the obligation to be civil. That includes you, me and everybody else. SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

"English"Edit

HI SW, I noticed your recent post at user talk:Mattbuck - just a quick comment. We all have to keep in mind that Commons is a multilingual project. While English is the Lingua franca used for most of our commons discussions, every aspect of this project must remain open also for people who don't speak English very well. That does make communication even more challenging at times, and if another user writes something that is difficult to understand please ask politely for clarifications. Describing other users attempts at expressing themselves as "English" could be seen as an attempt to belittle them&their efforts - I'd like to believe that was not your intention. Finn Rindahl (talk) 11:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

It was my honest and sincere intention to try to understand bits of language that are not English or any other language that can be comprehended by me. If it was Swenglish or the like I might be able to understand it. In the context in which this was written by me, to another editor (not to you), it would not have been a good idea, nor would it have been welcome, to write to those particular other editors about their language. I see your good intentions here, but if you had studied the matter more closely I think you would agree in this case. I reserve the right to call incomprehensible attempts to write French "French" or French, German "German" or German and so forth. If anyone gets their feathers ruffled, perhaps they should try to better their language, which may be a task of sorts, rather than complaining about me, which is easy. It is important that we are able to understand what is written to us and about us without having to ask about every other sentence. Don't you think? SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes, indeed - especially in somewhat heated discussions like the ones that frequently take place at admin notice boards understanding what is written to us, and that other understands what we write to them, is important. I wrote to you just to remind you that this isn't always possible at Commons, quite a lot of the people contributing here doesn't have English as first language or language skills like you have. We have to keep that in mind, both when people seem not to understand what we have written as well as when we can't really understand what other people try to say. It's probably for the best not to ruffle any more feathers than we absolutely have to. OK, this is just a piece of advice not asked for, and probably not needed anyway. And I have not studied the discussion that triggered your comment to Mattbuck closely - I try to stay away from the various COM:AN pages these days. Finn Rindahl (talk) 15:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! Sincerely, SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Pieter KuiperEdit

It is good to see that people are exploring ways of dealing with some of the disruption that Pieter has been causing. I'm not sure though that things like this really serve any useful purpose and so I'd suggest you refrain from making such comments which seem only likely to inflame the situation further. Thanks. Adambro (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

That entry reflects my honest opinion of Kuiper's opinion of himself based on a long period of persecution and a very disagreeable trail of tears, including sleepless nights, because of his intentional cruelty. I could also have added "I have never apologized to anyone about anything ever". SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:23, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Eiffel_Tower_4_20101026.JPGEdit

  File:Eiffel_Tower_4_20101026.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Angela_Romeo.jpgEdit

  File:Angela_Romeo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Michael_Kearns.jpgEdit

  File:Michael_Kearns.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:45, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ung Lilian.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ung Lilian.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ung Lilian.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 08:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you but I am not the original uploader, as you've noticed, and I know nada about the source in this case. The photo appears to be over 80 years old, though, so I don't know who (in the real world) would make a copyright issue of it. SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:54, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Pau_3_crop_20101028.JPGEdit

  File:Pau_3_crop_20101028.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Pau_2_20101028.JPGEdit

  File:Pau_2_20101028.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 10:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Demitz_Lecture_20101012-2.JPGEdit

  File:Demitz_Lecture_20101012-2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Category:Standers gårdEdit

Hejsan! En stilla undran bara angående rubricerade kategori och denna revertering. Gården har ju inte mer med sjön att göra än att den ligger bredvid sjön. På de flesta av bilderna syns sjön inte ens. Det var därför jag plockade bort gårdskategorin ur sjökategorin och istället lade till sjökategorin i ett antal anskilda bilder, där sjön faktiskt syntes. På samma sätt som det normalt inte finns några "ortskategorier" i andra sjökategorier, utan mest åar, öar och annat vattenrelaterat, även om orten ifråga skulle ligga intill sjön. Vänligen --MagnusA (talk) 08:10, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

I think any waterfront, coastal property can be categorized under the name of the body of water in question, whether or not the water actually is visible in the photos. You and I may disagree about that, and that's OK, but that's what I think. Sort of like categorizing bars on Götgatan, and people in those bars, under Götgatan. Thank you for all your great work, by the way! SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Tack! Jag för så gott jag kan i alla fall och vill bara få en vettig struktur även här bland bilderna på Commons, förhoppningsvis till det bättre för alla. Jodå, därvidlag har vi nog olika åsikter, men inget jag tänker bråka om. Jag ville bara framföra hur jag tänkte när jag avkategoriserade gården. Ha en trevlig kväll! --MagnusA (talk) 14:41, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for a great clue!

After I read your exchange with P.K. at COM:ADM, I realized that, indeed, watchlist can cause emotional problems. Who are all these little people digging in my stuff? What do they know? What's on their minds? Paranoia blues.

So I decided to be WP:BOLD and culled my watchlist from some twenty thousands items to just twenty. Now it's cool and quiet. Ignorance is bliss. It's like living on an island.

Cheers, NVO (talk) 20:58, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for this considerate and cheerful message! Unfortunately, though, I accepted an assigment in 2009 to watch those 1000+ images and associated categories, after PK drove a couple of other users away, so either I have to resign from that and quit Commons or try to do my duty somehow. Cheers back! SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Adolf JohanEdit

Hej Serge!

Hoppas att Du inte misstycker, men jag måste säga att jag är tveksam till om denna ändring verkligen blev en förbättring. I mitt tycke har den starkt uppdragna kontrasten mest lett till att bilden blivit mer grynig/rasteraktig (bl a genom att den gör själva pappersstrukturen väldigt markant). Dessutom är den nya bilden betydligt mindre än den gamla. Jag skulle nog förorda en återgång till den äldre versionen, där jag försökt att få denna så lik den skannade originalbilden som möjligt i såväl färgton som skärpa. /FredrikT (talk) 21:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Jag förstår inte hur bilden kunde bli mindre bara på en tonförändring, det var inte meningen. Trist. Men jag tycker nog ändå att den nya versionen utan den starka patineringen är klarare. Om du återställer den förra versionen kommer jag inte att vidta fler åtgärder. SergeWoodzing (talk) 04:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Jag skall se om jag kan få fram en kompromissversion - litet mer kontrastrik än originalet men inte så hårdragen som Din - som vi båda kan vara nöjda med. /FredrikT (talk) 14:53, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Support. SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:16, 28 December 2011 (UTC)


Oscar 1, Duc de Sudermanie/SödermanlandEdit

Bonjour, j'ai remarqué que vous aviez un niveau avancé du Français permettez moi de vous parler dans ma langue maternelle s'il vous plait.

Oscar 1 reçoit le titre de Duc de Sudermanie/Södermanland par Charles XIII de Suède en 1810, pourriez vous me dire si Oscar avait un blason de ce titre.

j'ai trouvé une source de blason pour le Prince Wilhelm avec le même titre mais Oscar avait il le même blason.http://www.google.fr/imgres?q=arms+as+Duke+of+S%C3%B6dermanland&um=1&hl=fr&sa=N&rlz=1C1CHNY_frFR367FR367&biw=1024&bih=641&tbm=isch&tbnid=HHmAwm1IFSrl2M:&imgrefurl=http://www.theroyalforums.com/forums/f191/prince-vilhelm-of-sweden-1884-1965-and-grand-duchess-maria-of-russia-14715.html&docid=UET7TJEoSLtzmM&imgurl=http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd299/Jan-Maarten2/wilhelmsweden1884.jpg&w=534&h=328&ei=AZE7T-S_FcfA0QWO9ehs&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=91&vpy=199&dur=1733&hovh=176&hovw=287&tx=146&ty=197&sig=106970413894028886767&page=4&tbnh=136&tbnw=189&start=63&ndsp=21&ved=1t:429,r:5,s:63

Merci d'avance pour votre aide bonne soirée cordialement--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I hope I may reply in English (French shoiuld be written well or not at all). I must assume that Oscar had a coat of arms as Duke of Sudermania, but I have never seen such work. Certainly it must be obtainable somewhere. The shield on the image of Wilhelm and Maria is that of the province of Sudermania (Soedermanland) itself, not of him. They each had personal arms too of course. 16:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


bonjour et merci beaucoup bonne journée à vous cordialement--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

File:BernadotteArmsCropToShield.jpgEdit

  File:BernadotteArmsCropToShield.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cabaret_Large_A-Cup_Oct_2nd_2012Edit

Senator2029talk 20:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

English names for categoriesEdit

Hi Serge! I don't think there is any specifically word in english for malmgård. It's a local name in Stockholm for country houses/mansions built during the 1700-1800s on the islands (malmarna) around Gamla Stan/Old town.Cucumber (talk) 16:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

So, do you wish to introduce it as an English word? Or should we try a bit harder to name the category in English, even though it's a local Stockholm thing? Something like [[Category:Central Stockholm island mansions (Malmgårdar)]]. I'm willing to help whenever I can. Category naming in English is always much more useful to the vast majority of users. Using only Swedish isn't, for obvious reasons. That's important to me. SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:32, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
I agree with you on that Category names for most should be in english. Could you help me "moving" the Malmgård-category to [[Category:Central Stockholm island mansions (Malmgårdar)]]?/Cucumber (talk) 16:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Great! I've requested the move on the current category's talk page, Let's see what happens! I'm no expert at how to get Commons moves done. SergeWoodzing (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Swain-I-Coin.jpgEdit

  File:Swain-I-Coin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File:OlafKyrreCoin.gifEdit

  File:OlafKyrreCoin.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File:USA2011-194crChan.jpgEdit

  File:USA2011-194crChan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Chanreis (talk) 13:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

For my own useEdit

{{consent}} --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

CropEdit

It may be ok to crop a few pixel of File:Christer Lindarw på premiär.JPG but pay attention to the resolution: original photo was 1,703 × 2,324. Yours was 388 × 525. --Jaqen (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing this error to my attention! I have corrected it now by using the largest version for the crop. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

  Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Kathisma (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Karl XIIEdit

Hello excuse me I did something wrong

good day sorry again

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Sara Lee AndersonEdit

I'm not sure I understand how a person can be in Category:Tiaras. Is this name just a stage name that implies that she would always be wearing a tiara? (That is, if she is not wearing a tiara, does she go by a different name?) If not, then Category:Tiaras should presumably be attached to individual photos, not to the person. No? - Jmabel ! talk 04:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

As far as I understand, Miss Anderson has never appeared in public without the tiara. If, however, you feel the category is inappropriate please feel free to make the adjustment. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ritch_Esra.jpg&oldid=121332382&diff=prevEdit

Hi, SergeWoodzing, I noticed your revert. In my opinion, this is not really what the Category:Views from Willis Tower was meant for, but rather an advertisment. Hence my removal of the category. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

I go by the basic principle that whatever is clearly visible in a photograph is clearly visible in that photograph, in this case the view. I don't know what you mean by "advertisment". Advertisement for what? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:20, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I understand, as to the advertisement --> wrong wording there --> better to use self promotion for Wild Side Story --> Ritch M. Esra ?   Lotje (talk) 14:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Unbelievably far-fetched! And very offensive. Apparently Mr. Esra worked with that show intermittently in 1979 and 1980. Today he is a successful Los Angeles publisher. If you are going to go through all photos of people on Commons and try to remove relevant categories for grudging and ridiculous reasons like that, you are going to be very busy. I strongly suggest you adandon your highly personalized attempt to police self-promotion on Commons and do something constructive instead. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: Storstugan category moveEdit

The official name is simply "Storstugan", there's no "building" in the original title. Note how another location in the same municipality is categorized as Category:Jarlabankes bro, and not "Jarlabankes bro archeological formation", or something similar. Also, Täby Centre can be confused with the nearby shopping mall, it's better to disambiguate it with the town name only. Anonimski (talk) 18:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

You are thinking and replying in Swedish as a Swede and for the benefit of Swedes only, whereas we are working on a project where a vast majority of non-Swedes are supposed to be able to understand easily. Something like this then probably doesn't interest you, but you can have a look at it if you'd like anyway, if you'd like to know about my basic linguistic standpoint. Also, that building is right at that mall, perhaps you don't know that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm simply bringing it in line with similar titles. Also, the original title was automatically made into a redirect, so it's not actually gone completely. About that last thing - it is a neighbor of Täby C, but it is not a part of the Täby C building complex itself. I've updated the text on the category page with an inline link to the category page, it should be clear enough to the reader. Anonimski (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:EricHolyCrown.jpgEdit

  File:EricHolyCrown.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

83.254.245.201 23:04, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Wisbur(GretaSellberg1911).jpgEdit

  File:Wisbur(GretaSellberg1911).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

83.254.245.201 23:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Category removalsEdit

They were parent categories for Category:Lars Jacob Prod and Category:Group photographs Cathy Richards (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! The Lars Jacob Prod category is used for photos from his productions, many of which he is not in. The category Lars Jacob modelling, performances, shows and direction is used for images where he appears himself in any modelling, performances, shows and/or directing such, whether or not they were his productions. Both apply for that particular image. Would you like to reinstate the category, or should I? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

File:CabarEngÅrsMöte2012.JPGEdit

  File:CabarEngÅrsMöte2012.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

RicJac (talk) 14:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Rome 2 20101103.JPGEdit

  File:Rome 2 20101103.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

RicJac (talk) 18:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:1996ThroneEndpapers.jpgEdit

  File:1996ThroneEndpapers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

RicJac (talk) 19:40, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Wild Side Story 2000 Bar Rehearsal.JPG and similar picturesEdit

Hi there! My edits to these media are done because the pictures are themselves of (very) low quality plus in my opinion you have to be selective about adding media to this category. Otherwise ALL activity on a stage with visible curtains would be added here. That's a lot of pictures... --Judithcomm (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for writing! In my opinion whatever is clearly visible and an integral part of a picture, particulary if it's obvious in the ambiance shown, should be covered by the categories. And I don't think opinions like "low quality plus in my opinion you have to be selective" are acceptable to Wikimedia Commons. Such personal motivations to remove categories, to me, are not constructive. Note that we are asked to add relevant categories, not delete them! If you'd like to create a subcategory for Low quality images with stage curtains (to suit your own opinions) or Images of stage curtains categorized with care (as you see it) or even People with stage curtains (which could be appropriate in this case) - please do! But please stop removing perfectly relevant categories arbitrarily! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Southerly Clubs Image ArchivesEdit

Fire away, there are quite a few file movers around. We should be able to cope, eventually. --Charlik (talk) 06:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for replying to this! I'll do my best as soon as I can get started with it. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:12, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Began doing 12 at a time today & hope to be able to keep it up. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
I would like to add 2 things:
  1. I'm adding the year of each image to its name;
  2. I was asked to take over the work of Deputy Chairman Emil Eikner, the original uploader of many of these files on behalf of the Southerly Clubs donor, when he retired a few years ago, so I am acting for him and that donor in this work.
--SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:06, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
3. I'm also using English throughout, including established English exonyms for old Scandinavian place names and personal names. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:07, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
4. The 50 uploads of User:ImageLib are also included in this project (see user page). --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

My dear User:Capricorn4049, User:FDMS4, User:4ing, User:Leitoxx, User:DerFussi, User:Wdwd, User:DragonflySixtyseven, User:Pierpao, User:Knochen, User:Natuur12, User:Bodhisattwa, User:Charlik, User:Strakhov, User:Steinsplitter, User:Hilarmont, User:Marcus Cyron, User:Stefan4, User:1989 and User:Wieralee: thanks to your efforts, some of which have been considerable, some huge and some unbelievably fast and efficient, I have managed to complete this assignment, and working hard together on the moves for only a few days, we've managed to bring the over 2000 images, contributed to Commons by this donor, into consistent line and format. This makes for an enormous improvement in clarity and navigability in the categories they are sorted under. Now, when I upload and add more images to these categories, I'll have a workable system for the file name formats, which we didn't have before, and all this designed in formats which are exacly as the donor wants them. You've also put up with correcting too many typos by an old man with increasingly failing eyesight, which has been especially kind and appreciated by me with those of you involved in that part of it. To one and all (and pardon my raising my voice): THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for YOUR work! Ours was not that much... :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Commons:File renaming - CriterionsEdit

If you rename your own uploads, you should use Criterion #1. This criterion is best => it has no conditions to fulfill. If you would like to learn more about moving files, read the table on Commons:File renaming page, please ;-)

Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 19:32, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
  • When the new name is completely different, it should be Criterion #2 or #3. Wieralee (talk) 21:48, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
OK - sorry! I'll try to remember that & adjust my routine. About 800 files left, then we'll be done. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

FilemoverEdit

Please request filemover rights: Commons:Requests_for_rights#Filemover

Thanks a lot! hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 09:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanx for the suggestion, but I don't know if I'll be needing them after this one project (see two previous sectiosn here) is finished. There are now only about 350 left out of over 2000 in my assignment. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Pau 5 20101028.JPGEdit

  File:Pau 5 20101028.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 12:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Latest changes in Category: Haelwig of SchleswigEdit

Hi, I just want to know why did you reverted my edition. The corresponding page in Wikipedia attests specifically that she belonged to the Estridsen dynasty. Mhmrodrigues (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for writing, but this belongs on that page's talk page, where you wrote nothing, but reverted this without discussion the the right place.
I'm glad you did though, as I was wrong in this case and you were right. Confused her with Queen Haelwig of Sweden, who was a Schaumburg.
I apologize. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

File:File:Christina Magdalene of Sweden c.1660Edit

I removed the English description here because the description of this portrait in the Stockholm Nationalmuseum was in Swedish only, I apologize for having done this. PancoPinco 18:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Gunilla BernadotteEdit

She (and Marianne Bernadotte) does belong to the royal family, but not the court itself. Even the Royal Court says so on their website.

http://www.kungahuset.se/royalcourt/royalfamily.4.396160511584257f21800060.html

I have reverted your edit.

Kaiketsu (talk) 12:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Belonging to the extended "Royal Family" of Sweden and belonging to the "House of Bernadotte" are not the same thing. The house is genealogical. That's why the term House of is used. You will not find these ladies listed anywhere (correctly) in Swedish as belonging to Huset Bernadotte. It is not common on Commons to play around with genealogical categories. Please do not continue doing so! --80.216.53.132 18:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please don't write to me here when the discussion belongs on the page which it concerns! This does not concern me personally. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Coat of armsEdit

Hi. Sorry I didn't get back to you before with respect to your Coat of Arms requests. Looking at File:Arms of Prince Lennart Bernadotte SVG.svg etc. it looks as though someone else managed to help you out =) /Lokal_Profil 16:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. It worked out very well. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


Coats of arms of the Princess Sofia and Prince OscarEdit

Hello Serge I hope you are well.

Do you have information on the coats of arms of the Princess Sofia and Prince Oscar please because I find nothing.

Thank you in advance for your help, good day

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 02:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

The coats of arms of all the new little ones could easily be created using the formats of their siblings & cousins, just replacing the provicial arms. Let me know if you can't find them & I'll do that for you. In Sofia's case we must wait till the royal court issues her arms, as there will probably be something enirely new in the middle. There have been a few suggestions, but nothing has been released yet. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Good evening Serge,

Thank you very much for your answer

See you soon

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Arms of Prince Oscar Bernadotte SVG.svgEdit

  File:Arms of Prince Oscar Bernadotte SVG.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elzo 90 (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Arms of Prince Lennart Bernadotte SVG.svgEdit

  File:Arms of Prince Lennart Bernadotte SVG.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elzo 90 (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Arms of Prince Sigvard Bernadotte SVG.svgEdit

  File:Arms of Prince Sigvard Bernadotte SVG.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elzo 90 (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Prince Bernadotte 1951 Luxembourg decree.svgEdit

FYI, I reverted your recent upload because it seems that you uploaded a file with corrupt SVG code. There was no thumbnail and even the originally sized image could not be parsed showing plain text SVG code instead. Regards, De728631 (talk) 18:03, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! I addressed the problem here and have asked for help. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)


Arms source?Edit

Hello Serge,

My source is Dynastien Bernadottes vapen och det svenska riksvapnet, Stockholm, Svensk Litteratur, coll. « Skrifter utgivna av Riksheraldikerämbetet »,‎ 1944 of Arvid Berghman p. 117

Cordially good day--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 14:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you DQF! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


Your opinionEdit

Hello Serge, I hope you are well.

Could I please have your opinion, because I have a doubt ....

Here is a painting of "normally" King Albert of Sweden, Duke of Mecklenburg.

 

What gives me a doubt this is the necklace he wears his neck .... the medallion there is the symbol of the province of Gotland ... it was never lord or Duke of Gotland!

While his son Crown Prince Eric ... yes from 1396 to 1397

(https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lista_%C3%B6ver_Sveriges_hertigar_och_hertiginnor#Gotland)

Do you think this pourait be a mistake?


Thank you in advance for your response, good weekend to you

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 08:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

If I had to guess I would say Eric. Albert's supporters took over Gotland and Eric represented his father there until he died. Sorry to say all we can do is guess. The only certain contemporary portrait of King Albert is his grave monument. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:08, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
PS: This is a more legitimate portrait of King Albert from the same source, which makes me even more strongly believe the other painting is of Eric. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Good evening Serge,

And thank you for your answer is what I think also

Thank you for your help, good day to you

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 17:01, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

File:James of Dacia statue Tarecuato.jpgEdit

 
File:James of Dacia statue Tarecuato.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 15:34, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Given what I wrote on the talkj page there, this was hardly necessary. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
These messages are automatically placed on the uploader's talk page when you tag a file for speedy deletion using the Commons toolbox. Many users don't add such links manually but rely on the built-in one-click mechanisms, so I assume LX didn't even add this message to your talk page himself. De728631 (talk) 17:15, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I apologized for this one on that talk page. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
PS - I'm going for a coffee break now. Let's both try to stay out of trouble in the meantime. Wiederse'en a' bisschen später. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
And yet you didn't bother to tag it for deletion or even remove the claim that you were the copyright holder from the file description. A comment on a talk page usually won't make anything happen. LX (talk, contribs) 19:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
I thought I did that - can't check it now anyway. I have apologized. What else would you like me to do? If you'd like to take some kind of action against me, go ahead! If you just came here now to pick a fight - stop it please! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:19, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
No, there was no deletion tag. If there were, I wouldn't have tagged it. It's okay though, just be more careful in the future. LX (talk, contribs) 20:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
You have made your point. I didn't notice the Metadata with the copyright info until after I had uploaded the file, and it was too late, which I explained on that talk page. I also noted there that the Metadata date info obviously was false. Can we leave this now, please? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Kulla-Gulla movie poster 1956.jpgEdit

  Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Kulla-Gulla movie poster 1956.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

De728631: I had just uploaded that and didn't even have time to add the rest of the info. Seems there are quite a few movie posters on Commons, Swedish ones as well as many others. Are they all non-free? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
The posters in Category:Movie posters of Sweden have either been published under a free licence or they are out of copyright due to old age. Your upload didn't seem to qualify for either so I deleted it. Please be sure to add the copyright info from the beginning, and please keep also in mind that uploading a copy of such posters does not make you the author as in {{own}}. The copyright holder/author is the original designer or the film company depending on Swedish law. I'd be happy to restore the file though if you have more information about the copyright of this poster that would make it either public domain or verify a free licence. De728631 (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Will you please give me time, like a few hours, to adjust all the info of all the images I just uploaded, like I've been doing for years now? Please!!!--SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
As you might have noticed, I am uploading a batch of images alphabetically right now. and as I always do, I will provide all the necessary info about sources and authors and categories within a very short time period. That's why it says "pending" on each one of them until I do that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:43, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Hrm, if you need a few hours to adjust vital information like copyright for a mass upload you should reconsider your method of uploading. "Description: pending" is alright for adding a description (which is not even required), but for legal reasons we need information about the copyright of an image from scratch. A simple note in the copyright section stating that you need some time to provide all necessary copyright information would already suffice to prevent your uploads from being speedily deleted. Now that I know about it I won't delete any more of your most recent uploads. But in case of this file, please let me know when you have gathered more information that would allow for its restoration. De728631 (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I have an old computer that dies at times, so uploading is always a real thriller, and my eyesight is quite poor. Would appreciate being able to use my regular method. It has worked very well for many years. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:05, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

De728631: I think the same would apply in this case as here. That's what I would have used. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry but I disagree in this case. File:Kulla-Gulla movie poster 1956.jpg has a distinctive background that might have come from the film itself so it's not just a bunch of "journalistic" photographs. Instead I think the entire arrangement constitutes an artistic work. That said, I would not have kept this either. You are welcome though to list the Kulla-Gulla file at Commons:Undeletion requests. De728631 (talk) 18:12, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
I'm OK with it. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Lars Jacob & Leo poster 1971Edit

This belongs on the file's talk page, not here. I'm moving it there. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

MiamiEdit

It's not a mistake; I'm adding the basic info pattern into a template {{USA location info}} which is to be put atop of every U.S. city's category. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 09:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

You removed the important info that Miami and Miami Beach are two different cities. Do you think that's helpful? I'm reinstating it again. If you keep removing helpful information I'll have to complain about you. Sorry! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:43, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Marielle Lagergren & Marianne Bernadotte 2015.jpgEdit

  File:Marielle Lagergren & Marianne Bernadotte 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ella24La (talk) 10:07, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Charlotte of Luxembourg statue 2015 Luxembourg.jpgEdit

 
File:Charlotte of Luxembourg statue 2015 Luxembourg.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Berthold Werner (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Emil Eikner (biography)Edit

 
Eikner in Stockholm in 2012
 
Eikner (seated) with his 2011 ensemble after performing at Don't Tell Mama in Manhattan
 
Eikner (left) in the National Costume of Sweden of 1778 after a meeting with Moritz, head of the ancient House of Brabant, and Lars Jacob at Kronberg Castle in 2010

Emil Eikner (Lars Emil Eikner born August 5 1979) is a Swedish chess competitor, professional chef, cabaret performer and entertainment executive, former Chairman of F.U.S.I.A. and Chairman since 2005 of Swenglistic Underground (previously CabarEng).

BackgroundEdit

Eikner was born and grew up in the southern suburbs of Stockholm and graduated in 1999 after junior college education in the restaurant business at the trade school at Ericsson Globe. The same year he was in the Swedish National Chess Competition and placed third in Class III.

Cabarets and recordingsEdit

Working usually with director Lars Jacob, Eikner has produced and appeared as a headliner in underground cabaret entertainment since 2004 in Stockholm and has produced over 100 studio recordings of songs (all now on YouTube), mainly with Yaiya Sacasios, but also with celebrities like Christina Schollin, Kjerstin Dellert, Kim Anderzon, Christer Lindarw, Hans E. Wallman, Thomas Dellert, Gunvor Pontén, Agneta Lindén and Caroline Gentele. His 2011 Stockholm cabaret ensemble toured that year with A Tribute Westward and Cabaret Large A-Cup to New York, DC, Maryland and Massachusetts. In 2007 he planted a park tree with Lars Jacob in memory of cabaret entertainer Steve Vigil, cooperating with the city of Warren, Michigan, and Vigil's sister Linda Vigil Allegro.

PublishingEdit

As a publisher, he has secured permission from composers and lyricists Birgit Ridderstedt (estate), Ian Whitcomb, John Groves, Örjan Ramberg, Berndt Egerbladh (estate) and Mia Adolphson to register some of their work with STIM and record it.

Other travelsEdit

Eikner travelled in the United States for entertaimnent purposes also in 2008 and 2016, staying with such prominent Americans as Dr. Stanley M. Truhlsen and meeting with Siri von Reis and daughter Serena Altshul. He also made extensive European trips in 2010 and 2015. On those excursions, he took part in photographing the monumental tombs of Queen Margaret I of Denmark (Roskilde), King Eric the Pomeranian (Darłowo), Queen Christina of Sweden (Vatican City) and King Albert of Sweden (Bad Doberan) for Wikipedia, and met with dynasty heads Christoph Prinz zu Schleswig-Holstein, Moritz Prinz und Landgraf von Hessen and Borwin Herzog zu Mecklenburg.

PhotographyEdit

Since 2005, Eikner is also Deputy Chairman of the Southerly Clubs of Stockholm and as such has photographed a considerable amount of notable Swedes for Wikimedia Commons, such as Måns Zelmerlöw.

--SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

COM:AN/UEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


   Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User_problems#User:SergeWoodzing. violation of Commons:NOT. Thank you.

Category:Lars_Jacob_birthday_partiesEdit

Domdeparis (talk) 14:28, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 21st birthday group 1969.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 21st birthday group 1969.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 30th birthday group 1978.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 30th birthday group 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 37th birthday group 1975.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 37th birthday group 1975.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 40th birthday group 1988.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 40th birthday group 1988.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:29, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 41st birthday group 1989.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 41st birthday group 1989.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 42nd birthday group 1990.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 42nd birthday group 1990.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 43rd birthday groups 1991.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 43rd birthday groups 1991.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 44th birthday table 1992 (1).jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 44th birthday table 1992 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 44th birthday table 1992 (2).jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 44th birthday table 1992 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 46th birthday group 1994.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 46th birthday group 1994.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 47th birthday group 1995.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 47th birthday group 1995.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 64th birthday groups 2012.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 64th birthday groups 2012.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 65th birthday groups 2013.JPGEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 65th birthday groups 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 65th birthday over 2013.JPGEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 65th birthday over 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 66th birthday group 2014 (1).JPGEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 66th birthday group 2014 (1).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 66th birthday group 2014 (2).JPGEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 66th birthday group 2014 (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday 2015.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday group 2015 (1) crop.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday group 2015 (1) crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday group 2015 (1).jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday group 2015 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday group 2015 (2).jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 67th birthday group 2015 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 68th birthday group 2016 (1).jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 68th birthday group 2016 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 15:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 9th birthday group 1957.jpgEdit

  File:Jacob Truedson Demitz 9th birthday group 1957.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 16:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Marianne Bernadotte, Lars Jacob & Linda Myers 2016.jpgEdit

  File:Marianne Bernadotte, Lars Jacob & Linda Myers 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Domdeparis (talk) 16:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "SergeWoodzing".